Internet DRAFT - draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam
draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam
Storage Maintenance (StorM) Working Group Frederick Knight
Internet Draft NetApp
Intended status: Standards Track M. Chadalapaka
Expires: February 2014 Microsoft
August 2013
Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) SCSI Features
Update
draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-sam-09.txt
Abstract
Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) is a SCSI
transport protocol that maps the SCSI family of protocols onto
TCP/IP. The iSCSI protocol as specified in RFCxxx (and as
previously specified by the combination of RFC 3720 and RFC
5048) is based on the SAM-2 (SCSI Architecture Model - 2)
version of the SCSI family of protocols. This document
defines enhancements to the iSCSI protocol to support certain
additional features of the SCSI protocol that were defined in
SAM-3, SAM-4, and SAM-5.
This document is a companion document to RFCxxx.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above two references to RFCxxx should
reference the RFC number assigned to the draft-ietf-storm-
iscsi-cons-xx document, and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with
the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-
Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work
in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire February, 2014.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided
without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.................................................. 3
2. Definitions, Acronyms, and Document Summary................... 3
2.1 Definitions ........................................... 3
2.2 Acronyms .............................................. 3
2.3 New Semantics ......................................... 3
3. Terminology Mapping........................................... 4
4. New Feature Use............................................... 7
4.1 Negotiation of New Feature Use............................... 7
4.2 Impact on standard INQUIRY data.............................. 7
5. SCSI Commands................................................. 8
5.1 SCSI Command Additions ................................ 8
5.1.1 Command Priority (byte 2) ......................... 9
5.2 SCSI Response Additions .............................. 10
5.2.1 Status Qualifier ................................. 11
5.2.2 Data Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment ... 11
6. Task Management Functions.................................... 12
6.1 Task Management Function Request PDU ................. 12
6.2 Existing Task Management Functions ................... 12
6.3 Task Management Function Additions ................... 13
6.3.1 LUN field ........................................ 14
6.3.2 Referenced Task Tag .............................. 14
6.3.3 RefCmdSN ......................................... 15
6.4 Task Management Function Responses ................... 16
6.4.1 Task Management Function Response PDU ............ 16
6.4.2 Task Management Function Response Additions ...... 17
6.5 Task Management Requests Affecting Multiple Tasks .... 18
7. Login/Text Operational Text Keys............................. 18
7.1 New Operational Text Keys ............................ 18
7.1.1 iSCSIProtocolLevel ............................... 18
8. Security Considerations...................................... 19
9. IANA Considerations.......................................... 19
10. References.................................................. 22
11. Acknowledgements............................................ 23
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 2
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
1. Introduction
The original iSCSI protocol [RFC3720] was built based on the
[SAM2] model for SCSI. Several new features and capabilities
have been added to the SCSI Architecture Model in the intervening
years (at the time of publication of this document, SAM-5 was the
current version of the SCSI Architecture Model). This document
is not a complete revision of [RFC3720]. Instead, this document
is intended as a companion document to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx]; this document may also be used as a companion document
to the combination of [RFC3720] and [RFC5048], although both of
those RFCs have been obsolete by [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-
xx].
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [draft-ietf-storm-
iscsi-cons-xx] should reference the RFC number assigned to
that document, and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
2. Definitions, Acronyms, and Document Summary
2.1 Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].
2.2 Acronyms
ISID Initiator Session Identifier
LU Logical Unit
PDU Protocol Data Unit
SAM-5 SCSI Architecture Model - 5 (see [SAM5])
TMF Task Management Function
2.3 New Semantics
This document specifies new iSCSI semantics. This section
summarizes the contents of the document.
Section 3: The mapping of iSCSI objects to SAM-5 objects
The iSCSI node may contain both initiator and
target capabilities.
Section 4: The protocol used to negotiate the use of the new
capabilities described in this document.
Section 5: New Command operations
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 3
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
The PRI field for SCSI command priority has been
added to the SCSI command PDU (see 5.1.1).
The Status Qualifier field has been added to the
SCSI response PDU (see 5.2.1).
Sense data may be returned (via autosense) for any
SCSI status, not just CHECK CONDITION (see 5.2.2).
Section 6: New Task Management Functions
Four new task management functions (QUERY TASK,
QUERY TASK SET, I_T NEXUS RESET, and QUERY
ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT have been added (see 6.3).
A new "function succeeded" response has been added
(see 6.4.2).
