Internet DRAFT - draft-rosenberg-vcon-cc-usecases
draft-rosenberg-vcon-cc-usecases
Network Working Group J. Rosenberg
Internet-Draft A. Siciliano
Intended status: Informational Five9
Expires: 9 January 2024 8 July 2023
Contact Center Use Cases and Requirements for VCON
draft-rosenberg-vcon-cc-usecases-00
Abstract
This document outlines use cases and requirements for the exchange of
VCONs (Virtual Conversation) within contact centers. A VCON is a
standardized format for the exchange of call recordings and call
metadata. Today, call recordings are exchanged between different
systems within the contact center. Often, these are done using
proprietary file formats and proprietary APIs. By using VCONs,
integration complexity can be reduced.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 9 January 2024.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Types of Supporting Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Quality Management (QM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Speech Analytics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. PII and PCI Redaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Omni Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Deployment Topologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Required Meta-Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
Contact Centers (CC) are a capability provided by companies for the
purposes of engaging with their customers. They are staffed by
contact center agents, whose job it is to handle these interactions.
Interactions include phone calls, emails, texts, and messages
delivered through messaging vendors, such as Facebook Messenger and
WhatsApp. Contact centers are staffed by human agents whose job it
is to handle these interactions. Interactions can be inbound - when
the customer initiates the conversation, such as by calling a toll
free number for the company. Interactions can be outbound, such as
when a company calls a customer for a reminder about an upcoming
appointment.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
Contact centers are implemented through the usage of software
applications. These applications usually include web front ends
consumed by agents, managers, supervisors and other persona in the
contact center. These are supported by backend servers, which
receive the interactions, queue them, distribute them to agents, and
handle agent actions like transfers and holds. This functionality is
sometimes referred to as the ACD - for Automatic Call Distribution.
It is also sometimes called the core, as it represents the primary
application in the contact center. Like much other software, the ACD
was initially deployed on-premise, but has now largely migrated to
cloud-based delivery. These vendors are often called Contact Center
as a Service (CCaaS) vendors.
Within the contact center, there are numerous supporting applications
that are purchased by companies and need to plug in to the core.
These include recording, quality management (QM), and speech
analytics (SA). These applications operate by obtaining recordings,
along with recording meta-data, from the core. Today, these
supporting applications make use of a variety of proprietary APIs to
obtain these recordings and their meta-data. This means that the
integrations vary from vendor to vendor, and result in
incompatibilities, security weaknesses, and lengthy timelines to
complete.
Recently, the IETF has begun to explore the standardization of a file
format for recordings and recording meta-data, called VCON (Virtual
Conversation) [I-D.petrie-vcon]. This document is meant to provide
input to the VCON effort by describing the use cases and requirements
specifically within the contact center.
2. Types of Supporting Applications
In the contact center, there are several different types of
applications which require consumption of recordings. These
typically go under the moniker of Workforce Optimization (WFO). This
section describes the main ones.
2.1. Recording
Call Recording applications receive call recordings from the core,
and then provide long term storage, playback, and search
functionality. Recording storage is needed for archival purposes,
and is often a requirement to meet compliance regulations in certain
industries.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
2.2. Quality Management (QM)
Quality Management (QM) applications are used by contact center
managers to make sure agents are following guidelines on proper
handling of calls. Many consumers are familiar with the greeting
played in voice response systems which say, "This call may be
monitored for quality and training purposes". That greeting refers
specifically to QM applications.
QM applications allow a user to playback recordings for a particular
agent, and then based on that recording, rate them on how they
performed. These ratings are made against a questionnaire that
defines the rubric against which agents are scored. This rubric will
often include questions like, "Did the agent thank the customer for
calling and ask them how they can help"? Or, "Did the agent upsell
the customer on the newest product?". These scorecards are then
shared with the agents and their managers (the supervisors), along
with coaching and training materials to handle cases where the agent
didn't do well. Originally, scoring was done entirely by humans, and
as a consequence, only a handful of calls for each agent could
possibly be scored. These were often done by sampling calls at
random.
It is also common for QM applications to use speech recognition
technology to transcribe calls into text. This allows a call to be
scored more quickly, and enables search functions for selection of
specific calls that would be good candidates for scoring.
A part of the agent role involves usage of corporate applications,
such as ordering, billing, shipping, to handle the customer inquiry.
To determine whether agents are using these tools correctly, it is
common in the contact center for agents to have desktop recording
applications installed. These record the screen content as a video
file. Typically, the vendor of the QM software provides the desktop
screen recording and backend applications which receive and store the
recording. These are then combined with the audio, email, or chat
recordings that come from the core. The following shows the flow of
recordings in this use case:
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
+--------+
|Customer|
+--------+
^ Real Time
| Voice
|
V Recording +--------+
+----+ Transfer +----+ Access |Quality |
|Core+----------->| QM +----------->|Manager |
+----+ +----+ +--------+
^ Real Time ^
| Voice |
| | Desktop
V | Recording
+-------+ |
| Agent |-------------+
+-------+
Figure 1: QM Recording Exchanges
In this flow, the customer calls into the contact center, and is
connected to the core. Typically this is done through the Session
Initial Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261] and the Real-Time Transport Protocol
(RTP) [RFC3550]. The call is delivered to the agent, also typically
using SIP and RTP. The core will record the call, and then at the
end of the call, the recording is transferred to the QM system.
