Internet DRAFT - draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model
draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model
q
Network Working Group J. George
Internet-Draft Google
Intended status: Informational L. Fang
Expires: April 21, 2016 Microsoft
E. Osborne
Level 3
R. Shakir
Jive Communications
October 19, 2015
MPLS / TE Model for Service Provider Networks
draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-02
Abstract
This document defines a framework for a YANG data model for
configuring and managing label switched paths, including the
signaling protocols, traffic engineering, and operational aspects
based on carrier and content provider operational requirements.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 21, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Goals and approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Model overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. MPLS global . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. TE global attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3. TE interface attributes overview . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4. Signaling protocol overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5. LSP overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. Example use cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1. Traffic engineered p2p LSP signaled with RSVP . . . . . . 11
3.2. Traffic engineered LSP signaled with SR . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3. IGP-congruent LDP-signaled LSP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6. YANG modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6.1. MPLS base modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6.2. MPLS LSP submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6.3. MPLS signaling protocol modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
7. Contributing Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
1. Introduction
This document describes a YANG [RFC6020] data model for MPLS and
traffic engineering, covering label switched path (LSP)
configuration, as well as signaling protocol configuration. The
model is intended to be vendor-neutral, in order to allow operators
to manage MPLS in heterogeneous environments with physical or virtual
devices (routers, switches, servers, etc.) supplied by multiple
vendors. The model is also intended to be readily mapped to existing
implementations, to facilitate support from as large a set of routing
hardware and software vendors as possible.
1.1. Goals and approach
The focus area of the model in this revision, is to set forth a
framework for MPLS, with hooks into which information specific to
various signaling-protocols can be added. The framework is built
around functionality from a network operator perspective rather than
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
a signaling protocol-centric approach. For example, a traffic-
engineered LSP will have configuration relating to its path
computation method, regardless of whether it is signaled with RSVP-TE
or with segment routing. Thus, rather than creating separate per-
signaling protocol models and trying to stitch them under a common
umbrella, this framework focuses on functionality, and adds signaling
protocol-specific information under it where applicable.
This model does not aim to be feature complete (i.e., cover all
possible aspects or features of MPLS). Rather its development is
driven by examination of actual production configurations in use
across a number of operator network deployments.
Configuration items that are deemed to be widely available in
existing major implementations are included in the model. Those
configuration items that are only available from a single
implementation are omitted from the model with the expectation they
will be available in companion modules that augment the current
model. This allows clarity in identifying data that is part of the
vendor-neutral model.
An important aspect of the model is the representation of operational
state data. This draft takes the approach described in
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate] and models configuration and
operational state together. Thus, rather than building a separate
tree of operational state, the operational state and configuration
data are located in parallel containers at the leaves of the data
model. This approach allows easy reuse of groupings across models,
as well as making it easier to correlate configuration and state.
The consolidated MPLS model encompasses the signaling protocols,
label-switched paths (configuration and operational state), and
generic TE attributes. The model is designed from an operational and
functional perspective, rather than focusing on protocol-centric
configuration. This allows protocol-independent functions to be
logically separated from protocol-specific details.
One question that arises in this approach is how the consolidated
model is integrated with routing instances (e.g., VRFs). This model
should be considered as part of a higher level network device model
which includes definitions for other routing protocols and system
services. For example, in [I-D.openconfig-netmod-model-structure],
VRFs and other logical instances are defined with MPLS/TE components
within VRFs as appropriate. In particular, some parts of the MPLS
model would be instantiated within a VRF, while other parts would
have common definitions across VRFs.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Where possible, naming in the model follows conventions used in
available standards documents, and otherwise tries to be self-
explanatory with sufficient descriptions of the intended behavior.
Similarly, configuration data value constraints and default values,
where used, are based on recommendations in current standards
documentation. Since implementations vary widely in this respect,
this version of the model specifies only a limited set of defaults
and ranges with the expectation of being more prescriptive in future
versions based on actual operator use.
Note that this version of the model is a work-in-progress in several
respects. Although we present a complete framework for MPLS and
traffic engineering from an operational perspective, some signaling
protocol configuration will be completed in future revisions. The
current revision has focus on traffic engineered LSPs signaled with
RSVP.
2. Model overview
The overall MPLS model is defined across several YANG modules and
submodules but at a high level is organized into 4 main sections:
o global -- configuration affecting MPLS behavior which exists
independently of the underlying signaling protocol or label
switched path configuration.
o te-global-attributes -- configuration affecting MPLS-TE behavior
which exists independently of the underlying signaling protocol or
label switched path configuration.
o signaling protocols -- configuration specific to signaling
protocols used to setup and manage label switched paths.
o label switched paths -- configuration specific to instantiating
and managing individual label switched paths.
The top level of the model is shown in the tree view below:
+--rw mpls!
+--rw global
| ...
+--rw te-global-attributes
| ...
+--rw signaling-protocols
| ...
+--rw lsps
...
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
2.1. MPLS global
The global section of the framework provides configuration data for
MPLS items which exist independently of an individual label switched
path or signaling protocol and are applicable to the MPLS protocol
itself. Items such as the depth of the label stack supported, or
specific label ranges may be included here.
2.2. TE global attributes
The TE global attributes section of the framework provides
configuration control for MPLS-TE items which exist independently of
an individual label switched path or signaling protocol. These
standalone items are applicable to the entire logical routing device,
and establish fundamental configuration such as the threshold for
interface bandwidth change that triggers update events into the IGP
traffic engineering database (TED). Timers are also specified which
determine the length of time an LSP must be present before being
considered viable for forwarding use (te-lsp-install-delay), and the
length of time between LSP teardown and removal of the LSP from the
network element's forwarding information base (te-lsp-cleanup-delay).
Also specified are the name to value mappings of MPLS administrative
groups (mpls-admin-groups) and shared risk link groups (mpls-te-
srlg).
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw te-global-attributes
| +--rw mpls-te-srlg
| | +--rw srlg* [srlg-name]
| | +--rw srlg-name leafref
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw srlg-name? string
| | | +--rw srlg-value? uint32
| | | +--rw srlg-cost? uint32
| | +--ro state
...
| | +--rw members-list* [from-address]
| | +--rw from-address leafref
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw from-address? inet:ip-address
| | | +--rw to-address? inet:ip-address
...
| +--rw igp-flooding-bandwidth
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw threshold-type? enumeration
| | | +--rw delta-percentage? oc-types:percentage
| | | +--rw threshold-specification? enumeration
| | | +--rw up-thresholds* oc-types:percentage
| | | +--rw down-thresholds* oc-types:percentage
| | | +--rw up-down-thresholds* oc-types:percentage
| | +--ro state
...
| +--rw mpls-admin-groups
| | +--rw admin-group* [admin-group-name]
| | +--rw admin-group-name leafref
| | +--rw config
| | | +--rw admin-group-name? string
| | | +--rw admin-group-value? uint32
| | +--rw state
...
| +--rw te-lsp-timers
| +--rw config
| | +--rw te-lsp-install-delay? uint16
| | +--rw te-lsp-cleanup-delay? uint16
| | +--rw te-lsp-reoptimize-timer? uint16
| +--ro state
...
2.3. TE interface attributes overview
The TE interface attributes section of the framework provides
configuration and state related to traffic engineering such as te-
metric or shared risk link group configuration.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw te-intf-attributes
| +--rw interface* [interface-name]
| +--rw interface-name leafref
| +--rw config
| | +--rw interface-name? ocif:interface-ref
| | +--rw te-metric? uint32
| | +--rw srlg* [srlg-name]
...
| | +--rw admin-group* [admin-group-name]
...
| | +--rw igp-flooding-bandwidth
...
| +--ro state
...
2.4. Signaling protocol overview
The signaling protocol section of the framework provides
configuration elements for configuring three major methods of
signaling label switched paths: RSVP-TE, segment routing, and label
distribution protocol (LDP). BGP-LU will be included in a future
version of this draft by definitions in the BGP model
([I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model]) and corresponding augmentations to the
MPLS model.
+--rw signaling-protocols
| +--rw rsvp-te
| ...
| +--rw segment-routing
| ...
| +--rw ldp
| ...
Configuration of RSVP-TE is centered around interfaces on the device
which participate in the protocol. A key focus is to expose common
RSVP-TE configuration parameters which are used to enhance scale and
reliability. Items which are applicable globally in the RSVP-TE
protocol such as graceful restart, soft preemption and various
statistics are grouped into a global section under the protocol.
RSVP neighbor and session state are also available in the RSVP
section.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw rsvp-te
| | +--rw rsvp-sessions
| | | +--rw config
| | | +--ro state
| | | +--ro rsvp-session* [source-port destination-port
source-address destination-address]
...
| | +--rw rsvp-neighbors
| | | +--rw config
| | | +--ro state
| | | +--ro rsvp-neighbor* [neighbor-address]
...
| | +--rw global
| | | +--rw graceful-restart
...
| | | +--rw soft-preemption
...
| | | +--ro statistics
| | | +--ro counters
....
| | +--rw interface-attributes
| | +--rw interface* [interface-name]
| | +--rw interface-name leafref
...
| | +--rw rsvp-hellos
...
| | +--rw authentication
...
| | +--rw subscription
...
| | +--rw protection
...
...
Containers for specifying signaling via segment routing and LDP are
also present. Specific subelements will be added for those
protocols, as well as for BGP labeled unicast, in the next revision.