Section 7: New Negotiation key
A new negotiation key has been added to enable the
use of the new features in section 5 and section 6.
3. Terminology Mapping
The iSCSI model (defined in [RFC-cons]) uses different
terminology than the SCSI Architecture Model. In some cases,
iSCSI uses multiple terms to describe what in the SCSI
Architecture Model is described with a single term. The iSCSI
terms and SAM-5 terms are not necessarily equivalent, but rather,
the iSCSI terms represent examples of the objects or classes
described in SAM-5 as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 4
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| RFCxxx Terminology | SAM-5 Terminology |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| Network Entity | none |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Node | SCSI Device |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Name | SCSI Device Name |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Node Name | SCSI Device Name |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Initiator Node | SCSI Initiator Device |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Initiator Name | SCSI Device Name |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Initiator Port | SCSI Initiator Port |
| Identifier; (i.e., iSCSI | Identifier |
| Node Name + ,,,i, + ISID)*1 | |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Initiator Port Name; | SCSI Initiator Port Name |
| (i.e., iSCSI Node Name + | |
| ,,,i, + ISID)*1 | |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Target Node | SCSI Target Device |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Target Name | SCSI Device Name |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Target Port | SCSI Target Port |
| Identifier; (i.e., iSCSI | Identifier |
| Node Name + ,,,t, + | |
| Target Portal Group Tag)*1 | |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Target Port Name; | SCSI Target Port Name |
| (i.e., iSCSI Node Name + | |
| ,,,t, + Target Portal | |
| Group Tag)*1 | |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Target Portal Group | SCSI Target Port |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| iSCSI Initiator Name + | I_T Nexus Identifier |
| ',i,' + ISID + iSCSI | |
| Target Name + ',t,' + | |
| Target Portal Group Tag | |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
| Target Portal Group Tag | Relative Port ID |
+-----------------------------+---------------------------+
*1 The text encoding of the ISID value and the Target Portal
Group Tag value includes an initial ,,0X or ,,0x (see [RFC-
cons]).
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 5
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference (in row 1) to [RFCxxx]
should reference this RFC, and this note should be removed.
The above reference to [RFC-cons] should reference the RFC
number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-xx], and this
note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
The following diagram shows an example of a combination target
device and initiator device. Such a configuration may exist in a
target device that implements a SCSI Copy Manager. This example
shows how a session that shares Network Portals within a Portal
Group may be established (see Target Portal Group 1). In
addition, this example shows the Initiator using a different
Portal Group than the Target Portal Group, but the Initiator
Portal group sharing Network Portal A with the Target Portal
Group.
----------------------------IP Network---------------------
| | |
+----|---------------|-------+ +----|------------+
| +----------+ +----------+ | | +----------+ |
| | Network | | Network | | | | Network | |
| | Portal A | | Portal B | | | | Portal A | |
| +----------+ +----------+ | | +----------+ |
| | Target | | | | Initiator |
| | Portal | | | | Portal |
| | Group 1 | | | | Group 2 |
+----|---------------|-------+ +----|------------+
| | |
+----------|---------------|--------------------|--------------------+
| +--------|---------------|----+ +-------------|------------------+ |
| |+-------|---------------|---+| |+------------|-----------------+| |
| ||iSCSI Session (Target side)|| ||iSCSI Session (Initiator side)|| |
| || || || || |
| || (TSIH = 56) || || (SSID = 48) || |
| |+---------------------------+| |+------------------------------+| |
| | | | | |
| | iSCSI Target Node | | iSCSI Initiator Node | |
| +-----------------------------+ +--------------------------------+ |
| iSCSI Node |
| (within Network Entity, not shown) |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 6
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
4. New Feature Use
4.1 Negotiation of New Feature Use
The iSCSIProtocolLevel operational text key (see 7.1.1)
containing a value of "2" MUST be negotiated to enable the use of
features described in this RFC.
This is an iSCSI negotiation mechanism that enabled iSCSI support
for corresponding SCSI capabilities (see [SAM5] and [SPC4]. For
this reason, negotiation of this key to a value of "2" is
necessary, but not sufficient for use of the SCSI capabilities
enabled by the iSCSI features in this RFC.
For example, an iSCSI implementation may negotiate this new key
to "2" but respond to the new task management functions (see 6.3)
with a "Task management function not supported" (which indicates
a SCSI error that prevents the function from being performed).
