Internet DRAFT - draft-rosen-ecrit-ecall
draft-rosen-ecrit-ecall
ECRIT B. Rosen
Internet-Draft NeuStar, Inc.
Intended status: Informational H. Tschofenig
Expires: January 13, 2014 Nokia Siemens Networks
R. Gellens
QUALCOMM Incorporated
July 14, 2013
Internet Protocol-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call
draft-rosen-ecrit-ecall-10.txt
Abstract
This document describes how to re-use the emergency services
mechanisms specified for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) to
accomplishing emergency calling support in vehicles. Profiling and
simplifications are possible due to the nature of the functionality
that is going to be provided in vehicles with the usage of Global
Positioning System (GPS).
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 13, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Overview of Current Deployment Models . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Migration to IP-based Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.1. Service URN Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2. MIME Content-type Registration for
'application/emergencyCall.VEDS+xml' . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.3. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call
Additional Data registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendix A. Matching Functionality with eCall Minimum Set of Data
(MSD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1. Introduction
Emergency calls made from vehicles can assist with the objective of
significantly reducing road deaths and injuries. Unfortunately,
drivers often have a poor location-awareness, especially on urban
roads (also during night) and abroad. In the most crucial cases, the
victim(s) may not be able to call because they have been injured or
trapped.
In Europe the European Commission has launched the 'eCall' initiative
that may best be described as a user-initiated or automatically
triggered system to provide notifications to Public Safety Answering
Points (PSAPs), by means of cellular communications, that a vehicle
has crashed, and to provide geodetic location information and where
possible a voice channel to the PSAP.
The general term for such systems is Automatic Crash Notification
(ACN). ACN systems transmit some amount of data specific to the
incident, referred to generally as "crash data." While different
systems transmit different amounts of crash data, standardized
formats, structures, and mechanisms are needed to provide
interoperability among systems and PSAPs.
This document describes how existing IETF mechanisms are used to
provide the realization of next-generation ACN in general, including
European eCall.
This document registers the 'application/emergencyCall.VEDS+xml' MIME
content-type, and registers the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call
Additional Data registry.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
The Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) is an XML structure defined by
the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and
the National Emergency Number Association (NENA). The 'application/
emergencyCall.VEDS+xml' MIME content-type is used to identify it.
The 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry is
used to construct a 'purpose' parameter value for conveying VEDS data
in a Call-Info header.
Circuit-switched eCall systems transmit crash data as a defined set,
the Minimum Set of Data (MSD) [eCall-MSD].The MSD for circuit-
switched eCall is a binary format defined by CEN, the European
Committee for Standardization. It is expected that CEN will choose
to define the XML schema for the eCall MSD for use in next-generation
systems. Once this done, a MIME content-type (e.g., 'application/
emergencyCall.eCall.MSD+xml') and Emergency Call Additional Data
entry (e.g., 'eCall.MSD') need to be registered for the MSD. Note
that Appendix Appendix A explains how the functionality available in
IETF specifications maps to the functionality required for the MSD of
the mobile circuit switched voice solution.
CEN and/or other entities may define additional sets of data in the
same manor: a standardized format, such as XML, is defined, and a
MIME content-type and Emergency Call Additional Data entry
registered.
An In-Vehicle System (IVS) transmits crash data by encoding it in one
of the standardized and registered formats (such as VEDS or
eCall.MSD) and attaching it to an INVITE as a data block. The block
is identified by its MIME content-type, and pointed to by a CID URL
in a Call-Info header with a 'purpose' parameter value corresponding
to the block.
The mechanisms described here can be used to deploy ACN systems in
general including eCall by providing for emergency calls that are
identifiable as ACN calls or specifically eCall calls and that carry
one or more defined crash data objects.
1.1. Overview of Current Deployment Models
Current (circuit-switched or legacy) systems for placing emergency
calls from vehicles, including automatic crash notification system,
generally use one of three architectural models: Telematics Service
Provider (TSP), direct, and paired handset. These three models are
illustrated below.
In the TSP model the IVS transmits crash data to the TSP using
proprietary means. The TSP operator bridges in the PSAP and
communicates location, crash, and other data to the call taker
verbally (there is a three-way voice call between the vehicle, the
TSP, and the PSAP).
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
///----\\\ proprietary +------+ 911 trunk +------+
||| IVS |||-------------->+ TSP +------------------>+ PSAP |
\\\----/// crash data +------+ +------+
In the paired model the IVS uses a Bluetooth link to a previously-
paired handset to establish an emergency call with the PSAP and then
communicates location data to the PSAP via text-to-speech; crash data
is not conveyed.