2.5. LSP overview
This part of the framework contains LSP information. At the high
level, LSPs are split into three categories: traffic-engineering-
capable (constrained-path), non-traffic-engineered determined by the
IGP (unconstrained-path), and hop-by-hop configured (static).
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw mpls!
+--rw lsps
+--rw constrained-path
| ...
+--rw unconstrained-path
| ...
+--rw static-lsps
...
The first two categories, constrained-path and unconstrained-path are
the ones for which multiple signaling protocols exist, and are
organized in protocol-specific and protocol-independent sections.
For example, traffic-engineered (constrained path) LSPs may be set up
using RSVP-TE or segment routing, and unconstrained LSPs that follow
the IGP path may be signaled with LDP or with segment routing. IGP-
determined LSPs may also be signaled by RSVP but this usage is not
considered in the current version of the model.
A portion of the data model for constrained path traffic-engineered
LSPs signaled with RSVP is shown below. It contains configuration
for named explicit paths and for tunnels. Tunnel configuration
differs for p2p and p2mp LSPs. In either case, some part of the
model is signaling-protocol independent. For example for a p2p LSP,
attributes such as the path computation method, the constraints for
the the path, the bandwidth allocated to it, and even the frequency
of reoptimization are signaling-protocol independent, while other
data, such as the setup and hold priorities are protocol-specific and
are specified in the protocol specific part of the model.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw mpls!
+--rw lsps
+--rw constrained-path
| +--rw explicit-path* [name]
...
| +--rw tunnel* [name type]
| +--rw name leafref
| +--rw type leafref
| +--rw config
| | +--rw name? string
| | +--rw type? identityref
| | +--rw local-id? union
| | +--rw description? string
| | +--rw admin-status? identityref
| | +--rw preference? uint8
| | +--rw metric? te-metric-type
| | +--rw (bandwidth)?
...
| | +--rw protection-style-requested? identityref
| | +--rw te-lsp-reoptimize-timer? uint16
| | +--rw (signaling-specific-tunnel-attributes)?
| | | +--:(RSVP)
| | | +--rw source? inet:ip-address
| | | +--rw soft-preemption? boolean
| | +--rw (tunnel-type)?
| | +--:(p2p)
| | | +--rw destination? inet:ip-address
| | | +--rw primary-paths* [name]
| | | | +--rw name string
| | | | +--rw preference? uint8
| | | | +--rw path-computation-method
...
| | | | +--rw admin-groups
...
| | | | +--rw no-cspf? empty
| | | | +--rw (sigaling-specific-path-attributes)?
| | | | +--:(RSVP)
| | | | | +--rw setup-priority? uint8
| | | | | +--rw hold-priority? uint8
| | | | | +--rw retry-timer? uint16
| | | | +--:(SR)
| | | | +--rw sid-selection-mode? enumeration
| | | | +--rw sid-protection-required? boolean
| | | +--rw secondary-paths* [name]
...
| +--ro state
...
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Similarly, the partial model for non-traffic-engineered, or IGP-
based, LSPs is shown below:
+--rw mpls!
+--rw lsps
+--rw unconstrained-path
+--rw path-setup-protocol
+--rw ldp!
| ...
+--rw segment-routing!
...
3. Example use cases
3.1. Traffic engineered p2p LSP signaled with RSVP
A possible scenario may be the establishment of a mesh of traffic-
engineered LSPs where RSVP signaling is desired, and the LSPs use a
local constrained path calculation to determine their path. These
LSPs would fall into the category of a constrained-path LSP, and the
tunnel type is p2p. Attributes such as metric, bandwidth or the
style of protection desired are also defined at this (protocol-
independent) level in the model. The path is defined to be locally-
computed under the path-computation-method container, specifying the
use of CSPF (use-cspf). Additional attributes for the path, such as
its RSVP priorities are specified at the path level under the
protocol-specific stanza.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
+--rw mpls!
+--rw lsps
+--rw constrained-path
...
| +--rw tunnel* [name type]
| +--rw name leafref
| +--rw type leafref
| +--rw config
| | +--rw name? string
| | +--rw type? identityref
| | +--rw metric? te-metric-type
| | +--rw (bandwidth)?
...
| | +--rw protection-style-requested? identityref
| | +--rw te-lsp-reoptimize-timer? uint16
...
| | +--rw (tunnel-type)?
| | +--:(p2p)
| | | +--rw destination? inet:ip-address
| | | +--rw primary-paths* [name]
| | | | +--rw name string
| | | | +--rw preference? uint8
| | | | +--rw path-computation-method
...
| | | | +--rw admin-groups
...
| | | | +--rw no-cspf? empty
| | | | +--rw (sigaling-specific-path-attributes)?
| | | | +--:(RSVP)
| | | | | +--rw setup-priority? uint8
| | | | | +--rw hold-priority? uint8
| | | | | +--rw retry-timer? uint16
| | | | +--:(SR)
| | | | +--rw sid-selection-mode? enumeration
| | | | +--rw sid-protection-required? boolean
| | | +--rw secondary-paths* [name]
...
| +--ro state
3.2. Traffic engineered LSP signaled with SR
A possible scenario may be the establishment of disjoint paths in a
network where there is no requirement for per-LSP state to be held on
midpoint nodes within the network, or RSVP-TE is unsuitable (as
described in [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] and
[I-D.shakir-rtgwg-sr-performance-engineered-lsps]). Such LSPs fall
in the constrained-path category. Similar to any other traffic
engineered LSPs, the path computation method must be specified. Path
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
attributes, such as the as lsp- placement-constraints (expressed as
administrative groups) or metric must be defined. Finally, the path
must be specified in a signaling- protocol specific manner
appropriate for SR. The same configuration elements from the tree
above apply in this case, except that path setup is done by the head-
end by building a label stack, rather than signaled.
3.3. IGP-congruent LDP-signaled LSP
A possible scenario may be the establishment of a full mesh of LSPs.
When traffic engineering is not an objective, no constraints are
placed on the end-to-end path, and the best- effort path can be setup
using LDP signaling simply for label distribution. The LSPs follow
IGP-computed paths, and fall in the unconstrained-path category in
the model. Protocol-specific configuration pertaining to the
signaling protocol used, such as the FEC definition and metrics
assigned are in the path- setup-protocol portion of the model.
The relevant part of the model for this case is shown below:
+--rw mpls!
+--rw lsps
+--rw unconstrained-path
+--rw path-setup-protocol
+--rw ldp!
+--rw tunnel
+--rw tunnel-type? mplst:tunnel-type
+--rw ldp-type? enumeration
+--rw p2p-lsp
| +--rw fec-address* inet:ip-prefix
+--rw p2mp-lsp
+--rw mp2mp-lsp
A common operational issue encountered when using LDP is traffic
blackholing under the following scenario: when an IGP failure occurs,
LDP is not aware of it as these are two protocols running
independently, resulting in traffic blackholing at the IGP failure
point even though LDP is up and running. LDP-IGP synchronization
[RFC5443] can be used to cost out the IGP failing point/segment to
avoid the blackholing issue. The LDP-IGP synchronization function
will be incorporated in a future version of this document.
Note that targeted LDP sessions are not discussed in this use case,
and will be incorporated as a separate use case in a future version
of this document.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
4. Security Considerations
MPLS configuration has a significant impact on network operations,
and as such any related protocol or model carries potential security
risks.
YANG data models are generally designed to be used with the NETCONF
protocol over an SSH transport. This provides an authenticated and
secure channel over which to transfer BGP configuration and
operational data. Note that use of alternate transport or data
encoding (e.g., JSON over HTTPS) would require similar mechanisms for
authenticating and securing access to configuration data.
Most of the data elements in the configuration model could be
considered sensitive from a security standpoint. Unauthorized access
or invalid data could cause major disruption.
5. IANA Considerations
This YANG data model and the component modules currently use a
temporary ad-hoc namespace. If and when it is placed on redirected
for the standards track, an appropriate namespace URI will be
registered in the IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. The MPLS YANG
modules will be registered in the "YANG Module Names" registry
[RFC6020].
6. YANG modules
The modules and submodules comprising the MPLS configuration and
operational model are currently organized as depcited below.
+-------+
+---------------->| MPLS |<--------------+
| +-------+ |
| ^ |
| | |
+----+-----+ +--------+-------+ +-----+-----+
| TE LSPs | | IGP-based LSPs | |static LSPs|
| | | | | |
+----------+ +----------------+ +-----------+
^ ^ ^ ^
| +----------------+ | +--------+
| | | |
| +------+ +-+---+-+ +--+--+
+---+ RSVP | |SEGMENT| | LDP |
+------+ |ROUTING| +-----+
+-------+
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
The base MPLS module includes submodules describing the three
different types of support LSPs, i.e., traffic-engineered
(constrained-path), IGP congruent (unconstrained-path), and static.
The signaling protocol specific parts of the model are described in
separate modules for RSVP, segment routing, and LDP. As mentioned
earlier, support for BGP labeled unicast is also planned in a future
revision.
A module defining various reusable MPLS types is included, and these
modules also make use of the standard Internet types, such as IP
addresses, as defined in RFC 6991 [RFC6991].