In contrast, if the key is negotiated to "2", an iSCSI
implementation MUST NOT reject a task management function request
PDU that requests one of the new task management functions (as
such a reject would report an iSCSI protocol error).
4.2 Impact on standard INQUIRY data
The negotiated value of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key is an
increment from the base iSCSI version descriptor value
(0960h)(see [SPC4]). If the SCSI device server returns an iSCSI
version descriptor in the standard INQUIRY data, then the value
returned in that iSCSI version descriptor MUST be set to the sum
of the base value (0960h) plus the negotiated value of the
iSCSIProtocolLevel key (for example, if the negotiated
iSCSIProtocolLevel=2, then if an iSCSI version descriptor is
returned in the standard INQUIRY data it is set to 0962h).
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The specification text in this section
requires corresponding changes in a SCSI standard (SPC-4 or
SPC-5) that is developed by INCITS Technical Committee T10.
Confirmation that these T10 changes have been made is
necessary before publishing this draft as an RFC; the
contacts for obtaining this confirmation are the primary
draft author (Frederick Knight) and storm WG chair (David
Black).
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 7
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
5. SCSI Commands
5.1 SCSI Command Additions
The format of the SCSI Command PDU is:
Byte/ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
/ | | | |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
0|.|I| 0x01 |F|R|W|. .|ATTR | PRI | Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
8| Logical Unit Number (LUN) |
+ +
12| |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
16| Initiator Task Tag |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
20| Expected Data Transfer Length |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
24| CmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
28| ExpStatSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
32/ SCSI Command Descriptor Block (CDB) /
+/ /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
48/ AHS (Optional) /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
x/ Header Digest (Optional) /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
y/ (DataSegment, Command Data) (Optional) /
+/ /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
z/ Data Digest (Optional) /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
The SCSI Command PDU above is duplicated from [RFC-cons] for
reference to show the PRI field. For any field other than the
PRI field, the text in [RFC-cons] supersedes the text in section
5.1 of this document in the event the two documents conflict.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 8
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
5.1.1 Command Priority (byte 2)
The Command Priority (PRI) is a four (4) bit field that specifies
the relative scheduling importance of this command in relation to
other commands already in the task set with SIMPLE task
attributes(see [SAM5]).
Section 11, iSCSI PDU Formats of [RFC-cons], requires that
senders set this field to zero. A sender MUST NOT set this field
to a value other than zero unless the iSCSIProtocolLevel text key
defined in section 7.1.1 has been negotiated on the session with
a value of "2".
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
This field MUST be ignored by iSCSI targets unless the
iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in
section 7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.
See [SAM5] for additional considerations on the use of the
command priority field.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 9
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
5.2 SCSI Response Additions
The format of the SCSI Response PDU is:
Byte/ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
/ | | | |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
0|.|.| 0x21 |1|. .|o|u|O|U|.| Response | Status |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
8| Status Qualifier | Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
12| Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
16| Initiator Task Tag |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
20| SNACK Tag or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
24| StatSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
28| ExpCmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
32| MaxCmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
36| ExpDataSN or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
40| Bidirectional Read Residual Count or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
44| Residual Count or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
48| Header-Digest (Optional) |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
/ Data Segment (Optional) /
+/ /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
| Data-Digest (Optional) |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
The SCSI Response PDU above is duplicated from [RFC-cons] for
reference to show the Status Qualifier field. For any field
other than the Status field, the Status Qualifier field, and the
Data Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment field, the text in
[RFC-cons] supersedes the text in section 5.2 of this document in
the event the two documents conflict.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 10
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
5.2.1 Status Qualifier
The Status Qualifier provides additional status information (see
[SAM5]).
As defined in Section 11, iSCSI PDU Formats of [RFC-cons],
compliant senders already set this field to zero. Compliant
senders MUST NOT set this field to a value other than zero unless
the iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in
section 7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
This field MUST be ignored by receivers unless the
iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in
section 7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.
