| RFC : | rfc1401 |
| Title: | |
| Date: | January 1993 |
| Status: | INFORMATIONAL |
Network Working Group Internet Architecture Board
Request for Comments: 1401 Lyman Chapin, Chair
January 1993
Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use of
DNS throughout the Internet
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.
Abstract
This memo reproduces three letters exchanged between the Internet
Activities Board (IAB) and the Defense Information Systems Agency
(DISA) regarding the importance of using the Domain Name System (DNS)
throughout the Internet, and phasing out the use of older host name
to address tables, such as "hosts.txt".
IAB [Page 1]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
1. Letter from the IAB to DISA
30 March, 1992
To: Members of the Federal Networking Council,
Members of the Federal Networking Advisory Council,
Colonel Ken Thomas, Chairman,
DoD Protocol Standards Steering Group, DISA/Center for
Standards
CC: C. J. Pasquariello, Associate Director, Center for Standards,
LCDR, David Chappell, Executive Secretary,
PSSG, DISA/Center for Standards
Eduardo Schonborn, Dep Director/DDN PMO
As the IAB, together with others in the Internet Engineering and
Research Task Forces, contemplates the challenges inherent in dealing
with an exponentially expanding Internet, the critical need for
widespread adoption of a uniform Domain Name service is very
apparent.
The attached memorandum is offered by the Internet Activities Board
for your consideration regarding technical policy concerning domain
naming in the US portion of the Internet. The proposed technical
policy is recommended world-wide and will be offered as an RFC for
that purpose. Adoption of such a policy would, we believe, much
enhance the operational efficiency of the existing world-wide
Internet backbone and major networks dependent upon it, including the
DDN Milnet.
Your consideration of this policy question is urged in the strongest
possible terms. We would much appreciate hearing the views of the
Protocol Standards Steering Group by April 20, 1992.
Regards,
A. Lyman Chapin
Chairman, Internet Activities Board
IAB [Page 2]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
Attachment
The Domain Name System is an Internet Necessity
Internet Activities Board
February 1992
Over the last several years, the Internet has evolved in size so
extensively that it has become infeasible to provide directory
services through a database maintained at a single, central
repository. Both the size and the dynamics of the required data make
such an approach impractical. Recognizing this problem several years
ago [1], the Internet community has adopted the Domain Name System
[2-5] as the principal means of achieving host name to IP address
mappings. During this time, almost the entire Internet has converted
from the use of the static name-to-address mapping tables thus far
centrally maintained at the DDN Network Information Center, to the
use of the more dynamic, up-to-date address mapping provided by DNS
mechanism.
There are still large fractions of the Internet community which rely
on the use of a centrally-maintained file ("hosts.txt") to accomplish
this mapping function. The MILNET community appears to have
substantial pockets of dependence on table-driven mappings, for
example. Although a plan for achieving a MILNET transition to use of
the Domain Name System was worked out in 1987, the transition is
incomplete and, as a result, naming services (i.e., host name lookups
on the MILNET) are many times still provided via static tables rather
than the distributed, and far more accurate, Domain Name System.
Ironically, most of the commercial, off-the-shelf software for TCP/IP
supports the user of the Domain Name System, so a policy of uniform
support and application of DNS would go a long way toward improving
the Defense Department data communication infrastructure, insofar as
it is dependent on TCP/IP to interconnect hosts on LANs and WANs.
The use of different means for name-to-address mappings by different
parties in the network community leads to unsynchronized and
inconsistent databases, which inevitably result in reachability
failures by users attempting to connect to network resources.
Moreover, the special facilities of the Domain Name System, such as
the MX (Mail eXchange) record, make it possible to include systems
not directly on the Internet into the universe of addressable
parties. MX records also allow a network administrator to prioritize
a list of alternative e-mail relays in case the final destination is
not reachable. Systems which do not support MX records, but rather
still depend on the "hosts.txt" information, pose a serious obstacle
to network connectivity, as well as to the operation and management
IAB [Page 3]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
of the highly connected Internet.
Non-DNS systems on the Internet will eventually be confronted with
the need to decide whether they want to continue as a part of the
larger Internet community, or remain a rather small, non-conforming
subset. Should they choose not to conform to the otherwise accepted
Domain Name System, they will have to accept the ramifications of
this decision. In particular, they will have to accept that the rest
of the community may, indeed has already started to, essentially
ignore those static files which reflect the principal non-DNS naming
service. The larger community has evolved so extensively beyond
these configurations, that these files are not only obsolete as a
technology, but also incomplete and often inaccurate in the present
implementation. Upon connecting a new host to the Internet, the
great majority of the Internet community no longer considers the
registration of host name/address updates to the NIC database a
necessity, and rather focuses on updating the Domain name System.