6.1. MPLS base modules
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls.yang
module openconfig-mpls {
yang-version "1";
// namespace
namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/mpls";
prefix "mpls";
// import some basic types
import openconfig-mpls-rsvp { prefix rsvp; }
import openconfig-mpls-sr { prefix sr; }
import openconfig-mpls-ldp { prefix ldp; }
import openconfig-types { prefix oc-types; }
import openconfig-interfaces { prefix ocif; }
// include submodules
include openconfig-mpls-te;
include openconfig-mpls-igp;
include openconfig-mpls-static;
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"This module provides data definitions for configuration of
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and associated protocols for
signaling and traffic engineering.
RFC 3031: Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture
The MPLS / TE data model consists of several modules and
submodules as shown below. The top-level MPLS module describes
the overall framework. Three types of LSPs are supported:
i) traffic-engineered (or constrained-path)
ii) IGP-congruent (LSPs that follow the IGP path)
iii) static LSPs which are not signaled
The structure of each of these LSP configurations is defined in
corresponding submodules. Companion modules define the relevant
configuration and operational data specific to key signaling
protocols used in operational practice.
+-------+
+---------------->| MPLS |<--------------+
| +-------+ |
| ^ |
| | |
+----+-----+ +--------+-------+ +-----+-----+
| TE LSPs | | IGP-based LSPs | |static LSPs|
| | | | | |
+----------+ +----------------+ +-----------+
^ ^ ^ ^
| +----------------+ | +--------+
| | | |
| +------+ +-+---+-+ +--+--+
+---+ RSVP | |SEGMENT| | LDP |
+------+ |ROUTING| +-----+
+-------+
";
revision "2015-10-14" {
description
"Work in progress";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
// identity statements
// grouping statements
grouping mpls-admin-group_config {
description
"configuration data for MPLS link admin groups";
leaf admin-group-name {
type string;
description "name for mpls admin-group";
}
leaf admin-group-value {
type uint32;
description "value for mpls admin-group";
}
}
grouping mpls-admin-groups-top {
description "top-level mpls admin-groups config
and state containers";
container mpls-admin-groups {
description
"Top-level container for admin-groups configuration
and state";
list admin-group {
key admin-group-name;
description "configuration of value to name mapping
for mpls affinities/admin-groups";
leaf admin-group-name {
type leafref {
path "../mpls:config/mpls:admin-group-name";
}
description
"name for mpls admin-group";
}
container config {
description "Configurable items for admin-groups";
uses mpls-admin-group_config;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
container state {
description "Operational state for admin-groups";
uses mpls-admin-group_config;
}
}
}
}
grouping mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth_config {
description
"Configurable items for igp flooding bandwidth
threshold configuration.";
leaf threshold-type {
type enumeration {
enum DELTA {
description "DELTA indicates that the local
system should flood IGP updates when a
change in reserved bandwidth >= the specified
delta occurs on the interface.";
}
enum THRESHOLD-CROSSED {
description "THRESHOLD-CROSSED indicates that
the local system should trigger an update (and
hence flood) the reserved bandwidth when the
reserved bandwidth changes such that it crosses,
or becomes equal to one of the threshold values.";
}
}
description
"The type of threshold that should be used to specify the
values at which bandwidth is flooded. DELTA indicates that
the local system should flood IGP updates when a change in
reserved bandwidth >= the specified delta occurs on the
interface. Where THRESHOLD-CROSSED is specified, the local
system should trigger an update (and hence flood) the
reserved bandwidth when the reserved bandwidth changes such
that it crosses, or becomes equal to one of the threshold
values";
}
leaf delta-percentage {
when "../threshold-type = 'DELTA'" {
description
"The percentage delta can only be specified when the
threshold type is specified to be a percentage delta of
the reserved bandwidth";
}
type oc-types:percentage;
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description
"The percentage of the maximum-reservable-bandwidth
considered as the delta that results in an IGP update
being flooded";
}
leaf threshold-specification {
when "../threshold-type = 'THRESHOLD-CROSSED'" {
description
"The selection of whether mirrored or separate threshold
values are to be used requires user specified thresholds to
be set";
}
type enumeration {
enum MIRRORED-UP-DOWN {
description
"MIRRORED-UP-DOWN indicates that a single set of
threshold values should be used for both increasing
and decreasing bandwidth when determining whether
to trigger updated bandwidth values to be flooded
in the IGP TE extensions.";
}
enum SEPARATE-UP-DOWN {
description
"SEPARATE-UP-DOWN indicates that a separate
threshold values should be used for the increasing
and decreasing bandwidth when determining whether
to trigger updated bandwidth values to be flooded
in the IGP TE extensions.";
}
}
description
"This value specifies whether a single set of threshold
values should be used for both increasing and decreasing
bandwidth when determining whether to trigger updated
bandwidth values to be flooded in the IGP TE extensions.
MIRRORED-UP-DOWN indicates that a single value (or set of
values) should be used for both increasing and decreasing
values, where SEPARATE-UP-DOWN specifies that the increasing
and decreasing values will be separately specified";
}
leaf-list up-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'THRESHOLD-CROSSED'" +
"and ../threshold-specification = 'SEPARATE-UP-DOWN'" {
description
"A list of up-thresholds can only be specified when the
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
bandwidth update is triggered based on crossing a
threshold and separate up and down thresholds are
required";
}
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth) at which bandwidth updates are to be
triggered when the bandwidth is increasing.";
}
leaf-list down-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'THRESHOLD-CROSSED'" +
"and ../threshold-specification = 'SEPARATE-UP-DOWN'" {
description
"A list of down-thresholds can only be specified when the
bandwidth update is triggered based on crossing a
threshold and separate up and down thresholds are
required";
}
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth) at which bandwidth updates are to be
triggered when the bandwidth is decreasing.";
}
leaf-list up-down-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'THRESHOLD-CROSSED'" +
"and ../threshold-specification = 'MIRRORED-UP-DOWN'" {
description
"A list of thresholds corresponding to both increasing
and decreasing bandwidths can be specified only when an
update is triggered based on crossing a threshold, and
the same up and down thresholds are required.";
}
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth of the interface) at which bandwidth
updates are flooded - used both when the bandwidth is
increasing and decreasing";
}
}
grouping mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwdith-if {
description "Interface-level group for traffic engineering
database flooding options options";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
container igp-flooding-bandwidth {
description "Interface bandwidth change percentages
that trigger update events into the IGP traffic
engineering database (TED)";
uses mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth_config;
}
}
grouping mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth {
description "Top level group for traffic engineering
database flooding options";
container igp-flooding-bandwidth {
description "Interface bandwidth change percentages
that trigger update events into the IGP traffic
engineering database (TED)";
container config {
description "Configuration parameters for TED
update threshold ";
uses mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State parameters for TED update threshold ";
uses mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth_config;
}
}
}
grouping te_lsp_delay_config {
description "Group for the timers goerning the delay
in installation and cleanup of TE LSPs";
leaf te-lsp-install-delay {
type uint16 {
range 0..3600;
}
units seconds;
description "delay the use of newly installed te lsp for a
specified amount of time.";
}
leaf te-lsp-cleanup-delay {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description "delay the removal of old te lsp for a specified
amount of time";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
}
grouping te-interface-attributes-top {
description
"Top level grouping for attributes
for TE interfaces.";
list interface {
key interface-name;
description "List of TE interfaces";
leaf interface-name {
type leafref {
path "../config/interface-name";
require-instance true;
}
description "The interface name";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to TE interfaces:";
uses te-interface-attributes-config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State parameters related to TE interfaces";
uses te-interface-attributes-config;
}
}
}
grouping te-interface-attributes-config {
description "global level definitions for interfaces
on which TE is run";
leaf interface-name {
type ocif:interface-ref;
description "reference to interface name";
}
leaf te-metric {
type uint32;
description "TE specific metric for the link";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
list srlg {
key srlg-name;
description "list of shared risk link groups on the
interface";
leaf srlg-name {
type string;
description "The SRLG group identifier";
}
}
list admin-group {
key admin-group-name;
description "list of admin groups on the
interface";
leaf admin-group-name {
type string;
description "The admin group identifier";
}
}
uses mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwdith-if;
}
grouping mpls-te-lsp-timers {
description
"Grouping for traffic engineering timers";
container te-lsp-timers {
description
"definition for delays associated with setup
and cleanup of TE LSPs";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters related
to timers for TE LSPs";
uses te_lsp_delay_config;
uses te-tunnel-reoptimize_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State related to timers for TE LSPs";
uses te_lsp_delay_config;
uses te-tunnel-reoptimize_config;
}
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
container mpls {
presence "top-level container for MPLS config and operational
state";
description "Anchor point for mpls configuration and operational
data";
container global {
// entropy label support, label ranges will be added here.