5.2.2 Data Segment - Sense and Response Data Segment
Section 11.4.7 of [RFC-cons] specifies that iSCSI targets MUST
support and enable autosense. If Status is CHECK CONDITION
(0x02), then the Data Segment MUST contain sense data for the
failed command. While [RFC-cons] does not make any statements
about the state of the Data Segment when the Status is not CHECK
CONDITION (0x02)(i.e., the Data Segment is not prohibited from
containing sense data when the Status is not CHECK CONDITION),
negotiation of the iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of
"2" as defined in section 7.1.1 explicitly indicates that the
Data Segment MAY contain sense data at any time, no matter what
value is set in the Status field.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 11
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
6. Task Management Functions
6.1 Task Management Function Request PDU
Byte/ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
/ | | | |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
0|.|I| 0x02 |1| Function | Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
8| Logical Unit Number (LUN) |
+ +
12| |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
16| Initiator Task Tag |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
20| Referenced Task Tag or 0xffffffff |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
24| CmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
28| ExpStatSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
32| RefCmdSN or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
36| ExpDataSN or Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
40| Reserved /
+/ /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
48| Header-Digest (Optional) |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
The Task Management Function Request PDU above is duplicated from
[RFC-cons] for reference only. [RFC-cons] supersedes the text in
section 6.1 and 6.2 of this document in the event the two
documents conflict.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
6.2 Existing Task Management Functions
Section 11.5 of [RFC-cons] defines the semantics used to request
SCSI Task Management Functions be performed. The following task
management functions are defined:
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 12
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
1 - ABORT TASK
2 - ABORT TASK SET
3 - CLEAR ACA
4 - CLEAR TASK SET
5 - LOGICAL UNIT RESET
6 - TARGET WARM RESET
7 - TARGET COLD RESET
8 - TASK REASSIGN
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
6.3 Task Management Function Additions
Additional task Management function codes are listed below. For
a more detailed description of SCSI task management, see [SAM5].
9 - QUERY TASK - determines if the command identified by the
Referenced Task Tag field is present in the task set.
10 - QUERY TASK SET - determine if any command is present in
the task set for the I_T_L Nexus on which the task management
function was received.
11 - I_T NEXUS RESET - perform an I_T nexus loss function (see
[SAM5]) for the I_T nexus on which the task management
function was received.
12 - QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT - determine if there is a unit
attention condition or a deferred error pending for the I_T_L
nexus on which the task management function was received.
These task management function requests MUST NOT be sent unless
the iSCSIProtocolLevel text key with a value of "2" as defined in
section 7.1.1 was negotiated on the session.
Any compliant initiator that sends any of the new task management
functions defined in this section MUST also support all new task
management function responses (as specified in section 6.4.2).
For all of the task management functions detailed in this
section, the Task Management function response MUST be returned
as detailed in section 6.4.
The iSCSI target MUST ensure that no responses for the commands
covered by a task management function are sent to the iSCSI
initiator port after the Task Management response except for a
commands covered by a TASK REASSIGN, QUERY TASK, or QUERY TASK
SET.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 13
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
If a QUERY TASK is issued for a task created by an immediate
command then RefCmdSN MUST be that of the Task Management request
itself (i.e., CmdSN and RefCmdSN are equal); otherwise RefCmdSN
MUST be set to the CmdSN of the task to be queried (lower than
CmdSN).
If the connection is still active (it is not undergoing an
implicit or explicit logout), QUERY TASK MUST be issued on the
same connection to which the task to be queried is allegiant at
the time the Task Management request is issued. If the
connection is implicitly or explicitly logged out (i.e., no other
request will be issued on the failing connection and no other
response will be received on the failing connection), then a
QUERY TASK function request may be issued on another connection.
This Task Management request will then establish a new allegiance
for the command being queried.
At the target a QUERY TASK function MUST NOT be executed on a
Task Management request; such a request MUST result in Task
Management response of "Function rejected".
For the I_T NEXUS RESET function, the target device MUST respond
to the function as defined in [SAM5]. Each logical unit
accessible via the receiving I_T NEXUS MUST behave as dictated by
the I_T nexus loss function in [SAM5] for the I_T nexus on which
the task management function was received. The target device
MUST drop all connections in the session over which this function
is received. Independent of the DefaultTime2Wait and
DefaultTime2Retain value applicable to the session over which
this function is received, the target device MUST consider each
participating connection in the session to have immediately timed
out, leading to FREE state. The resulting timeouts cause the
session timeout event defined in [RFC-cons], which in turn
triggers the I_T nexus loss notification to the SCSI layer as
described in [RFC-cons].
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
6.3.1 LUN field
This field is required for functions that address a specific LU
(i.e., ABORT TASK, CLEAR TASK SET, ABORT TASK SET, CLEAR ACA,
LOGICAL UNIT RESET, QUERY TASK, QUERY TASK SET, and QUERY
ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT) and is reserved in all others.
