rfc3292
Network Working Group A. Doria
Request for Comments: 3292 Lulea University of Technology
Category: Standards Track F. Hellstrand
K. Sundell
Nortel Networks
T. Worster
June 2002
General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP) V3
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document describes the General Switch Management Protocol
Version 3 (GSMPv3). The GSMPv3 is an asymmetric protocol that allows
one or more external switch controllers to establish and maintain the
state of a label switch such as, an ATM, frame relay or MPLS switch.
The GSMPv3 allows control of both unicast and multicast switch
connection state as well as control of switch system resources and
QoS features.
Acknowledgement
GSMP was created by P. Newman, W. Edwards, R. Hinden, E. Hoffman, F.
Ching Liaw, T. Lyon, and G. Minshall (see [6] and [7]). This version
of GSMP is based on their work.
Contributors
In addition to the authors/editors listed in the heading, many
members of the GSMP group have made significant contributions to this
specification. Among the contributors who have contributed
materially are: Constantin Adam, Clint Bishard, Joachim Buerkle,
Torbjorn Hedqvist, Georg Kullgren, Aurel A. Lazar, Mahesan
Nandikesan, Matt Peters, Hans Sjostrand, Balaji Srinivasan, Jaroslaw
Sydir, Chao-Chun Wang.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Specification of Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................... 4
2. GSMP Packet Encapsulation ...................................... 6
3. Common Definitions and Procedures .............................. 6
3.1 GSMP Packet Format ........................................... 7
3.1.1 Basic GSMP Message format ................................ 7
3.1.2 Fields commonly found in GSMP messages .................. 11
3.1.3 Labels .................................................. 12
3.1.4 Failure Response Messages ............................... 17
4. Connection Management Messages ................................ 18
4.1 General Message Definitions ................................. 18
4.2 Add Branch Message .......................................... 25
4.2.1 ATM specific procedures: ................................ 29
4.3 Delete Tree Message ......................................... 30
4.4 Verify Tree Message ......................................... 30
4.5 Delete All Input Port Message ............................... 30
4.6 Delete All Output Port Message .............................. 31
4.7 Delete Branches Message ..................................... 32
4.8 Move Output Branch Message .................................. 35
4.8.1 ATM Specific Procedures: ................................ 37
4.9 Move Input Branch Message ................................... 38
4.9.1 ATM Specific Procedures: ................................ 41
5. Reservation Management Messages ............................... 42
5.1 Reservation Request Message ................................. 43
5.2 Delete Reservation Message .................................. 46
5.3 Delete All Reservations Message.............................. 47
6. Management Messages ........................................... 47
6.1 Port Management Message ..................................... 47
6.2 Label Range Message ......................................... 53
6.2.1 Labels .................................................. 56
7. State and Statistics Messages ................................. 60
7.1 Connection Activity Message ................................. 61
7.2 Statistics Messages ......................................... 64
7.2.1 Port Statistics Message ................................. 67
7.2.2 Connection Statistics Message ........................... 67
7.2.3 QoS Class Statistics Message ............................ 68
7.3 Report Connection State Message ............................. 68
8. Configuration Messages ........................................ 73
8.1 Switch Configuration Message ................................ 73
8.1.1 Configuration Message Processing ........................ 75
8.2 Port Configuration Message .................................. 75
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
8.2.1 PortType Specific Data .................................. 79
8.3 All Ports Configuration Message ............................. 87
8.4 Service Configuration Message ............................... 89
9. Event Messages ................................................ 93
9.1 Port Up Message ............................................ 95
9.2 Port Down Message .......................................... 95
9.3 Invalid Label Message ...................................... 95
9.4 New Port Message ........................................... 96
9.5 Dead Port Message .......................................... 96
9.6 Adjacency Update Message ................................... 96
10. Service Model Definition .................................... 96
10.1 Overview .................................................. 96
10.2 Service Model Definitions ................................. 97
10.2.1 Original Specifications ............................... 97
10.2.2 Service Definitions ................................... 98
10.2.3 Capability Sets ....................................... 99
10.3 Service Model Procedures .................................. 99
10.4 Service Definitions ....................................... 100
10.4.1 ATM Forum Service Categories .......................... 101
10.4.2 Integrated Services ................................... 104
10.4.3 MPLS CR-LDP ........................................... 105
10.4.4 Frame Relay ........................................... 105
10.4.5 DiffServ .............................................. 106
10.5 Format and Encoding of the Traffic Parameters ............. 106
10.5.1 Traffic Parameters for ATM Forum Services ............. 106
10.5.2 Traffic Parameters for Int-Serv Controlled Load Service 107
10.5.3 Traffic Parameters for CRLDP Service .................. 108
10.5.4 Traffic Parameters for Frame Relay Service ............ 109
10.6 Traffic Controls (TC) Flags ............................... 110
11. Adjacency Protocol .......................................... 111
11.1 Packet Format ............................................. 112
11.2 Procedure ................................................. 115
11.2.1 State Tables .......................................... 117
11.3 Partition Information State ............................... 118
11.4 Loss of Synchronisation.................................... 119
11.5 Multiple Controllers Per Switch Partition ................. 119
11.5.1 Multiple Controller Adjacency Process ................. 120
12. Failure Response Codes ...................................... 121
12.1 Description of Failure and Warning Response Messages ...... 121
12.2 Summary of Failure Response Codes and Warnings ............ 127
13. Security Considerations ..................................... 128
Appendix A Summary of Messages ................................. 129
Appendix B IANA Considerations ................................. 130
References ...................................................... 134
Authors' Addresses .............................................. 136
Full Copyright Statement ........................................ 137
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
1. Introduction
The General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP) is a general purpose
protocol to control a label switch. GSMP allows a controller to
establish and release connections across the switch, add and delete
leaves on a multicast connection, manage switch ports, request
configuration information, request and delete reservation of switch
resources, and request statistics. It also allows the switch to
inform the controller of asynchronous events such as a link going
down. The GSMP protocol is asymmetric, the controller being the
master and the switch being the slave. Multiple switches may be
controlled by a single controller using multiple instantiations of
the protocol over separate control connections. Also a switch may be
controlled by more than one controller by using the technique of
partitioning.
A "physical" switch can be partitioned into several virtual switches
that are referred to as partitions. In this version of GSMP, switch
partitioning is static and occurs prior to running GSMP. The
partitions of a physical switch are isolated from each other by the
implementation and the controller assumes that the resources
allocated to a partition are at all times available to that
partition. A partition appears to its controller as a label switch.
Throughout the rest of this document, the term switch (or
equivalently, label switch) is used to refer to either a physical,
non-partitioned switch or to a partition. The resources allocated to
a partition appear to the controller as if they were the actual
physical resources of the partition. For example if the bandwidth of
a port were divided among several partitions, each partition would
appear to the controller to have its own independent port.
