Internet DRAFT - draft-tissa-netmod-oam
draft-tissa-netmod-oam
NETMOD Tissa Senevirathne
Internet Draft Norman Finn
Intended status: Standards Track Deepak Kumar
Samer Salam
Carlos Pignataro
Cisco
June 10, 2014
Expires: December 2014
YANG Data Model for Generic Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance (OAM)
draft-tissa-netmod-oam-01.txt
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 10, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Abstract
This document presents YANG Data model for OAM. It provides a
protocol-independent and technology-independent abstraction of key
OAM constructs. These abstractions span OAM configuration and
operational data; they promote uniformity between OAM technologies
and support nested OAM workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at
different layers through a unified interface).
Table of Contents
1. Introduction...................................................2
2. Conventions used in this document..............................4
2.1. Terminology...............................................4
3. Architecture of OAM YANG Model.................................5
4. Overview of the OAM Model......................................6
4.1. Maintenance Domain (MD) configuration.....................7
4.2. Maintenance Association (MA) configuration................7
4.3. Maintenance Endpoint (MEP) configuration..................8
4.4. rpc definitions...........................................9
5. OAM data hierarchy............................................11
6. OAM YANG module...............................................17
7. Base Mode for IP..............................................33
7.1. MEP Address..............................................33
7.2. MEP ID for Base Mode.....................................34
7.3. Maintenance Domain.......................................34
7.4. Maintenance Association..................................34
8. Security Considerations.......................................34
9. IANA Considerations...........................................35
10. References...................................................35
10.1. Normative References....................................35
10.2. Informative References..................................35
11. Acknowledgments..............................................36
1. Introduction
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) are important
networking functions that allow operators to:
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
1. Configure networks
2. Monitor networks (Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check)
3. Troubleshoot failures (Fault verification and isolation).
An overview of OAM tools is presented at [OAMOVW].
Ping and Traceroute [RFC792], [RFC4443] are well-known fault
verification and isolation tools, respectively, for IP networks. Over
the years different technologies have developed similar tools for
similar purposes.
[8021Q] Connectivity Fault Management is a well-established OAM
standard that is widely adopted for Ethernet networks. ITU-T [Y1731],
MEF Service OAM, MPLS-TP [RFC6371], TRILL [TRILLOAMFM] all define OAM
methods based on [8021Q] CFM.
Given the wide adoption of the underlying OAM concepts defined in
[8021Q] CFM, it is a reasonable choice to develop the unified OAM
framework based on those concepts. In this document, we take the
[8021Q] CFM model and extend it to a technology independent framework
and build the corresponding YANG model accordingly. The YANG model
presented in this document is the base model and supports IP Ping and
Traceroute. The generic OAM YANG model is designed such that it can
be extended to cover various technologies. Technology dependent nodes
and RPC commands are defined in technology specific YANG models,
which use and extend the base model defined here. As an example,
VXLAN uses source UDP port number for flow entropy, while MPLS
[RFC4379] uses IP addresses or the label stack for flow entropy in
the hashing for multipath selection. To capture this variation,
corresponding YANG models would define the applicable structures as
augmentation to the generic base model presented here. This
accomplishes three purposes: first it keeps each YANG model smaller
and manageable. Second, it allows independent development of
corresponding YANG models. Third, implementations can limit support
to only the applicable set of YANG models. (e.g. TRILL RBridge may
only need to implement Generic OAM model and the TRILL YANG model).
All implementations that follow the YANG framework presented in this
document MUST implement the generic OAM YANG model presented here.
The unification of OAM, according to the proposal of this document,
occurs at the management layer. Encapsulations and state machines may
differ according to each protocol. A user who wishes to issues a Ping
command or a Traceroute or initiate a performance monitoring session
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
can do so in the same manner regardless of the underlying protocol or
technology.
As an example, consider a scenario where an IP ping from device A to
Device B failed. Between device A and B there are IEEE 802.1 bridges
a,b and c. Let's assume a,b and c are using [8021Q] CFM. A user upon
detecting the IP layer ping failure, may decide to drill down to the
Ethernet layer and issue the corresponding fault verification (LBM)
and fault isolation (LTM) tools, using the same API. This ability to
go up and down to different layers for troubleshooting is referred to
as "nested OAM workflow" and is a useful concept that leads to
efficient network troubleshooting and maintenance. The OAM YANG model
presented in this document facilitates that without needing changes
to the underlying protocols.
2. Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [RFC2119].
In this document, these words will appear with that interpretation
only when in ALL CAPS. Lower case uses of these words are not to be
interpreted as carrying RFC-2119 significance.