6.3.2 Referenced Task Tag
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 14
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
The Initiator Task Tag of the task to be aborted for the ABORT
TASK function, reassigned for the TASK REASSIGN function, or
queried for the QUERY TASK function. For all other functions
this field MUST be set to the reserved value 0xffffffff.
6.3.3 RefCmdSN
If a QUERY TASK is issued for a task created by an immediate
command then RefCmdSN MUST be that of the Task Management request
itself (i.e., CmdSN and RefCmdSN are equal).
For a QUERY TASK of a task created by non-immediate command
RefCmdSN MUST be set to the CmdSN of the task identified by the
Referenced Task Tag field. Targets must use this field as
described in section 11.6.1 of [RFC-cons] when the task
identified by the Referenced Task Tag field is not in the task
set.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 15
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
6.4 Task Management Function Responses
6.4.1 Task Management Function Response PDU
Byte/ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
/ | | | |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
0|.|.| 0x22 |1| Reserved | Response | Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
4|TotalAHSLength | DataSegmentLength |
+-----------------------------------------------+---------------+
8| Additional Response Information | Reserved |
+-----------------------------------------------+---------------+
12| Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
16| Initiator Task Tag |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
20| Reserved |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
24| StatSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
28| ExpCmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
32| MaxCmdSN |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
36/ Reserved /
+/ /
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
48| Header-Digest (Optional) |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
Section 11.6 of [RFC-cons] defines the semantics used for
responses to SCSI Task Management Functions. The following
responses are defined in [RFC-cons]:
0 - Function Complete.
1 - Task does not exist.
2 - LUN does not exist.
3 - Task still allegiant.
4 - Task allegiance reassignment not supported.
5 - Task management function not supported.
6 - Function authorization failed.
255 - Function rejected.
The Task Management Function Response PDU above and the list of
task management function responses above are duplicated from
[RFC-cons] for reference only. [RFC-cons] supersedes the text in
section 6.4.1 of this document in the event the two documents
conflict.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 16
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Responses to new task management functions (see 6.4.2) are listed
below. In addition, a new task Management response is listed
below. For a more detailed description of SCSI task management
responses, see [SAM5].
For the functions QUERY TASK, QUERY TASK SET, I_T NEXUS RESET,
and QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, the target performs the requested
Task Management function and sends a Task Management response
back to the initiator.
6.4.2 Task Management Function Response Additions
The new response is listed below:
7 - Function succeeded.
In symbolic terms Response value 7 maps to the SCSI service
response of FUNCTION SUCCEEDED in [SAM5].
The task management function response of "Function succeeded"
MUST be supported by an initiator that sends any of the new task
management functions (see 6.3).
For the QUERY TASK function, if the specified task is in the task
set, then the logical unit returns a Response value of Function
succeeded and additional response information is returned as
specified in [SAM5]. If the specified task is not in the task
set, then the logical unit returns a Response value of Function
complete.
For the QUERY TASK SET function, if there is any command present
in the task set from the specified I_T_L nexus, then the logical
unit returns a Response value of Function succeeded. If there
are no commands present in the task set from the specified I_T_L
nexus, then the logical unit returns a Response value of Function
complete.
For the I_T NEXUS RESET function, after completion of the events
described in section 6.3 for this function, the logical unit
returns a Response value of Function complete. However, because
the target drops all connections, the Service Response (defined
by [SAM5]) for this SCSI task management function may not be
reliably delivered to the issuing initiator port.
For the QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, if there is a unit attention
condition or deferred error pending for the specified I_T_L
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 17
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
nexus, then the logical unit returns a Response value of Function
succeeded and additional response information is returned as
specified in [SAM5]. If there is no unit attention or deferred
error pending for the specified I_T_L nexus then the logical unit
returns a Response value of Function complete.
6.5 Task Management Requests Affecting Multiple Tasks
Section 4.1 of [RFC5048] defines the notion of "affected tasks"
in multi-task abort scenarios. This section adds to the list
include in that section by defining the tasks affected by the I_T
NEXUS RESET function.
I_T NEXUS RESET: All outstanding tasks received on the I_T
nexus on which the function request was received for all
logical units accessible to the I_T nexus.
Section 4.1.2 of [RFC5048] and section 4.1.3 of [RFC5048]
identify semantics for task management functions that involve
multi-task abort operations. If an iSCSI implementation supports
the I_T NEXUS RESET function, it MUST also support the protocol
behavior as defined in those sections and follow the sequence of
actions as described in those sections when processing the I_T
NEXUS RESET function.
