Internet DRAFT - draft-sun-v4tov6
draft-sun-v4tov6
Network Working Group C. Xie
Internet-Draft Q. Sun
Intended status: Standards Track Q. He
Expires: April 24, 2014 China Telecom
C. Zhou
Huawei Technologies
X. Li
C. Bao
CERNET Center/Tsinghua
University
October 21, 2013
4to6: The Approach for IPv4-only users to access IPv6-only Content
draft-sun-v4tov6-00
Abstract
Current approaches can not solve the scenario that the users from
IPv4 Internet to access IPv6-only content. When IPv6 content are
becoming more and more popular, it is important to ensure that IPv6-
only content can be reachable from legacy IPv4-only clients via some
IPv4-only network. This document proposes an approach for IPv4-only
users to access IPv6-only content, and can also achieve address
sharing in the server side. It is designed to cover the Scenario 2
in [RFC6144].
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Overall solution architecture for IPv4 Internet to access
IPv6 network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. The Workflow of 4to6 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
1. Introduction
Currently, IPv4 addresses for servers are also facing address
shortage problem. When IPv4 addresses are becoming a more scarce
resource, it will cost more for content providers to keep using so
many IPv4 addresses as today. Besides, the upcoming new
applications, e.g. cloud computing, etc., are consuming more and more
IPv4 addresses. Therefore, it is better for content provider to
upgrade to IPv6 directly.
Scenario 2 in [RFC6144] is important for this use case. Not only
could servers move directly to IPv6 without trudging through a
difficult transition period, but they could do so without risk of
losing connectivity with the IPv4-only Internet. In addition, when
address sharing can be achieved, the content providers can further
save money by requiring less IPv4 addresses and reduce the
operational complexity by using IPv6 single-stack servers. For Data
Center Operators, they can offer service to more ICPs with limited
IPv4 addresses.
There are several requirements in the design:
1.Considering IPv4 address has been a scarce resource, the amount
of public IPv4 addresses consumed by the translator should be less
than that the number of IPv6 servers in the IPv6 network.
2. It should not require extra modifications on the server-side
and on the client-side, e.g. by using a dynamic port number in the
server, implementing a TURN client, etc.
3. It should not require modification on existing DNS
architecture. Otherwise, it would be difficult to deploy in
reality.
Existing solutions have not solved this scenario well. NAT-
PT[RFC2766]can be used in this scenario, but it requires a tightly
coupled DNS Application Level Gateway (ALG) in the translator, and
have been deprecated by the IETF [RFC4966]. The stateless
translation solution [RFC6219] can work too, but since each IPv6
server will consume one IPv4 public address, it is not suitable to
deploy in situation that operators are running out of IPv4 address.
[RFC6156] can be used for IPv4 client to communicate with IPv6
client. But this requires the IPv4 client and IPv6 client to
implement a TURN client. Therefore, it is not suitable for
C-S(Client-Server) and B-S (Browser-Server) mode.
[I-D.rfvlb-behave-v6-content-for-v4-clients] can work for IPv4-only
user to access IPv6 content. But since it uses private IPv4 address
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
to mapping the IPv6 server, it can only be used for IPv4 network to
reach IPv6 network.
This document is designed for IPv4 Internet to reach IPv6 network.
It is not a new protocol, but just to make use of existing protocols
and funtionalities. It can achieve high IPv4 address sharing ratio
for IPv6 servers, and there is no impact on the server/client and
existing DNS architecture.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Terminology defined in [RFC6144] is used extensively in this
document. Besides, this document uses the following terminologies:
IPv6-converted addresses: IPv4 addresses used to represent IPv6 nodes
in an IPv4 Internet. They have an explicit mapping relationship to
IPv6 addresses.
IPv6-converted port: The port number used to distinguish the traffic
destinated to different IPv6 servers from the same IPv4 client.
NAT46: a stateful IPv4/IPv6 translation functionality. It is
consistent with IP/ICMP translation [RFC6145].
3. Overall solution architecture for IPv4 Internet to access IPv6
network
The 4to6 solution is used for IPv4 clients in IPv4 Internet to reach
IPv6 servers . It is designed for HTTP applications specially.
In order to achieve the translation initiated from the IPv4 side, two
addresses need to be determined by NAT46 translator. The first one
is the IPv6-converted address of the IPv6 server, which is is
selected from the IPv4 address pool configured in NAT46. The second
one is the IPv4-converted address for the IPv4 client, which can be
synthetized using the stateless approach defined in [RFC6052].
In HTTP, since the traffic can be redirected to a different service
port, it is able to achieve address sharing for IPv6 servers by using
distinctive port numbers (denoted as IPv6-converted port) in IPv4
client's upstream traffic . Therefore, one IPv4 address can support
up to thousands of IPv6 servers in theory.
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
The overall architecture of the 4to6 solution is depicted in the
following figure.
------- +--------------------+ ------
// \\ | +----------------+ | // \\
/ \ | |Redirect Server | | / \
+---------+ | The IPv4 | | +----------------+ | | The IPv6 | +--------+
| IPv4 | | Internet | | | | Network | | IPv6 |
| Client |--+ +-| +------------+ |--+ +--| Server |
+---------+ | | | | NAT46 | | | | +--------+
\ / | +------------+ | \ /
\\ // +--------------------+ \\ //
------- ------
Figure 1: Overall solution for IPv4 Internet to IPv6 network
It consists of several functionalities:
1. NAT46: This functionality is consistent with [RFC6145]. It keeps
the binding table between the IPv6 server address, IPv6 service port,
IPv6-converted address and IPv6-converted port. When an IPv4 packet
initiated from the IPv4 client arrives at the NAT46, NAT46 will
extract the destination address and the destination port, lookup the
binding table and then translate it to an IPv6 packet. It will take
similar action to the downstream packet from the IPv6 server.