2.1. Terminology
CCM - Continuity Check Message [8021Q]
ECMP - Equal Cost Multipath
LBM - Loopback Message [8021Q]
MP - Maintenance Point [8021Q]
MEP - Maintenance End Point [RFC7174] [8021Q] [RFC6371]
MIP - Maintenance Intermediate Point [RFC7174] [8021Q] [RFC6371]
MA - Maintenance Association [8021Q] [RFC7174]
MD - Maintenance Domain [8021Q]
MTV - Multi-destination Tree Verification Message
OAM - Operations, Administration, and Maintenance [RFC6291]
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
TRILL - Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links [RFC6325]
3. Architecture of OAM YANG Model
In this document we define the YANG model for Generic OAM. The YANG
model defined here is generic such that other technologies can extend
it for technology specific needs. The Generic OAM YANG model acts as
the root for other OAM YANG models. This allows users to traverse
between OAM of different technologies at ease through a uniform API
set. This is also provides a nested OAM workflow. Figure 1 depicts
the relationship of different OAM YANG models to the Generic OAM YANG
Model. Some technologies may have different sub-technologies. As an
example, consider Network Virtualization Overlays. These could employ
either vXLAN or NVGRE as encapsulation. The Generic OAM YANG model
provides a framework where technology-specific YANG models can
inherit constructs from parent YANG models without needing to
redefine them within the sub-technology.
Figure 1 depicts relationship of different YANG modules.
+-+-+-+-+-+
| gen |
|OAM YANG |
+-+-+-+-+-+
|
O
|
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| | | | |
+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+
| TRILL | | NVO3 | | MPLS | | IP | . . .| foo |
|OAM YANG | |OAM YANG | |OAM YANG | |OAM YANG | |OAM YANG |
+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+
| | | | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+
| | NVO3 | | MPLS | | IP | . . .| foo |
| |sub tech | |sub tech | |OAM YANG | |sub tec |
| +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+
| | | | |
| | | | |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Uniform API |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 1 Relationship of TRILL OAM YANG model to generic YANG model
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
4. Overview of the OAM Model
In this document we adopt the concepts of the [8021Q] CFM model and
structure it such that it can be adapted to different technologies.
At the top of the Model is the Maintenance Domain. Each Maintenance
Domain is associated with a Maintenance Name and a Domain Level.
Under each Maintenance Domain there is one or more Maintenance
Association (MA). In IP, the MA can be per IP Subnet, in NVO3 this
can be per VNI and for TRILL this can be per Fine-Grained Label or
for VPLS this can be per VPLS instance.
Under each MA, there can be two or more MEPs (Maintenance End
Points). MEPs are addressed by their respective technology specific
address identifiers. The YANG model presented here provides
flexibility to accommodate different addressing schemes.
In a parallel vertical, presented are the commands. Those, in YANG
terms, are the rpc commands. These rpc commands provide uniform APIs
for ping, traceroute and their equivalents as well as other OAM
commands.
[8021Q] CFM framework requires explicit configuration of OAM entities
prior to using any of the OAM tools. Users of Ping and Traceroute
tools within IP devices are expecting ability to use OAM tools with
no explicit configuration. In order to facilitate zero-touch
experience, this document defines a default mode of OAM. The default
mode of OAM is referred to as the Base Mode and specifies default
values for each of the [8021Q] CFM parameters, such as Maintenance
Domain Level, Name of the Maintenance Association and Addresses of
MEP and so on. The default values of these depend on the technology.
Base Mode for TRILL is defined in [TRILLOAMFM]. Section X of this
document specifies the Base mode for IP devices. Base mode for other
technologies such as NVO3, MPLS and future extensions will be defined
in their corresponding documents.
It is important to note that, no specific enhancements are needed in
the YANG model to support Base Mode. Implementations that comply with
this document, by default implement the data nodes of the applicable
technology. Data nodes of the Base Mode are read-only nodes.
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
4.1. Maintenance Domain (MD) configuration
The container "domains" is the top level container within the ietf-
oam module. Within the container "domains", separate list is
maintained per MD. The MD list uses the key MD-name for indexing.
module: ietf-oam
+--rw domains
| +--rw domain* [md-name]
| +--rw technology identityref
| +--rw md-name-format MD-name-format
| +--rw md-name binary
| +--rw md-level int32
.
.