7. Login/Text Operational Text Keys
7.1 New Operational Text Keys
7.1.1 iSCSIProtocolLevel
Use: LO, IO
Irrelevant when: SessionType = Discovery
Senders: Initiator and Target
Scope: SW
iSCSIProtocolLevel=<numerical-value-from-0-to-31>
Default is 1.
Result function is Minimum.
This key is used to negotiate the use of iSCSI features that
require different levels of protocol support (e.g., PDU formats,
end node semantics) for proper operation.
Negotiation of the iSCSIProtocolLevel key to a value
corresponding to an RFC indicates that both negotiating parties
are compliant to the RFC in question, and agree to support the
corresponding PDU formats and semantics on that iSCSI session.
Features using this key are expected to be cumulative.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 18
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "0" indicates that the
implementation does not claim a specific iSCSI protocol level.
An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "1" indicates that the
implementation claims compliance with [RFC-cons].
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
An iSCSIProtocolLevel key negotiated to "2" is required to enable
use of features defined in this RFC.
If the negotiation answer is ignored by the acceptor, or the
answer from the remote iSCSI end point is key=NotUnderstood, then
the features defined in this RFC, and the features defined in any
RFC requiring a key value greater than "2" MUST NOT be used.
8. Security Considerations
Command priorities are relative values, not absolute values (see
[SAM5] and affect collections of commands, not necessarily
individual commands (see [SAM5]); if command priority is
supported, it should be implemented in a fashion that avoids
unwanted reduction or denial of service.
All the iSCSI-related security text in [RFC3723] and the security
text in [RFC-cons] is also directly applicable to this document.
--------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFC-cons] should
reference the RFC number assigned to [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-
cons-xx], and this note should be removed.
--------------------------------------------------------
9. IANA Considerations
This document modifies or creates a number of iSCSI-related
registries. The following iSCSI-related registries are modified:
1. iSCSI Task Management Functions Codes
Name of the existing registry: "iSCSI Task Management Function
Codes"
Additional entries:
9, QUERY TASK, [RFCxxx]
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 19
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
10, QUERY TASK SET, [RFCxxx]
11, I_T NEXUS RESET, [RFCxxx]
12, QUERY ASYNCHRONOUS EVENT, [RFCxxx]
13-127, Unassigned, [RFCxxx]
---------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFCxxx] should
reference this RFC, and this note should be removed. The last
entry (values 13-127 in the above list) should replace the
existing entry for the "Unassigned" values.
---------------------------------------------------------
2. iSCSI Login/Text Keys
Name of the existing registry: "iSCSI Login/Text Keys"
Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value and its
associated RFC reference:
iSCSIProtocolLevel, [RFCxxx]
---------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFCxxx] should
reference this RFC, and this note should be removed.
---------------------------------------------------------
This document creates the following iSCSI-related registries for
IANA to manage.
3. iSCSI Protocol Level
Name of new registry: "iSCSI Protocol Level"
Namespace details: Numerical values from 0 to 31
Information that must be provided to assign a new value: An
IESG-approved standards track specification defining the
semantics and interoperability requirements of the proposed
new value and the fields to be recorded in the registry.
Assignment policy:
The assignments of these values must be coordinated with the
INCITS T10 committee; therefore review by an expert that
maintains an association with that committee is required prior
to IESG approval of the associated specification. After
creation of the registry, values are to be assigned
sequentially (for example, any value greater than 4 will not
be assigned until after the value 4 has been assigned).
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 20
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
Special care must be taken in the assignment of new values in
this registry. Compatibility and interoperability will be
adversely impacted if proper care is not exercised. Features
using this key are expected to be cumulative. For example,
since this draft explicitly lists only value 2 for the
features listed in this draft, it is expected that a new RFC
assigning value 3 will also have the features listed in this
RFC and therefore such an RFC is expected to either revise or
replace this RFC. Assignments that do not follow this policy
should be reviewed and approved by the INCITS T10 committee.
3-31: range available to IANA for assignment in this registry.
Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value, description,
and its associated RFC reference.