++
///----\\\ || 911 voice call via handset +------+
||| IVS |||--->|+----------------------------------->+ PSAP |
\\\----/// ++ location via text-to-speech +------+
In the direct model the IVS communicates crash data to the PSAP via
the eCall in-band modem (in the voice call).
///----\\\ 112/911 voice call via IVS +------+
||| IVS |||---------------------------------------->+ PSAP |
\\\----/// crash data via eCall in-band modem +------+
1.2. Migration to IP-based Models
The migration to next-generation (all-IP) would then look like as
follows.
In the TSP model The IVS transmits crash data to the TSP using either
proprietary or standard means. The TSP bridges in the PSAP and
transmits crash and other data to the PSAP using IETF specifications.
There is a three-way call between the vehicle, the TSP, and the PSAP.
proprietary
///----\\\ or standard +------+ standard +------+
IVS ------------->+ TSP +------------------->+ PSAP |
\\\----/// crash data +------+ crash + other data +------+
In the paired model, the IVS uses a Bluetooth link to a previously-
paired handset to establish an emergency call with the PSAP; it is
not clear what facilities are or will be available for transmitting
crash data.
++
///----\\\ || IP-based Emergency Call +------+
IVS --->|+----------------------------------->+ PSAP |
\\\----/// ++ +------+
In the direct model the IVS communicates crash data to PSAP using
Internet protocols.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
///----\\\ NG1-1-2/NG9-1-1 call +------+
IVS ----------------------------------------->+ PSAP |
\\\----/// crash data +------+
This document is focused on the interface to the PSAP, that is, how
an emergency call (including location and crash data) is setup and
data is transmitted to the PSAP using existing IETF specifications.
The goal is to re-use existing specifications rather than to invent
new. For the direct model (such as the European eCall), this is the
end-to-end description. For the TSP model, this describes the right-
hand side, leaving the left-hand side up to the entities involved
(e.g., IVS and TSP vendors) who are then free to use the same
mechanism as for the right-hand side or not.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
This document re-uses terminology defined in Section 3 of [RFC5012].
Additionally, we use the following abbreviations:
IVS: In-Vehicle System
TSP: Telematics Service Provider
MSD: Minimum Set of Data
VEDS: Vehicle Emergency Data Set
NENA: National Emergency Number Association
APCO: Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials
CEN: European Committee for Standardization
ESInet: Emergency Services IP network
3. Profile
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
In the context of emergncy calls placed from a vehicle it is assumed
that the car is equipped with a built-in GPS receiver. For this
reason only geodetic location information will be sent within an
emergency call. The following location shapes MUST be implemented:
2d and 3d Point (see Section 5.2.1 of [RFC5491]), Circle (see Section
5.2.3 of [RFC5491]), and Ellipsoid (see Section 5.2.7 of [RFC5491]).
The coordinate reference systems (CRS) specified in [RFC5491] are
also mandatory for this document. The <direction> element, as
defined in [RFC5962] which indicates the direction of travel of the
vehicle, is important for dispatch and hence it MUST be included in
the PIDF-LO . The <heading> element specified in [RFC5962] MUST be
implemented and MAY be included.
This specification also inherits the ability to utilize test call
functionality from Section 15 of [RFC6881].
4. Example
Figure 7 shows an emergency call placed from a vehicle whereby
location information information is directly attached to the SIP
INVITE message itself. The call uses the request URI
'urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic' service URN and is recognized as an
emergency call because the request URI starts with 'urn:service:sos'.
The VoIP provider routes the call to an Emergency services IP Network
(ESInet), as for any emergency call. The ESInet routes the call to
an appropriate PSAP using location information and the fact that that
it is an eCall carrying crash data. (In deployments where there is
no ESInet, the VoIP provider may route directly to an appropriate
PSAP.) The emergency call continues towards the PSAP and in this
example it hits the ESRP, as the entry point to the ESInet. Finally,
the emergency call will be received by a call taker and first
reponders will be dispatched.
+--------+
| LoST |
| Server | +-----------------------------------------+
+--------+ | |
^ | +-------+ |
| | | PSAP2 | |
| | +-------+ |
v | |
+-------+ | +------+ +-------+ |
Vehicle ------>| Proxy |--+->| ESRP |---->| PSAP1 |-----> Call-Taker|
+-------+ | +------+ +-------+ |
| |
| +-------+ |
| | PSAP3 | |
| +-------+ |
| |
| |
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
| |
| ESInet |
+-----------------------------------------+
The example, shown in Figure 8, illustrates a SIP emergency call
eCall INVITE that is being conveyed with location information encoded
in a PIDF-LO and VEDS data.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
INVITE urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic SIP/2.0
To: urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic
From: <sip:+13145551111@example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl
Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com
Geolocation: <cid:target123@example.com>
Geolocation-Routing: no
Call-Info: cid:1234567890@atlanta.example.com;
purpose=emergencyCallData.VEDS
Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml
CSeq: 31862 INVITE
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=boundary1
Content-Length: ...