Figure 1 Snippet of data hierarchy related to OAM domains
4.2. Maintenance Association (MA) configuration
Within a given Maintenance Domain there can be one or more
Maintenance Associations (MA). MAs are represented as a list and
indexed by the MA-name.
module: ietf-oam
+--rw domains
| +--rw domain* [md-name]
| +--rw technology identityref
| +--rw md-name-format MD-name-format
| +--rw md-name binary
| +--rw md-level int32
| +--rw MAs!
| +--rw MA* [ma-name]
| +--rw ma-name-format MA-name-format
| +--rw ma-name binary
.
.
Figure 2 Snippet of data hierarchy related to Maintenance
Associations (MA).
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
4.3. Maintenance Endpoint (MEP) configuration
Within a given Maintenance Association (MA), there can be one or more
Maintenance End Points (MEP). MEPs are represented as a list within
the data hierarchy and indexed by the key MEP-id.
module: ietf-oam
+--rw domains
| +--rw domain* [md-name]
| +--rw technology identityref
| +--rw md-name-format MD-name-format
| +--rw md-name binary
| +--rw md-level int32
| +--rw MAs!
| +--rw MA* [ma-name]
| +--rw ma-name-format MA-name-format
| +--rw ma-name binary
.
.
+--rw MEP* [mep-id]
| +--rw mep-id MEP-id
| +--rw mep-name? string
| +--rw mep-direction MEP-direction
| +--rw ccm-Tx-enable? boolean
| +--rw (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--rw mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--rw ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw (context-id)?
| | +--:(context-null)
.
.
.
Figure 3 Snippet of data hierarchy related to Maintenance Endpoint
(MEP).
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
4.4. rpc definitions
The rpc model facilitates issuing commands to a NETCONF server (in
this case to the device that need to execute the OAM command) and
obtain a response. rpc model defined here abstracts OAM specific
commands in a technology independent manner.
There are several rpc commands defined for the purpose of OAM. In
this section we present a snippet of the ping command for
illustration purposes. Please refer to Section 4 for the complete
data hierarchy and Section 5 for the YANG model.
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
module: ietf-oam
+--rw domains
| +--rw Domain* [MA-domain-name]
| +--rw technology technology
| +--rw MA-domain-name-format int32
| +--rw MA-domain-name binary
| +--rw MD-level int32
.
.
rpcs:
+---x ping
| +--ro input
| | +--ro technology identityref
| | +--ro md-name-format MD-name-format
| | +--ro md-name? binary
| | +--ro md-level int32
| | +--ro ma-name-format MA-name-format
| | +--ro ma-name binary
| | +--ro (context-id)?
| | | +--:(context-null)
| | | +--ro context-null? empty
| | +--ro (flow-entropy)?
| | | +--:(flow-entropy-null)
| | +--ro ttl? uint8
.
.
| | +--ro source-mep
| | | +--ro (mep-address)?
.
.
| | | +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
| | +--ro destination-mep
| | +--ro (mep-address)?
.
.
| +--ro output
| +--ro tx-packt-count? oam-counter32
| +--ro rx-packet-count? oam-counter32
| +--ro min-delay? oam-counter32
| +--ro average-delay? oam-counter32
| +--ro max-delay? oam-counter32
Figure 4 Snippet of data hierarchy related to rpc call Ping
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
5. OAM data hierarchy
The complete data hierarchy related to the OAM YANG model is
presented below. The following notations are used within the data
tree and carry the meaning as below.
Each node is printed as:
<status> <flags> <name> <opts> <type>
<status> is one of:
+ for current
x for deprecated
o for obsolete
<flags> is one of:
rw for configuration data
ro for non-configuration data
-x for rpcs
-n for notifications
<name> is the name of the node
If the node is augmented into the tree from another module, its
name is printed as <prefix>:<name>.
<opts> is one of:
? for an optional leaf or choice
! for a presence container
* for a leaf-list or list
[<keys>] for a list's keys
<type> is the name of the type for leafs and leaf-lists
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
module: gen-oam
+--rw domains
+--rw domain* [md-name technology]
+--rw technology identityref
+--rw md-name-format MD-name-format
+--rw md-name binary
+--rw md-level int32
+--rw MAs!