0, No version claimed, [RFCxxx]
1, RFC-cons, [RFCxxx]
2, RFCxxx, [RFCxxx]
3-31, Unassigned
---------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [RFCxxx] should
reference this RFC, and this note should be removed. The
above reference to RFC-cons should be replaced with the name
of the [draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-xx] document, and this
note should be removed. All associated RFC references are to
this document; even the reference for value 1. The
description for value 1 however contains the RFC-cons name but
should not have [] around the description (it is a description
not a formal reference). The description for value 2 is the
name of this RFC but should not contain the [] (again, a
description not a formal reference). This note should be
removed.
---------------------------------------------------------
Allocation Policy:
Expert review ([IANA]) and Standards Action ([IANA])
4. iSCSI Task Management Function Response Codes
Name of new registry: "iSCSI Task Management Function Response
Codes"
Namespace details: Numerical values that can fit in 8 bits.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 21
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
Information that must be provided to assign a new value: An
IESG-approved specification defining the semantics and
interoperability requirements of the proposed new value and
the fields to be recorded in the registry.
Assignment policy:
If the requested value is not already assigned, it may be
assigned to the requester.
8-254: Range available to IANA for assignment in this
registry.
Fields to record in the registry: Assigned value, Operation
Name, and its associated RFC reference.
0, Function complete, [RFC-cons]
1, Task does not exist, [RFC-cons]
2, LUN does not exist, [RFC-cons]
3, Task still allegiant, [RFC-cons]
4, Task allegiance reassignment not supported, [RFC-cons]
5, Task management function not supported, [RFC-cons]
6, Function authorization failed, [RFC-cons]
7, Function succeeded, [RFCxxx]
8-254, Unassigned
255, Function rejected, [RFC-cons]
------------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFCxxx] should
reference this RFC, and this note should be removed.
The above references to [RFC-cons] should reference the
[draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-xx] document, and this note
should be removed.
------------------------------------------------------------
Allocation Policy:
Standards Action ([IANA])
10. References
10.1 Normative References
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 22
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
[RFC2119] Bradner, S. "Key Words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3723] Aboba, B., Tseng, J., Walker, J., Rangan, V., and
Travostino, F., "Securing Block Storage Protocols
over IP", RFC 3723, April 2004.
[RFC5048] Chadalapaka, M., "Internet Small Computer System
Interface (iSCSI) Corrections and Clarifications",
RFC 5048, October 2007.
[draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-xx] Chadalapaka, M., Satran, J.,
Kalman, M., "iSCSI Protocol (consolidated)", RFC xxx,
Date 2013.
------------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above references to [draft-ietf-storm-
iscsi-cons-xx] and RFC xxx should reference the RFC number
assigned to that draft, and this note should be removed.
------------------------------------------------------------
[IANA] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing
an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC
5226, May 2008.
[SAM2] T10/1157D, SCSI Architecture Model - 2 (SAM-2).
[SAM5] T10/2104D rev r04, SCSI Architecture Model - 5 (SAM-
5), Committee Draft.
[SPC4] T10/1731D rev r36, SCSI Primary Commands - 4 (SPC-4),
Committee Draft.
10.2 Informative References
[RFC3720] Satran, J., Meth, K., Sapuntzakis, C., Chadalapaka,
M., and E. Zeidner, "Internet Small Computer Systems
Interface (iSCSI)", RFC 3720, April 2004.
10.3 Additional Reference Sources
For more information on the SCSI Architecture Model and SCSI
Primary Commands - 4, contact the INCITS T10 Technical Committee
for SCSI Storage Interfaces at http://www.t10.org.
11. Acknowledgements
The Storage Maintenance (STORM) Working Group in the Transport
Area of the IETF has been responsible for defining these
additions to the iSCSI protocol (apart from other relevant IP
Storage protocols). The editor acknowledges the contributions of
the entire working group and other IETF reviewers.
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 23
Internet-Draft iSCSI SCSI Features Update August 13
The following individuals directly contributed to identifying
[RFCxxx] issues and/or suggesting resolutions to the issues
clarified in this document: David Black, Rob Elliott. This
document benefited from all of these contributions.
------------------------------------------------------------
RFC EDITORS NOTE: The above reference to [RFCxxx] should
reference this RFC, and this note should be removed.
------------------------------------------------------------
Author's Addresses:
Frederick Knight
7301 Kit Creek Road
P.O. Box 13917
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Phone: +1-919-476-5362
Email: knight@netapp.com
Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
Microsoft
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052 USA
Email: cbm@chadalapaka.com
Knight, et al. Expires February, 2014 Page 24