GSMP controls a partitioned switch through the use of a partition
identifier that is carried in every GSMP message. Each partition has
a one-to-one control relationship with its own logical controller
entity (which in the remainder of the document is referred to simply
as a controller) and GSMP independently maintains adjacency between
each controller-partition pair.
Kinds of label switches include frame or cell switches that support
connection oriented switching, using the exact match-forwarding
algorithm based on labels attached to incoming cells or frames. A
switch is assumed to contain multiple "ports". Each port is a
combination of one "input port" and one "output port". Some GSMP
requests refer to the port as a whole, whereas other requests are
specific to the input port or the output port. Cells or labelled
frames arrive at the switch from an external communication link on
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
incoming labelled channels at an input port. Cells or labelled
frames depart from the switch to an external communication link on
labelled channels from an output port.
A switch may support multiple label types, however, each switch port
can support only one label type. The label type supported by a given
port is indicated by the switch to the controller in a port
configuration message. Connections may be established between ports,
supporting different label types. Label types include ATM, Frame
Relay, MPLS Generic and FEC Labels.
A connection across a switch is formed by connecting an incoming
labelled channel to one or more outgoing labelled channels.
Connections are referenced by the input port on which they originate
and the Label values of their incoming labelled channel.
GSMP supports point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections. A
multipoint-to-point connection is specified by establishing multiple
point-to-point connections, each of them specifying the same output
branch. A multipoint-to-multipoint connection is specified by
establishing multiple point-to-multipoint trees each of them
specifying the same output branches.
In general a connection is established with a certain quality of
service (QoS). This version of GSMP includes a default QoS
Configuration and additionally allows the negotiation of alternative,
optional QoS configurations. The default QoS Configuration includes
three QoS Models: a Service Model, a Simple Abstract Model (strict
priorities) and a QoS Profile Model.
The Service Model is based on service definitions found external to
GSMP such as in Integrated Services or ATM Service Categories. Each
connection is assigned a specific service that defines the handling
of the connection by the switch. Additionally, traffic parameters
and traffic controls may be assigned to the connection depending on
the assigned service.
In the Simple Abstract Model, a connection is assigned a priority
when it is established. It may be assumed that for connections that
share the same output port, a cell or frame on a connection with a
higher priority is much more likely to exit the switch before a cell
or frame on a connection with a lower priority if they are both in
the switch at the same time. The number of priorities that each port
of the switch supports may be obtained from the port configuration
message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The QoS Profile Model provides a simple mechanism that allows
connection to be assigned QoS semantics defined externally to GSMP.
The QoS Profile Model can be used to indicate pre-defined
Differentiated Service Per Hop Behaviours (PHBs). Definition of QoS
profiles is outside of the scope of this specification.
All GSMP switches MUST support the default QoS Configuration. A GSMP
switch may additionally support one or more alternative QoS
Configurations. The QoS models of alternative QoS configurations are
defined outside the GSMP specification. GSMP includes a negotiation
mechanism that allows a controller to select from the QoS
configurations that a switch supports.
GSMP contains an adjacency protocol. The adjacency protocol is used
to synchronise states across the link, to negotiate which version of
the GSMP protocol to use, to discover the identity of the entity at
the other end of a link, and to detect when it changes.
2. GSMP Packet Encapsulation
GSMP packets may be transported via any suitable medium. GSMP packet
encapsulations for ATM, Ethernet and TCP are specified in [15].
Additional encapsulations for GSMP packets may be defined in separate
documents.
3. Common Definitions and Procedures
GSMP is a master-slave protocol. The controller issues request
messages to the switch. Each request message indicates whether a
response is required from the switch and contains a transaction
identifier to enable the response to be associated with the request.
The switch replies with a response message indicating either a
successful result or a failure. There are six classes of GSMP
request-response message: Connection Management, Reservation
Management, Port Management, State and Statistics, Configuration, and
Quality of Service. The switch may also generate asynchronous Event
messages to inform the controller of asynchronous events. The
controller can be required to acknowledge event messages, but by
default does not do so. There is also an adjacency protocol message
used to establish synchronisation across the link and maintain a
handshake.
For the request-response messages, each message type has a format for
the request message and a format for the success response. Unless
otherwise specified a failure response message is identical to the
request message that caused the failure, with the Code field
indicating the nature of the failure.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Switch ports are described by a 32-bit port number. The switch
assigns port numbers and it may typically choose to structure the 32
bits into opaque sub-fields that have meaning to the physical
structure of the switch (e.g., slot, port). In general, a port in
the same physical location on the switch will always have the same
port number, even across power cycles. The internal structure of the
port number is opaque to the GSMP protocol. However, for the
purposes of network management such as logging, port naming, and
graphical representation, a switch may declare the physical location
(physical slot and port) of each port. Alternatively, this
information may be obtained by looking up the product identity in a
database.
Each switch port also maintains a port session number assigned by the
switch. A message, with an incorrect port session number MUST be
rejected. This allows the controller to detect a link failure and to
keep states synchronised.
Except for the adjacency protocol message, no GSMP messages may be
sent across the link until the adjacency protocol has achieved
synchronisation, and all GSMP messages received on a link that do not
currently have state synchronisation MUST be discarded.
3.1 GSMP Packet Format
3.1.1 Basic GSMP Message format
All GSMP messages, except the adjacency protocol message, have the
following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Message Body ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
(The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols [5] is to
express numbers in decimal. Numbers in hexadecimal format are
specified by prefacing them with the characters "0x". Numbers in
binary format are specified by prefacing them with the characters
"0b". Data is pictured in "big-endian" order. That is, fields are
described left to right, with the most significant byte on the left
and the least significant byte on the right. Whenever a diagram
shows a group of bytes, the order of transmission of those bytes is
the normal order in which they are read in English. Whenever a byte
represents a numeric quantity, the left most bit in the diagram is
the high order or most significant bit. That is, the bit labelled 0
is the most significant bit. Similarly, whenever a multi-byte field
represents a numeric quantity, the left most bit of the whole field
is the most significant bit. When a multi-byte quantity is
transmitted, the most significant byte is transmitted first. This is
the same coding convention as is used in the ATM layer [1] and AAL-5
[2][3].)
Version
The version number of the GSMP protocol being used in this
session. It SHOULD be set by the sender of the message to the
GSMP protocol version negotiated by the adjacency protocol.
Message Type
The GSMP message type. GSMP messages fall into the following
classes: Connection Management, Reservation Management, Port
Management, State and Statistics, Configuration, Quality of
Service, Events and messages belonging to an Abstract or
Resource Model (ARM) extension. Each class has a number of
different message types. In addition, one Message Type is
allocated to the adjacency protocol.
