Internet DRAFT - draft-mahy-dispatch-immi-content
draft-mahy-dispatch-immi-content
dispatch R. Mahy
Internet-Draft Wire
Intended status: Informational 7 March 2022
Expires: 8 September 2022
Inside MLS Message Interop (IMMI) instant message content
draft-mahy-dispatch-immi-content-00
Abstract
This document defines a profile intended for instant messaging
interoperability of messages end-to-end encrypted inside the MLS
(Message Layer Security) Protocol. It adapts prior work (CPIM) to
work well in the MLS context.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 September 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
Table of Contents
1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Naming schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Negotiation of MIME types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3. CPIM and MIME headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. Original Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Reply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.3. Reaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.4. Mentions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.5. Edit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.6. Delete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.7. Expiring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.8. Knock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.9. Read Receipt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.10. Attachments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.11. Conferencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. IMMI CPIM profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1. CPIM headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.2. Definition of message/immi-disposition-notification . . . 12
5.3. Required and Recommended MIME types . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.1. MIME subtype registration of message/
immi-disposition-notification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
9. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2219].
The terms MLS client, MLS group, and KeyPackage have the same
meanings as in the MLS protocol [I-D.ietf-mls-protocol].
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
2. Introduction
MLS [I-D.ietf-mls-protocol] is a group key establishment protocol
motivated by the desire for group chat with efficient end-to-end
encryption. While one of the motivations of MLS is interoperable
standards-based secure messaging, the MLS protocol does not define or
prescribe any format for the encrypted "application messages" encoded
by MLS. The development of MLS was strongly motivated by the needs
of a number of Instant Messaging (IM) systems, which encrypt messages
end-to-end using variations of the Double Ratchet protocol [].
End-to-end encrypted instant messaging was also a motivator for the
Common Protocol for Instant Messaging (CPIM) [RFC3862], however the
model used at the time assumed standalone encryption of each message
using a protocol such as S/MIME [RFC8551] or PGP [RFC3156] to
interoperate between IM protocols such as SIP [RFC3261] and XMPP
[RFC6120]. For a variety of practical reasons, interoperable end-to-
end encryption between IM systems was never deployed commercially.
There are now several vendors prepared to implement MLS. In order to
enable interoperable messaging conveyed "inside" MLS application
messages, some additional specification and some minor changes are
required. Also, the expectation of what constitutes basic features
common across multiple IM systems has grown. It would be beneficial
to provide an interoperable format for these additional features as
well. Most of these features can be implemented using a profile
which describes how to use already-defined URIs, message headers, and
MIME types.
This proposal assumes that MLS clients can advertise MIME types they
support and that MLS clients can determine what MIME types are
required to join a specific MLS group. A companion proposal
[I-D.mahy-dispatch-immi-mls-mime] defines two MLS extensions which
meets this requirement. It would allow implementations to define
groups with different MIME type requirements and it would allow MLS
clients to send extended or proprietary messages that would be
interpreted by some members of the group while assuring that an
interoperable end-to-end encrypted baseline is available to all
members, even when the group spans multiple systems or vendors.
Below is a list of some features commonly found in IM group chat
systems:
* plain text and rich text messaging
* delivery notifications
* read receipts
* replies
* reactions
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
* edit or delete previously sent messages
* expiring messages
* knock / ping
* shared files/audio/videos
* calling / conferencing
3. Overview
3.1. Naming schemes
IM systems have a number of types of identifiers. Not all systems
use every type:
* client/device identifier (internal representation)
* user identifier
* handle identifier (external, friendly representation)
* group conversation identifier
* group or or channel name (external, friendly representation)
* team identifier (less common)
One user may have multiple clients (for example a mobile and a
desktop client). A handle may refer to a single user or it may
redirect to multiple users. In some systems, the user identifier is
a handle. In other systems the user identifier is an internal
representation, for example a UUID. Handles may be changed/renamed,
but hopefully internal user identifiers do not. Unqualified handles
are often prefixed with a commercial at-sign ("@").
Likewise, group conversation identifiers could be internal or
external representations, whereas group names or channel names are
often external friendly representations. Unqualified channel names
are often prefixed with a hash character ("#"). Some systems have an
additional level of hierarchy with a team identifier under which
groups/channels can be organized and authorized.
This proposal relies on URIs for naming and identifiers. All the
example use the im: URI scheme (defined in [RFC3862]), but any
instant messaging scheme is acceptable.
3.2. Negotiation of MIME types
As most IM systems are proprietary, standalone systems, it is useful
to allow clients to send and receive proprietary formats among
themselves. Using the multipart/alternative MIME wrapper, clients
can send a message using the basic functionality described in this
document AND a proprietary format for same-vendor clients
simultaneously over the same group with end-to-end encryption.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
[I-D.mahy-dispatch-immi-mls-mime] contains the actual MLS extensions
useful for negotiating MIME types. The profile in this document
requires support for receiving message/cpim, text/plain, text/
markdown, and multipart MIME. All other mime types (including some
recommended in this profile) are optional.