description "general mpls configuration applicable to any
type of LSP and signaling protocol - label ranges,
entropy label supportmay be added here";
}
container te-global-attributes {
description "traffic-engineering global attributes";
uses mpls-te-srlg-top;
uses mpls-te-igp-flooding-bandwidth;
uses mpls-admin-groups-top;
uses mpls-te-lsp-timers;
}
container te-intf-attributes {
description "traffic engineering attributes specific
for interfaces";
uses te-interface-attributes-top;
}
container signaling-protocols {
description "top-level signaling protocol configuration";
uses rsvp:rsvp-global;
uses sr:sr-global;
uses ldp:ldp-global;
}
container lsps {
description "LSP definitions and configuration";
container constrained-path {
description "traffic-engineered LSPs supporting different
path computation and signaling methods";
uses explicit-paths-top;
uses te-tunnels-top;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
container unconstrained-path {
description "LSPs that use the IGP-determined path, i.e., non
traffic-engineered, or non constrained-path";
uses igp-lsp-common;
uses igp-lsp-setup;
}
container static-lsps {
description "statically configured LSPs, without dynamic
signaling";
uses static-lsp-main;
}
}
}
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-types.yang
module openconfig-mpls-types {
yang-version "1";
// namespace
namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/mpls-types";
prefix "mplst";
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"General types for MPLS / TE data model";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
revision "2015-10-04" {
description
"Work in progress";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// using identities rather than enum types to simplify adding new
// signaling protocols as they are introduced and supported
identity path-setup-protocol {
description "base identity for supported MPLS signaling
protocols";
}
identity path-setup-rsvp {
base path-setup-protocol;
description "RSVP-TE signaling protocol";
}
identity path-setup-sr {
base path-setup-protocol;
description "Segment routing";
}
identity path-setup-ldp {
base path-setup-protocol;
description "lDP - RFC 5036";
}
identity protection-type {
description "base identity for protection type";
}
identity unprotected {
base protection-type;
description "no protection is desired";
}
identity link-protection-requested {
base protection-type;
description "link protection is desired";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
identity link-node-protection-requested {
base protection-type;
description "node and link protection are both desired";
}
identity lsp-role {
description
"Base identity for describing the role of
label switched path at the current node";
}
identity INGRESS {
base "lsp-role";
description
"Label switched path is an ingress (headend)
LSP";
}
identity EGRESS {
base "lsp-role";
description
"Label switched path is an egress (tailend)
LSP";
}
identity TRANSIT {
base "lsp-role";
description
"Label switched path is a transit LSP";
}
identity tunnel-type {
description
"Base identity from which specific tunnel types are
derived.";
}
identity P2P {
base tunnel-type;
description
"TE point-to-point tunnel type.";
}
identity P2MP {
base tunnel-type;
description
"TE point-to-multipoint tunnel type.";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
identity lsp-oper-status {
description
"Base identity for LSP operational status";
}
identity DOWN {
base "lsp-oper-status";
description
"LSP is operationally down or out of service";
}
identity UP {
base "lsp-oper-status";
description
"LSP is operationally active and available
for traffic.";
}
identity tunnel-admin-status {
description
"Base identity for tunnel administrative status";
}
identity ADMIN_DOWN {
base "tunnel-admin-status";
description
"LSP is administratively down";
}
identity ADMIN_UP {
base "tunnel-admin-status";
description
"LSP is administratively up";
}
// typedef statements
typedef mpls-label {
type union {
type uint32 {
range 16..1048575;
}
type enumeration {
enum IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL {
value 0;
description "valid at the bottom of the label stack,
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
indicates that stack must be popped and packet forwarded
based on IPv4 header";
}
enum ROUTER_ALERT {
value 1;
description "allowed anywhere in the label stack except
the bottom, local router delivers packet to the local CPU
when this label is at the top of the stack";
}
enum IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL {
value 2;
description "valid at the bottom of the label stack,
indicates that stack must be popped and packet forwarded
based on IPv6 header";
}
enum IMPLICIT_NULL {
value 3;
description "assigned by local LSR but not carried in
packets";
}
enum ENTROPY_LABEL_INDICATOR {
value 7;
description "Entropy label indicator, to allow an LSR
to distinguish between entropy label and applicaiton
labels RFC 6790";
}
}
}
description "type for MPLS label value encoding";
reference "RFC 3032 - MPLS Label Stack Encoding";
}
typedef tunnel-type {
type enumeration {
enum P2P {
description "point-to-point label-switched-path";
}
enum P2MP {
description "point-to-multipoint label-switched-path";
}
enum MP2MP {
description "multipoint-to-multipoint label-switched-path";
}
}
description "defines the tunnel type for the LSP";
reference
"RFC 6388 - Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for
Point-to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Paths
RFC 4875 - Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol
- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE
Label Switched Paths (LSPs)";
}
typedef bandwidth-kbps {
type uint64;
units kbps;
}
typedef bandwidth-mbps {
type uint64;
units mbps;
}
typedef bandwidth-gbps {
type uint64;
units gbps;
}
// grouping statements
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
6.2. MPLS LSP submodules
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-te.yang
submodule openconfig-mpls-te {
yang-version "1";
belongs-to "openconfig-mpls" {
prefix "mpls";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
// import some basic types
import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; }
import openconfig-mpls-rsvp { prefix rsvp; }
import openconfig-mpls-sr { prefix sr; }
import openconfig-mpls-types {prefix mplst; }
import openconfig-types { prefix oc-types; }
import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Configuration related to constrained-path LSPs and traffic
engineering. These definitions are not specific to a particular
signaling protocol or mechanism (see related submodules for
signaling protocol-specific configuration).";
revision "2015-10-04" {
description
"Work in progress";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// using identities for path comp method, though enums may also
// be appropriate if we decided these are the primary computation
// mechanisms in future.
identity path-computation-method {
description
"base identity for supported path computation
mechanisms";
}
identity locally-computed {
base path-computation-method;
description
"indicates a constrained-path LSP in which the
path is computed by the local LER";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
identity externally-queried {
base path-computation-method;
description
"constrained-path LSP in which the path is
obtained by querying an external source, such as a PCE server";
}
identity explicitly-defined {
base path-computation-method;
description
"constrained-path LSP in which the path is
explicitly specified as a collection of strict or/and loose
hops";
}
// typedef statements
typedef mpls-hop-type {
type enumeration {
enum LOOSE {
description "loose hop in an explicit path";
}
enum STRICT {
description "strict hop in an explicit path";
}
}
description
"enumerated type for specifying loose or strict
paths";
}
typedef te-metric-type {
type union {
type enumeration {
enum IGP {
description
"set the LSP metric to track the underlying
IGP metric";
}
}
type uint32;
}
description
"union type for setting the LSP TE metric to a
static value, or to track the IGP metric";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
typedef cspf-tie-breaking {
type enumeration {
enum RANDOM {
description
"CSPF calculation selects a random path among
multiple equal-cost paths to the destination";
}
enum LEAST_FILL {
description
"CSPF calculation selects the path with greatest
available bandwidth";
}
enum MOST_FILL {
description "CSPF calculation selects the path with the least
available bandwidth";
}
}
default RANDOM;
description
"type to indicate the CSPF selection policy when
multiple equal cost paths are available";
}
// grouping statements
grouping te-tunnel-reoptimize_config {
description "Definition for reoptimize timer configuration";
leaf te-lsp-reoptimize-timer {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description
"frequency of reoptimization of
a traffic engineered LSP";
}
}
grouping path-placement-constraints {
description
"Top level grouping for path placement constraints";
container admin-groups {
description
"Include/Exclude constraints for link affinities";
uses te-lsp-exclude-admin-group_config;
uses te-lsp-include-any-admin-group_config;
uses te-lsp-include-all-admin-group_config;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
grouping te-tunnel-bandwidth_config {
description "Bandwidth configuration for TE LSPs";
choice bandwidth {
default explicit;
description
"select how bandwidth for the LSP will be
specified and managed";
case explicit {
leaf set-bandwidth {
type uint32;
description
"set bandwidth explicitly, e.g., using
offline calculation";
}
}
case auto {
uses te-lsp-auto-bandwidth_config;
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-auto-bandwidth_config {
description "Configuration parameters related to autobandwidth";
container auto-bandwidth {
description
"configure auto-bandwidth operation in
which devices automatically adjust bandwidth to meet
requirements";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"enables mpls auto-bandwidth on the
lsp";
}
leaf min-bw {
type uint32;
description
"set the minimum bandwidth in Mbps for an
auto-bandwidth LSP";
}
leaf max-bw {
type uint32;
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description
"set the maximum bandwidth in Mbps for an
auto-bandwidth LSP";
}
leaf adjust-interval {
type uint32;
description
"time in seconds between adjustments to
LSP bandwidth";
}
leaf adjust-threshold {
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"percentage difference between the LSP's
specified bandwidth and its current bandwidth
allocation -- if the difference is greater than the
specified percentage, auto-bandwidth adjustment is
triggered";
}
container overflow {
description
"configuration of MPLS overflow bandwidth
adjustement for the LSP";
uses te-lsp-overflow_config;
}
container underflow {
description
"configuration of MPLS underflow bandwidth
adjustement for the LSP";
uses te-lsp-underflow_config;
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-overflow_config {
description
"configuration for mpls lsp bandwidth
overflow adjustment";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"enables mpls lsp bandwidth overflow
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
adjustment on the lsp";
}
leaf overflow-threshold {
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"bandwidth percentage change to trigger
an overflow event";
}
leaf trigger-event-count {
type uint16;
description
"number of consecutive overflow sample
events needed to trigger an overflow adjustment";
}
}
grouping te-lsp-underflow_config {
description
"configuration for mpls lsp bandwidth
underflow adjustment";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default false;
description
"enables bandwidth underflow
adjustment on the lsp";
}
leaf underflow-threshold {
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"bandwidth percentage change to trigger
and underflow event";
}
leaf trigger-event-count {
type uint16;
description
"number of consecutive underflow sample
events needed to trigger an underflow adjustment";
}
}
grouping te-tunnel-metric_config {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description "Configuration parameters related to LSP metric";
leaf metric {
type te-metric-type;
description "LSP metric, either explicit or IGP";
}
}
grouping te-lsp-exclude-admin-group_config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to admin-groups
to exclude in path calculation";
list exclude-groups {
key exclude-admin-group-name;
description
"list of admin-groups to exclude in path calculation";
leaf exclude-admin-group-name {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/te-global-attributes/mpls-admin-groups/" +
"admin-group/admin-group-name";
}
description
"name of the admin group -- references a defined admin
group";
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-include-all-admin-group_config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to admin-groups
which all must be included in the path calculation";
list include-all-groups {
key all-admin-group-name;
description
"list of admin-groups of which all must be included";
leaf all-admin-group-name {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/te-global-attributes/mpls-admin-groups/" +
"admin-group/admin-group-name";
}
description