2. Redirect Server: A redirect server is used to redirect traffic to
a different IPv6-converted address and IPv6-converted port. Since
the A record for a given IPv6 server is always the IPv4 address of
the redirect server, the first packet from the IPv4 client will be
routed to the redirect server. The redirect server will return IPv6-
converted address and IPv6-converted port to the client by querying
from the NAT46.
In 4to6 solution, only the first TCP flow will be treated by the
redirect server. The subsequent traffic will be translated directly
by the NAT46.
4. The Workflow of 4to6 Solution
The workflow of this apporach is as follows:
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| IPv4 | | DNS | |Redirect| | NAT46 | | IPv6 |
| Client | | | | Server | | | | Server |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| | | | |
| DNS A request | | | |
| ipv6.example.com | | | |
|----------------->| | | |
| A response with | | | |
| Redirect Ser Addr| | | |
|<-----------------| | | |
| HTTP GET request, with domain name | | |
| in HOST field | Request for | |
|----------------------------------->| IPv4 Dst Addr | Setup mapping |
| |-------------->| table |
|return 302 not found, carry IPv4 dst|Return Add+Port| |
|addr and port in the redirect packet|<--------------| |
|<-----------------------------------| | |
| IPv4 HTTP request with new v4 dst addr | |
|--------------------------------------------------->| Translate to IPv6 |
| |------------------>|
| |<------------------|
|<---------------------------------------------------| |
Figure 2: Workflow of Proxy-lite Approach
1. An IPv4 client initiates a DNS query for A record (e.g.
ipv6.example.com).
2. In DNS server, the address of the redirect server is configured
as the A record for ipv6.example.com and returns to the IPv4 client.
3. The IPv4 client sends HTTP GET request. The domain name (e.g.
ipv6.example.com) is carried in HOST field.
4. The redirect server interprets the domain name, and sends the
request to get IPv6-converted address to NAT46 (carrying the address
of IPv4 client and the destination port). The specific protocol for
the request is now out of scope.
5. NAT46 selects IPv6-converted address and IPv6-converted port by
lookuping the binding table. It will also keep the destination port
in the binding table.
6. NAT46 returns the IPv6-converted address and IPv6-converted port
to redirect server and the redirect server in turn returns IPv6-
converted address in HTTP redirect packet with HTTP error "302 not
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
found".
7. IPv4 client replaces the destination IPv4 address with the
returned IPv6-converted address. The IPv4 traffic is routed to the
NAT46.
8. NAT46 extracts the destination address and destination port in
the IPv4 traffic. It will lookup the binding table maintained in
NAT46 and NAT46 translates the IPv4 packet to IPv6 packet according
to [RFC6145].
5. IANA Considerations
No requirement on IANA.
6. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dan Wing, Fred Baker and Jari Arkko
for their review and comments.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[I-D.rfvlb-behave-v6-content-for-v4-clients]
Rajtar, B., Farrer, I., Ales, V., Li, X., and C. Bao,
"Framework for accessing IPv6 content for IPv4-only
clients", draft-rfvlb-behave-v6-content-for-v4-clients-01
(work in progress), July 2013.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2766] Tsirtsis, G. and P. Srisuresh, "Network Address
Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)", RFC 2766,
February 2000.
[RFC4966] Aoun, C. and E. Davies, "Reasons to Move the Network
Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to
Historic Status", RFC 4966, July 2007.
[RFC6052] Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., Boucadair, M., and X.
Li, "IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators", RFC 6052,
October 2010.
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
[RFC6144] Baker, F., Li, X., Bao, C., and K. Yin, "Framework for
IPv4/IPv6 Translation", RFC 6144, April 2011.
[RFC6145] Li, X., Bao, C., and F. Baker, "IP/ICMP Translation
Algorithm", RFC 6145, April 2011.
[RFC6146] Bagnulo, M., Matthews, P., and I. van Beijnum, "Stateful
NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6
Clients to IPv4 Servers", RFC 6146, April 2011.
[RFC6156] Camarillo, G., Novo, O., and S. Perreault, "Traversal
Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Extension for IPv6",
RFC 6156, April 2011.
[RFC6219] Li, X., Bao, C., Chen, M., Zhang, H., and J. Wu, "The
China Education and Research Network (CERNET) IVI
Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6
Coexistence and Transition", RFC 6219, May 2011.
7.2. Informative References
Authors' Addresses
Chongfeng Xie
China Telecom
P.R.China
Phone: 86 10 58552116
Email: xiechf@ctbri.com.cn
Qiong Sun
China Telecom
P.R.China
Phone: 86 10 58552936
Email: sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn
Qi He
China Telecom
P.R.China
Phone: 86 10 58552332
Email: heqi@ctbri.com.cn
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft IPv4 user to access IPv6 Content October 2013
Cathy Zhou
Huawei Technologies
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518129
P.R. China
Phone:
Email: cathy.zhou@huawei.com
Xing Li
CERNET Center/Tsinghua University
Room 225, Main Building
Beijing 100084
P.R.China
Phone: +86 10 6278 5983
Email: xing@cernet.edu.cn
Congxiao Bao
CERNET Center/Tsinghua University
Room 225, Main Building
Beijing 100084
P.R.China
Phone: +86 10 6278 5983
Email: congxiao@cernet.edu.cn
Xie, et al. Expires April 24, 2014 [Page 9]