Result
Field in a Connection Management request message, a Port
Management request message, or a Quality of Service request
message that is used to indicate whether a response is required
to the request message if the outcome is successful. A value
of "NoSuccessAck" indicates that the request message does not
expect a response if the outcome is successful, and a value of
"AckAll" indicates that a response is expected if the outcome
is successful. In both cases a failure response MUST be
generated if the request fails. For State and Statistics, and
Configuration request messages, a value of "NoSuccessAck" in
the request message is ignored and the request message is
handled as if the field was set to "AckAll". (This facility
was added to reduce the control traffic in the case where the
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
controller periodically checks that the state in the switch is
correct. If the controller does not use this capability, all
request messages SHOULD be sent with a value of "AckAll".)
In a response message, the result field can have three values:
"Success," "More," and "Failure". The "Success" and "More"
results both indicate a success response. All messages that
belong to the same success response will have the same
Transaction Identifier. The "Success" result indicates a
success response that may be contained in a single message or
the final message of a success response spanning multiple
messages.
"More" in the result indicates that the message, either request
or response, exceeds the maximum transmission unit of the data
link and that one or more further messages will be sent to
complete the success response.
ReturnReceipt is a result field used in Events to indicate that
an acknowledgement is required for the message. The default
for Events Messages is that the controller will not acknowledge
Events. In the case where a switch requires acknowledgement,
it will set the Result Field to ReturnReceipt in the header of
the Event Message.
The encoding of the result field is:
NoSuccessAck: Result = 1
AckAll: Result = 2
Success: Result = 3
Failure: Result = 4
More: Result = 5
ReturnReceipt Result = 6
The Result field is not used in an adjacency protocol message.
Code
Field gives further information concerning the result in a
response message. It is mostly used to pass an error code in a
failure response but can also be used to give further
information in a success response message or an event message.
In a request message, the code field is not used and is set to
zero. In an adjacency protocol message, the Code field is used
to determine the function of the message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Partition ID
Field used to associate the command with a specific switch
partition. The format of the Partition ID is not defined in
GSMP. If desired, the Partition ID can be divided into
multiple sub-identifiers within a single partition. For
example: the Partition ID could be subdivided into a 6-bit
partition number and a 2-bit sub-identifier which would allow a
switch to support 64 partitions with 4 available IDs per
partition.
Transaction Identifier
Used to associate a request message with its response message.
For request messages, the controller may select any transaction
identifier. For response messages, the transaction identifier
is set to the value of the transaction identifier from the
message to which it is a response. For event messages, the
transaction identifier SHOULD be set to zero. The Transaction
Identifier is not used, and the field is not present, in the
adjacency protocol.
I flag
If I is set then the SubMessage Number field indicates the
total number of SubMessage segments that compose the entire
message. If it is not set then the SubMessage Number field
indicates the sequence number of this SubMessage segment within
the whole message.
SubMessage Number
When a message is segmented because it exceeds the MTU of the
link layer, each segment will include a submessage number to
indicate its position. Alternatively, if it is the first
submessage in a sequence of submessages, the I flag will be set
and this field will contain the total count of submessage
segments.
Length
Length of the GSMP message including its header fields and
defined GSMP message body. The length of additional data
appended to the end of the standard message SHOULD be included
in the Length field.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
3.1.2 Fields commonly found in GSMP messages
The following fields are frequently found in GSMP messages. They are
defined here to avoid repetition.
Port
Gives the port number of the switch port to which the message
applies.
Port Session Number
Each switch port maintains a Port Session Number assigned by
the switch. The port session number of a port remains
unchanged while the port is continuously in the Available state
and the link status is continuously Up. When a port returns to
the Available state after it has been Unavailable or in any of
the Loopback states, or when the line status returns to the Up
state after it has been Down or in Test, or after a power
cycle, a new Port Session Number MUST be generated. Port
session numbers SHOULD be assigned using some form of random
number.
If the Port Session Number in a request message does not match
the current Port Session Number for the specified port, a
failure response message MUST be returned with the Code field
indicating, "5: Invalid port session number". The current port
session number for a port may be obtained using a Port
Configuration or an All Ports Configuration message.
3.1.2.1 Additional General Message Information
1. Any field in a GSMP message that is unused or defined as
"reserved" MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the
receiver.
2. Flags that are undefined will be designated as: x: reserved
3. It is not an error for a GSMP message to contain additional data
after the end of the Message Body. This is allowed to support
proprietary and experimental purposes. However, the maximum
transmission unit of the GSMP message, as defined by the data link
layer encapsulation, MUST NOT be exceeded. The length of
additional data appended to the end of the standard message SHOULD
be included in the message length field.
4. A success response message MUST NOT be sent until the requested
operation has been successfully completed.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
3.1.3 Labels
All labels in GSMP have a common structure composed of tuples,
consisting of a Type, a Length, and a Value. Such tuples are
commonly known as TLV's, and are a good way of encoding information
in a flexible and extensible format. A label TLV is encoded as a 2
octet field that uses 12 bits to specify a Type and four bits to
specify certain behaviour specified below, followed by a 2 octet
Length field, followed by a variable length Value field.
Additionally, a label field can be composed of many stacked labels
that together constitute the label.
A summary of TLV labels supported in this version of the protocol is
listed below:
TLV Label Type Section Title
--------- ---- -------------
ATM Label 0x100 ATM TLV Labels
FR Label 0x101 Frame Relay TLV Labels
MPLS Gen Label 0x102 MPLS Generic TLV Labels
FEC Label 0x103 FEC TLV Labels
All Labels will be designated as follow:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| Label Type | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Label Value ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
x: Reserved Flags.
These are generally used by specific messages and will be
defined in those messages.
S: Stacked Label Indicator
Label Stacking is discussed below in section 3.1.3.5
Label Type
A 12-bit field indicating the type of label.
Label Length
A 16-bit field indicating the length of the Label Value field
in bytes.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Label Value
A variable length field that is an integer number of 32 bit
words long. The Label Value field is interpreted according to
the Label Type as described in the following sections.
3.1.3.1 ATM Labels
If the Label Type = ATM Label, the labels MUST be interpreted as an
ATM labels as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| ATM Label (0x100) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x| VPI | VCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
For a virtual path connection (switched as a single virtual path
connection) or a virtual path (switched as one or more virtual
channel connections within the virtual path) the VCI field is not
used.
ATM distinguishes between virtual path connections and virtual
channel connections. The connection management messages apply both
to virtual channel connections and virtual path connections. The Add
Branch and Move Branch connection management messages have two
Message Types. One Message Type indicates that a virtual channel
connection is required, and the other Message Type indicates that a
virtual path connection is required. The Delete Branches, Delete
Tree, and Delete All connection management messages have only a
single Message Type because they do not need to distinguish between
virtual channel connections and virtual path connections. For
virtual path connections, neither Input VCI fields nor Output VCI
fields are required. They SHOULD be set to zero by the sender and
ignored by the receiver. Virtual channel branches may not be added
to an existing virtual path connection. Conversely, virtual path
branches may not be added to an existing virtual channel connection.
In the Port Configuration message each switch input port may declare
whether it is capable of supporting virtual path switching (i.e.,
accepting connection management messages requesting virtual path
connections).