+--rw MA* [ma-name]
+--rw ma-name-format MA-name-format
+--rw ma-name binary
+--rw (context-id)?
| +--:(context-null)
| +--rw context-null? empty
+--rw ccm-Interval? CCM-Interval
+--rw ccm-loss-threshold? uint32
+--rw ccm-ttl? uint8
+--rw (flow-entropy)?
| +--:(flow-entropy-null)
+--rw MEP* [mep-id]
| +--rw mep-id MEP-id
| +--rw mep-name? string
| +--rw mep-direction MEP-direction
| +--rw ccm-Tx-enable? boolean
| +--rw (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--rw mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--rw ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw (context-id)?
| | +--:(context-null)
| | +--rw context-null? empty
| +--rw Interface? if:interface-ref
| +--ro admin-status? leafref
| +--ro oper-status? leafref
| +--rw (flow-entropy)?
| | +--:(flow-entropy-null)
| +--rw session* [user-cookie destination-mepid]
| +--rw user-cookie uint32
| +--rw ttl? uint8
| +--rw interval? uint32
| +--rw enable? boolean
| +--rw ecmp-choice? ecmp-choices
| +--rw destination-mepid MEP-id
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
| +--rw destination-mep-address
| | +--rw (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--rw mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--rw ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro ccm-rdi-indicator? boolean
| +--ro ccm-xcon-count? oam-counter32
| +--ro ccm-xcon-Indicator? boolean
| +--rw (context-id)?
| | +--:(context-null)
| | +--rw context-null? empty
| +--rw (flow-entropy)?
| | +--:(flow-entropy-null)
| +--rw outgoing-interface* [interface]
| +--rw interface leafref
+--rw remote-MEP* [mep-id]
| +--rw mep-id uint32
| +--rw (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--rw mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--rw ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw mep-name? string
| +--rw ccm-rx-error-count? oam-counter32
+--rw MIP* [interface direction]
| +--rw interface if:interface-ref
| +--rw direction MEP-direction
+--ro ccm-rdi-indicator? boolean
+--ro ccm-xcon-count? oam-counter32
+--ro ccm-xcon-Indicator? boolean
+--rw nested-oam-layer* [offset]
+--rw offset int8
+--rw technology identityref
+--rw md-name-format MD-name-format
+--rw md-name? binary
+--rw md-level int32
+--rw ma-name-format MA-name-format
+--rw ma-name binary
rpcs:
+---x ping
| +--ro input
| | +--ro technology identityref
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
| | +--ro md-name-format MD-name-format
| | +--ro md-name? binary
| | +--ro md-level int32
| | +--ro ma-name-format MA-name-format
| | +--ro ma-name binary
| | +--ro (context-id)?
| | | +--:(context-null)
| | | +--ro context-null? empty
| | +--ro (flow-entropy)?
| | | +--:(flow-entropy-null)
| | +--ro ttl? uint8
| | +--ro ecmp-choice? ecmp-choices
| | +--ro sub-type? identityref
| | +--ro outgoing-interfaces* [interface]
| | | +--ro interface if:interface-ref
| | +--ro source-mep
| | | +--ro (mep-address)?
| | | | +--:(mac-address)
| | | | | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | | +--ro ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | | +--ro ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
| | +--ro destination-mep
| | +--ro (mep-address)?
| | | +--:(mac-address)
| | | | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | +--ro ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
| +--ro output
| +--ro tx-packt-count? oam-counter32
| +--ro rx-packet-count? oam-counter32
| +--ro min-delay? oam-counter32
| +--ro average-delay? oam-counter32
| +--ro max-delay? oam-counter32
+---x trace-route
+--ro input
| +--ro technology identityref
| +--ro md-name-format MD-name-format
| +--ro md-name? binary
| +--ro md-level int32
| +--ro ma-name-format MA-name-format
| +--ro ma-name binary
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
| +--ro (context-id)?
| | +--:(context-null)
| | +--ro context-null? empty
| +--ro (flow-entropy)?
| | +--:(flow-entropy-null)
| +--ro ttl? uint8
| +--ro command-sub-type? identityref
| +--ro ecmp-choice? ecmp-choices
| +--ro outgoing-interfaces* [interface]
| | +--ro interface if:interface-ref
| +--ro source-mep
| | +--ro (mep-address)?
| | | +--:(mac-address)
| | | | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | | +--ro ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | | +--ro ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
| +--ro destination-mep
| +--ro (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--ro ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--ro ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
+--ro output
+--ro response* [ttl]
+--ro ttl uint8
+--ro destination-mep
| +--ro (mep-address)?