--boundary1
Content-Type: application/sdp
...Session Description Protocol (SDP) goes here
--boundary1
Content-Type: application/pidf+xml
Content-ID: <target123@atlanta.example.com>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<presence
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"
xmlns:dyn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:dynamic"
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"
entity="sip:+13145551111@example.com">
<dm:device id="123">
<gp:geopriv>
<gp:location-info>
<gml:Point srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">
<gml:pos>-34.407 150.883</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
<dyn:Dynamic>
<dyn:heading>278</dyn:heading>
<dyn:direction><dyn:direction>
</dyn:Dynamic>
</gp:location-info>
<gp:usage-rules/>
<method>gps</method>
</gp:geopriv>
<timestamp>2012-04-5T10:18:29Z</timestamp>
<dm:deviceID>1M8GDM9A_KP042788</dm:deviceID>
</dm:device>
</presence>
--boundary1
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
Content-Type: application/emergencyCall.VEDS+xml
Content-ID: 1234567890@atlanta.example.com
...eCall VEDS data object goes here
--boundary1--
5. Security Considerations
This document does not raise security considerations beyond those
described in [RFC5069]. As with emergency service systems with end
host provided location information there is the possibility that that
location is incorrect, either intentially (in case of an a denial of
service attack against the emergency services infrastructure) or due
to a malfunctioning devices. The reader is referred to [I-D.ietf-
ecrit-trustworthy-location] for a discussion of some of these
vulnerabilities.
6. IANA Considerations
6.1. Service URN Registration
IANA is requested to register the URN 'urn:service:sos.ecall' under
the sub-services 'sos' registry defined in Section 4.2 of [RFC5031].
This service identifier reaches a public safety answering point
(PSAP), which in turn dispatches aid appropriate to the emergency
related to accidents of vehicles. Two sub-services are registered as
well, namely
urn:service:sos.ecall.manual
This service URN indicates that an eCall had been triggered based
on the manual interaction of the driver or a passenger.
urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic
This service URN indicates that an eCall had been triggered
automatically, for example, due to a crash. No human involvement
was detected.
6.2. MIME Content-type Registration for 'application/
emergencyCall.VEDS+xml'
This specification requests the registration of a new MIME type
according to the procedures of RFC 4288 [RFC4288] and guidelines in
RFC 3023 [RFC3023].
MIME media type name: application
MIME subtype name: emergencyCall.VEDS+xml
Mandatory parameters: none
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
Optional parameters: charset
Indicates the character encoding of enclosed XML.
Encoding considerations: Uses XML, which can employ 8-bit
characters, depending on the character encoding used. See Section
3.2 of RFC 3023 [RFC3023].
Security considerations: This content type is designed to carry
vehicle crash data during an emergency call. This data may
contains personal information including vehicle VIN, location,
direction, etc. appropriate precautions need to be taken to limit
unauthorized access, inappropriate disclosure to third parties,
and eavesdropping of this information. Please refer to Section 7
and Section 8 of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] for more
information.
Interoperability considerations: None
Published specification: [TBD: This specification]
Applications which use this media type: Emergency Services
Additional information: None
Magic Number: None
File Extension: .xml
Macintosh file type code: 'TEXT'
Person and email address for further information: Hannes
Tschofenig, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
Intended usage: LIMITED USE
Author: This specification is a work item of the IETF ECRIT
working group, with mailing list address <ecrit@ietf.org>.
Change controller: The IESG <ietf@ietf.org>
6.3. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional
Data registry
This specification requests IANA to add the 'VEDS' entry to the
Emergency Call Additional Data registry, with a reference to this
document. The Emergency Call Additional Data registry has been
established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data].
7. Contributors
We would like to thank Ulrich Dietz for his help with earlier
versions of the document.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
8. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Ban Al-Bakri,
and Gunnar Hellstroem for their feedback.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[10] Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for
Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031,
January 2008.
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object
Format", RFC 4119, December 2005.
[3] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M. and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV
Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)
Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations",
RFC 5491, March 2009.
[4] Rosen, B. and J. Polk, "Best Current Practice for
Communications Services in Support of Emergency Calling",
BCP 181, RFC 6881, March 2013.