During the call, the agent desktop is recorded, and this recording is
transferred to the QM system. At a later time, the Quality Manager
can log into the QM application, and access the recording, inclusive
of the audio, the transcript and the desktop recording.
In practice, there are many variations on this basic exchange.
Sometimes, the ACD sends the audio portion of the call to the QM
system using real-time streaming, sometimes using SIPREC [RFC7866].
This is then augmented with meta-data using proprietary REST APIs.
In other cases, the audio is sent post-call, and similarly, meta-data
is obtained using proprietary REST APIs. When transcription takes
place, it is most often done by the QM system but not always. In
some cases, a transcript is sent from the core to the QM system
instead of, or in addition to, the audio recording.
In a similar way, the transfer of the desktop recording from the
agent's computer to the QM system can happen in real-time or post-
call. Post-call systems will often upload the recording in chunks,
sometimes doing so after hours or when the agent is not on a call.
A key considering for this use case is the concept of recording
stitching.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
In a typical call in the contact center, there are multiple segments,
each of which represents a phase of the call. There will be a
segment that contains the customer's interaction with the voice
response system, where no agents were present. When the customer is
connected to an agent, there will be a segment representing the
portion of the call where the customer talks to the agent. As the
call is conferenced, transferred or held, each corresponds to an
additional segment.
The process of assembling together these segments into a complete
recording is referred to as stitching. Different stitches are needed
depending on the use case. In a QM use case, the quality manager is
rating the agent, and thus what matters is the call as seen by that
agent. In the case where a call was handled by multiple agents (a
common use case in the contact center), a single call would result in
two separate stitched recordings - one representing the customer's
time with the first agent, and the second with the second agent.
This is different than recording use cases as described above, where
what matters is the entire call as seen by the customer.
2.3. Speech Analytics
Speech analytics applications provide graphs and dashboards on the
content of conversations. For voice calls, this includes metrics
like cross-talk, silence durations, and anger, which are computed
directly from the voice. Voice calls are often transcribed to text,
and further analysis is provided on the text. This might include
customer sentiment, frequency of common reasons for call, and so on.
These tools will also often provide discovery tools, such as word
clouds and clustering.
Speech analytics tools are often used to help companies decide which
calls should be used for quality management. This is an improvement
over pure random based sampling. They are also used to help
companies improve their processes in the contact center, identifying
areas where agents are inefficient. For example, speech analytics
can be used to determine that there has been a spike in customer
refund requests, and the agents are taking too long to handle these
types of calls.
Architecturally, speech analytics look a lot like recording. At the
end of the call, a transcript is sent from the core platform to the
speech analytics platform for processing. Meta-data is then fetched.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
3. PII and PCI Redaction
A common requirement in contact center use cases is the redaction of
payment card information (PCI) and personally identifiable
information (PII) from recordings and transcripts. This happens in
several ways.
For payment cards, it is common for the agent to transfer the call to
dedicated voice response systems whose job is to collect the credit
card numbers and process them. This way, the agent never hears this
information. Furthermore, the system can be configured to pause the
recording so that this particular segment is not recorded. For cases
where the agent does collect the credit card information, it is
common for systems to have a "pause recording" button that can be
triggered manually by the agent to ensure that this content is not
recorded. Another common solution is to instrument the website where
credit card information is entered, so that when the agent places
their mouse into this form, the recording is paused. It would be
useful in the VCON to indicate that this particular section of the
recording was absent for PCI reasons.
It is also a common request to remove PII information, such as first
and last name, street address, email address, and phone numbers, from
recordings and from transcripts. In such cases, it is desirable to
clearly indicate in the transferred recording that this has happened,
so that downstream analytics applications function properly. Just
replacing a first name with "XXX" is likely to confuse a word cloud
tool in a speech analytics application, and make it think that "XXX"
is a common word in the transcript. At the same time, just removing
the PII entirely results in transcripts that are improperly formed
language, making it harder to process by natural language
understanding (NLU) tools.
4. Omni Channel
In contact center, the term "omni channel" is used to refer to the
usage of non-voice communications with a customer. Sometimes, this
means an email exchange or web chat from a widget on a web page. In
other cases, it can involve a combination of voice with these other
technologies. For example, a customer might call into the contact
center, and then the agent uses SMS to send the customer links to
information, or collect information from the customer. In that case,
the overall interaction is composed of a voice segment and an SMS
segment combined together.
In some cases, video is used in contact center applications. Mostly,
this is in support of the "see what I see" case, where the customer
uses the front camera on their mobile phone to show something to the
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
contact center agent. For example, a customer might show the agent a
part that is broken and needs to be replaced, to help the agent
identify which part to send. In other use cases, traditional person-
to-person video is used, in high touch support or sales use cases.
Co-browsing is also used in contact center applications. This is
sometimes used in support situations, where a customer is having
trouble navigating the website. The agent can take control over the
browsing experience and get the customer where they need to be. This
is different than screen sharing use cases common in meetings.