| | +--:(mac-address)
| | | +--ro mac-address? yang:mac-address
| | +--:(ipv4-address)
| | | +--ro ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--ro ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro mep-id? MEP-id
+--ro tx-packt-count? oam-counter32
+--ro rx-packet-count? oam-counter32
+--ro min-delay? oam-counter32
+--ro average-delay? oam-counter32
+--ro max-delay? oam-counter32
notifications:
+---n CCM-RDI-notification
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
+--ro mep-id? MEP-id
+--ro remote-mepid? MEP-id
+--ro error-message? string
Figure 5 data hierarchy of OAM
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
6. OAM YANG module
<CODE BEGINS> file "xxx.yang"
module gen-oam {
namespace "urn:cisco:params:xml:ns:yang:gen-oam";
prefix goam;
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix if;
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
}
organization "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling ) Working Group";
contact
"Tissa Senevirathne tsenevir@cisco.com";
description
"This YANG module defines the generic configuration,
statistics and rpc for OAM to be used within IETF in
a protocol indpendent manner. Functional level
abstraction is indendent with YANG modeling. It is
assumed that each protocol maps corresponding
abstracts to its native format.
Each protocoal may extend the YANG model defined
here to include protocol specific extensions";
revision 2014-04-17 {
description
"Initial revision. - 02 version";
reference "draft-tissa-netmod-oam";
}
identity technology-types {
description
"this is the base identity of technology types which are
vpls, nvo3, TRILL, ipv4, ipv6, mpls";
}
identity ipv4 {
base technology-types;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
description
"technology of ipv4";
}
identity ipv6 {
base technology-types;
description
"technology of ipv6";
}
identity command-sub-type {
description
"defines different rpc command subtypes, e.g rfc792 ping
vs udp ping, this is optional for most cases";
}
identity icmp-rfc792 {
base command-sub-type;
description
"Defines the command subtypes for ICMP ping";
reference "RFC 792";
}
typedef MEP-direction {
type enumeration {
enum "Up" {
value 0;
}
enum "Down" {
value 1;
}
}
}
typedef MEP-id {
type uint32 {
range "1..8191";
}
description
"Defines type for MEPIDm range is 1..8191";
}
typedef CCM-Interval {
default "interval-1min";
type enumeration {
enum "interval-invalid" {
value 0;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
enum "interval-300hz" {
value 1;
}
enum "interval-10ms" {
value 2;
}
enum "interval-100ms" {
value 3;
}
enum "interval-1s" {
value 4;
}
enum "interval-10s" {
value 5;
}
enum "interval-1min" {
value 6;
}
enum "interval-10min" {
value 7;
}
}
reference
"802.2Q Rev5 or 802.ag, all of the above
are standard enumeration from the 802.1Q";
description
"IntervalInvalid - value 0
Interval300Hz - Value 1
Intervale10ms - value 2
Interval100ms - value3
Interval1s - value 4
Interval10s - value 5
Interval1min - value 6
Interval10min - value 7";
}
typedef ecmp-choices {
type enumeration {
enum "ecmp-use-platform-hash" {
value 0;
}
enum "ecmp-use-round-robin" {
value 1;
}
}
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
typedef MD-name-format {
type enumeration {
enum "ieee-reserved" {
value 0;
}
enum "none" {
value 1;
}
enum "dns-like-name" {
value 2;
}
enum "mac-address-and-uint" {
value 3;
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
description
"Domain name 3 specifies domain name is mac-address + 2
octets.";
}
}
reference "802.1Q";
description
"defines the domain name format";
}
typedef MA-name-format {
type enumeration {
enum "ieee-reserved" {
value 0;
}
enum "primary-vid" {
value 1;
}
enum "char-string" {
value 2;
}
enum "unsigned-int16" {
value 3;
}
enum "rfc2865-vpnid" {
value 4;
}
}
reference "802.1Q";
description
"Defines Format of MA-names";
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
typedef oam-counter32 {
type yang:zero-based-counter32;
description
"defines 32 bit counter for OAM";
}
grouping mep-address {
choice mep-address {
case mac-address {
leaf mac-address {
type yang:mac-address;
}
}
case ipv4-address {
leaf ipv4-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
}
}
case ipv6-address {
leaf ipv6-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
}
}
}
}
grouping maintenance-domain {
status current;
description
"Defines the MA-domain group";
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
leaf technology {
mandatory true;
status current;
type identityref {
base technology-types;
}
description
"Defines the technology";
}
leaf md-name-format {
mandatory true;
status current;
description
"Defines the maintenance domain name";
type MD-name-format;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
}
leaf md-name {
status current;
description
"Defines the MA-Domain name. This is a binary (octet) string
of 43 bytes";
type binary {
length "1..43";
}
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
}
leaf md-level {
mandatory true;
status current;
description
"Defines the MD-Level";
type int32 {
range "0..7";
}
reference "802.1Q Rev5 or 802.1ag";
}
}
grouping ma-identifier {
description
"ma-identifier defines MAID parameters as defined in 8021Q";
reference "IEEE 802.1Q Rev5";
leaf ma-name-format {
mandatory true;
status current;
description
"This defines the MA name format 1 is no format,
2 - dnslikename, 3- macaddress 4-CharString";
type MA-name-format;
reference "IEEE 802.1Q Rev 5";
}
leaf ma-name {
mandatory true;
description
"Define the MA-Name according to the specified format.
