Internet DRAFT - draft-vanderstok-roll-admin-local-policy
draft-vanderstok-roll-admin-local-policy
roll P. van der Stok
Internet-Draft Consultant
Intended status: Informational February 14, 2014
Expires: August 18, 2014
MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope
draft-vanderstok-roll-admin-local-policy-00
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to specify a policy for the routing
of mmulticast messages with admin-local scope.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2014.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Required Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Network identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. IEEE 802.15.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. IEEE 802.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. ITU-T G.9959 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.4. BLUETOOTH Low Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Admin-Local policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Legal incoming packets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Forwarding legal packets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2.1. Packet with MPL option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2.2. Packet without MPL option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
Multicast scopes are defined in [RFC4291]. The
[I-D.ietf-6man-multicast-scopes] extends the scope definition with
the text:
"Interface-Local, Link-Local, and Realm-Local scope boundaries are
automatically derived from physical connectivity or other, non-
multicast related configuration. Global scope has no boundary. The
boundaries of all other non-reserved scopes of Admin-Local or larger
are administratively configured."
The admin-local scope with value 4 must be administratively
configured. This draft shows how the policy that specifies the
admin-local scope can be automated.
Scope 3 multicast address is currently used by MPL to distribute the
multicast message to all receivers and forwarders within a mesh
network. The multicast distribution is limited to a mesh network
with a common layer-2. For example, the LoWPAN is defined by the
IEEE 802.15.4 layer-2 mesh network, composed of all connected nodes
sharing the same PANID [RFC4944].
In current and projected deployments, the multicast message needs to
be distributed outside the single mesh over a multi-link network.
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
For example, distribution is wanted over two meshes with an edge
router each, where the two edge routers are connected with an
ethernet link. Another example of a multi-link network is: one edge
router with two interfaces where each interface is connected to a
different mesh. A message with a scope 4 multicast address can be
distributed over this multi-link networks. The boundary of the scope
4 is administratively configured.
The purpose of this document is to specify an automated policy for
the admin-local scope. This draft specifies conditions under which
multicast packets arriving over a given interface of a router are
forwarded over other interfaces of the same router. The concept of
mesh network is mapped to various lowpan networks.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Additionally, this document uses terminology
[I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
1.2. Required Reading
Admin-local multicast scope is defined in
[I-D.ietf-6man-multicast-scopes]. MPL is described in
[I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast]
2. Network identifier
Links have the concept of channel associated with a communication
frequency. For some link technologies, several networks can coexist
using the same channel. For these link technologies, a network
identifier exists. The network identifier is determined by the link
technology specification. When no network identifier exists for a
given link, the network identifier has the value "undefined".
2.1. IEEE 802.15.4
IPv6 over IEEE 802.15.4 is described in [RFC4944]. A LoWPAN is
composed of the nodes connected by an IEEE 802.15.4 mesh sharing the
same PANID. The PANID identifies a network in the IEEE 802.15.4
mesh. Several networks with different PANIDs can coexist on the same
channel [IEEE802.15.4]. The PANID of an interface is defined when
the interface is switched on. The value of the network identifier of
a IEEE 802.15.4 link is the value of the PANID.
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
2.2. IEEE 802.11
IP over IEEE 802.11 is described in [RFC5416]. The SSID identifies a
network in the IEEE 802.11 link. Several networks with different
SSIDs can coexist on the same channel [IEEE802.11]. The SSID of an
interface is defined when the interface is switched on. The value of
the network identifier of a IEEE 802.11 link is the value of the
SSID.
2.3. ITU-T G.9959
IPv6 over ITU-T G.9959 is specified in [I-D.ietf-6lo-lowpanz]. The
HomeID identifies a network of connected nodes [G.9959]. Several
HomeIDs can coexist within communication range, but nodes adhering to
a network with a given HomeID cannot communicate with nodes adhering
to a network with a different HomeID. The value of the network
identifier of a G.9959 link is the value of the HomeID.
2.4. BLUETOOTH Low Energy
IPv6 over BLUETOOTH low energy (btle) is specified in
[I-D.ietf-6lo-btle]. The medium is specified in [btle].
BTLE does know the concept of multiple networks in one channel.
3. Admin-Local policy
The section starts with specifying what multicast packets arriving
over a link are legal. It continues with the forwarding of the legal
packets over the interfaces for packets with multicast destination
addresses with Admin -local scope 4.
The admin-local policy is specified as function of the state of a
destination link and the multicast packet. The state of the packet
is determined by the presence of the MPL option and the destination
Multicast address. The state of the interface is determined by the
subscribed multicast addresses and the value of the
PROACTIVE_FORWARDING parameter of the interface.
