Internet DRAFT - draft-mrose-apex-historic

draft-mrose-apex-historic






Network Working Group                                            M. Rose
Internet-Draft                              Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
Obsoletes: 3340 3341 3342 3343                              May 31, 2007
(if approved)
Intended status: Informational
Expires: December 2, 2007


             Reclassification of the APEX RFCs to Historic
                      draft-mrose-apex-historic-02

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 2, 2007.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).












Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


Abstract

   This memo reclassifies the APEX RFCs (RFCs 3340-3343) from PROPOSED
   STANDARD to HISTORIC.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   3.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 7






































Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


1.  Introduction

   The Application Exchange (APEX) service is defined in four RFCs:
   [RFC3340], [RFC3341], [RFC3342], and [RFC3343].

   To the author's knowledge, no implementations of these RFCs were ever
   deployed.

   To the author's knowledge, all of APEX's functionality is currently
   provided by XMPP ([RFC3920], and [RFC3921], and [RFC3923]), which
   enjoys extrodinarily robust deployment.

   Accordingly, the APEX RFCs are reclassified to Historic status.






































Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


2.  Security Considerations

   The Security Considerations section of the XMPP documents are
   considerably more detailed than those of the APEX documents, and are
   believed to provide security at least as strong as APEX.
   Accordingly, no decrease in security is envisioned.













































Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


3.  Normative References

   [RFC3340]  Rose, M., Klyne, G., and D. Crocker, "The Application
              Exchange Core", RFC 3340, July 2002.

   [RFC3341]  Rose, M., Klyne, G., and D. Crocker, "The Application
              Exchange (APEX) Access Service", RFC 3341, July 2002.

   [RFC3342]  Klyne, G., Rose, M., Schwartz, M., Dixon, E., Franklin,
              H., Kint, J., New, D., and S. Pead, "The Application
              Exchange (APEX) Option Party Pack, Part Deux!", RFC 3342,
              July 2002.

   [RFC3343]  Rose, M., Klyne, G., and D. Crocker, "The Application
              Exchange (APEX) Presence Service", RFC 3343, April 2003.

   [RFC3920]  Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
              Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 3920, October 2004.

   [RFC3921]  Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
              Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence",
              RFC 3921, October 2004.

   [RFC3923]  Saint-Andre, P., "End-to-End Signing and Object Encryption
              for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
              (XMPP)", RFC 3923, October 2004.

























Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


Author's Address

   Marshall T. Rose
   Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
   POB 255268
   Sacramento, CA  95865-5268
   US

   Phone: +1 916 483 8878
   Email: mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us









































Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft            APEX RFCs to Historic                 May 2007


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).





Rose                    Expires December 2, 2007                [Page 7]