Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl
Network Working Group R. Bush
Internet-Draft Internet Initiative Japan
Intended status: Informational R. Austein
Expires: June 14, 2014 Dragon Research Labs
K. Patel
Cisco Systems
H. Gredler
Juniper Networks, Inc.
M. Waehlisch
FU Berlin
December 11, 2013
RPKI Router Implementation Report
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-05
Abstract
This document is an implementation report for the RPKI Router
protocol as defined in [RFC6810]. The editor did not verify the
accuracy of the information provided by respondents. The respondents
are experts with the implementations they reported on, and their
responses are considered authoritative for the implementations for
which their responses represent. Respondents were asked to only use
the YES answer if the feature had at least been tested in the lab.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 14, 2014.
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Implementation Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Protocol Data Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Protocol Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Protocol Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Error Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Incremental Updates Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Session ID Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Incremental Session Startup Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. Interoperable Implementations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.1. Cisco Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.2. Juniper Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.3. rpki.net Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.4. RIPE NCC Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.5. RTRlib Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.6. BBN RPSTIR Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
12. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
13. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
14. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1. Introduction
In order to formally validate the origin Autonomous Systems (ASs) of
BGP announcements, routers need a simple but reliable mechanism to
receive Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) [RFC6810] prefix
origin data from a trusted cache. The RPKI Router protocol defined
in [RFC6810] provides a mechanism to deliver validated prefix origin
data to routers.
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
This document provides an implementation report for the RPKI Router
protocol as defined in RFC 6810 [RFC6810].
The editor did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by
respondents or by any alternative means. The respondents are experts
with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are
considered authoritative for the implementations for which their
responses represent. Respondents were asked to only use the YES
answer if the feature had at least been tested in the lab.
2. Implementation Forms
Contact and implementation information for person filling out this
form:
IOS
Name: Keyur Patel
Email: keyupate@cisco.com
Vendor: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Release: IOS
Protocol Role: Client
XR
Name: Forhad Ahmed
Email:foahmed@cisco.com
Vendor: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Release: IOS-XR
Protocol Role: Client
JUNOS
Name: Hannes Gredler
Email: hannes@juniper.net
Vendor: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Release: JUNOS
Protocol Role: Client
rpki.net
Name: Rob Austein
Email: sra@hactrn.net
Vendor: rpki.net project
Release: http://subvert-rpki.hactrn.net/trunk/
Protocol Role: Client, Server
NCC
Name: Tim Bruijnzeels
Email: tim@ripe.net
Vendor: RIPE NCC
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
Release: RIPE NCC validator-app 2.0.0 https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/
rpki-validator
Protocol Role: Server
RTRlib
Name: Fabian Holler, Matthias Waehlisch
Email: waehlisch@ieee.org
Vendor: HAW Hamburg, FU Berlin, RTRlib project
Release: RTRlib 0.2 http://rpki.realmv6.org/
Protocol Role: Client
BBN
Name: David Mandelberg, Andrew Chi
Email: dmandelb@bbn.com
Vendor: Raytheon/BBN Technologies
Release: RPSTIR 0.2 http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpstir/
Protocol Role: Server
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
3. Protocol Data Units
Does the implementation support Protocol Data Units (PDUs) as
described in Section 5 of [RFC6810]?
P0: Serial Notify
P1: Serial Query
P2: Reset Query
P3: Cache Response
P4: IPv4 Prefix
P6: IPv6 Prefix
P7: End of Data
P8: Cache Reset
P10: Error Report
+---------+------+-----+-------+--------+--------+-----+------+-----+
| | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTR- | BBN |
| | | | | .net | .net | | lib | |
| | | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+---------+------+-----+-------+--------+--------+-----+------+-----+
| Rcv.P0 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P0 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P1 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Snd.P1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Rcv.P2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Snd.P2 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Rcv.P3 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P4 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P4 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P6 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P6 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P7 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P7 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P8 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.P8 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.P10 | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Snd.P10 | YES | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
+---------+------+-----+-------+--------+--------+-----+------+-----+
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
Note 1: No, Error PDU gets silently ignored.
4. Protocol Sequence
Does RPKI Router protocol implementation follow the four protocol
sequences as outlined in Section 6 of [RFC6810]?
S1: Start or Restart
S2: Typical Exchange
S3: No Incremental Update Available
S4: Cache Has No Data Available
+-----+-----+-----+-------+--------+--------+------+--------+-------+
| | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | | .net | .net | | | |
| | | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+-----+-----+-----+-------+--------+--------+------+--------+-------+
| S1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| S2 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES |
| S3 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| S4 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES~2 |
+-----+-----+-----+-------+--------+--------+------+--------+-------+
Note 1: Does not implement Serial Query, thus Incremental Update is
never available, so responds to Serial Query with Cache Reset as
described in Section 6.3 of [RFC6810]
Note 2: Sends Cache Reset in response to Serial Query when no data;
sends Error Report PDU in response to Reset Query when no data.