"name of the admin group -- references a defined
admin group";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-include-any-admin-group_config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to admin-groups
of which one must be included in the path calculation";
list include-any-groups {
key any-admin-group-name;
description
"list of admin-groups of which one must be included";
leaf any-admin-group-name {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/te-global-attributes/mpls-admin-groups/" +
"admin-group/admin-group-name";
}
description
"name of the admin group -- references a defined
admin group";
}
}
}
grouping te-tunnel-protection_config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to LSP
protection";
leaf protection-style-requested {
type identityref {
base mplst:protection-type;
}
default mplst:unprotected;
description
"style of mpls frr protection desired: can be
link, link-node or unprotected.";
}
}
grouping te-lsp-comp-explicit {
description
"definitions for LSPs in which hops are explicitly
specified";
container explicit-path {
description "LSP with explicit path specification";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf path-name {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/lsps/constrained-path/"
+ "explicit-path/config/named-explicit-paths/name";
require-instance true;
}
description "reference to a defined path";
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-comp-queried {
description "definitons for LSPs computed by querying a remote
service, e.g., PCE server";
container queried-path {
description "LSP with path queried from an external server";
leaf path-computation-server {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Address of the external path computation
server";
}
}
}
grouping te-lsp-comp-local {
description "definitons for locally-computed LSPs";
container locally-computed {
description "LSP with path computed by local ingress LSR";
leaf use-cspf {
type boolean;
description "Flag to enable CSPF for locally computed LSPs";
}
leaf cspf-tiebreaker {
type cspf-tie-breaking;
description
"Determine the tie-breaking method to choose between
equally desirable paths during CSFP computation";
}
}
}
grouping explicit-route-subobject {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description
"The explicit route subobject grouping";
choice type {
description
"The explicit route subobject type";
case ipv4-address {
description
"IPv4 address explicit route subobject";
leaf address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "router hop for the LSP path";
}
leaf hop-type {
type mpls-hop-type;
description "strict or loose hop";
}
}
case label {
leaf value {
type uint32;
description "the label value";
}
description
"The Label ERO subobject";
}
}
}
// Explicit paths config somewhat following the IETF model
grouping named-explicit-path_config {
description
"Global explicit path configuration
grouping";
list named-explicit-paths {
key "name";
description
"A list of explicit paths";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"A string name that uniquely identifies
an explicit path";
}
list explicit-route-objects {
key "index";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description
"List of explicit route objects";
leaf index {
type uint8 {
range "0..255";
}
description
"Index of this explicit route object,
to express the order of hops in path";
}
uses explicit-route-subobject;
}
}
}
grouping explicit-paths-top {
description
"common information for MPLS explicit path definition";
list explicit-path {
key name;
description "Explicit path definition";
leaf name {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/lsps/constrained-path/"
+ "explicit-path/config/named-explicit-paths/name";
require-instance true;
}
description "definition for naming an explicit path";
}
container config {
description "configuration for an explicit path";
uses named-explicit-path_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "operational state for LSP path name";
uses named-explicit-path_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-te-srlg_config {
description
"Configuration of various attributes associated
with the SRLG";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf srlg-name {
type string;
description "SRLG group identifier";
}
leaf srlg-value {
type uint32;
description "group ID for the SRLG";
}
leaf srlg-cost {
type uint32;
description
"The cost of the SRLG to the computation
algorithm";
}
}
grouping mpls-te-srlg-members_config {
description "Configuration of the membership of the SRLG";
leaf from-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "IP address of the a-side of the SRLG link";
}
leaf to-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "IP address of the z-side of the SRLG link";
}
}
grouping mpls-te-srlg-top {
description
"Top level grouping for MPLS shared
risk link groups.";
container mpls-te-srlg {
description
"Shared risk link groups attributes";
list srlg {
key srlg-name;
description "List of shared risk link groups";
leaf srlg-name {
type leafref {
path "../config/srlg-name";
require-instance true;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description "The SRLG group identifier";
}
container config {
description "Configuration parameters related to the SRLG";
uses mpls-te-srlg_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State parameters related to the SRLG";
uses mpls-te-srlg_config;
}
list members-list {
key from-address;
description
"List of SRLG members, which are expressed
as IP address endpoints of links contained in the SRLG";
leaf from-address {
type leafref {
path "../config/from-address";
require-instance true;
}
description "The from address of the link in the SRLG";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to the
SRLG members";
uses mpls-te-srlg-members_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters relating to the SRLG
members";
uses mpls-te-srlg-members_config;
}
}
}
}
}
grouping tunnel-path_config {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
description
"Tunnel path properties grouping";
container path-computation-method {
description
"select and configure the way the LSP path is
computed";
leaf path-computation {
type identityref {
base path-computation-method;
}
description "path computation method to use with the LSP";
}
uses te-lsp-comp-explicit;
uses te-lsp-comp-queried;
uses te-lsp-comp-local;
}
uses path-placement-constraints;
leaf no-cspf {
type empty;
description
"Indicates no CSPF is to be attempted on this
path.";
}
choice sigaling-specific-path-attributes {
description "Signaling-protocol specific path attributes.";
case RSVP {
uses rsvp:rsvp-p2p-path-attributes_config;
}
case SR {
uses sr:sr-path-attributes_config;
}
}
}
grouping te-tunnel_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relevant to a single
traffic engineered tunnel.";
leaf name {
type string;
description "The tunnel name";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf type {
type identityref {
base mplst:tunnel-type;
}
description "Tunnel type, p2p or p2mp";
}
leaf local-id {
type union {
type uint32;
type string;
}
description
"locally signficant optional identifier for the
tunnel; may be a numerical or string value";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description "optional text description for the tunnel";
}
leaf admin-status {
type identityref {
base mplst:tunnel-admin-status;
}
default mplst:ADMIN_UP;
description "TE tunnel administrative state.";
}
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
description "Specifies a preference for this tunnel.
A lower number signifies a better preference";
}
uses te-tunnel-metric_config;
uses te-tunnel-bandwidth_config;
uses te-tunnel-protection_config;
uses te-tunnel-reoptimize_config;
choice signaling-specific-tunnel-attributes {
description "Signaling-protocol specific path attributes.";
case RSVP {
uses rsvp:rsvp-p2p-tunnel-attributes_config;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
choice tunnel-type {
description
"Describes tunnel by type type";
case p2p {
leaf destination {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"P2P tunnel destination address";
}
/* P2P list of path(s) */
list primary-paths {
key "name";
leaf name {
type string;
description "Path name";
}
description
"List of primary paths for this
tunnel.";
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
description
"Specifies a preference for
this path. The lower the
number higher the
preference";
}
uses tunnel-path_config;
}
list secondary-paths {
key "name";
description
"List of secondary paths for this
tunnel.";
leaf name {
type string;
description "Path name";
}
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
description
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
"Specifies a preference for
this path. The lower the
number higher the
preference";
}
uses tunnel-path_config;
}
}
case p2mp {
// TODO - complete
}
}
}
grouping te-tunnel_state {
description
"Counters and statistical data relevent to a single
tunnel.";
leaf oper-status {
type identityref {
base mplst:lsp-oper-status;
}
description
"The operational status of the TE tunnel";
}
leaf role {
type identityref {
base mplst:lsp-role;
}
description
"The lsp role at the current node, whether it is headend,
transit or tailend.";
}
container counters {
description
"State data for MPLS label switched paths. This state
data is specific to a single label switched path.";
leaf bytes {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of bytes that have been forwarded over the
label switched path.";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf packets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of pacets that have been forwarded over the
label switched path.";
}
leaf path-changes {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of path changes for the label switched path";
}
leaf state-changes {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of state changes for the label switched path";
}
leaf online-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Indication of the time the label switched path
transitioned to an Oper Up or in-service state";
}
leaf current-path-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Indicates the time the LSP switched onto its
current path. This is reset upon a LSP path
change.";
}
leaf next-reoptimization-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Indicates the next scheduled time the LSP
will be reoptimized.";
}
}
}
grouping te-tunnels-top {
description
"Top level grouping for TE tunnels";
list tunnel {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
key "name type";
description "List of TE tunnels";
leaf name {
type leafref {
path "../config/name";
require-instance true;
}
description "The tunnel name";
}
leaf type {
type leafref {
path "../config/type";
require-instance true;
}
description "The tunnel type, p2p or p2mp.";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters related to TE tunnels:";
uses te-tunnel_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State parameters related to TE interfaces";
uses te-tunnel_config;
uses te-tunnel_state;
}
}
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
6.3. MPLS signaling protocol modules
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-rsvp.yang
module openconfig-mpls-rsvp {
yang-version "1";
// namespace
namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/rsvp";
prefix "rsvp";
// import some basic types
import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; }
import openconfig-mpls-types { prefix mplst; }
import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; }
import openconfig-types { prefix oc-types; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Configuration for RSVP-TE signaling, including global protocol
parameters and LSP-specific configuration for constrained-path
LSPs";
revision "2015-09-18" {
description
"Initial revision";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// typedef statements
// grouping statements
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
grouping mpls-rsvp-soft-preemption_config {
description "Configuration for MPLS soft preemption";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
default false;
description "Enables soft preemption on a node.";
}
leaf soft-preemption-timeout {
type uint16 {
range 0..max;
}
// The RFC actually recommends 30 seconds as default.
default 0;
description
"Timeout value for soft preemption to revert
to hard preemption";
reference "RFC5712 MPLS-TE soft preemption";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-soft-preemption {
description "Top level group for MPLS soft preemption";
container soft-preemption {
description
"Protocol options relating to RSVP
soft preemption";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP
soft preemption support";
uses mpls-rsvp-soft-preemption_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters relating to RSVP
soft preemption support";
uses mpls-rsvp-soft-preemption_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-hellos_config {
description "RSVP protocol options configuration.";
leaf hello-interval {
type uint16 {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
range 1000..60000;
}
units milliseconds;
default 9000;
description
"set the interval in ms between RSVP hello
messages";
reference
"RFC 3209: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for
LSP Tunnels.