Example sending this profile and proprietary messaging protocol
simultaneously.
Content-type: multipart/alternative
3.3. CPIM and MIME headers
We assume that an MLS group is already established and that either
out-of-band or using the MLS protocol or MLS extensions that the
following is known to every member of the group:
* The membership of the group (via MLS).
* The identity of any MLS client which sends an application message
(via MLS).
* The MLS group ID (via MLS)
* The human readable name(s) of the MLS group, if any (out-of-band
or extension).
* Which MIME types are mandatory to implement (proposed extension).
* For each member, the MIME types each supports (proposed
extension).
For all messages the message header equivalent of To (the MLS group)
and Sender fields (MLS sender) is already known and is therefore
redundant. Every message contains a message/cpim header which
includes the From, DateTime, and Message-ID fields. The From field
contains the external, user-friendly representation of the Sender.
Messages sent to an MLS group are delivered to every member of the
group active during the epoch in which the message was sent.
It is also mandatory to understand are the following MIME headers:
* Content-Type
* Content-Disposition
* Content-Length
4. Example
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
4.1. Original Message
In this example, Alice Smith sends a rich-text (Markdown) [RFC7763]
message to the Engineering Team MLS group. The following values are
implied as if headers were present:
* Implied Sender header from MLS sender: im:3b52249d-68f9-45ce-8bf5-
c799f3cad7ec-0003@example.com (im:3b52249d-68f9-45ce-8bf5-
c799f3cad7ec-0003@example.com)
* Implied To header from MLS group: "Engineering Team" im:9dc867ca-
3a01-4385-bb69-1573601c3c0c@example.com (im:9dc867ca-
3a01-4385-bb69-1573601c3c0c@example.com)
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:alice-smith@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:45-00:00
Message-ID: <28fd19857ad7@example.com>
Content-Type: text/markdown;charset=utf-8
Hi everyone, we just shipped release 2.0. __Good work__!
4.2. Reply
A reply message looks similar, but contains an In-Reply-To CPIM
header with the ID of the original message. The implied To header is
the same all example messages in this section. The implied Sender
header is always the MLS sender, and will not be shown in subsequent
example messages.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:bob-jones@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:57-00:00
Message-ID: <e701beee59f9@example.com>
In-Reply-To: <28fd19857ad7@example.com>
Content-Type: text/markdown;charset=utf-8
Right on! _Congratulations_ 'all!
4.3. Reaction
A reaction, uses the reaction Content-Disposition token defined in
[RFC9078]. This Content-Disposition token indicates that the
intended disposition of the contents of the message is a reaction.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
The content in the sample message is a single Unicode heart character
(U+2665). Discovering the range of characters each implementation
could render as a reaction can occur out-of-band and is not within
the scope of this proposal. However, an implementation which
receives a reaction character string it does not recognize could
render the reaction as a reply, possibly prefixing with a localized
string such as "Reaction: ". Note that a reaction could
theoretically even be another media type (ex: image, audio, or
video), although not currently implemented in major instant messaging
systems.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:cathy-washington@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:57-00:00
Message-ID: <1a771ca1d84f@example.com>
In-Reply-To: <28fd19857ad7@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: reaction
♥
4.4. Mentions
In instant messaging systems and social media, a mention allows
special formatting and behavior when a name, handle, or tag
associated with a known group is encountered, often when prefixed
with a commercial-at "@" character for mentions of users or a hash
"#" character for groups or tags. A message which contains a mention
may trigger distinct notifications on the IM client.
We can convey a mention by linking the user, handle, or tag URI in
Markdown or HTML rich content. For example, a mention using Markdown
is indicated below.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:cathy-washington@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:14:03-00:00
Message-ID: <4dcab7711a77@example.com>
Content-Type: text/markdown;charset=utf-8
Kudos to [@Alice Smith](im:alice-smith@example.com)
for making the release happen!
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
The same mention using HTML [W3C.CR-html52-20170808] is indicated
below.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:cathy-washington@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:14:03-00:00
Message-ID: <4dcab7711a77@example.com>
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
<p>Kudos to <a href="im:alice-smith@example.com">@Alice
Smith</a> for making the release happen!</p>
4.5. Edit
Unlike with email messages, it is common in IM systems to allow the
sender of a message to edit or delete the message after the fact.
Typically the message is replaced in the user interface of the
receivers (even after the original message is read) but shows a
visual indication that it has been edited.
We reuse the Supersedes header from MIXER [RFC2156], because the
semantics are correct: the message included in the body is a
replacement for the message with the superseded message ID.
