Internet DRAFT - draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples
draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples
Network Working Group A. Robachevsky
Internet-Draft Internet Society
Intended status: Best Current Practice April 07, 2016
Expires: October 9, 2016
Mandating use of IPv6 in examples
draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-01
Abstract
IPv6 is a successor of the legacy IPv4 protocol. This document
strongly recommends use of IPv6 in examples provided in RFCs.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 9, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Robachevsky Expires October 9, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft I-D April 2016
1. Introduction
IPv6 is a successor of the legacy IPv4 protocol. The expectation is
that in the coming years/decades IPv6 will become a predominant
protocol in the Internet. It would be wise, therefore, to use IPv6
in examples provided in the RFC.
2. Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
[RFC2119].
3. Mandating use of IPv6 in examples in RFCs
When there is a need to provide an example that makes use of IP
addresses, address ranges or prefixes, all IETF documents SHOULD use
IPv6, unless there is a specific limited case for IPv4 only.
In these cases authors SHOULD use addresses from the IPv6 prefix
reserved for documentation purposes [RFC3849]
Authors MAY also provide examples for IPv4 protocol.
4. Examples of use
o IPv6 address
RFC 5952 [RFC5952] section 4 recommends to use the compressed format
for IPv6 address textual representation. For instance, leading zeros
MUST be suppressed, the use of the symbol "::" MUST be used to its
maximum capability and the characters "a", "b", "c", "d", "e", and
"f" in an IPv6 address MUST be represented in lowercase.
So an address 2001:0db8:0a0b:12f0:0000:0000:0000:0001 in the examples
will look like:
2001:db8:a0b:12f0::1
o IPv6 address with a port number
IPv6 addresses including a port number SHOULD use the bracket
notation style [RFC5952]. URI examples containing an IPv6 literal
MUST use enclose it in brackets [RFC3986]:
[2001:db8:a0b:12f0::1]:21
Robachevsky Expires October 9, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft I-D April 2016
https://[2001:db8:a0b:12f0::1]:8088/
o IPv6 prefix
The prefix is appended to the IPv6 address separated by a slash "/"
character as recommended in [RFC4291]:
2001:db8:a0b:12f0::1/64
5. Acknowledgements
This draft was inspired by a presentation by Russ White at NANOG 66
that used IPv6 examples.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
6.2. Informative References
[RFC3849] Huston, G., Lord, A., and P. Smith, "IPv6 Address Prefix
Reserved for Documentation", RFC 3849, DOI 10.17487/
RFC3849, July 2004,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3849>.
[RFC5952] Kawamura, S. and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6
Address Text Representation", RFC 5952, DOI 10.17487/
RFC5952, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5952>.
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February
2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>.
Author's Address
Andrei Robachevsky
Internet Society
Email: robachevsky@isoc.org
Robachevsky Expires October 9, 2016 [Page 3]