Internet DRAFT - draft-law-moq-catalog
draft-law-moq-catalog
Media Over QUIC W. Law
Internet-Draft Akamai
Intended status: Informational S. Nandakumar
Expires: 14 September 2023 Cisco
13 March 2023
Catalog Specification for MoQ compliant streaming formats
draft-law-moq-catalog-00
Abstract
This document defines an interoperable Catalog specification for
streaming formats implementing the MoQ Base Protocol.
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Status information for this document may be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-law-moq/.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Media Over QUIC
Working Group mailing list (mailto:moq@ietf.org), which is archived
at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/. Subscribe at
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/suhasHere/moq-catalog.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 September 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Conventions and Definitions
2.1. Terminology
3. Catalog
3.1. Catalog Track ID
3.2. Catalog payload structure
3.3. Catalog contents
3.4. Catalog dependency
4. Security Considerations
5. IANA Considerations
5.1. Catalog Type Registry
6. References
6.1. Normative References
6.2. Informative references
Acknowledgments
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
The MOQ Base Protocol [MOQTransport] defines a media transport
protocol that utilizes the QUIC network protocol [QUIC] and
WebTransport[WebTrans] to move objects between publishers,
subscribers and intermediaries. Subscription IDs are used to
identify available tracks. The mapping of media characteristics to
objects, as well as relative prioritization of those objects, is
defined by a separate MoQ Streaming Format specification. Multiple
streaming formats can operate concurrently over MoQ base protocol.
Each streaming format defines its own catalog definition. This
document provides normative requirements for these catalog
definitions to ensure their compatibility across networks
implementing the MoQ Base Protocol.
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC
2119 [RFC2119].
2.1. Terminology
* Catalog - a Track with a reserved Track ID within an emission or
MoQSession that defines the availability of other Tracks.
* Emission - a collection of Tracks under a common prioritization
and orchestration domain.
* MoQ Base Protocol (MBP) - a media transport protocol that utilizes
the QUIC network protocol [QUIC] and WebTransport[WebTrans] to
move objects between publishers, subscribers and intermediaries
* MoQ Streaming Format - a specification which defines how to stream
media over the MoQ Base Protocol. It includes a catalog
definition, a mapping of media to the protocol objects,
prioritization rules and additional business logic.
* Track - a sequence of Objects within MBP
* Track ID - a string concatenation of a globally unique provider
identifier and a "Track Name".
3. Catalog
A Catalog is a special case of a Track. A Track is composed of a
succession of Objects, each assigned to a Group.
3.1. Catalog Track ID
A Catalog MUST have a Track ID whose Track Name MUST be the lowercase
string "catalog". Each Emission MUST have at most one track with
Track Name of "catalog", which defines all other tracks within that
emission. If a streaming format requires a series of multiple
catalogs, then it MUST maintain a singleton parent "catalog" which is
the entry point and definition of all other child catalogs within
that emission.
Catalog TrackID := <provider-domain>/<emission-id>/catalog
Ex: streaming.com/emission123/catalog identifies the catalog
track for the emission123
3.2. Catalog payload structure
The payload of a Catalog Object consists of two components - a two
octet header defining the type, followed by the variable length body.
+---------------+--------------------+
| 0x01 - 0x02 | Type designator |
| 0x03 - | Body |
+---------------+--------------------+
To understand the type of catalog object, a receiver would read the
first two octets of the object payload and interpret them as an
integer in the range 0x0000 - 0xFFFF. This would define the
Streaming Format of the catalog object, which in turn would define
the serialization of the body, allowing the receiver to parse the
body and extract the internal information.
A Catalog specification MUST define the binary serialization of the
body. This serialization may vary between streaming formats and
there is no requirement to standardize how the data within the body
is represented.
3.3. Catalog contents
A Catalog MUST describe the Track IDs available within an emission.
It MAY provide initialization data as well as selection criteria to
assist a client in selecting content for subscription.
3.4. Catalog dependency
The first Catalog object in any group sequence MUST be independent of
any other catalog object. Subsequent catalog objects within the same
group sequence MAY be dependent on the prior catalog objects within
the same group.
4. Security Considerations
The catalog payload type header MUST NOT be encrypted. The catalog
payload body MAY be encrypted.
5. IANA Considerations
This section details how the Type of the Catalog format that can be
registered. The type registry can be updated by incrementally
expanding the type space, i.e., by allocating and reserving new type
identifiers. As per [RFC8126], this section details the creation of
the "MoQ Base Protocol Catalog Type" registry.
5.1. Catalog Type Registry
This document creates a new registry, "MoQ Base Protocol Catalog
Type". The registry policy is "RFC Required". The Type value is 2
octets. The range is 0x0000-0xFFFF. The initial entry in the
registry is:
+--------+-------------+----------------------------------+
| Type | Name | RFC |
+--------+-------------+----------------------------------+
| 0x0000 | Reserved | |
+--------+-------------+----------------------------------+
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[MoQTransport] Nandakumar, S "MOQTransport - Unified Media Delivery
over QUIC" Work in progress
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March
1997, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119 (https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc2119).
6.2. Informative references
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/
rfc8126 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126).
[QUIC] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based
Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000,
May 2021, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000 (https://www.rfc-
editor.org/rfc/rfc9000).
[WebTransport] Frindell, A., Kinnear, E., and V. Vasiliev,
"WebTransport over HTTP/3", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-webtrans-http3-04, 24 January 2023,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-04
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-04).
Acknowledgments
The IETF MoQ mailing lists and discussion groups.
Authors' Addresses
Will Law
Akamai
Email: wilaw@akamai.com
Suhas Nandakumar
Cisco
Email: snandaku@cisco.com
