Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp
draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp
PCP Working Group M. Boucadair
Internet-Draft France Telecom
Intended status: Standards Track R. Penno
Expires: October 16, 2014 D. Wing
Cisco
April 14, 2014
DHCP Options for the Port Control Protocol (PCP)
draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-13
Abstract
This document specifies DHCP (IPv4 and IPv6) options to configure
hosts with Port Control Protocol (PCP) server IP addresses. The use
of DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 depends on the PCP deployment scenarios. The set
of deployment scenarios to which use of DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 apply are
outside the scope of this document.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 16, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. DHCPv6 PCP Server Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. DHCPv6 Client Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. DHCPv4 PCP Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2. DHCPv4 Client Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. DHCP Server Configuration Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Dual-Stack Hosts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. Hosts with Multiple Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9.1. DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9.2. DHCPv4 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1. Introduction
This document defines DHCPv4 [RFC2131] and DHCPv6 [RFC3315] options
that can be used to configure hosts with PCP server [RFC6887] IP
addresses.
This specification assumes a PCP server is reachable with one or
multiple IP addresses. As such, a list of IP addresses can be
returned in the DHCP PCP server option.
This specification allows returning one or multiple lists of PCP
server IP addresses. This is used as a hint to guide the PCP client
when determining whether to send PCP requests to one or multiple PCP
servers. Concretely, the PCP client needs an indication to decide
whether entries need to be instantiated in all PCP servers (e.g.,
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
multi-homing, multiple PCP-controlled devices providing distinct
services , etc.) or using one IP address from the list (e.g.,
redundancy group scenario, proxy-based model, etc.). Refer to
[I-D.boucadair-pcp-deployment-cases] for a discussion on PCP
deployment scenarios.
For guidelines on how a PCP client can use multiple IP addresses and
multiple PCP servers, see [I-D.ietf-pcp-server-selection].
2. Terminology
This document makes use of the following terms:
o PCP server denotes a functional element that receives and
processes PCP requests from a PCP client. A PCP server can be co-
located with or be separated from the function (e.g., NAT,
Firewall) it controls. Refer to [RFC6887].
o PCP client denotes a PCP software instance responsible for issuing
PCP requests to a PCP server. Refer to [RFC6887].
o DHCP refers to both DHCPv4 [RFC2131] and DHCPv6 [RFC3315].
o DHCP client denotes a node that initiates requests to obtain
configuration parameters from one or more DHCP servers.
o DHCP server refers to a node that responds to requests from DHCP
clients.
3. DHCPv6 PCP Server Option
3.1. Format
The DHCPv6 PCP server option can be used to configure a list of IPv6
addresses of a PCP server.
The format of this option is shown in Figure 1.
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER | Option-length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| ipv6-address |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| ipv6-address |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: DHCPv6 PCP server option
The fields of the option shown in Figure 1 are as follows:
o Option-code: OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER (TBA, see Section 9.1)
o Option-length: Length of the 'PCP server IP Address(es)' field in
octets. MUST be a multiple of 16.
o PCP server IPv6 Addresses: Includes one or more IPv6 addresses
[RFC4291] of the PCP server to be used by the PCP client. Note,
IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291]) are
allowed to be included in this option.
To return more than one PCP server to the DHCPv6 client (as opposed
to more than one address for a single PCP server), the DHCPv6 server
returns multiple instances of OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER.
3.2. DHCPv6 Client Behavior
To discover one or more PCP servers, the DHCPv6 client requests PCP
server IP addresses by including OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER in an Option
Request Option (ORO), as described in Section 22.7 of [RFC3315].
The DHCPv6 client MUST be prepared to receive multiple instances of
OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER; each instance is to be treated as a separate
PCP server.
If an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address is received in OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER,
it indicates that the PCP server has the corresponding IPv4 address.
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
Note: When presented with the IPv4-mapped prefix, current versions
of Windows and Mac OS generate IPv4 packets, but will not send
IPv6 packets [RFC6052]. Representing IPv4 addresses as
IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses follows the same logic as in section 5
of [RFC6887].
The DHCPv6 client MUST silently discard multicast and host loopback
addresses [RFC6890] conveyed in OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER.
