Internet DRAFT - draft-morton-lmap-examples
draft-morton-lmap-examples
Network Working Group A. Morton
Internet-Draft AT&T Labs
Intended status: Informational March 21, 2016
Expires: September 22, 2016
Examples of LMAP Objects using IPPM Metrics and Protocols
draft-morton-lmap-examples-01
Abstract
In order to examine the completeness and coverage of the LMAP info
and data models, we present examples expressing information from IP
Performance Metric working group metrics and protocols, and the
Performance Metrics Registry. The main update in the version
provides a more realistic and useful example of the Cycle_ID in
measurement instruction and reporting.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 22, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Scope and Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. UDP Round Trip Latency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Measurement Task Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Instruction Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3. Measurement Task . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4. Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.5. Report Task . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.6. Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Introduction
The Large-scale Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP) working
group has completed a Framework [RFC7594] and Use cases, and now
proceeds with development of an information model
[I-D.ietf-lmap-information-model] and data model.
The IETF IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) working group first created a
framework for metric development in [RFC2330]. This framework has
largely stood the test of time and enabled development of many
fundamental metrics. It has been updated once in the area of metric
composition [RFC5835], and again in several areas related to active
stream measurement of modern networks with reactive propoerties
[RFC7312]. The Working Group has developed an extensive set of
Standards Track Metrics and Measurment Protocols. Among the work
especially relevant to LMAP is the development of a Performance
Metrics Registry [I-D.ietf-ippm-metric-registry], and a proposal for
the initial regsitry contents [I-D.morton-ippm-initial-registry].
This memo is orgainzed into sections that present an example of LMAP
Control and Reporting by populating the various information model
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
objects for measurement Tasks and Reporting Tasks (and eventually
Schedule, Event, Action, etc).
The first example is a UDP Round Trip Latency Metric.
2. Scope and Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to examine the features and capabilities
of the LMAP information model [I-D.ietf-lmap-information-model] by
populating the models with example data intended to enable
measurement of IPPM metrics.
The scope is to create the examples for Active Metrics and their
Methods of Measurement, as defined in the IPPM literature of
Standards Track Metrics. Specifically, Metrics in the proposed
initial contents for the Performance Metrics Registry
[I-D.ietf-ippm-metric-registry] contined in
[I-D.ietf-ippm-metric-registry] are the primary focus, along with
existing standards track measurement protocols developed in IPPM
[RFC4656] [RFC5357].
3. UDP Round Trip Latency
This draft presents information in a conceptual form. Safeguarding
correct syntax is a collosal non-goal in the early drafts.
3.1. Measurement Task Capabilities
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
Example:
Measurement Capability [
Measurement Protocol [
Protocol Roles [ ]
]
Registry URI [
Method Roles [ ]
]
]
so, an example would be
Measurement Capability [
TWAMP [
Control-Client; Session-Sender; Server; Session-Reflector;
]
Prefix:Act_IP_UDP_Round-trip_Delay_95th-percentile_Poisson [
Src; Dst;
... more URIs and Roles ...
]
]
for a fully-capable MA.