This is 43 byte string.";
type binary {
length "1..45";
}
reference "802.1Q Rve 5 or 8021ag Clause 21.6.5";
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
grouping MEP {
status current;
description
"Defines elements withing the MEP";
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
leaf mep-id {
mandatory true;
status current;
description
"Assigm MEPID in the range of 1..8191";
type MEP-id {
range "1..8191";
}
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
}
leaf mep-name {
type string;
description
"Defines textual name for MEP. This is not specified in IEEE
but
defined in IETF OAM for ease of use";
}
leaf mep-direction {
type MEP-direction;
mandatory true;
}
leaf ccm-Tx-enable {
type boolean;
default "false";
}
uses mep-address;
uses context-id;
leaf Interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Interface name as defined by ietf-interfaces";
}
}
grouping CCM-defect-stats {
description
"Contains all of the CCM related defect stats";
leaf ccm-rdi-indicator {
config false;
type boolean;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
description
"True indicate one or more of the MEP have seen RDI
flag set from remote MEP";
}
leaf ccm-xcon-count {
config false;
type oam-counter32;
description
"Number of times cross connect errors are seen";
}
leaf ccm-xcon-Indicator {
config false;
type boolean;
description
"There is currently cross connect error seen since last
clearing of the variable";
}
}
grouping monitor-stats {
leaf tx-packt-count {
type oam-counter32;
description
"Transmitted Packet count";
}
leaf rx-packet-count {
type oam-counter32;
description
"Received packet count";
}
leaf min-delay {
units "milliseconds";
type oam-counter32;
description
"Delay is specified in milliseconds";
}
leaf average-delay {
units "milliseconds";
type oam-counter32;
description
"average delay in milliseconds";
}
leaf max-delay {
type oam-counter32;
units "millisecond";
}
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
grouping MIP {
description
"defines MIP";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
}
leaf direction {
type MEP-direction;
}
}
grouping nested-oam-layer {
leaf offset {
type int8 {
range "1..7";
}
description
"defines nested OAM layer offset
+1 is the layer immediatly above
-1 is the layer immediatly below";
}
uses maintenance-domain;
uses ma-identifier;
}
grouping interface-status {
description
"collection of interface related status";
leaf admin-status {
config false;
type leafref {
path "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface/if:admin-status";
}
description
"oper status from ietf-interface module";
}
leaf oper-status {
config false;
type leafref {
path "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface/if:oper-status";
}
description
"oper status from ietf-interface module";
}
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
grouping context-id {
description
"grouping for context id, this will be augmented
by others who use this component";
choice context-id {
default "context-null";
case context-null {
description
"this is a place holder when no context is needed";
leaf context-null {
type empty;
description
"there is no context define";
}
}
}
}
grouping flow-entropy {
description
"defines the grouping statement for flow-entropy";
choice flow-entropy {
case flow-entropy-null;
}
}
container domains {
status current;
config true;
description
"Contains configuration related data. Within the container
is list of fault domains. Wihin each domian has List of MA.";
list domain {
uses maintenance-domain {
status current;
}
key "md-name technology";
ordered-by system;
status current;
config true;
description
"Define the list of Domains within the IETF-OAM";
container MAs {
presence
"Indicates creation of MA within the Domain
There can be more than one MA within a specified domain";
status current;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
config true;
description
"This container defines MA, within that have multiple MA
and within MA have MEP, MIP";
list MA {
ordered-by system;
status current;
config true;
key "ma-name";
uses ma-identifier;
uses context-id;
leaf ccm-Interval {
default "interval-invalid";
description
"Defines CCM Interval 0- Means disable
1 - CCM are sent 3 1/3 ms
2 - CCM are sent every 10 ms
3- CCM are sent every 100 ms
4- CCM are sent every 1 s
5 - CCM are sent every 10 s
6 - CCM are sent every 1 minute
7- CCM are sent every 10 mins";
type CCM-Interval;
reference "802.1Q Rev5 and 802.1ag";
}
leaf ccm-loss-threshold {
default "3";
type uint32;
description
"number of consecutive CCM messages missed before
declaring RDI fault. This is monitored per each
remote MEP";
}
leaf ccm-ttl {
type uint8;
default "255";
}
uses flow-entropy;
list MEP {
key "mep-id";
ordered-by system;
status current;
config true;
description
"contain list of MEPS";
uses MEP {
status current;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
uses interface-status {
description
"status of associated interface";
}