Therefore, today's NIC database, and the "hosts.txt" file generated
from it, largely reflects only the non-DNS community, a tiny subset
of the hundreds of thousands of entities configured into the Internet
name space via the DNS.
If the non-DNS users maintain a requirement for the use of static
mapping tables, at least some mechanism should exist to augment the
NIC data sets with additional information represented by the Domain
Name System. These more comprehensive tables, accompanied by a
method to guarantee synchronization with the DNS, would significantly
improve the accuracy of the information which non-DNS users apply to
map between names and addresses. However, this solution will not
address the need for support of the richer DNS functionality by the
NIC's system. At a minimum, the incorporation of MX information into
the NIC database is imperative for compatibility between the
"hosts.txt" file and the DNS. Network subcommunities which choose to
maintain a separate and incompatible mapping system will have a
partitioning effect on the subcommunities themselves, but also a
detrimental impact on overall Internet operations. Both end-users
and system and network administrators will inevitably find themselves
devoting considerable attention to tracing inconsistency problems
arising from the discrepancy in mapping methods.
The Internet Activities Board, recognizing the need for universal
interoperability and consistent naming mechanisms, and benefitting
from several years of experience with the Domain Name System, is
advocating a policy that all connected components of the Internet
community should adopt the DNS, and urges parties having policy-
setting authority to adopt the same position and undertake to set
deadlines for conversion to uniform use of DNS.
IAB [Page 4]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
References
1. J.B. Postel and J.K. Reynolds, Domain Requirements, RFC 920,
October 1984.
2. P.V. Mockapetris, Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities,
RFC 1034, November 1987.
3. P.V. Mockapetris, Domain Names - Implementation and Specification,
RFC 1035, November 1987.
4. M.K. Stahl, Domain Administrators Guide, RFC 1032, November 1987.
5. M. Lottor, Domain Administrators Operations Guide, RFC 1033,
November 1987.
6. W.D. Lazear, MILNET Name Domain Transition, RFC 1031,
November 1987.
IAB [Page 5]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
2. Letter from DISA to the IAB
16 APR 1992
Mr. Lyman Chapin
Chairman, Internet Activities Board
BBN Communications
Division of Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.
150 Cambridge Park Dr.
Chambridge, MA 02140
Dear Mr. Chapin:
We have received you letter concerning the adoption and use of the
Domain Name System (DNS) throughout the Internet. Since the DoD
makes significant use of the Internet, we are very concerned with
issues such as the DNS that potentially affect both performance and
interoperability. We have agreed to staff this issue to consider all
the technical and economical impacts on DoD systems. We will inform
you of the decisions reached as the result of our reviews as son as
they are completed.
Sincerely,
Kenneth A. Thomas
Colonel, USA
Chairman, Protocol Standards
Steering Group (PSSG)
Copy to:
Mr. Pasquariello, Associate Director, Center for Standards
Mr. Schonborn, Deputy Director/DDN PMO
IAB [Page 6]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
3. Letter from the IAB to DISA
19 May, 1992
Colonel Kenneth Thomas
Chairman, Protocol Standards Steering Group
Defense Information Systems Agency
Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703-5613
Dear Colonel Thomas,
Thank you for your response to my letter concerning the adoption and
use of the Domain Name System throughout the Internet. I appreciate
your willingness to devote resources to consider this issue, and look
forward to hearing the results of the study.
As LCDR David Chappell has suggested, it would be useful for us to
arrange a meeting to discuss issues of mutual concern to DISA and the
IAB. I do not yet know if it will be feasible for me to arrange to
meet with you in Ft. Monmouth in the near future (my travel schedule
being somewhat oversubscribed), but will get in touch with you soon
to find a suitable date and location.
Regards,
A. Lyman Chapin
Chairman, Internet Activities Board
BBN Communications 20/5b
150 Cambridge Park Drive
Cambridge, MA 02140
IAB [Page 7]
RFC 1401 IAB & DISA Correspondence on DNS January 1993
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
A. Lyman Chapin
BBN Communications Corporation
150 Cambridge Park Drive
Cambridge, MA 02140
Phone: 617-873-3133
Fax: 617-873-4086
Email: Lyman@BBN.COM
IAB [Page 8]