Here Bob Jones corrects a typo in his original message:
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:bob-jones@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:57-00:00
Message-ID: <89d3472622a4@example.com>
Supersedes: <e701beee59f9@example.com>
Content-Type: text/markdown;charset=utf-8
Right on! _Congratulations_ y'all!
4.6. Delete
In IM systems, a delete means that the author of a specific message
has retracted the message, regardless if other users have read the
message or not. Typically a placeholder remains in the user
interface showing that a message was deleted. Replies which
reference a deleted message typically hide the quoted portion and
reflect that the original message was deleted.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
If Bob deleted his message instead of modifying it, we would
represent it using the Supersedes header with an empty body, as shown
below.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:bob-jones@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:57-00:00
Message-ID: <89d3472622a4@example.com>
Supersedes: <e701beee59f9@example.com>
Content-Length: 0
4.7. Expiring
Expiring messages are designed to be deleted automatically by the
receiving client at a certain time whether they have been read or
not. As with manually deleted messages, there is no guarantee that a
uncooperative client or a determined user will not save the content
of the message, however most clients respect the convention.
MIXER defines an Expires header which is also used sent simply by
including an Expires header in the CPIM message body.
To avoid using two different date header syntaxes, we define an
ExpiresDateTime header, which uses the same date/time format as
CPIM's DateTime header. The semantics of the header are that the
message is automatically deleted by the receiving clients at the
indicated time without user interaction or network connectivity
necessary.
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:alice-smith@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:49:03-00:00
Message-ID: <5c95a4dfddab@example.com>
ExpiresDateTime: 2022-02-08T22:59:03-00:00
Content-Type: text/markdown;charset=utf-8
__*VPN GOING DOWN*__
I'm rebooting the VPN in ten minutes unless anyone objects.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
4.8. Knock
A knock or ping is message sent to get the attention of a user or a
group of users. It might be sent when a user has not responded to
direct messages or mentions, or in a group when something requires
the attention of everyone quickly (ex: a serious unusual situation
like a major system outage).
We represent a knock as a text/plain body containing a single CRLF
with the alert Content-Disposition token (defined in [RFC3261]).
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:alice-smith@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-08T22:13:45-00:00
Message-ID: <c1a3375bfe3f@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: alert
4.9. Read Receipt
In instant messaging systems, read receipts typically generate a
distinct indicator for each message. In some systems, the number of
users in a group who have read the message is subtly displayed and
the list of users who read the message is available on further
inspection.
Of course, Internet mail has support for read receipts as well, but
the existing message disposition notification mechanism defined for
email in [RFC8098] is unfortunately inappropriate in this context.
* notifications can be sent by intermediaries
* only one notification can be sent about a single message per
recipient
* a human-readable version of the notification is expected
* each notification can refer to only one message
* it is extremely verbose
The proposed format below, message/immi-disposition-notification is
sent by one member of an MLS group to the entire group and can refer
to multiple messages. There is one IMMI-Disposition line per
message, with the disposition of the original message in a parameter.
As the disposition at the recipient changes, the disposition can be
updated in a subsequent notification.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
Content-type: message/cpim
From: <im:bob-jones@example.com>
DateTime: 2022-02-09T07:57:13-00:00
Message-ID: <7e924c2e6ee5@example.com>
Content-Disposition: notification
Content-type: message/immi-disposition-notification
IMMI-Disposition: <4dcab7711a77@example.com>;dispo=read
IMMI-Disposition: <285f75c46430@example.com>;dispo=read
IMMI-Disposition: <c5e0cd6140e6@example.com>;dispo=read
IMMI-Disposition: <5c95a4dfddab@example.com>;dispo=expired
4.10. Attachments
The message/external-body MIME Type is a convenient way to present a
URL to download an attachment which should not be rendered inline.
Content-Type: message/external-body; access-type="URL";
URL="https://example.com/storage/bigfile.m4v";
size=708234961
4.11. Conferencing
Joining a conference via URL is also possible. The link could be
rendered to the user, requiring a click. Alternatively another
Content-Disposition could be specified to more automatic actions.
However further calling and conferencing functionality is out-of-
scope of this document.
Content-Type: message/external-body; access-type="URL";
URL="https://example.com/join/12345"
5. IMMI CPIM profile
We define a profile of CPIM for instant messaging within MLS. The
grammar uses Augmented Backus-Naur Form (BNF) [RFC5234].
5.1. CPIM headers
The following CPIM headers are required:
* From: the identity of message sender. for example
im:alice@example.com this identity could be pseudonymous or
anonymous if the group policy allows.
* DateTime: the date and time in a reasonable format, as specified
in CPIM.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
* Message-ID: a message ID which is unique across domains.