As it relates to recording, all of these additional channels need to
be included in the VCON.
5. Deployment Topologies
As one might imagine, there are a variety of deployment topologies
for these applications, mixing and matching on-premise vs cloud
delivery. The core platform can be delivered on-premise, or via
cloud. The supporting applications can also be delivered on-premise
or via cloud. In the cloud delivery model, they can be co-resident
with the core application (meaning, the vendor of the core service
also deploys and operates the supporting application), or be
delivered via different cloud services.
6. Required Meta-Data
This section enumerates the meta-data which needs to be transferred
from the core application to recording, QM and speech analytics
applications. This represents the information that is transferred
today between the core and supporting applications.
* Interaction Type: This could be audio, screen recording, email,
SMS, web chat, or potentially a combination of multiple ones in
omni-channel use cases
* Interaction ID: a unique identifier for the interaction. This can
get complicated as calls are conferenced (merging) and transferred
(splitting).
* File Type: For the media - what is the encoding and/or container
format
* Media meta-data: Bitrate, channels (typically each participant is
its own channel even in conferencing use cases), the participant
that is the source of the channel, resolution for video and screen
share.
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
* Start time
* Duration
* Direction of call - inbound or outbound
* Details for each participating party, which include
- Participant UUID: A unique identifier for the participant. In
a contact center, this is particular important for the agent,
and must be static across interactions to allow correlation
with the actual agent configuration provisioned into the
systems
- First Name: In cases where the agent information is not
provisioned ahead of time, the recording itself can be used to
push agent configuration from the core into the supporting
application. Basic identifying information is needed so that
(for example) the manager scoring agents can know which agent
the scoring is for.
- Last Name:
- Participant Type: Is this the agent or the customer? Is this
the party that initiated the communications or received it? Is
this the party that initiated the transfer or conference, or
the party that received it?
- Participant Info: In the case of a customer, additional
information about the customer - such as phone number, email,
address, and so on, is often desired in archival use cases.
* PII and PCI Information: Indications on whether data has already
been redacted, and if so, what type of information?
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
* Skill: This is a core concept in contact centers, common across
many vendors. The skill refers to the general purpose of the
call, which is then matched to the expertise of agents that can
handle it. In a simple case, a contact center might have a skill
for sales, one for billing support, and one for technical support.
Each of those three would have different sets of agents. In an
inbound call, the voice response system is used to determine the
customer intent and thus derive the skill. Skill information is
needed in speech analytics applications, and is also useful for
sorting/filtering in recording and QM use cases. The skill name
and skill ID are both desirable. Note that, in transfer
situations, a call can be transferred to a different skill. Thus,
the skill is a property of the segment and not the overall
interaction.
* Campaign: This is another core concept in contact centers, common
across vendors. The campaign is a container for configuration,
such as routing rules, voice response scripts, and so on. A
campaign is typically bound to a phone number or email address.
When an interaction is received, it is immediately mapped to a
campaign to determine how the interaction is processed. Campaign
name and campaign ID are required. Like skills, it is possible
for an interaction to be transferred between campaigns, and thus
this is a property of the segment.
* Transfer Bit Flag: Was this call transferred or not. This is
useful for filtering purposes.
* Conference Big Flag: Was this call conferenced or not.
* Number of conferences: The number of times this call had a
conference during the call. The higher this number, the more
worrisome it is. This is useful for determining which calls to
listen to, for quality purposes.
* Number of transfers: Similar to number of conferences, the more
frequently a call has been transferred, the more problematic it
is.
* Number of holds: The dreaded call hold. The more it happens, the
more concerning it is.
* Hangup Party: Which party initiated the call hangup
* Disposition: This is another core concept, common to most contact
center software vendors. At the end of an interaction, the agent
selects a disposition code which indicates "what was the
conclusion of this". An example disposition might be, "Support,
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft VCON CC Requirements July 2023
Issue Resolved" or "Sales Inquiry, Followup needed". These
dispositions are used for reporting purposes, and also drive
automations. For example, if a contact center agent selects the
followup disposition code, this might trigger an email to be sent
to the sales department asking them to contact the customer. The
disposition includes the name and unique ID.
* Dialing List: For outbound calls, they are typically made against
a list that is imported into the system. The name and ID of the
list is useful for quality management cases.
7. Informative References
[I-D.petrie-vcon]
Petrie, D. and T. McCarthy-Howe, "The JSON format for vCon
- Conversation Data Container", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-petrie-vcon-01, 13 March 2023,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-petrie-vcon-
01>.
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, DOI 10.17487/RFC3550,
July 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3550>.
[RFC7866] Portman, L., Lum, H., Ed., Eckel, C., Johnston, A., and A.
Hutton, "Session Recording Protocol", RFC 7866,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7866, May 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7866>.
Authors' Addresses
Jonathan Rosenberg
Five9
Email: jdrosen@jdrosen.net
Andrew Siciliano
Five9
Email: Andrew.Siciliano@five9.com
Rosenberg & Siciliano Expires 9 January 2024 [Page 11]