[5] Polk, J., Rosen, B. and J. Peterson, "Location Conveyance
for the Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 6442, December
2011.
[6] Schulzrinne, H., Singh, V., Tschofenig, H. and M. Thomson,
"Dynamic Extensions to the Presence Information Data
Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5962, September
2010.
[7] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media
Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.
[8] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", RFC 4288, December 2005.
[9] Rosen, B., Tschofenig, H., Marshall, R. and R. Randy,
"Additional Data related to an Emergency Call", Internet-
Draft draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-09, May 2013.
9.2. Informative references
[1] Schulzrinne, H. and R. Marshall, "Requirements for
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies",
RFC 5012, January 2008.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
[2] Taylor, T., Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H. and M.
Shanmugam, "Security Threats and Requirements for
Emergency Call Marking and Mapping", RFC 5069, January
2008.
[3] Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H. and B. Aboba, "Trustworthy
Location", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-
location-05, March 2013.
[4] Schulzrinne, H., "Timed Presence Extensions to the
Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status
Information for Past and Future Time Intervals", RFC 4481,
July 2006.
[5] CEN, , "Intelligent transport systems - eSafety - eCall
minimum set of data (MSD), EN 15722", June 2011.
Appendix A. Matching Functionality with eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD)
[eCall-MSD] outlines a number of data elements that are transmitted
in an emergency call triggered by a vehicle. Note that the work on
eCall for mobile circuit switched voice is constrained in a number of
ways since legacy eCall uses an inband voice modem for backwards
compatibility with the already deployed cellular infrastructure to
transmit data from a vehicle to a PSAP. Since the functionality in
this document is based on the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) these
limitations do not exist. As such, it is not useful to transmit the
MSD inband in the voice channel but to rather use the SIP mechanisms
standardized for emergency call handling. Any voice, video, or real-
text communication will be negotiated using the Session Description
Protocol (SDP), as shown in Figure 8, and the actual media stream
will then take place in RTP packets. For transmitting location
information an XML-based data structure had been defined, the so-
called Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO).
The following list compares the eCall minimum set of data with the
functionality provided in this document.
Version of the MSD Format: Conveying information in a SIP-based
emergency call is accomplished by using XML payloads and XML
provides namespace declarations that allow a receipient of that
information to distinguish different versions and additional
extensions. For example, if additional data about a vehicle is
defined and can be transmitted by vehicle then a respective
extension can be defined for use inside a previously-defined XML
structure. One or more top-level structures can be transmitted
using the mechanism defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data].
Selecting the appropriate extension point depends on the type of
extension envisioned.
Message Identifier: Every SIP INVITE message contains a Call-ID,
which is a globally unique identifier for this call.
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
Test Call Indication A service URN starting with "test." indicates a
request for an automated test. For example,
"urn:service:test.sos.ecall.automatic" indicates such a test
feature. This functionality is defined in [RFC6881].
Automatic Activation Indication: This document registers new service
URNs, which allow the differentiation between manually and
automatically triggered emergency calls. The two service URNs
are: urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic and
urn:service:sos.ecall.manual
Vehicle Identification: The PIDF data structure contains a deviceID
field that holds the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN).
Timestamp of Incident Event: The PIDF-LO element contains the
timestamp when the PIDF-LO was created, which is at the time of
the incident.
Vehicle Location: The location of the vehicle is conveyed using the
PIDF location object, as described in Section 3.
Vehicle Direction: The direction of the vehicle is part of location
information, as described in Section 3.
Recent Vehicle Location: With this optional functionality multiple
location objects may be required to be transported simultaneously.
This can be achieved using <timed-presence>, defined in RFC 4481
[RFC4481].
Additional Data: [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] provides the
ability to carry additional data for an emergency call.
While most fields have an equivalent already in the corresponding SIP
emergency signaling payloads there are currently no fields defined in
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] that allow information about the
"Vehicle Type Encoding", "Number of Passengers", and "Vehicle
Propulsion Storage type" to be conveyed. Extensions for those fields
will have to be defined.
Authors' Addresses
Brian Rosen
NeuStar, Inc.
470 Conrad Dr
Mars, PA 16046
US
Email: br@brianrosen.net
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft IP-based In-Vehicle Emergency Call July 2013
Hannes Tschofenig
Nokia Siemens Networks
Linnoitustie 6
Espoo, 02600
Finland
Phone: +358 (50) 4871445
Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at
Randall Gellens
QUALCOMM Incorporated
5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, 92651
US
Email: rg+ietf@qualcomm.com
Rosen, Tschofenig & GellExpires January 13, 2014 [Page 14]