RFC 5495: Description of the Resource
Reservation Protocol - Traffic-Engineered
(RSVP-TE) Graceful Restart Procedures";
}
leaf refresh-reduction {
type boolean;
default true;
description
"enables all RSVP refresh reduction message
bundling, RSVP message ID, reliable message delivery
and summary refresh";
reference
"RFC 2961 RSVP Refresh Overhead Reduction
Extensions";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-hellos {
description "Top level grouping for RSVP hellos parameters";
// TODO: confirm that the described semantics are supported
// on various implementations. Finer grain configuration
// will be vendor-specific
container rsvp-hellos {
description "Top level container for RSVP hello parameters";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP
hellos";
uses mpls-rsvp-hellos_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State information associated with RSVP hellos";
uses mpls-rsvp-hellos_config;
}
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-subscription_config {
description "RSVP subscription configuration";
leaf subscription {
type oc-types:percentage;
description
"percentage of the interface bandwidth that
RSVP can reserve";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-subscription {
description "Top level group for RSVP subscription options";
container subscription {
description
"Bandwidth percentage reservable by RSVP
on an interface";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP
subscription options";
uses mpls-rsvp-subscription_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters relating to RSVP
subscription options";
uses mpls-rsvp-subscription_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-graceful-restart_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to RSVP Graceful-Restart";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
default false;
description "Enables graceful restart on the node.";
}
leaf restart-time {
type uint32;
description
"Graceful restart time (seconds).";
reference
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
"RFC 5495: Description of the Resource
Reservation Protocol - Traffic-Engineered
(RSVP-TE) Graceful Restart Procedures";
}
leaf recovery-time {
type uint32;
description
"RSVP state recovery time";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-graceful-restart {
description
"Top level group for RSVP graceful-restart
parameters";
container graceful-restart {
description "TODO";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to
graceful-restart";
uses mpls-rsvp-graceful-restart_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State information associated with
RSVP graceful-restart";
uses mpls-rsvp-graceful-restart_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-authentication_config {
description "RSVP authentication parameters container.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
default false;
description "Enables RSVP authentication on the node.";
}
leaf authentication-key {
type string {
// Juniper supports 1..16 while
// Cisco has a much bigger range, up to 60.
length "1..32";
}
description
"authenticate RSVP signaling
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
messages";
reference
"RFC 2747: RSVP Cryptographic Authentication";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-authentication {
description
"Top level group for RSVP authentication,
as per RFC2747";
container authentication {
description "TODO";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating
to authentication";
uses mpls-rsvp-authentication_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State information associated
with authentication";
uses mpls-rsvp-authentication_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-protection_config {
description "RSVP facility (link/node) protection configuration";
leaf link-protection-style-requested {
type identityref {
base mplst:protection-type;
}
default mplst:link-node-protection-requested;
description
"style of mpls frr protection desired:
link, link-node, or unprotected";
}
leaf bypass-optimize-interval {
type uint16;
units seconds;
description
"interval between periodic optimization
of the bypass LSPs";
// note: this is interface specific on juniper
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
// on iox, this is global. need to resolve.
}
// to be completed, things like enabling link protection,
// optimization times, etc.
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-link-protection {
description "Top level group for RSVP protection";
container protection {
description "link-protection (NHOP) related configuration";
container config {
description "Configuration for link-protection";
uses mpls-rsvp-protection_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description "State for link-protection";
uses mpls-rsvp-protection_config;
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-error-statistics {
description "RSVP-TE packet statistics";
container error {
description "RSVP-TE error statistics";
leaf authentication-failure {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Authentication failure count";
}
leaf path-error {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Path error to client count";
}
leaf resv-error {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Resv error to client count";
}
leaf path-timeout {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Path timeout count";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
leaf resv-timeout {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Resv timeout count";
}
leaf rate-limit {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Count of packets that were rate limited";
}
// TODO - complete the other error statistics
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-protocol-statistics {
description "RSVP protocol statistics";
container protocol {
description "RSVP-TE protocol statistics";
leaf hello-sent {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Hello sent count";
}
leaf hello-rcvd {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Hello received count";
}
leaf path-sent {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Path sent count";
}
leaf path-rcvd {
type yang:counter32;
description
"Path received count";
}
// TODO - To be completed the other packet statistics
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-statistics {
description "Top level grouping for RSVP protocol state";
uses mpls-rsvp-protocol-state;
}
grouping rsvp-global {
description "Global RSVP protocol configuration";
container rsvp-te {
description "RSVP-TE global signaling protocol configuration";
container rsvp-sessions {
description "Configuration and state of RSVP sessions";
container config {
description
"Configuration of RSVP sessions on the device";
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State information relating to RSVP sessions
on the device";
uses mpls-rsvp-session-state;
}
}
container rsvp-neighbors {
description
"Configuration and state for RSVP neighbors connecting
to the device";
container config {
description "Configuration of RSVP neighbor information";
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State information relating to RSVP neighbors";
uses mpls-rsvp-neighbor-state;
}
}
container global {
description "Platform wide RSVP configuration and state";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
uses mpls-rsvp-graceful-restart;
uses mpls-rsvp-soft-preemption;
container statistics {
config false;
description "Platform wide RSVP state, including counters";
// TODO - reconcile global and per-interface
// protocol-related statistics
container counters {
config false;
description
"Platform wide RSVP statistics and counters";
uses mpls-rsvp-global-protocol-state;
uses mpls-rsvp-statistics;
}
}
}
container interface-attributes {
// interfaces, bw percentages, hello timers, etc goes here";
list interface {
key interface-name;
description "list of per-interface RSVP configurations";
// TODO: update to interface ref -- move to separate
// augmentation.