5. Protocol Transport
Does RPKI Router protocol implementation support different protocol
transport mechanism outlined in Section 7 of [RFC6810]?
+---------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-----+--------+-----+
| | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | | .net | .net | | | |
| | | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+---------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-----+--------+-----+
| SSH | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES |
| TLS | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
| TCP | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| TCP-MD5 | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
| TCP-AO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
| IPsec | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
+---------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-----+--------+-----+
6. Error Codes
Does RPKI Router protocol implementation support different protocol
error codes outlined in Section 10 of [RFC6810]?
+-------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-------+--------+-----+
| | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | | .net | .net | | | |
| | | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+-------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-------+--------+-----+
| Rcv.0 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Snd.0 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Rcv.1 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Snd.1 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Rcv.2 | YES | YES | NO | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.3 | YES | YES | NO | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Snd.3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES |
| Rcv.4 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Snd.4 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Rcv.5 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Snd.5 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Rcv.6 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES~1 | --- | YES |
| Snd.6 | YES | YES | NO | NO | --- | --- | YES | --- |
| Rcv.7 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES~1 | --- | YES |
| Snd.7 | YES | YES | NO | NO | --- | --- | YES | --- |
+-------+-------+------+-------+------+------+-------+--------+-----+
Note 1: YES, but... fatal, so connection is dropped, but cache does
not conclude it's inconsistent.
7. Incremental Updates Support
Does the RPKI Router implementation support Incremental Updates as
defined in Section 4 of [RFC6810]?
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
+-----+------+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
| IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+-----+------+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
| NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES |
+-----+------+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
8. Session ID Support
Session ID is used to indicate that the cache server may have
restarted and that the incremental restart may not be possible.
Does RPKI Router protocol implementation support Session ID
procedures outlined in Section 5.1 of [RFC6810]?
+-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+
| IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES |
+-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+
Note 1: NO, using random, but will FIX
9. Incremental Session Startup Support
Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation support Incremental
session startups with Serial Number and Session ID as defined in
section 5.3 of [RFC6810]?
+------+-----+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
| IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN |
| | | | clnt | srvr | | | |
+------+-----+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES |
+------+-----+-------+------------+------------+-----+--------+-----+
10. Interoperable Implementations
List other implementations that you have tested interoperability of
RPKI Router Implementation.
10.1. Cisco Implementation
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
Cisco: The Cisco IOS and IOS-XR implementation should be
interoperable with other vendor RPKI Router Protocol implementations.
In particular we have tested our interoperability with rpki.net's
RPKI Router implementation.
10.2. Juniper Implementation
Juniper: The Juniper Networks, Inc. JUNOS implementation should be
interoperable with other vendor RPKI Router Protocol implementations.
In particular we have tested our interoperability with rpki.net's and
NCC's RPKI Router Cache implementation.
10.3. rpki.net Implementation
rpki.net: The rpki.net implementation should operate with other rpki-
rtr implementations. In particular, we have tested our rpki-rtr
server's interoperability with Cisco IOS, Cisco IOS-XR, and Juniper.
10.4. RIPE NCC Implementation
RIPE NCC: The RIPE NCC validator has been tested by us with other
rpki-rtr implementations. In particular we have tested with RTRLib
and CISCO IOS. We received positive feedback from close contacts
testing our validator with JUNOS and Quagga.
10.5. RTRlib Implementation
RTRlib: The RTRlib has been tested by us with other rpki-rtr
implementations. In particular, we have tested with rtr-origin from
rpki.net and RIPE NCC Validator.
10.6. BBN RPSTIR Implementation
BBN RPSTIR: We have not yet tested with any other implementations.
11. IANA Considerations
This document makes no request of IANA.
Note to RFC Editor: The IANA has requested that this section remain
in the document upon publication as an RFC. This note to the RFC
Editor, however, may be removed.
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
12. Security considerations
No new security issues are introduced to the RPKI Router protocol
defined in [RFC6810].
13. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Andrew Chi, David Mandelberg, Fabian
Holler, Forhad Ahmed, and Tim Bruijnzeels for their contributions to
this document.
14. Normative References
[RFC6810] Bush, R. and R. Austein, "The Resource Public Key
Infrastructure (RPKI) to Router Protocol", RFC 6810,
January 2013.
Authors' Addresses
Randy Bush
Internet Initiative Japan
5147 Crystal Springs
Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110
US
Email: randy@psg.com
Rob Austein
Dragon Research Labs
Email: sra@hactrn.net
Keyur Patel
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
US
Email: keyupate@cisco.com
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft RPKI Router Implementation Report December 2013
Hannes Gredler
Juniper Networks, Inc.
1194 N. Mathilda Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
US
Email: hannes@juniper.net
Matthias Waehlisch
FU Berlin
Takustr. 9
Berlin 14195
Germany
Email: waehlisch@ieee.org
URI: http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
Bush, et al. Expires June 14, 2014 [Page 11]