3.1. Legal incoming packets
A packet created in a source (seed) is legal when it conforms to the
conditions described in section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
A packet received over a given link with a multicast destination
address, is legal when:
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
o The packet carries the MPL option and the incoming interface is
subscribed to the destination multicast address.
o The packet does not carry the MPL option and the interface has
expressed interest to receive packets with the specified multicast
address via MLD [RFC3810] or via IGMP [RFC3376]. Packet was sent
on according to PIM-DM [RFC3973] or according to PIM-SM [RFC4601].
The packet forwarded with unicast has been decapsulated.
Illegal packets are discarded.
3.2. Forwarding legal packets
A legal packet that arrived over a link is associated with a network
identifier with a value copied from the network identifier of the
interface of the incoming link . A packet that is created locally has
a network identifier with value "any".
Two types of legal packets are considered: (1) packets which carry
the MPL option, and (2) packets which do NOT carry the MPL option.
3.2.1. Packet with MPL option
The packet is forwarded over the link of an interface according to
the Trickle algorithm, when:
o The packet with a multicast address with scope 2 (link-local) is
not forwarded.
o Packet with a multicast scope of 5 or higher is out of scope.
o The packet with MPL option and a Multicast address MC4 with a
scope value of 4, is transmitted over all interfaces that are
subscribed to the same multicast address MC4, and have
PROACTIVE_FORWARDING set to true.
o The packet with MPL option and a Multicast address MC3 with a
scope value of 3, is transmitted over all interfaces that are
subscribed to the same multicast address MC3, have
PROACTIVE_FORWARDING set to true, and the network identifier of
the packet is identical to the network-identifier of the
interface, or the network identifier of the packet is "any".
3.2.2. Packet without MPL option
The legal packet without MPL option is handled according to the
following rules:
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
o The packet with a multicast address with scope 2 (link-local) or
scope 3( Realm-local) is not forwarded.
o Packet with a multicast scope of 5 or higher is out of scope.
o The packet with a multicast address MC4 with scope 4 is
encapsulated with a header carrying the MPL option, and is
forwarded according to the Trickle algorithm, over all interfaces
that are subscribed to multicast address MC4, and have
PROACTIVE_FORWARDING set to true.
4. Security Considerations
Refer to the security considerations of
[I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast].
5. IANA Considerations
No considerations for IANA are formulated in this document.
6. Acknowledgements
This document reflects discussions and remarks from several
individuals including (in alphabetical order):
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3810] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery
Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004.
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.
[RFC4944] Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D. Culler,
"Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4
Networks", RFC 4944, September 2007.
[RFC3376] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
3", RFC 3376, October 2002.
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
[RFC4007] Deering, S., Haberman, B., Jinmei, T., Nordmark, E., and
B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture", RFC 4007,
March 2005.
[RFC5416] Calhoun, P., Montemurro, M., and D. Stanley, "Control and
Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Protocol
Binding for IEEE 802.11", RFC 5416, March 2009.
[I-D.ietf-6lo-lowpanz]
Brandt, A. and J. Buron, "Transmission of IPv6 packets
over ITU-T G.9959 Networks", draft-ietf-6lo-lowpanz-02
(work in progress), February 2014.
[I-D.ietf-roll-trickle-mcast]
Hui, J. and R. Kelsey, "Multicast Protocol for Low power
and Lossy Networks (MPL)", draft-ietf-roll-trickle-
mcast-06 (work in progress), January 2014.
[I-D.ietf-6man-multicast-scopes]
Droms, R., "IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes", draft-ietf-
6man-multicast-scopes-02 (work in progress), November
2013.
[I-D.ietf-6lo-btle]
Nieminen, J., Savolainen, T., Isomaki, M., Patil, B.,
Shelby, Z., and C. Gomez, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets
over BLUETOOTH Low Energy", draft-ietf-6lo-btle-00 (work
in progress), November 2013.
[IEEE802.15.4]
"IEEE 802.15.4 - Standard for Local and metropolitan area
networks -- Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area
Networks", <IEEE Standard 802.15.4>.
[IEEE802.11]
"IEEE 802.11 - Telecommunications and information exchange
between systems Local and metropolitan area networks --
Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications", <IEEE Standard
802.11>.
[G.9959] "ITU-T G.9959 Short range narrow-band digital
radiocommunication transceivers - PHY and MAC layer
specifications", <ITU-T G.9959>.
[btle] "BLUETOOTH Specification Version 4.0", <BLUETOOTH low
energy>.
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft MPL admin-local policy February 2014
7.2. Informative References
[RFC3973] Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, January 2005.
[RFC4601] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
"Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601, August 2006.
Author's Address
Peter van der Stok
Consultant
Email: consultancy@vanderstok.org
van der Stok Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 8]