leaf interface-name {
type leafref {
path "../config/interface-name";
require-instance true;
}
description "references a configured IP interface";
}
container config {
description
"Configuration of per-interface RSVP parameters";
leaf interface-name {
type string;
description "Name of configured IP interface";
}
}
container state {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
config false;
description
"Per-interface RSVP protocol and state information";
uses mpls-rsvp-interfaces-state;
container counters {
config false;
description
"Interface specific RSVP statistics and counters";
uses mpls-rsvp-protocol-state;
}
}
uses mpls-rsvp-hellos;
uses mpls-rsvp-authentication;
uses mpls-rsvp-subscription;
uses mpls-rsvp-link-protection;
}
}
}
}
grouping rsvp-p2p-tunnel-attributes_config {
description "properties of RSPP point-to-point paths";
leaf source {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"tunnel source address";
}
leaf soft-preemption {
type boolean;
default false;
description "enables RSVP soft-preemption on this LSP";
}
}
grouping rsvp-p2p-path-attributes_config {
description "properties of RSPP point-to-point paths";
leaf setup-priority {
type uint8 {
range 0..7;
}
default 7;
description
"preemption priority during LSP setup, lower is
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
higher priority; default 7 indicates that LSP will not
preempt established LSPs during setup";
reference "RFC 3209 - RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for
LSP Tunnels";
}
leaf hold-priority {
type uint8 {
range 0..7;
}
default 0;
description
"preemption priority once the LSP is established,
lower is higher priority; default 0 indicates other LSPs
will not preempt the LSPs once established";
reference "RFC 3209 - RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for
LSP Tunnels";
}
leaf retry-timer {
type uint16 {
range 1..600;
}
units seconds;
description
"sets the time between attempts to establish the
LSP";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-neighbor-state {
description "State information for RSVP neighbors";
list rsvp-neighbor {
key "neighbor-address";
description
"List of RSVP neighbors connecting to the device,
keyed by neighbor address";
leaf neighbor-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Address of RSVP neighbor";
}
leaf detected-interface {
type string;
description "Interface where RSVP neighbor was detected";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf neighbor-status {
type enumeration {
enum UP {
description
"RSVP hello messages are detected from the neighbor";
}
enum DOWN {
description
"RSVP neighbor not detected as up, due to a
communication failure or IGP notification
the neighbor is unavailable";
}
}
description "Enumuration of possible RSVP neighbor states";
}
leaf neighbor-refresh-reduction {
type boolean;
description
"Suppport of neighbor for RSVP refresh reduction";
reference
"RFC 2961 RSVP Refresh Overhead Reduction
Extensions";
}
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-session-state {
description "State information for RSVP TE sessions";
list rsvp-session {
key "source-port destination-port
source-address destination-address";
description "List of RSVP sessions";
leaf source-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Origin address of RSVP session";
}
leaf destination-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description "Destination address of RSVP session";
}
leaf source-port {
type uint16;
description "RSVP source port";
reference "RFC 2205";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
leaf destination-port {
type uint16;
description "RSVP source port";
reference "RFC 2205";
}
leaf session-state {
type enumeration {
enum UP {
description "RSVP session is up";
}
enum DOWN {
description "RSVP session is down";
}
}
description "Enumeration of RSVP session states";
}
leaf session-type {
type enumeration {
enum SOURCE {
description "RSVP session originates on this device";
}
enum TRANSIT {
description "RSVP session transits this device only";
}
enum DESTINATION {
description "RSVP session terminates on this device";
}
}
description "Enumeration of possible RSVP session types";
}
leaf tunnel-id {
type uint16;
description "Unique identifier of RSVP session";
}
leaf label-in {
type mplst:mpls-label;
description
"Incoming MPLS label associated with this RSVP session";
}
leaf label-out {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
type mplst:mpls-label;
description
"Outgoing MPLS label associated with this RSVP session";
}
leaf-list associated-lsps {
type leafref {
path "/mpls/lsps/constrained-path/tunnel/" +
"config/name";
}
description
"List of label switched paths associated with this RSVP
session";
}
}
} //rsvp-session-state
grouping mpls-rsvp-interfaces-state {
description "RSVP state information relevant to an interface";
list bandwidth {
key priority;
description
"Available and reserved bandwidth by priority on
the interface.";
leaf priority {
type uint8 {
range 0..7;
}
description
"RSVP priority level for LSPs traversing the interface";
}
leaf available-bandwidth {
type mplst:bandwidth-mbps;
description "Bandwidth currently available";
}
leaf reserved-bandwidth {
type mplst:bandwidth-mbps;
description "Bandwidth currently reserved";
}
}
leaf highwater-mark {
type mplst:bandwidth-mbps;
description "Maximum bandwidth ever reserved";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
leaf active-reservation-count {
type yang:gauge64;
description "Number of active RSVP reservations";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-global-protocol-state {
description "RSVP protocol statistics which may not apply
on an interface, but are significant globally.";
leaf path-timeouts {
type yang:counter64;
description "TODO";
}
leaf reservation-timeouts {
type yang:counter64;
description "TODO";
}
leaf rate-limited-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "RSVP messages dropped due to rate limiting";
}
}
grouping mpls-rsvp-protocol-state {
description "RSVP protocol statistics and message counters";
leaf in-path-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Path messages";
}
leaf in-path-error-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Path Error messages";
}
leaf in-path-tear-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Path Tear messages";
}
leaf in-reservation-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Resv messages";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
leaf in-reservation-error-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Resv Error messages";
}
leaf in-reservation-tear-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP Resv Tear messages";
}
leaf in-rsvp-hello-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP hello messages";
}
leaf in-rsvp-srefresh-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of received RSVP summary refresh messages";
}
leaf in-rsvp-ack-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of received RSVP refresh reduction ack
messages";
}
leaf out-path-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP PATH messages";
}
leaf out-path-error-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP Path Error messages";
}
leaf out-path-tear-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP Path Tear messages";
}
leaf out-reservation-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP Resv messages";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf out-reservation-error-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP Resv Error messages";
}
leaf out-reservation-tear-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP Resv Tear messages";
}
leaf out-rsvp-hello-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP hello messages";
}
leaf out-rsvp-srefresh-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description "Number of sent RSVP summary refresh messages";
}
leaf out-rsvp-ack-messages {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Number of sent RSVP refresh reduction ack messages";
}
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-sr.yang
module openconfig-mpls-sr {
yang-version "1";
// namespace
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/sr";
prefix "sr";
// import some basic types
import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; }
import openconfig-mpls-types { prefix mplst; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Configuration for MPLS with segment routing-based LSPs,
including global parameters, and LSP-specific configuration for
both constrained-path and IGP-congruent LSPs";
revision "2015-10-14" {
description
"Work in progress";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// typedef statements
grouping srgb_config {
// Matches the "global" configuration options in
// draft-litkowski-spring-yang...
// TODO: request to Stephane for this to be a separate
// grouping such that it can be included.
leaf lower-bound {
type uint32;
description
"Lower value in the block.";
}
leaf upper-bound {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
type uint32;
description
"Upper value in the block.";
}
description
"List of global blocks to be advertised.";
}
grouping srgb_state {
description
"State parameters relating to the SRGB";
leaf size {
type uint32;
description
"Number of indexes in the SRGB block";
}
leaf free {
type uint32;
description
"Number of SRGB indexes that have not yet been allocated";
}
leaf used {
type uint32;
description
"Number of SRGB indexes that are currently allocated";
}
// TODO: where do we put LFIB entries?
}
grouping adjacency-sid_config {
description
"Configuration related to an Adjacency Segment Identifier
(SID)";
// tuned from draft-litkowski-spring-yang
// TODO: need to send a patch to Stephane
leaf-list advertise {
type enumeration {
enum "PROTECTED" {
description
"Advertise an Adjacency-SID for this interface, which is
eligible to be protected using a local protection
mechanism on the local LSR. The local protection
mechanism selected is dependent upon the configuration
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
of RSVP-TE FRR or LFA elsewhere on the system";
}
enum UNPROTECTED {
description
"Advertise an Adajcency-SID for this interface, which is
explicitly excluded from being protected by any local
protection mechanism";
}
}
description
"Specifies the type of adjacency SID which should be
advertised for the specified entity.";
}
leaf-list groups {
type uint32;
description
"Specifies the groups to which this interface belongs.
Setting a value in this list results in an additional AdjSID
being advertised, with the S-bit set to 1. The AdjSID is
assumed to be protected";
}
}
grouping interface_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to a Segment Routing
enabled interface";
leaf interface {
type string;
// TODO: this should be changed to a leafref.
description
"Reference to the interface for which segment routing
configuration is to be applied.";
}
}
// grouping statements
grouping sr-global {
description "global segment routing signaling configuration";
container segment-routing {
description "SR global signaling config";
list srgb {
key "lower-bound upper-bound";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
uses srgb_config;
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to the Segment Routing
Global Block (SRGB)";
uses srgb_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters relating to the Segment Routing Global
Block (SRGB)";
uses srgb_config;
uses srgb_state;
}
description
"List of Segment Routing Global Block (SRGB) entries. These
label blocks are reserved to be allocated as domain-wide
entries.";
}
list interfaces {
key "interface";
uses interface_config;
container config {
description
"Interface configuration parameters for Segment Routing
relating to the specified interface";
uses interface_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"State parameters for Segment Routing features relating
to the specified interface";
uses interface_config;
}
container adjacency-sid {
description
"Configuration for Adjacency SIDs that are related to
the specified interface";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters for the Adjacency-SIDs
that are related to this interface";
uses adjacency-sid_config;
}
container state {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
config false;
description
"State parameters for the Adjacency-SIDs that are
related to this interface";
uses adjacency-sid_config;
}
}
description
"List of interfaces with associated segment routing
configuration";
}
}
}
grouping sr-path-attributes_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to SR-TE LSPs";
leaf sid-selection-mode {
type enumeration {
enum "ADJ-SID-ONLY" {
description
"The SR-TE tunnel should only use adjacency SIDs
to build the SID stack to be pushed for the LSP";
}
enum "MIXED-MODE" {
description
"The SR-TE tunnel can use a mix of adjacency
and prefix SIDs to build the SID stack to be pushed
to the LSP";
}
}
default "MIXED-MODE";
