Internet DRAFT - draft-valin-netvc-l1tw
draft-valin-netvc-l1tw
Network Working Group JM. Valin
Internet-Draft Mozilla
Intended status: Standards Track July 6, 2015
Expires: January 7, 2016
Screencasting Considerations and L1-Tree Wavelet Coding
draft-valin-netvc-l1tw-01
Abstract
This document proposes a screencasting encoding mode based on the
Haar wavelet transform and L1-tree wavelet (L1TW) coding.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 7, 2016.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not
be created, and it may not be published except as an Internet-Draft.
Valin Expires January 7, 2016 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Screencasting and L1TW July 2015
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. The Haar Wavelet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. L1-Tree Coding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Objective Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Development Repository . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
10. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction
Screensharing is an important application for an Internet video
codec. Screensharing content differs from photographic images in
many ways, including:
o Text: screenshots often contain anti-aliased text on a perfectly
flat background. This makes ringing artefacts highly perceptible.
Also, typical photographic codecs based on the discrete cosine
transform (DCT) cannot take advantage of the fact that the
background often has a constant colour.
o Lines and edges. Screenshots often contain perfectly straight
horizontal and/or vertical lines. They appear in window frames,
toolbars, widgets, spreadsheets, etc. DCT-based codecs can
represent those lines and edges, but not as compactly as codecs
like PNG.
o Reduced number of colours: Screenshots are much less "noisy" than
photographic images. It is common for a certain region of an
image to only contain a handful of different colours, another
property we would like to exploit in a video codec.
o A very common motion pattern in screensharing content is the
displacement of windows. This typically involves rectangular
boundaries.
The technique described in this document only deals with still images
for now and focuses on the problem of efficiently coding anti-aliased
text. While it is implemented for the Daala [Daala-website] codec,
it should be applicable to most other video codecs.
Valin Expires January 7, 2016 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Screencasting and L1TW July 2015
2. The Haar Wavelet
The Haar wavelet <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_wavelet> is the
simplest of all orthogonal wavelets, and also the only one with
linear phase. We use the Haar transform both because it is spatially
compact and because it makes it easy to switch between a wavelet
transform and the DCT.
In 1-D, a single level of the Haar transform is expressed as:
___
[ y0 ] / 1 [ 1 1 ] [ x0 ]
[ ] = / --- [ ] [ ]
[ y1 ] v 2 [ -1 1 ] [ x1 ]
The 2-D Haar transform is implemented from a 2x2 lifting Haar kernel:
inputs: x0, x1, x2, x3
x0 <= x0 + x2
x3 <= x3 - x1
tmp <= (x0 - x3) >> 1
x1 <= tmp - x1
x2 <= tmp - x2
x0 <= x0 - x1
x3 <= x3 + x2
outputs: x0, x1, x2, x3
This kernel has perfect reconstruction, making it also useful for
lossless compression.
The kernel above is applied on 5 levels for 32x32 superblocks. The
resulting wavelet coefficients are quantized non-uniformly using the
following quantization scales relative to the DC quantizer (from low
frequency to high frequency):
horizontal/vertical: [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0]
diagonal: [1.0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0]
3. L1-Tree Coding
Like other wavelet coding methods such as EZW and SPIHT, we code the
wavelet coefficients using trees. The main difference however is
that rather than being based on the maximum coefficient value in a
tree, this technique is based on the sum of the absolute values of
all coefficients in the tree. Let x(i,j) denote the quantized
wavelet coefficient at position (i,j), the children of x(i,j) are
x(2*i,2*j), x(2*i,2*j+1), x(2*i+1,2*j), and x(2*i+1,2*j+1). The
absolute sum of the tree rooted in (i,j) is defined recursively as:
Valin Expires January 7, 2016 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Screencasting and L1TW July 2015
S(i,j) = |x(i,j)| + S(2*i,2*j) + S(2*i,2*j+1)
+ S(2*i+1,2*j) + S(2*i+1,2*j+1),
with S(i,j)=0 for i or j >= N. C(i,j) is defined as S(i,j)
- |x(i,j)|.
Coefficient coding starts at the root of each of the three "direction
trees": (1,0), (0,1), and (1,1). At each level we code the value
of |x(i,j)| using a cumulative density function adapted based on the
value of S(i,j). Coding |x(i,j)| implies that the value of C(i,j) is
known to the decoder, so it does not need to be coded. Three symbols
are then required to encode each of the new roots: S(2*i,2*j),
S(2*i,2*j+1), S(2*i+1,2*j), and S(2*i+1,2*j+1).
At the top level, we have S(0,0) = S(1,0) + S(0,1) + S(1,1), so that
completely flat blocks can be coded with a single S(0,0)=0 symbol.
The DC is coded separately.
4. Results
The coded images obtained with the Haar transform and L1TW have far
better subjective visual quality than those obtained with the lapped
DCT or with JPEG, and of comparable quality to those obtained with
x264 <http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html> and x265
<http://x265.org/>. An example image at around 0.35 bit/pixel is
provided at <http://jmvalin.ca/video/haar_example/>. The x264 image
encoded with options "--preset placebo --crf=27" and the x265 image
is encoded with "--preset slow --crf=29".
While the technique presented here works relatively well on the
example above, there are still cases where it performs significantly
worse than x265. These include gradients, such as those in toolbars
and window titlebars, and long horizontal and vertical lines such as
those found in spreadsheets. These cases should improve once we
implement the ability to dynamically switch between the lapped DCT
and the Haar transform. Other ways of improving performance on long
lines and edges would be to extend to use a different 2D wavelet
decomposition, or use an overcomplete basis.
5. Objective Evaluation
As a first step for evaluating screensharing quality, we have added a
small collection of screenshot images to the "Are We Compressed Yet?"
(AWCY) <https://arewecompressedyet.com/> website, under the
"screenshots" set name. AWCY currently runs four quality metrics:
PSNR, PSNR-HVS, SSIM, and FAST-SSIM [I-D.daede-netvc-testing]. It is
not yet clear that and of these metrics is suitable for evaluating
the quality of screensharing material.
Valin Expires January 7, 2016 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Screencasting and L1TW July 2015
6. Development Repository
The algorithms in this proposal are being developed as part of
Xiph.Org's Daala project. The code is available in the Daala git
repository at <https://git.xiph.org/daala.git>. See [Daala-website]
for more information.
7. IANA Considerations
This document makes no request of IANA.
8. Security Considerations
This draft has no security considerations.
9. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Timothy B. Terriberry for useful feedback and for
designing the 2-D Haar lifting kernel.
10. Informative References
[Daala-website]
"Daala website", Xiph.Org Foundation , <https://xiph.org/
daala/>.
[I-D.daede-netvc-testing]
Daede, T. and J. Jack, "Video Codec Testing and Quality
Measurement", draft-daede-netvc-testing-00 (work in
progress), March 2015.
Author's Address
Jean-Marc Valin
Mozilla
331 E. Evelyn Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94041
USA
Email: jmvalin@jmvalin.ca
Valin Expires January 7, 2016 [Page 5]