uses flow-entropy;
list session {
key "user-cookie destination-mepid";
ordered-by user;
config true;
description
"per session basis create the monitoring";
leaf user-cookie {
config true;
type uint32;
description
"user need to specify some cookie to identify
multiple sessions between two MEPs";
}
leaf ttl {
config true;
type uint8;
default "255";
}
leaf interval {
units "milliseconds";
default "1000";
type uint32;
description
"In milli seconds. 0 means continous";
}
leaf enable {
default "false";
config true;
type boolean;
description
"enable or disable a monitor session";
}
leaf ecmp-choice {
config true;
type ecmp-choices;
description
"0 means use the specified interface
1 means use round robin";
}
leaf destination-mepid {
type MEP-id;
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
container destination-mep-address {
uses mep-address;
}
uses CCM-defect-stats;
uses context-id;
uses flow-entropy;
list outgoing-interface {
config true;
key "interface";
leaf interface {
type leafref {
path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name";
}
config true;
}
}
}
}
list remote-MEP {
key "mep-id";
ordered-by system;
status current;
config true;
description
"list all of the remote MEP within the MA";
leaf mep-id {
mandatory true;
status current;
description
"Assigm MEPID in the range of 1..8191";
config true;
type uint32;
reference "802.1Q Rev5";
}
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-name {
type string;
description
"Defines textual name for MEP. This is not
specified in IEEE but defined in IETF OAM
for ease of use";
}
leaf ccm-rx-error-count {
type oam-counter32;
description
"counts number of CCM packets that was
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
expected but not received";
}
}
list MIP {
key "interface direction";
uses MIP;
}
uses CCM-defect-stats {
description
"CCM defect stats capture at MA level
This will contain aggregrate stats from all MEP";
}
list nested-oam-layer {
key "offset";
description
"List of OAM layers above and below that are related to
current MA. This allow users to easily navigate up and
down
to effeciently troubleshoot a connectivity issue";
uses nested-oam-layer;
}
}
}
}
}
notification CCM-RDI-notification {
description
"When RDI is received this notificiation is sent";
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
description
"Indicate which MEP is seeing the error";
}
leaf remote-mepid {
type MEP-id;
description
"Who is seeing the error (if known) if unknown make it 0.";
}
leaf error-message {
type string {
length "0..255";
}
description
"Error message to indicate more details.";
}
}
rpc ping {
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
description
"Generates Ping and return response";
input {
uses maintenance-domain {
description
"Specifies the MA-domain";
}
uses ma-identifier {
description
"identfies the Maintenance association";
}
uses context-id;
uses flow-entropy;
leaf ttl {
type uint8;
default "255";
}
leaf ecmp-choice {
type ecmp-choices;
description
"0 means use the specified interface
1 means use round robin";
}
leaf sub-type {
type identityref {
base command-sub-type;
}
description
"defines different command types";
}
list outgoing-interfaces {
key "interface";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
}
}
container source-mep {
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
}
}
container destination-mep {
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
}
output {
uses monitor-stats {
description
"Stats of Ping is same as that of monitor sessions";
}
}
}
rpc trace-route {
description
"Generates Trace-route and return response. Starts with TTL
of one and increment by one at each hop. Untill destination
reached or TTL reach max valune";
input {
uses maintenance-domain {
description
"Specifies the MA-domain";
}
uses ma-identifier {
description
"identfies the Maintenance association";
}
uses context-id;
uses flow-entropy;
leaf ttl {
type uint8;
default "255";
}
leaf command-sub-type {
type identityref {
base command-sub-type;
}
description
"defines different command types";
}
leaf ecmp-choice {
type ecmp-choices;
description
"0 means use the specified interface
1 means use round robin";
}
list outgoing-interfaces {
key "interface";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
}
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
}
container source-mep {
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
}
}
container destination-mep {
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
}
}
}
output {
list response {
key "ttl";
leaf ttl {
type uint8;
}
container destination-mep {
uses mep-address;
leaf mep-id {
type MEP-id;
}
}
uses monitor-stats;
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 6 YANG module of OAM
7. Base Mode for IP
The Base Mode defines default configuration that MUST be present in
the devices that comply with this document. Base Mode allows users to
have "zero-touch" experience. Several parameters require technology
specific definition.