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
3.1.3.2 Frame Relay Labels
If the TLV Type = FR Label, the labels MUST be interpreted as a Frame
Relay labels as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| FR Label (0x101) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x| Res |Len| DLCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Res
The Res field is reserved in [21], i.e., it is not explicitly
reserved by GSMP.
Len
The Len field specifies the number of bits of the DLCI. The
following values are supported:
Len DLCI bits
0 10
2 23
DLCI
DLCI is the binary value of the Frame Relay Label. The
significant number of bits (10 or 23) of the label value is to
be encoded into the Data Link Connection Identifier (DLCI)
field when part of the Frame Relay data link header [13].
3.1.3.3 MPLS Generic Labels
If a port's attribute PortType=MPLS, then that port's labels are for
use on links for which label values are independent of the underlying
link technology. Examples of such links are PPP and Ethernet. On
such links the labels are carried in MPLS label stacks [14]. If the
Label Type = MPLS Generic Label, the labels MUST be interpreted as
Generic MPLS labels as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| MPLS Gen Label (0x102)| Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x| MPLS Label |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
MPLS Label
This is a 20-bit label value as specified in [14], represented
as a 20-bit number in a 4-byte field.
3.1.3.4 FEC Labels
Labels may be bound to Forwarding Equivalence Classes (FECs) as
defined in [18]. A FEC is a list of one or more FEC elements. The
FEC TLV encodes FEC items. In this version of the protocol only,
Prefix FECs are supported. If the Label Type = FEC Label, the labels
MUST be interpreted as Forwarding Equivalence Class Labels as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| FEC Label (0x103) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~ FEC Element 1 ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~ FEC Element n ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
FEC Element
The FEC element encoding depends on the type of FEC element.
In this version of GSMP only, Prefix FECs are supported.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Element Type | Address Family | Prefix Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~ Prefix ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Element Type
In this version of GSMP the only supported Element Type is
Prefix FEC Elements. The Prefix FEC Element is a one-octet
value, encoded as 0x02.
Address Family
Two-byte quantity containing a value from ADDRESS FAMILY
NUMBERS in [5], that encodes the address family for the address
prefix in the Prefix field.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Prefix Length
One byte containing the length in bits of the address prefix
that follows. A length of zero indicates a prefix that matches
all addresses (the default destination); in this case the
Prefix itself is zero bytes.
Prefix
An address prefix encoded according to the Address Family
field, whose length, in bits, was specified in the Prefix
Length field.
3.1.3.5 Label Stacking
Label stacking is a technique used in MPLS [14] that allows
hierarchical labelling. MPLS label stacking is similar to, but
subtly different from, the VPI/VCI hierarchy of labels in ATM. There
is no set limit to the depth of label stacks that can be used in
GSMP.
When the Stacked Label Indicator S is set to 1 it indicates that an
additional label field will be appended to the adjacent label field.
For example, a stacked Input Short Label could be designated as
follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
** |x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Stacked Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
** Note: There can be zero or more Stacked Labels fields (like
those marked **) following an Input or Output Label field. A
Stacked Label follows the previous label field if and only if
the S Flag in the previous label is set.
When a label is extended by stacking, it is treated by the protocol
as a single extended label, and all operations on that label are
atomic. For example, in an add branch message, the entire input
label is switched for the entire output label. Likewise, in Move
Input Branch and Move Output Branch messages, the entire label is
swapped. For that reason, in all messages that designate a label
field, it will be depicted as a single 64-bit field, though it might
be instantiated by many 64-bit fields in practice.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
3.1.4 Failure Response Messages
A failure response message is formed by returning the request message
that caused the failure with the Result field in the header
indicating failure (Result = 4) and the Code field giving the failure
code. The failure code specifies the reason for the switch being
unable to satisfy the request message.
If the switch issues a failure response in reply to a request
message, no change should be made to the state of the switch as a
result of the message causing the failure. (For request messages
that contain multiple requests, such as the Delete Branches message,
the failure response message will specify which requests were
successful and which failed. The successful requests may result in
changed state.)
A warning response message is a success response (Result = 3) with
the Code field specifying the warning code. The warning code
specifies a warning that was generated during the successful
operation.
If the switch issues a failure response it MUST choose the most
specific failure code according to the following precedence:
- Invalid Message
- General Message Failure
- Specific Message Failure
A failure response specified in the text defining the message
type.
- Connection Failures
- Virtual Path Connection Failures
- Multicast Failures
- QoS Failures
- General Failures
- Warnings
If multiple failures match in any of the categories, the one that is
listed first should be returned. Descriptions of the Failure
response messages can be found in section 12.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
4. Connection Management Messages
4.1 General Message Definitions
Connection management messages are used by the controller to
establish, delete, modify and verify connections across the switch.
The Add Branch, Delete Tree, and Delete All connection management
messages have the following format, for both request and response
messages:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reservation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Adaptation Method |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
When required, the Add Branch, Move Input Branch and Move Output
Branch messages have an additional, variable length data block
appended to the above message. This will be required when
indicated by the IQS and OQS flags (if the value of either is set
to 0b10) and the service selector. The additional data block has
the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input TC Flags|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Output TC Flags|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Reservation ID
Identifies the reservation that MUST be deployed for the branch
being added. Reservations are established using reservation
management messages (see Chapter 5). A value of zero indicates
that no Reservation is being deployed for the branch. If a
reservation with a corresponding Reservation ID exists, then
the reserved resources MUST be applied to the branch. If the
numerical value of Reservation ID is greater than the value of
Max Reservations (from the Switch Configuration message), a
failure response is returned indicating "20: Reservation ID out
of Range". If the value of Input Port differs from the input
port specified in the reservation, or if the value of Output
Port differs from the output port specified in the reservation,
a failure response MUST be returned indicating "21: Mismatched
reservation ports". If no reservation corresponding to
Reservation ID exists, a failure response MUST be returned
indicating "23: Non-existent reservation ID".
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
If a valid Reservation ID is specified and the Service Model is
used (i.e., IQS or OQS=0b10) then the Traffic Parameters Block
may be omitted from the Add Branch message indicating that the
Traffic Parameters specified in the corresponding Reservation
Request message are to be used.
Input Port
Identifies a switch input port.
Input Label
Identifies an incoming labelled channel arriving at the switch
input port indicated by the Input Port field. The value in the
Input Label field MUST be interpreted according to the Label
Type attribute of the switch input port indicated by the Input
Port field.
Input Service Selector
Identifies details of the service specification being used for
the connection. The interpretation depends upon the Input QoS
Model Selector (IQS).
IQS = 00: In this case, the Input Service Selector indicates a
simple priority.
IQS = 01: In this case, the Input Service Selector is an opaque
service profile identifier. The definition of these
service profiles is outside the scope of this
specification. Service Profiles can be used to
indicate pre-defined Differentiated Service Per Hop
Behaviours.