3.2. Instruction Object
3.3.1. Definition of ma-instruction-obj
object {
ma-task-obj ma-instruction-tasks<0..*>;
name:UDP_RT_Metrics_001;
ma-channel-obj ma-report-channels<0..*>;
ma-schedule-obj ma-instruction-schedules<0..*>;
ma-suppression-obj ma-suppression;
} ma-instruction-obj;
3.3. Measurement Task
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
3.9.1. Definition of ma-task-obj
object {
string ma-task-name;
task-name: UDP_RT_Metrics_001;
uri ma-task-registry-entries<1..*>;
Prefix: Act_IP_UDP_Round-trip_Delay_95th-percentile_Poisson;
Prefix: Act_IP_UDP_Round-trip_Delay_Mean_Poisson;
[ma-option-obj ma-task-options<0..*>];
option-role: Src; option-meas_point: mp100;
option-measurement_protocol: TWAMP;
option-meas_protocol_roles: Control-Client; Session-Sender;
option-Src_IP: xxx.xxx.xxx;
option-Dst_IP: xxx.xxx.xxx;
option-T0: 0; option-lambda: 1 second;
option-Tf: 15 min; option-truncate: 30 seconds;
[boolean ma-task-suppress-by-default;]
suppress: true;
[string ma-task-cycle-id;]
cycle-id: Access_2016-03-21-0930;
} ma-task-obj;
Prefix = urn:ietf:params:performance:metric
3.4. Report
3.6.1. Definition of ma-report-obj
object {
datetime ma-report-date;
[uuid ma-report-agent-id;]
[string ma-report-group-id;]
[ma-report-task-obj ma-report-tasks<0..*>];
name:UDP_RT_Metrics_REPORT_001;
} ma-report-obj;
3.5. Report Task
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
3.6.2. Definition of ma-report-task-obj
object {
string ma-report-task-name;
task-name: UDP_RT_Metrics_REPORT_001;
[uri ma-report-task-registry-entries<1..*>;]
Prefix: Act_IP_UDP_Round-trip_Delay_95th-percentile_Poisson;
Prefix: Act_IP_UDP_Round-trip_Delay_Mean_Poisson;
[ma-option-obj ma-report-task-options<0..*>];
option-role: Src; option-meas_point: mp100;
option-measurement_protocol: TWAMP;
option-meas_protocol_roles: Control-Client; Session-Sender;
option-Src_IP: xxx.xxx.xxx;
option-Dst_IP: xxx.xxx.xxx;
option-T0: 0;
option-Tf: 15 minutes;
[ma-option-obj ma-report-task-action-options<0..*>];
[string ma-report-task-cycle-id;]
cycle-id: Access_2016-03-21-0930;
[string ma-report-task-column-labels<0..*>;]
label: Mean; label: 95%-tile;
[ma-report-row-obj ma-report-task-rows<0..*>;]
row(0): 0.25; 0.34;
} ma-report-task-obj;
3.6. Schedule
TBD
4. Security Considerations
The security considerations that apply to any active measurement of
live paths are relevant here as well. See [RFC4656] and [RFC5357].
When considering privacy of those involved in measurement or those
whose traffic is measured, the sensitive information available to
potential observers is greatly reduced when using active techniques
which are within this scope of work. Passive observations of user
traffic for measurement purposes raise many privacy issues. We refer
the reader to the privacy considerations described in the Large Scale
Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP) Framework [RFC7594],
which covers active and passive techniques.
5. IANA Considerations
This memo makes no requests of IANA.
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
6. Acknowledgements
The author thanks LMAP Participants for their comments.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2330] Paxson, V., Almes, G., Mahdavi, J., and M. Mathis,
"Framework for IP Performance Metrics", RFC 2330,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2330, May 1998,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2330>.
[RFC2679] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., and M. Zekauskas, "A One-way
Delay Metric for IPPM", RFC 2679, DOI 10.17487/RFC2679,
September 1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2679>.
[RFC3432] Raisanen, V., Grotefeld, G., and A. Morton, "Network
performance measurement with periodic streams", RFC 3432,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3432, November 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3432>.
[RFC4656] Shalunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J., and M.
Zekauskas, "A One-way Active Measurement Protocol
(OWAMP)", RFC 4656, DOI 10.17487/RFC4656, September 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4656>.
[RFC5357] Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J.
Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)",
RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, October 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5357>.
[RFC5835] Morton, A., Ed. and S. Van den Berghe, Ed., "Framework for
Metric Composition", RFC 5835, DOI 10.17487/RFC5835, April
2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5835>.
[RFC6049] Morton, A. and E. Stephan, "Spatial Composition of
Metrics", RFC 6049, DOI 10.17487/RFC6049, January 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6049>.
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
[RFC6576] Geib, R., Ed., Morton, A., Fardid, R., and A. Steinmitz,
"IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Standard Advancement
Testing", BCP 176, RFC 6576, DOI 10.17487/RFC6576, March
2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6576>.
