Internet DRAFT - draft-kanazawa-applic-urn

draft-kanazawa-applic-urn




INTERNET-DRAFT                                           Masaki Kanazawa
Network Working Group                                             APPLIC
Expires: December 6, 2013                                   June 7, 2013


The proposal of A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Formal Namespace for the Local Government
ICT Platform Project in Japan
                       draft-kanazawa-applic-urn-02

Abstract

 This document describes the Namespace Idendifier (NID) 'applic' for 
 Uniform Resource Name (URN) which is used to identify resources
 released by the Association for Promotion of Public Local Information
 and Communication (APPLIC).  APPLIC publishes and manages
 specifications that define unique and persistent resources which make
 use of the namespace.
 (APPLIC is a nonprofit organization which consists of local
 governments, private companies and academic experts in Japan.)


Status of this Memo

 This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
 provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document.
 Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
 and restrictions with respect to this document.

 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task 
 Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that other
 groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
 time.
 It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or
 to cite them other than as "work in progress."

 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
 http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html

 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html


Copyright Notice

 Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors.  All rights reserved.



Table of Contents

 1. Introduction .....................................................3
 2. Specification Template ...........................................4
 3. Example ..........................................................6
 4. Namespace Considerations .........................................6
 5. Community Considerations .........................................6
 6. IANA Considerations ..............................................6
 7. Security Considerations ..........................................7
 8. References .......................................................7
  8.1 Normative References ...........................................7
  8.2 Informative References .........................................7
 Author's Address.....................................................7




1. Introduction

 In order to realize the improvement of public services for citizens
 and the reduction of ICT costs for local governments in japan, APPLIC
 has started the Local Government ICT Platform project(*1) according to
 one of the Japanese government policies(*2).

 In this project APPLIC has set the standard specifications for various 
 services and exchanged data items between local governments, between
 local government and private enterprise, which are based on the concept
 of SOA, and has published them(*3).(and will upgrade them when
 necessary.)

 The XML schemas and WSDL files on the services also are included in the 
 specifications, and NamespaceID on them has to be registered formaly
 and to be unique.

 (*1)Reference to the document "Local Government ICT Platform" at
     http://www.applic.or.jp/tech/urn/Local_Government_ICT_Platform.pdf
 (*2)Reference to page 12 of the document "Outline of Japan's 
     Info-Communications Policies" at
     http://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/kouhoushi/pdf/060530-e_1.pdf
 (*3)The latest version at 2013/06 is published on the following page.
     http://www.applic.or.jp/URN/APPLIC-0002-2013/



2. Specification Template

   NamespaceID:  "applic"


Registration Information:

   Version 1
   Date:  2011-08-22


Declared registrant of the namespace:

   Name(Organization): The Association for Promotion of Public Local
                       Information and Communication (APPLIC)
   Address: 2-9-4,Torano-mon,Minato-ward,Tokyo 105-0001,Japan
   E-mail: tech-ans@applic.or.jp
   URL: http://www.applic.or.jp/


Declaration of syntactic structure:

  The identifier structure is as follows:

  urn: <namespace ID>:xmlns:pf:<the classification of the
 specification>:
       <the classification of the document type>:<the information of the 
       specification release>

  <namespace ID> is "applic"

  <the classification of the specification>
   is "dis" | "gis" | "lgxml" | "interop" | "common"

  <the classification of the document type> is
 "schema" | "wsdl" | "bpel"

  <the information of the specification release time> is YYYY-**

     YYYY : the year of the specification release
      **  : the time of the specification release in the year,
            which is from "01" to "99"


Relevant ancillary documentation :

   The specification documents and XML schemas are published on the 
   following site:
   http://www.applic.or.jp/

   (e.g. The latest version at 2013/6 is published on the following
 page.)
   ( http://www.applic.or.jp/URN/APPLIC-0002-2013/ )



Identifier uniqueness considerations:

    URN identifiers are assigned uniquely.
      -- APPLIC assigns them to at most one resource according to above 
         syntactic structure, and do not reassign.


Identifier persistence considerations:

    All identifier assignments are permanent by APPLIC.


Process of identifier assignment:

    The assignment process is completely closed one under APPLIC
 control.


Process for identifier resolution:

    APPLIC will maintain lists of assigned identifiers on its web pages
 or documents. (http://www.applic.or.jp/)


Rules for Lexical Equivalence:

    The entire URN is case-insensitive.

Conformance with URN Syntax:

    No special considerations.


Validation mechanism:

    No special considerations.


Scope:

    Global.



3. Example

  (The following examples are not to be real.)

  urn:applic:xmlns:pf:lgxml:wsdl:2016-01
  urn:applic:xmlns:pf:common:schema:2020-03



4. Namespace Considerations

 In order to guarantee the uniqueness of URNs, the assignment process of 
 them is completely closed one under APPLIC control and in fact APPLIC 
 assigns them according to the above "Declaration of syntactic
 structure" in "2. Specification Template" and publishes them.



5. Community Considerations

 In Japan software development companies implement the functions of the 
 Local Government ICT Platform specifications (including XML schemas 
 and WSDL files) into their software products for local governments and 
 release them.  Local governments need to design their services by using 
 them in order to communicate with each other on the Local Government 
 ICT Platform.
 The software products in accordance with the specifications can be 
 passed by APPLIC and published on the following APPLIC web page.
 http://www.applic.or.jp/pf/entry/unit.html.

 Any organization such as local governments and private enterprises will 
 be entitled to access the namespace and its associated application, 
 registration and resolution services.  The primary "applic" namespace 
 usage is to identify information resources, such as XML messages, 
 according to the Local Government ICT Platform specifications.



6. IANA Considerations

 This document includes a URN NID registration for APPLIC for entry in 
 the IANA registry of URN NIDs (see [RFC5226] for more information).

 (APPLIC indicates in the document "Standard Specification regarding 
  Platform Communication", one of the Local Government ICT Platform 
  documents, that The NamespaceID "applic" is entered into the IANA 
  registry of URN NIDs.)



7. Security Considerations

 There are no additional security considerations except those of the use 
 and resolution of URNs in general.



8. References

8.1. Normative References

 [RFC3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, 
 "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", 
 BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002.


8.2. Informative References

 [RFC4350] F.Hendrikx, C.Wallis, (New Zealand Government), "A Uniform 
 Resource Names (URN) Namespace for the New Zealand Government", 
 RFC4350, February 2006.

 [RFC4617] J.KorniJenko, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Formal 
 Namespace for the Latvian National Government Integration Project", 
 RFC4617, August 2006.



Author's Address

  Masaki Kanazawa
  The Association for Promotion of Public Local Information and 
  Communication (APPLIC)
  2-9-4,Torano-mon,Minato-ward,Tokyo 105-0001,Japan
  E-mail: tech-ans@applic.or.jp
  URL: http://www.applic.or.jp/


Expires: December 6, 2013