IQS = 10: In this case, the Input Service Selector corresponds
to a Service Spec as defined in Chapter 8.2. When
the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10, then a
Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the message.
IQS = 11: In this case the Input Service Selector corresponds
to an ARM service specification. Definition of ARM
service specifications is outside the scope of this
specification and is determined by the MType as
defined in Chapter 8.1.
Output Port
Identifies a switch output port.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Output Label
Identifies an outgoing labelled channel departing at the switch
output port indicated by the Output Port field. The value in
the Output Label field MUST be interpreted according to the
Label Type attribute of the switch input port indicated by the
Output Port field
Output Service Selector
Identifies details of the service model being used. The
interpretation depends upon the Output QoS Model selector
(OQS).
OQS = 00: In this case the Output Service Selector indicates a
simple priority.
OQS = 01: In this case the Output Service Selector is an opaque
service profile identifier. The definition of these
service profiles is outside the scope of this
specification. Service Profiles can be used to
indicate pre-defined Differentiated Service Per Hop
Behaviours.
OQS = 10: In this case the Output Service Selector corresponds
to a Service Spec as defined in Chapter 8.2. When
the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10 then a
Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the message.
OQS = 11: In this case the Output Service Selector corresponds
to an ARM service specification. Definition of ARM
service specifications is outside the scope of this
specification and is determined by the MType as
defined in Chapter 8.1.
IQS, OQS
Input and Output QoS Model Selector:
The QoS Model Selector is used to specify a QoS Model for the
connection. The values of IQS and OQS determine respectively
the interpretation of the Input Service Selector and the Output
Service Selector, and SHOULD be interpreted as a priority, a
QoS profile, a service specification, or an ARM specification
as shown:
IQS/OQS QoS Model Service Selector
------- --------- ----------------
00 Simple Abstract Model Priority
01 QoS Profile Model QoS Profile
10 Default Service Model Service Specification
11 Optional ARM ARM Specification
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
P Flag
If the Parameter flag is set it indicates that a single
instance of the Traffic Parameter block is provided. This
occurs in cases where the Input Traffic Parameters are
identical to Output Traffic Parameters.
N Flag
The Null flag is used to indicate a null adaptation method.
This occurs when the branch is connecting two ports of the same
type.
O Flag
The Opaque flag indicates whether the adaptation fields are
opaque, or whether they are defined by the protocol. See the
definition of Adaptation Method below for further information.
Adaptation Method
The adaptation method is used to define the adaptation framing
that may be in use when moving traffic from one port type to
another port type; e.g., from a frame relay port to an ATM
port. The content of this field is defined by the Opaque flag.
If the Opaque flag is set, then this field is defined by the
switch manufacturer and is not defined in this protocol. If
the opaque flag is not set, the field is divided into two 12-
bit fields as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Input Adaptation | Output Adaptation |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Input Adaptation
Adaptation framing method used on incoming connections.
Output Adaptation
Adaptation framing method used on outgoing connections.
Adaptation Types:
0x100 PPP
0x200 FRF.5
0x201 FRF.8
Input and Output TC Flags
TC (Traffic Control) Flags are used in Add Branch, Move Input
Branch and Move Output Branch messages for connections using
the Service Model (i.e., when IQS or OQS=0b10). The TC Flags
field is defined in Section 10.6.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Input and Output Traffic Parameters Block
This variable length field is used in Add Branch, Move Input
Branch and Move Output Branch messages for connections using
the Service Model (i.e., when IQS or OQS=0b10). Traffic
Parameters Block is defined in Section 10.5. The Traffic
Parameters Block may be omitted if a valid, non-zero
Reservation ID is specified, in which case the Traffic
Parameters of the corresponding Reservation Request message are
used. If the P flag is set, then the appended message block
will only include a single traffic parameter block which will
be used for both input and output traffic.
For all connection management messages, except the Delete Branches
message, the success response message is a copy of the request
message returned with the Result field indicating success. The Code
field is not used in a connection management success response
message.
The failure response message is a copy of the request message
returned with a Result field indicating failure.
Fundamentally, no distinction is made between point-to-point and
point-to-multipoint connections. By default, the first Add Branch
message for a particular Input Port and Input Label will establish a
point-to-point connection. The second Add Branch message with the
same Input Port and Input Label fields will convert the connection to
a point-to-multipoint connection with two branches. However, to
avoid possible inefficiency with some switch designs, the Multicast
Flag is provided. If the controller knows that a new connection is
point-to-multipoint when establishing the first branch, it may
indicate this in the Multicast Flag. Subsequent Add Branch messages
with the same Input Port and Input Label fields will add further
branches to the point-to-multipoint connection. Use of the Delete
Branch message on a point-to-multipoint connection with two branches
will result in a point-to-point connection. However, the switch may
structure this connection as a point-to-multipoint connection with a
single output branch if it chooses. (For some switch designs this
structure may be more convenient.) Use of the Delete Branch message
on a point-to-point connection will delete the point-to-point
connection. There is no concept of a connection with zero output
branches. All connections are unidirectional, one input labelled
channel to one or more output labelled channels.
In GSMP a multipoint-to-point connection is specified by establishing
multiple point-to-point connections, each of them specifying the same
output branch. (An output branch is specified by an output port and
output label.)
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The connection management messages may be issued regardless of the
Port Status of the switch port. Connections may be established or
deleted when a switch port is in the Available, Unavailable, or any
of the Loopback states. However, all connection states on an input
port will be deleted when the port returns to the Available state
from any other state, i.e., when a Port Management message is
received for that port with the Function field indicating either
Bring Up, or Reset Input Port.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
4.2 Add Branch Message
The Add Branch message is a connection management message used to
establish a connection or to add an additional branch to an existing
connection. It may also be used to check the connection state stored
in the switch. The connection is specified by the Input Port and
Input Label fields. The output branch is specified by the Output
Port and Output Label fields. The quality of service requirements of
the connection are specified by the QoS Model Selector and Service
Selector fields. To request a connection the Add Branch message is:
Message Type = 16
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reservation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Adaptation Method |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|M|B| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|M|R| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
When the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10 then the following
Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the above message:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Input TC Flags |x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Input Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Output TC Flags|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Output Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
M: Multicast
Multicast flags are used as a hint for point-to-multipoint or
multipoint-to-point connections in the Add Branch message.
They are not used in any other connection management messages
and in these messages they SHOULD be set to zero. There are
two instances of the M-bit in the Add Branch message; one for
input branch specified by the Input Port and Input Label fields
and one for the output branch specified by the Output Port and
Output Label fields. If set for the input branch (in front of
Input Label field), it indicates that the connection is very
likely to be a point-to-multipoint connection. If zero, it
indicates that this connection is very likely to be a point-
to-point connection or is unknown. If set for the output
branch (in front of the Output Label field), it indicates that
the connection is very likely to be a multipoint-to-point
connection. If zero, it indicates that this connection is very
likely to be a point-to-point connection or is unknown.