[RFC6703] Morton, A., Ramachandran, G., and G. Maguluri, "Reporting
IP Network Performance Metrics: Different Points of View",
RFC 6703, DOI 10.17487/RFC6703, August 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6703>.
[RFC7312] Fabini, J. and A. Morton, "Advanced Stream and Sampling
Framework for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 7312,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7312, August 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7312>.
7.2. Informative References
[EEAW] Pentikousis, K., Piri, E., Pinola, J., Fitzek, F.,
Nissilae, T., and I. Harjula, "Empirical Evaluation of
VoIP Aggregation over a Fixed WiMAX Testbed", Proceedings
of the 4th International Conference on Testbeds and
research infrastructures for the development of networks
and communities (TridentCom
'08) http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1390599, March
2008.
[I-D.ietf-ippm-metric-registry]
Bagnulo, M., Claise, B., Eardley, P., Morton, A., and A.
Akhter, "Registry for Performance Metrics", draft-ietf-
ippm-metric-registry-05 (work in progress), October 2015.
[I-D.ietf-lmap-information-model]
Burbridge, T., Eardley, P., Bagnulo, M., and J.
Schoenwaelder, "Information Model for Large-Scale
Measurement Platforms (LMAP)", draft-ietf-lmap-
information-model-09 (work in progress), March 2016.
[I-D.morton-ippm-initial-registry]
Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza,
"Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries", draft-
morton-ippm-initial-registry-04 (work in progress),
February 2016.
[IBD] Fabini, J., Karner, W., Wallentin, L., and T. Baumgartner,
"The Illusion of Being Deterministic - Application-Level
Considerations on Delay in 3G HSPA Networks", Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Volume 5550, 2009,
pp 301-312 , May 2009.
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
[IRR] Fabini, J., Wallentin, L., and P. Reichl, "The Importance
of Being Really Random: Methodological Aspects of IP-Layer
2G and 3G Network Delay Assessment", ICC'09 Proceedings of
the 2009 IEEE International Conference on
Communications, doi: 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199514, June 2009.
[Mat98] Mathis, M., "Empirical Bulk Transfer Capacity", IP
Performance Metrics Working Group report in Proceeding of
the Forty Third Internet Engineering Task Force, Orlando,
FL. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/slides/
ippm-mathis-98dec.pdf, December 1998.
[RFC3148] Mathis, M. and M. Allman, "A Framework for Defining
Empirical Bulk Transfer Capacity Metrics", RFC 3148,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3148, July 2001,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3148>.
[RFC6808] Ciavattone, L., Geib, R., Morton, A., and M. Wieser, "Test
Plan and Results Supporting Advancement of RFC 2679 on the
Standards Track", RFC 6808, DOI 10.17487/RFC6808, December
2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6808>.
[RFC6985] Morton, A., "IMIX Genome: Specification of Variable Packet
Sizes for Additional Testing", RFC 6985,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6985, July 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6985>.
[RFC7594] Eardley, P., Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Burbridge, T.,
Aitken, P., and A. Akhter, "A Framework for Large-Scale
Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP)", RFC 7594,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7594, September 2015,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7594>.
[RRC] Peraelae, P., Barbuzzi, A., Boggia, G., and K.
Pentikousis, "Theory and Practice of RRC State Transitions
in UMTS Networks", IEEE Globecom 2009 Workshops doi:
10.1109/GLOCOMW.2009.5360763, November 2009.
[TSRC] Fabini, J. and M. Abmayer, "Delay Measurement Methodology
Revisited: Time-slotted Randomness Cancellation", IEEE
Transactions on Instrumentation and
Measurement doi:10.1109/TIM.2013.2263914, October 2013.
Author's Address
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft LMAP Examples of IPPM March 2016
Al Morton
AT&T Labs
200 Laurel Avenue South
Middletown, NJ 07748
USA
Phone: +1 732 420 1571
Fax: +1 732 368 1192
Email: acmorton@att.com
URI: http://home.comcast.net/~acmacm/
Morton Expires September 22, 2016 [Page 10]