7.1. MEP Address
In the Base Mode of operation, the MEP Address is the IP address of
the interface on which the MEP is located.
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
7.2. MEP ID for Base Mode
In the Base Mode of operation, each device creates a single UP MEP
associated with a virtual OAM port with no physical layer (NULL PHY).
The MEPID associated with this MEP is zero (0). The choice of MEP-ID
zero is explained below.
MEPID is 2 octet field. It is never used on the wire except when
using CCM. Ping, traceroute and session monitoring does not use the
MEPID on its message header. It is important to have method that can
derive MEP ID of base mode in an automatic manner with no user
intervention. IP address cannot be directly used for this purpose as
the MEP ID is much smaller field. For Base Mode of IP we propose to
use MEP ID zero (0) as the default MEP-ID.
CCM packet use MEP-ID on the paylod. CCM MUST NOT be used in the Base
Mode for IP. Hence CCM MUST be disabled on the Maintenance
Association of the Base Mode.
If CCM is required, users MUST configure a separate Maintenance
association and assign unique value for the corresponding MEP IDs.
[8021Q] CFM defines MEP ID as an unsigned integer in the range 1 to
8191. In this document we propose to extend the range to 0 to 65535.
Value 0 is reserved for MEP ID of Base Mode of IP and MUST NOT be
used for other purposes.
7.3. Maintenance Domain
Default MD-LEVEL is set to 3.
7.4. Maintenance Association
MAID [8021Q] has a flexible format and includes two parts:
Maintenance Domain Name and Short MA name. In the Based Mode of
operation, the value of the Maintenance Domain Name must be the
character string "GenericBaseMode" (excluding the quotes "). In Base
Mode operation Short MA Name format is set to 2-octet integer format
(value 3 in Short MA Format field [8021Q]) and Short MA name set to
65532 (0xFFFC).
8. Security Considerations
TBD
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
9. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following namespace URI in the IETF XML
registry.
URI:TBD
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC792] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD
5,RFC 792, September 1981.
[8021Q] IEEE, "Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual
Bridged Local Area Networks", IEEE Std 802.1Q-2011, August,
2011.
10.2. Informative References
[Y1731] ITU, "OAM functions and mechanisms for Ethernet based
networks", ITU-T G.8013/Y.1731, July, 2011.
[RFC7174] Salam, S., et.al., "TRILL OAM Framework", RFC7174, May
2014.
[RFC6291] Andersson, L., et.al., "Guidelines for the use of the "OAM"
Acronym in the IETF" RFC 6291, June 2011.
[RFC6325] Perlman, R., et.al., "Routing Bridges (RBridges): Base
Protocol Specification", RFC 6325, July 2011.
[OAMOVW] Mizrahi, T., et.al., "An Overview of Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tools", draft-ietf-
opsawg-oam-overview-16, Work in Progress, March 2014.
[RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet
Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 4443,
March 2006.
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
[RFC4379] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol
Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379,
February 2006.
[RFC6371] Busi, I., et.al., "Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks,
RFC 6317, September 2011.
[TRILLOAMFM] Senevirathne, T., et.al., "TRILL OAM Fault Management",
draft-ietf-trill-oam-fm, Work in Progress, May 2014.
11. Acknowledgments
Giles Heron came up with the idea of developing a YANG model as a way
of creating a unified OAM API set (interface), work in this document
is largely an inspiration of that. Alexander Clemm provided many
valuable tips, comments and remarks that helped to refine the YANG
model presented in this document.
This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft YANG Data Model for Generic OAM June 2014
Authors' Addresses
Tissa Senevirathne
CISCO Systems
375 East Tasman Drive.
San Jose, CA 95134
USA.
Phone: 408-853-2291
Email: tsenevir@cisco.com
Norman Finn
CISCO Systems
510 McCarthy Blvd
Milpitas, CA 95035.
Email: nfinn@cisco.com
Deepak Kumar
CISCO Systems
510 McCarthy Blvd
Milpitas, CA 95035.
Email: dekumar@cisco.com
Samer Salam
CISCO Systems
595 Burrard St. Suite 2123
Vancouver, BC V7X 1J1, Canada
Email: ssalam@cisco.com
Carlos Pignataro
Cisco Systems
7200-12 Kit Creek Rd,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Email: cpignata@cisco.com
Senevirathne Expires December 10, 2014 [Page 37]