If M flags are set for input as well as output branches, it
indicates that the connection is very likely to be a
multipoint-to-multipoint connection.
The Multicast flags are only used in the Add Branch message
when establishing the first branch of a new connection. It is
not required to be set when establishing subsequent branches of
a point-to-multipoint or a multipoint-to-point connection and
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
on such connections it SHOULD be ignored by the receiver.
(Except in cases where the connection replace bit is enabled
and set, the receipt of the second and subsequent Add Branch
messages from the receiver indicates a point-to-multipoint or a
multipoint-to-point connection.) If it is known that this is
the first branch of a point-to-multipoint or a multipoint-to-
point connection, this flag SHOULD be set. If it is unknown,
or if it is known that the connection is point-to-point, this
flag SHOULD be zero. The use of the multicast flag is not
mandatory and may be ignored by the switch. If unused, the
flags SHOULD be set to zero. Some switches use a different
data structure for multicast connections rather than for
point-to-point connections. These flags prevent the switch
from setting up a point-to-point structure for the first branch
of a multicast connection that MUST immediately be deleted and
reconfigured as point-to-multipoint or multipoint-to-point when
the second branch is established.
B: Bi-directional
The Bi-directional flag applies only to the Add Branch message.
In all other Connection Management messages it is not used. It
may only be used when establishing a point-to-point connection.
The Bi-directional flag in an Add Branch message, if set,
requests that two unidirectional connections be established,
one in the forward direction, and one in the reverse direction.
It is equivalent to two Add Branch messages, one specifying the
forward direction, and one specifying the reverse direction.
The forward direction uses the values of Input Port, Input
Label, Output Port and Output Label as specified in the Add
Branch message. The reverse direction is derived by exchanging
the values specified in the Input Port and Input Label fields,
with those of the Output Port and Output Label fields
respectively. Thus, a connection in the reverse direction
originates at the input port specified by the Output Port
field, on the label specified by the Output Label field. It
departs from the output port specified by the Input Port field,
on the label specified by the Input Label field.
The Bi-directional flag is simply a convenience to establish
two unidirectional connections in opposite directions between
the same two ports, with identical Labels, using a single Add
Branch message. In all future messages the two unidirectional
connections MUST be handled separately. There is no bi-
directional delete message. However, a single Delete Branches
message with two Delete Branch Elements, one for the forward
connection and one for the reverse, may be used.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
R: Connection Replace
The Connection Replace flag applies only to the Add Branch
message and is not used in any other Connection Management
messages. The R flag is used in cases when creation of
multipoint-to-point connections is undesirable (e.g., POTS
applications where fan-in is meaningless). If the R flag is
set, the new connection replaces any existing connection if the
label is already in use at the same Output Port.
The Connection Replace mechanism allows a single Add Connection
command to function as either a Move Branch message or a
combination of Delete Branch/Add Branch messages. This
mechanism is provided to support existing 64k call handling
applications, such as emulating 64k voice switches.
The use of R flag is optional and MUST be pre-configured in the
Port Management message [see section 6.1] to activate its use.
The R flag MUST NOT be set if it is not pre-configured with the
Port Management message. The switch MUST then return a Failure
Response message: "36: Replace of connection is not activated
on switch". Information about whether the function is active
or not, can be obtained by using the Port Configuration message
[see section 8.2].
The R flag MUST NOT be set if either the M flag or the B flag
is set. If a switch receives an Add connection request that
has the R flag set with either the B or the M flag set, it MUST
return a failure response message of: "37: Connection
replacement mode cannot be combined with Bi-directional or
Multicast mode"
If the connection specified by the Input Port and Input Label fields
does not already exist, it MUST be established with the single output
branch specified in the request message. If the Bi-directional Flag
in the Flags field is set, the reverse connection MUST also be
established. The output branch SHOULD have the QoS attributes
specified by the Class of Service field.
If the connection specified by the Input Port and Input Label fields
already exists and the R flag is not set, but the specified output
branch does not, the new output branch MUST be added. The new output
branch SHOULD have the QoS attributes specified by the Class of
Service field.
If the connection specified by the Input Port and Input Label fields
already exists and the specified output branch also already exists,
the QoS attributes of the connection, specified by the Class of
Service field, if different from the request message, SHOULD be
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
changed to that in the request message. A success response message
MUST be sent if the Result field of the request message is "AckAll".
This allows the controller to periodically reassert the state of a
connection or to change its priority. If the result field of the
request message is "NoSuccessAck" a success response message SHOULD
NOT be returned. This may be used to reduce the traffic on the
control link for messages that are reasserting a previously
established state. For messages that are reasserting a previously
established state, the switch MUST always check that this state is
correctly established in the switch hardware (i.e., the actual
connection tables used to forward cells or frames).
If the connection specified by the Input Port and Input Label fields
already exists, and the Bi-directional Flag in the Flags field is
set, a failure response MUST be returned indicating: "15: Point-to-
point bi-directional connection already exists".
It should be noted that different switches support multicast in
different ways. There may be a limit to the total number of point-
to-multipoint or multipoint-to-point connections certain switches can
support, and possibly a limit on the maximum number of branches that
a point-to-multipoint or multipoint-to-point connection may specify.
Some switches also impose a limit on the number of different Label
values that may be assigned e.g., to the output branches of a point-
to-multipoint connection. Many switches are incapable of supporting
more than a single branch of any particular point-to-multipoint
connection on the same output port. Specific failure codes are
defined for some of these conditions.
4.2.1 ATM specific procedures:
To request an ATM virtual path connection the ATM Virtual Path
Connection (VPC) Add Branch message is:
Message Type = 26
An ATM virtual path connection can only be established between ATM
ports, i.e., ports with the "ATM" Label Type attribute. If an ATM
VPC Add Branch message is received and either the switch input port
specified by the Input Port field or the switch output port specified
by the Output Port field is not an ATM port, a failure response
message MUST be returned indicating, "28: ATM Virtual path switching
is not supported on non-ATM ports".
If an ATM VPC Add Branch message is received and the switch input
port specified by the Input Port field does not support virtual path
switching, a failure response message MUST be returned indicating,
"24: ATM virtual path switching is not supported on this input port".
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
If an ATM virtual path connection already exists on the virtual path
specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields, a failure response
message MUST be returned, indicating "27: Attempt to add an ATM
virtual channel connection branch to an existing virtual path
connection". For the VPC Add Branch message, if a virtual channel
connection already exists on any of the virtual channels within the
virtual path specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields, a
failure response message MUST be returned indicating, "26: Attempt to
add an ATM virtual path connection branch to an existing virtual
channel connection".