4. DHCPv4 PCP Option
4.1. Format
The DHCPv4 PCP server option can be used to configure a list of IPv4
addresses of a PCP server. The format of this option is illustrated
in Figure 2.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Code | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| List-Length | List of |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ PCP server |
/ IPv4 Addresses /
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
| List-Length | List of | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ PCP server | |
/ IPv4 Addresses / |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
. ... . optional
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| List-Length | List of | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ PCP server | |
/ IPv4 Addresses / |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
Figure 2: DHCPv4 PCP server option
The description of the fields is as follows:
o Code: OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER (TBA, see Section 9.2);
o Length: Length of all included data in octets. The minimum length
is 5.
o List-Length: Length of the "List of PCP server IPv4 Addresses"
field in octets; MUST be a multiple of 4.
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
o List of PCP server IPv4 Addresses: Contains one or more IPv4
addresses of the PCP server to be used by the PCP client. The
format of this field is shown in Figure 3.
o OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER can include multiple lists of PCP server IPv4
addresses; each list is treated as a separate PCP server. When
several lists of PCP server IPv4 addresses are to be included,
"List-Length" and "PCP server IPv4 Addresses" fields are repeated.
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
| a1 | a2 | a3 | a4 | a1 | a2 | ...
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--
IPv4 Address 1 IPv4 Address 2 ...
This format assumes that an IPv4 address is encoded as a1.a2.a3.a4.
Figure 3: Format of the List of PCP server IPv4 Addresses
OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER is a concatenation-requiring option. As such,
the mechanism specified in [RFC3396] MUST be used if
OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER exceeds the maximum DHCPv4 option size of 255
octets.
4.2. DHCPv4 Client Behavior
To discover one or more PCP servers, the DHCPv4 client requests PCP
server IP addresses by including OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER in a Parameter
Request List Option [RFC2132].
The DHCPv4 client MUST be prepared to receive multiple lists of PCP
server IPv4 addresses in the same DHCPv4 PCP server option; each list
is to be treated as a separate PCP server.
The DHCPv4 client MUST silently discard multicast and host loopback
addresses [RFC6890] conveyed in OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER.
5. DHCP Server Configuration Guidelines
DHCP servers supporting the DHCP PCP server option can be configured
with a list of IP addresses of the PCP server(s). If multiple IP
addresses are configured, the DHCP server MUST be explicitly
configured whether all or some of these addresses refer to:
1. the same PCP server: the DHCP server returns multiple addresses
in the same instance of the DHCP PCP server option.
2. distinct PCP servers: the DHCP server returns multiple lists of
PCP server IP addresses to the requesting DHCP client (encoded as
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
multiple OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER or in the same
OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER); each list is referring to a distinct PCP
server. For example, multiple PCP servers may be configured to a
PCP client in some deployment contexts such as multi-homing. It
is out of scope of this document to enumerate all deployment
scenarios that require multiple PCP servers to be returned.
Precisely how DHCP servers are configured to separate lists of IP
addresses according to which PCP server they address is out of scope
for this document. However, DHCP servers MUST NOT combine the IP
addresses of multiple PCP servers and return them to the DHCP client
as if they belong to a single PCP server, and DHCP servers MUST NOT
separate the addresses of a single PCP server and return them as if
they belonged to distinct PCP servers. For example, if an
administrator configures the DHCP server by providing a Fully
Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) for a PCP server, even if that FQDN
resolves to multiple addresses, the DHCP server MUST deliver them
within a single server address block.
DHCPv6 servers that implement this option and that can populate the
option by resolving FQDNs will need a mechanism for indicating
whether to query for A records or only AAAA records. When a query
returns A records, the IP addresses in those records are returned in
the DHCPv6 response as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
Discussion: The motivation for this design is to accommodate
deployment cases where an IPv4 connectivity service is provided
while only DHCPv6 is in use (e.g., an IPv4-only PCP server in a
DS-Lite context [RFC6333]).
Since this option requires support for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, a
DHCPv6 server implementation will not be complete if it does not
query for A records and represent any that are returned as
IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses in DHCPv6 responses. This behavior is
neither required nor suggested for DHCPv6 options in general: it is
specific to OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER. The mechanism whereby DHCPv6
implementations provide this functionality is beyond the scope of
this document.