description
"The restrictions placed on the SIDs to be selected by the
calculation method for the SR-TE LSP";
}
leaf sid-protection-required {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"When this value is set to true, only SIDs that are
protected are to be selected by the calculating method
for the SR-TE LSP.";
}
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
grouping sr_fec-address_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to a FEC that is to be
advertised by Segment Routing";
leaf fec-address {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description
"FEC that is to be advertised as part of the Prefix-SID";
}
}
grouping sr_fec-prefix-sid_config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to the nature of the
Prefix-SID that is to be advertised for a particular FEC";
leaf type {
type enumeration {
enum "INDEX" {
description
"Set when the value of the prefix SID should be specified
as an off-set from the SRGB's zero-value. When multiple
SRGBs are specified, the zero-value is the minimum
of their lower bounds";
}
enum "ABSOLUTE" {
description
"Set when the value of a prefix SID is specified as the
absolute value within an SRGB. It is an error to specify
an absolute value outside of a specified SRGB";
}
}
default "INDEX";
description
"Specifies how the value of the Prefix-SID should be
interpreted - whether as an offset to the SRGB, or as an
absolute value";
}
leaf node-flag {
type boolean;
description
"Specifies that the Prefix-SID is to be treated as a Node-SID
by setting the N-flag in the advertised Prefix-SID TLV in the
IGP";
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
leaf last-hop-behavior {
type enumeration {
enum "EXPLICIT-NULL" {
description
"Specifies that the explicit null label is to be used
when the penultimate hop forwards a labelled packet to
this Prefix-SID";
}
enum "UNCHANGED" {
description
"Specicies that the Prefix-SID's label value is to be
left in place when the penultimate hop forwards to this
Prefix-SID";
}
enum "PHP" {
description
"Specicies that the penultimate hop should pop the
Prefix-SID label before forwarding to the eLER";
}
}
description
"Configuration relating to the LFIB actions for the
Prefix-SID to be used by the penultimate-hop";
}
}
grouping igp-tunnel-sr {
description "defintiions for SR-signaled, IGP-based LSP tunnel
types";
container tunnel {
description "contains configuration stanzas for different LSP
tunnel types (P2P, P2MP, etc.)";
leaf tunnel-type {
type mplst:tunnel-type;
description "specifies the type of LSP, e.g., P2P or P2MP";
}
container p2p-lsp {
when "tunnel-type = 'P2P'" {
description "container active when LSP tunnel type is
point to point";
}
description "properties of point-to-point tunnels";
list fec {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
key "fec-address";
uses sr_fec-address_config;
description
"List of FECs that are to be originated as SR LSPs";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to the FEC to be
advertised by SR";
uses sr_fec-address_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state relating to a FEC advertised by SR";
uses sr_fec-address_config;
}
container prefix-sid {
description
"Parameters relating to the Prefix-SID
used for the originated FEC";
container config {
description
"Configuration parameters relating to the Prefix-SID
used for the originated FEC";
uses sr_fec-prefix-sid_config;
}
container state {
config false;
description
"Operational state parameters relating to the
Prefix-SID used for the originated FEC";
uses sr_fec-prefix-sid_config;
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping igp-lsp-sr-setup {
description "grouping for SR-IGP path setup for IGP-congruent
LSPs";
container segment-routing {
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
presence "Presence of this container sets the LSP to use
SR signaling";
description "segment routing signaling extensions for
IGP-confgruent LSPs";
uses igp-tunnel-sr;
}
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-ldp.yang
module openconfig-mpls-ldp {
yang-version "1";
// namespace
namespace "http://openconfig.net/yang/ldp";
prefix "ldp";
// import some basic types
import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; }
import openconfig-mpls-types { prefix mplst; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Configuration of Label Distribution Protocol global and LSP-
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
specific parameters for IGP-congruent LSPs";
revision "2015-07-04" {
description
"Initial revision";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// typedef statements
// grouping statements
grouping ldp-global {
description "global LDP signaling configuration";
container ldp {
description "LDP global signaling configuration";
container timers {
description "LDP timers";
}
}
}
grouping igp-tunnel-ldp {
description "common defintiions for LDP-signaled LSP tunnel
types";
container tunnel {
description "contains configuration stanzas for different LSP
tunnel types (P2P, P2MP, etc.)";
leaf tunnel-type {
type mplst:tunnel-type;
description "specifies the type of LSP, e.g., P2P or P2MP";
}
leaf ldp-type {
type enumeration {
enum BASIC {
description "basic hop-by-hop LSP";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
enum TARGETED {
description "tLDP LSP";
}
}
description "specify basic or targeted LDP LSP";
}
container p2p-lsp {
when "tunnel-type = 'P2P'" {
description "container active when LSP tunnel type is
point to point";
}
description "properties of point-to-point tunnels";
leaf-list fec-address {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description "Address prefix for packets sharing the same
forwarding equivalence class for the IGP-based LSP";
}
}
container p2mp-lsp {
when "tunnel-type = 'P2MP'" {
description "container is active when LSP tunnel type is
point to multipoint";
}
description "properties of point-to-multipoint tunnels";
// TODO: specify group/source, etc.
}
container mp2mp-lsp {
when "tunnel-type = 'MP2MP'" {
description "container is active when LSP tunnel type is
multipoint to multipoint";
}
description "properties of multipoint-to-multipoint tunnels";
// TODO: specify group/source, etc.
}
}
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
grouping igp-lsp-ldp-setup {
description "grouping for LDP setup attributes";
container ldp {
presence "Presence of this container sets the LSP to use
LDP signaling";
description "LDP signaling setup for IGP-congruent LSPs";
// include tunnel (p2p, p2mp, ...)
uses igp-tunnel-ldp;
}
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-igp.yang
submodule openconfig-mpls-igp {
yang-version "1";
belongs-to "openconfig-mpls" {
prefix "mpls";
}
// import some basic types
import openconfig-mpls-ldp { prefix ldp; }
import openconfig-mpls-sr { prefix sr; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 79]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Configuration generic configuration parameters for IGP-congruent
LSPs";
revision "2015-07-04" {
description
"Initial revision";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
// feature statements
// identity statements
// typedef statements
// grouping statements
grouping igp-lsp-common {
description "common definitions for IGP-congruent LSPs";
// container path-attributes {
// description "general path attribute settings for IGP-based
// LSPs";
//}
}
grouping igp-lsp-setup {
description "signaling protocol definitions for IGP-based LSPs";
container path-setup-protocol {
description "select and configure the signaling method for
the LSP";
// uses path-setup-common;
uses ldp:igp-lsp-ldp-setup;
uses sr:igp-lsp-sr-setup;
}
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 80]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
<CODE BEGINS> file openconfig-mpls-static.yang
submodule openconfig-mpls-static {
yang-version "1";
belongs-to "openconfig-mpls" {
prefix "mpls";
}
// import some basic types
import openconfig-mpls-types {prefix mplst; }
import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; }
// meta
organization "OpenConfig working group";
contact
"OpenConfig working group
netopenconfig@googlegroups.com";
description
"Defines static LSP configuration";
revision "2015-07-04" {
description
"Initial revision";
reference "TBD";
}
// extension statements
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 81]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
// feature statements
// identity statements
// typedef statements
// grouping statements
grouping static-lsp-common {
description "common definitions for static LSPs";
leaf next-hop {
type inet:ip-address;
description "next hop IP address for the LSP";
}
leaf incoming-label {
type mplst:mpls-label;
description "label value on the incoming packet";
}
leaf push-label {
type mplst:mpls-label;
description "label value to push at the current hop for the
LSP";
}
}
grouping static-lsp-main {
description "grouping for top level list of static LSPs";
list label-switched-path {
key name;
description "list of defined static LSPs";
leaf name {
type string;
description "name to identify the LSP";
}
// TODO: separation into ingress, transit, egress may help
// to figure out what exactly is configured, but need to
// consider whether implementations can support the
// separation
container ingress {
description "Static LSPs for which the router is an
ingress node";
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 82]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
uses static-lsp-common;
}
container transit {
description "static LSPs for which the router is a
transit node";
uses static-lsp-common;
}
container egress {
description "static LSPs for which the router is a
egress node";
uses static-lsp-common;
}
}
}
// data definition statements
// augment statements
// rpc statements
// notification statements
}
<CODE ENDS>
7. Contributing Authors
The following people contributed significantly to this document and
are listed below:
Ina Minei
Google
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
US
Email: inaminei@google.com
Anees Shaikh
Google
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
US
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 83]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Email: aashaikh@google.com
Phil Bedard
Cox Communications
Atlanta, GA 30319
US
Email: phil.bedard@cox.com
8. Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for valuable contributions to this document
and the associated models from: Ebben Aires, Deepak Bansal, Nabil
Bitar, Feihong Chen, Mazen Khaddam.
9. References
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model]
Shaikh, A., Shakir, R., Patel, K., Hares, S., D'Souza, K.,
Bansal, D., Clemm, A., Alex, A., Jethanandani, M., and X.
Liu, "BGP Model for Service Provider Networks", draft-
ietf-idr-bgp-model-00 (work in progress), July 2015.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B.,
Litkowski, S., Horneffer, M., rjs@rob.sh, r., Tantsura,
J., and E. Crabbe, "Segment Routing with MPLS data plane",
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-02 (work in
progress), October 2015.
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-model-structure]
Shaikh, A., Shakir, R., D'Souza, K., and L. Fang,
"Operational Structure and Organization of YANG Models",
draft-openconfig-netmod-model-structure-00 (work in
progress), March 2015.
[I-D.openconfig-netmod-opstate]
Shakir, R., Shaikh, A., and M. Hines, "Consistent Modeling
of Operational State Data in YANG", draft-openconfig-
netmod-opstate-01 (work in progress), July 2015.
[I-D.shaikh-idr-bgp-model]
Shaikh, A., Shakir, R., Patel, K., Hares, S., D'Souza, K.,
Bansal, D., Clemm, A., Alex, A., Jethanandani, M., and X.
Liu, "BGP Model for Service Provider Networks", draft-
shaikh-idr-bgp-model-02 (work in progress), June 2015.
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 84]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
[I-D.shakir-rtgwg-sr-performance-engineered-lsps]
Shakir, R., Vernals, D., and A. Capello, "Performance
Engineered LSPs using the Segment Routing Data-Plane",
draft-shakir-rtgwg-sr-performance-engineered-lsps-00 (work
in progress), July 2013.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC5443] Jork, M., Atlas, A., and L. Fang, "LDP IGP
Synchronization", RFC 5443, DOI 10.17487/RFC5443, March
2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5443>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
Authors' Addresses
Joshua George
Google
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy
Mountain View, CA 94043
US
Email: jgeorge@google.com
Luyuan Fang
Microsoft
15590 NE 31st St
Redmond, WA 98052
US
Email: lufang@microsoft.com
Eric Osborne
Level 3
Email: eric.osborne@level3.com
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 85]
Internet-Draft MPLS / TE Model October 2015
Rob Shakir
Jive Communications, Inc.
1275 West 1600 North, Suite 100
Orem, UT 84057
Email: rjs@rob.sh
George, et al. Expires April 21, 2016 [Page 86]