4.3 Delete Tree Message
The Delete Tree message is a Connection Management message used to
delete an entire connection. All remaining branches of the
connection are deleted. A connection is defined by the Input Port
and the Input Label fields. The Output Port and Output Label fields
are not used in this message. The Delete Tree message is:
Message Type = 18
If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll" a success
response message MUST be sent upon successful deletion of the
specified connection. The success message MUST NOT be sent until the
delete operation has been completed and if possible, not until all
data on the connection, queued for transmission, has been
transmitted.
4.4 Verify Tree Message
The Verify Tree message has been removed from this version of GSMP.
Message Type = 19
If a request message is received with Message Type = 19, a failure
response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating:
"3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.".
4.5 Delete All Input Port Message
The Delete All Input Port message is a connection management message
used to delete all connections on a switch input port. All
connections that originate at the specified input port MUST be
deleted. On completion of the operation all dynamically assigned
Label values for the specified port MUST be unassigned, i.e., there
MUST be no connections established in the Label space that GSMP
controls on this port. The Service Selectors, Output Port, Input
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Label and Output Label fields are not used in this message. The
Delete All Input Port message is:
Message Type = 20
If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll", a success
response message MUST be sent upon completion of the operation. The
success response message MUST NOT be sent until the operation has
been completed.
The following failure response messages may be returned to a Delete
All Input Port request.
3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
4: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
5: Invalid Port Session Number.
If any field in a Delete All Input Port message not covered by the
above failure codes is invalid, a failure response MUST be returned
indicating: "2: Invalid request message". Else, the Delete All Input
Port operation MUST be completed successfully and a success message
returned. No other failure messages are permitted.
4.6 Delete All Output Port Message
The Delete All message is a connection management message used to
delete all connections on a switch output port. All connections that
have the specified output port MUST be deleted. On completion of the
operation all dynamically assigned Label values for the specified
port MUST be unassigned, i.e., there MUST be no connections
established in the Label space that GSMP controls on this port. The
Service Selectors, Input Port, Input Label and Output Label fields
are not used in this message. The Delete All Output Port message is:
Message Type = 21
If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll", a success
response message MUST be sent upon completion of the operation. The
success response message MUST NOT be sent until the operation has
been completed.
The following failure response messages may be returned to a Delete
All Output Port request.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
4: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
5: Invalid Port Session Number.
If any field in a Delete All Output Port message not covered by the
above failure codes is invalid, a failure response MUST be returned
indicating: "2: Invalid request message". Else, the delete all
operation MUST be completed successfully and a success message
returned. No other failure messages are permitted.
4.7 Delete Branches Message
The Delete Branches message is a connection management message used
to request one or more delete branch operations. Each delete branch
operation deletes a branch of a channel, or in the case of the last
branch of a connection, it deletes the connection. The Delete
Branches message is:
Message Type = 17
The request message has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Number of Elements |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Delete Branch Elements ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Number of Elements
Specifies the number of Delete Branch Elements to follow in the
message. The number of Delete Branch Elements in a Delete
Branches message MUST NOT cause the packet length to exceed the
maximum transmission unit defined by the encapsulation.
Each Delete Branch Element specifies a branch to be deleted and has
the following structure:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Error |x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Element Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
Error
Is used to return a failure code indicating the reason for the
failure of a specific Delete Branch Element in a Delete
Branches failure response message. The Error field is not used
in the request message and MUST be set to zero. A value of
zero is used to indicate that the delete operation specified by
this Delete Branch Element was successful. Values for the
other failure codes are specified in Section 12, "Failure
Response Codes".
All other fields of the Delete Branch Element have the same
definition as specified for the other connection management
messages.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
In each Delete Branch Element, a connection is specified by the Input
Port and Input Label fields. The specific branch to be deleted is
indicated by the Output Port and Output Label fields.
If the Result field of the Delete Branches request message is
"AckAll" a success response message MUST be sent upon successful
deletion of the branches specified by all of the Delete Branch
Elements. The success response message MUST NOT be sent until all of
the delete branch operations have been completed. The success
response message is only sent if all of the requested delete branch
operations were successful. No Delete Branch Elements are returned
in a Delete Branches success response message and the Number of
Elements field MUST be set to zero.
If there is a failure in any of the Delete Branch Elements, a Delete
Branches failure response message MUST be returned. The Delete
Branches failure response message is a copy of the request message
with the Code field of the entire message set to "10: General Message
Failure" and the Error field of each Delete Branch Element indicating
the result of each requested delete operation. A failure in any of
the Delete Branch Elements MUST NOT interfere with the processing of
any other Delete Branch Elements.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
4.8 Move Output Branch Message
The Move Output Branch message is used to move a branch of an
existing connection from its current output port label to a new
output port label in a single atomic transaction. The Move Output
Branch connection management message has the following format for
both request and response messages:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Old Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| New Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Adaptation Method |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Old Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ New Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
When the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10 then the following
Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the above message:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Input TC Flags |x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Input Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Output TC Flags|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Output Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
The Move Output Branch message is a connection management message
used to move a single output branch of connection from its current
output port and Output Label, to a new output port and Output Label
on the same connection. None of the connection's other output
branches are modified. When the operation is complete the original
Output Label on the original output port will be deleted from the
connection.
The Move Output Branch message is:
Message Type = 22
For the Move Output Branch message, if the connection specified by
the Input Port and Input Label fields already exists, and the output
branch specified by the Old Output Port and Old Output Label fields
exists as a branch on that connection, the output branch specified by
the New Output Port and New Output Label fields is added to the
connection and the branch specified by the Old Output Port and Old
Output Label fields is deleted. If the Result field of the request
message is "AckAll", a success response message MUST be sent upon
successful completion of the operation. The success response message
MUST NOT be sent until the Move Branch operation has been completed.
For the Move Output Branch message, if the connection specified by
the Input Port and Input Label fields already exists, but the output
branch specified by the Old Output Port and Old Output Label fields
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
does not exist as a branch on that connection, a failure response
MUST be returned with the Code field indicating, "12: The specified
branch does not exist".
4.8.1 ATM Specific Procedures:
The ATM VPC Move Output Branch message is a connection management
message used to move a single output branch of a virtual path
connection from its current output port and output VPI, to a new
output port and output VPI on the same virtual channel connection.
None of the other output branches are modified. When the operation
is complete the original output VPI on the original output port will
be deleted from the connection.
The VPC Move Branch message is:
Message Type = 27
For the VPC Move Output Branch message, if the virtual path
connection specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields already
exists, and the output branch specified by the Old Output Port and
Old Output VPI fields exists as a branch on that connection, the
output branch specified by the New Output Port and New Output VPI
fields is added to the connection and the branch specified by the Old
Output Port and Old Output VPI fields is deleted. If the Result
field of the request message is "AckAll", a success response message
MUST be sent upon successful completion of the operation. The
success response message MUST NOT be sent until the Move Branch
operation has been completed.
For the VPC Move Output Branch message, if the virtual path
connection specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields already
exists, but the output branch specified by the Old Output Port and
Old Output VPI fields does not exist as a branch on that connection,
a failure response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating,
"12: The specified branch does not exist".