* Content-type: As is from CPIM.
* In-Reply-To: Refers to the previous Message-ID. Same semantics as
in [RFC5322].
* Supersedes: Refers to the previous Messsage-ID. Similar semantics
to header of the same name in MIXER. Content-Disposition: The
intended handling of the message. The two required dispositions
are render and reaction.
* Content-Length:
For clarity the grammar for the headers not already included in CPIM
are formulated below.
msg-id-header-line = msg-id-header ":" SP msg-id CRLF
msg-id-header = "Message-ID" ; case-sensitive
in-reply-to-header-line = in-reply-to-header ":" SP msg-id CRLF
in-reply-to-header = "In-Reply-To" ; case-sensitive
supersedes-header-line = supersedes-header ":" SP msg-id CRLF
supersedes-header = "Supersedes" ; case-sensitive
msg-id = "<" id-left "@" id-right ">"
id-left = dot-atom-text
id-right = dot-atom-text / no-fold-literal
dot-atom-text = 1*atext *("." 1*atext)
atext = ALPHA / DIGIT / atom-symbol
atom-symbol = "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" /
"/" / "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
no-fold-literal = "[" *dtext "]"
dtext = %d33-90 / %d94-126 ; Printable US-ASCII
; excluding "[", "]", and "\"
5.2. Definition of message/immi-disposition-notification
The grammar below defines the syntax.
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
immi-disposition-notification-body = 1*immi-header-line
immi-header-line = immi-header ":" SP msg-id ";" status CRLF
imm-header = "IMMI-Disposition" ; case-sensitive
status = "dispo" "=" status-value
status-value = "read" /
"error" /
"delivered" /
"expired" /
"deleted" /
"hidden"
5.3. Required and Recommended MIME types
The following MIME types are REQUIRED:
* message/cpim
* multipart/alternative
* multipart/mixed
* multipart/parallel
* text/plain
* text/markdown
The following MIME types are RECOMMENDED:
* text/html
* message/external-body
* message/immi-disposition-notification
* image/jpeg
* image/png
6. IANA Considerations
6.1. MIME subtype registration of message/immi-disposition-notification
This document proposes registration of a MIME subtype with IANA.
TBC
7. Security Considerations
TBC
8. Normative References
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
[I-D.ietf-mls-protocol]
Barnes, R., Beurdouche, B., Robert, R., Millican, J.,
Omara, E., and K. Cohn-Gordon, "The Messaging Layer
Security (MLS) Protocol", Work in Progress, Internet-
Draft, draft-ietf-mls-protocol-12, 11 October 2021,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mls-
protocol-12>.
[I-D.mahy-dispatch-immi-mls-mime]
Mahy, R., "Inside MLS Message Interop (IMMI) MIME type
extensions", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-mahy-
dispatch-immi-mls-mime-00, 7 March 2022,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mahy-
dispatch-immi-mls-mime-00>.
[RFC2156] Kille, S., "MIXER (Mime Internet X.400 Enhanced Relay):
Mapping between X.400 and RFC 822/MIME", RFC 2156,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2156, January 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2156>.
[RFC2219] Hamilton, M. and R. Wright, "Use of DNS Aliases for
Network Services", BCP 17, RFC 2219, DOI 10.17487/RFC2219,
October 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2219>.
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.
[RFC3862] Klyne, G. and D. Atkins, "Common Presence and Instant
Messaging (CPIM): Message Format", RFC 3862,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3862, August 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3862>.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
[RFC7763] Leonard, S., "The text/markdown Media Type", RFC 7763,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7763, March 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7763>.
9. Informative References
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Inside MLS IM content March 2022
[RFC3156] Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R., and T. Roessler,
"MIME Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3156, August 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3156>.
[RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5322, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5322>.
[RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, DOI 10.17487/RFC6120,
March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6120>.
[RFC8098] Hansen, T., Ed. and A. Melnikov, Ed., "Message Disposition
Notification", STD 85, RFC 8098, DOI 10.17487/RFC8098,
February 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8098>.
[RFC8551] Schaad, J., Ramsdell, B., and S. Turner, "Secure/
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 4.0
Message Specification", RFC 8551, DOI 10.17487/RFC8551,
April 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8551>.
[RFC9078] Crocker, D., Signes, R., and N. Freed, "Reaction:
Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message", RFC 9078,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9078, August 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9078>.
[W3C.CR-html52-20170808]
Faulkner, S., Eicholz, A., Leithead, T., Danilo, A., and
S. Moon, "HTML 5.2", World Wide Web Consortium CR CR-
html52-20170808, 8 August 2017,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-html52-20170808>.
Author's Address
Rohan Mahy
Wire
Email: rohan.mahy@wire.com
Mahy Expires 8 September 2022 [Page 15]