For guidelines on providing context-specific configuration
information (e.g., returning a regional-based configuration), and
information on how a DHCP server might be configured with FQDNs that
get resolved on demand, see [I-D.ietf-dhc-topo-conf].
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
6. Dual-Stack Hosts
A Dual-Stack host might receive PCP server option via both DHCPv4 and
DHCPv6. For guidance on how a DHCP client can handle PCP server IP
lists for the same network but obtained via different mechanisms, see
[I-D.ietf-pcp-server-selection].
7. Hosts with Multiple Interfaces
A host may have multiple network interfaces (e.g, 3G, IEEE 802.11,
etc.); each configured differently. Each PCP server learned MUST be
associated with the interface via which it was learned.
Refer to [I-D.ietf-pcp-server-selection] and Section 8.4 of [RFC6887]
for more discussion on multi-interface considerations.
8. Security Considerations
The security considerations in [RFC2131] and [RFC3315] are to be
considered. PCP-related security considerations are discussed in
[RFC6887].
The PCP Server option targets mainly the simple threat model
(Section 18.1 of [RFC6887]). It is out of scope of this document to
discuss potential implications of the use of this option in the
advanced threat model (Section 18.2 of [RFC6887]).
9. IANA Considerations
9.1. DHCPv6 Option
IANA is requested to assign the following new DHCPv6 Option Code in
the registry maintained in http://www.iana.org/assignments/
dhcpv6-parameters:
Option Name Value
-------------------- -----
OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER TBA
9.2. DHCPv4 Option
IANA is requested to assign the following new DHCPv4 Option Code in
the registry maintained in http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-
dhcp-parameters/:
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
Option Name Value Data length Meaning
-------------------- ----- ----------- ------------------------------
OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER TBA Variable; Includes one or multiple lists
the minimum of PCP server IP addresses;
length is each list is treated as a
5. separate PCP server.
10. Acknowledgements
Many thanks to C. Jacquenet, R. Maglione, D. Thaler, T. Mrugalski, T.
Reddy, S. Cheshire, M. Wasserman, C. Holmberg, A. Farrel, S. Farrel,
B. Haberman, and P. Resnick for their review and comments.
Special thanks to T. Lemon and B. Volz for the review and their
effort to enhance this specification.
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2131] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC
2131, March 1997.
[RFC2132] Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
Extensions", RFC 2132, March 1997.
[RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
[RFC3396] Lemon, T. and S. Cheshire, "Encoding Long Options in the
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4)", RFC 3396,
November 2002.
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.
[RFC6887] Wing, D., Cheshire, S., Boucadair, M., Penno, R., and P.
Selkirk, "Port Control Protocol (PCP)", RFC 6887, April
2013.
[RFC6890] Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., and B. Haberman,
"Special-Purpose IP Address Registries", BCP 153, RFC
6890, April 2013.
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft PCP DHCP Options April 2014
11.2. Informative References
[I-D.boucadair-pcp-deployment-cases]
Boucadair, M., "PCP Deployment Models", draft-boucadair-
pcp-deployment-cases-01 (work in progress), December 2013.
[I-D.ietf-dhc-topo-conf]
Lemon, T. and T. Mrugalski, "Customizing DHCP
Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", draft-
ietf-dhc-topo-conf-01 (work in progress), February 2014.
[I-D.ietf-pcp-server-selection]
Boucadair, M., Penno, R., Wing, D., Patil, P., and T.
Reddy, "PCP Server Selection", draft-ietf-pcp-server-
selection-02 (work in progress), January 2014.
[RFC6052] Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M., and X.
Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052,
October 2010.
[RFC6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual-
Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4
Exhaustion", RFC 6333, August 2011.
Authors' Addresses
Mohamed Boucadair
France Telecom
Rennes 35000
France
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Reinaldo Penno
Cisco
USA
Email: repenno@cisco.com
Dan Wing
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, California 95134
USA
Email: dwing@cisco.com
Boucadair, et al. Expires October 16, 2014 [Page 10]