If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port and
Input Label fields; or the virtual path connection specified by the
Input Port and Input VPI fields; does not exist, a failure response
MUST be returned with the Code field indicating, "11: The specified
connection does not exist".
If the output branch specified by the New Output Port, New Output
VPI, and New Output VCI fields for a virtual channel connection; or
the output branch specified by the New Output Port and New Output VPI
fields for a virtual path connection; is already in use by any
connection other than that specified by the Input Port and Input
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Label fields, then the resulting output branch will have multiple
input branches. If multiple point-to-point connections share the
same output branch, the result will be a multipoint-to-point
connection. If multiple point-to-multipoint trees share the same
output branches, the result will be a multipoint-to-multipoint
connection.
4.9 Move Input Branch Message
The Move Input Branch message is used to move a branch of an existing
connection from its current input port label to a new input port
label in a single atomic transaction. The Move Input Branch
connection management message has the following format for both
request and response messages:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Old Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| New Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Adaptation Method |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Old Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ New Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
When the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10, then the
following Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the above message:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Input TC Flags |x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Input Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Output TC Flags|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Output Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
The Move Input Branch message is a connection management message used
to move a single input branch of connection from its current input
port and Input Label, to a new input port and Input Label on the same
connection. None of the connection's other input branches are
modified. When the operation is complete, the original Input Label
on the original input port will be deleted from the connection.
The Move Input Branch message is:
Message Type = 23
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
For the Move Input Branch message, if the connection specified by the
Output Port and Output Label fields already exists, and the input
branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old Input Label fields
exists as a branch on that connection, the input branch specified by
the New Input Port and New Input Label fields is added to the
connection and the branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old
Input Label fields is deleted. If the Result field of the request
message is "AckAll", a success response message MUST be sent upon
successful completion of the operation. The success response message
MUST NOT be sent until the Move Input Branch operation has been
completed.
For the Move Input Branch message, if the connection specified by the
Output Port and Output Label fields already exists, but the input
branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old Input Label fields
does not exist as a branch on that connection, a failure response
MUST be returned with the Code field indicating, "12: The specified
branch does not exist".
4.9.1 ATM Specific Procedures:
The ATM VPC Move Input Branch message is a connection management
message used to move a single input branch of a virtual path
connection from its current input port and input VPI, to a new input
port and input VPI on the same virtual channel connection. None of
the other input branches are modified. When the operation is
complete, the original input VPI on the original input port will be
deleted from the connection.
The VPC Move Input Branch message is:
Message Type = 28
For the VPC Move Input Branch message, if the virtual path connection
specified by the Output Port and Output VPI fields already exists,
and the input branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old Input
VPI fields exists as a branch on that connection, the input branch
specified by the New Input Port and New Input VPI fields is added to
the connection and the branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old
Input VPI fields is deleted. If the Result field of the request
message is "AckAll" a success response message MUST be sent upon
successful completion of the operation. The success response message
MUST NOT be sent until the Move Input Branch operation has been
completed.
For the VPC Move Input Branch message, if the virtual path connection
specified by the Output Port and Output VPI fields already exists,
but the input branch specified by the Old Input Port and Old Input
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
VPI fields does not exist as a branch on that connection, a failure
response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating, "12: The
specified branch does not exist".
If the virtual channel connection specified by the Output Port and
Output Label fields, or if the virtual path connection specified by
the Output Port and Output VPI fields does not exist, a failure
response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating, "11: The
specified connection does not exist".
If the input branch specified by the New Input Port, New Input VPI,
and New Input VCI fields for a virtual channel connection, or the
input branch specified by the New Input Port and New Input VPI fields
for a virtual path connection, is already in use by any connection
other than that specified by the Output Port and Output Label fields,
then the resulting input branch will have multiple output branches.
If multiple point-to-point connections share the same input branch,
the result will be a point-to-multipoint connection. If multiple
multipoint-to-point trees share the same input branches, the result
will be a multipoint-to-multipoint connection.
5. Reservation Management Messages
GSMP allows switch resources (e.g., bandwidth, buffers, queues,
labels, etc.) to be reserved for connections before the connections
themselves are established. This is achieved through the
manipulation of Reservations in the switch.
Reservations are hard state objects in the switch that can be created
by the controller by sending a Reservation Request message. Each
Reservation is uniquely identified by an identifying number called a
Reservation ID. Reservation objects can be deleted with the Delete
Reservation message or the Delete All Reservations message. A
reservation object is also deleted when the Reservation is deployed
by specifying a Reservation ID in a valid Add Branch message.
The reserved resources MUST remain reserved until either the
reservation is deployed, in which case the resources are applied to a
branch, or the reservation is explicitly deleted (with a Delete
Reservation message or a Delete All Reservations message), in which
case the resources are freed. Reservations and reserved resources
are deleted if the switch is reset.
A Reservation object includes its Reservation ID plus all the
connection state associated with a branch with the exception that the
branch's input label and/or output label may be unspecified. The
Request Reservation message is therefore almost identical to the Add
Branch message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The switch establishes the maximum number of reservations it can
store by setting the value of Max Reservations in the Switch
Configuration response message. The switch indicates that it does
not support reservations by setting Max Reservations to 0. The valid
range of Reservation IDs is 1 to Max Reservations).
5.1 Reservation Request Message
The Reservation Request message creates a Reservation in the switch
and reserves switch resources for a connection that may later be
established using an Add Branch message. The Reservation Request
Message is:
Message Type = 70
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Reservation Request message has the following format for the
request message:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reservation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Service Selector |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IQS|OQS|P|x|N|O| Adaptation Method |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|M|B| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|M|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
When the value of either IQS or OQS is set to 0b10 then the following
Traffic Parameters Block is appended to the above message:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Input TC Flags |x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Input Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Output TC Flags|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Output Traffic Parameters Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general connection message will not be
explained in this section. Please refer to section 4.1 for
details.
All the fields of the Reservation Request message have the same
meanings as they do in the Add Branch message with the following
exceptions:
Reservation ID
Specifies the Reservation ID of the Reservation. If the
numerical value of the Reservation ID is greater than the value
of the Max Reservations (from the Switch Configuration
message), a failure response is returned indicating "20: the
Reservation ID out of Range". If the value of Reservation ID
matches that of an extant Reservation, a failure response is
returned indicating "22: Reservation ID in use".
Input Label
If a specific input label is specified, then that label is
reserved along with the required resources. If the Input Label
is 0 then the switch reserves the resources, but will not bind
them to a label until the add branch command is given, which
references the Reservation Id. If the input label is 0, then
all stacked labels MUST also be zeroed.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Output Label
If a specific Output Label is specified then that label is
reserved along with the required resources. If the Output
Label is 0 then the switch reserves the resources, but will not
bind them to a label until the add branch command is given
which references the Reservation Id. If the Output Label is 0,
then all stacked labels MUST also be zeroed
When the switch receives a valid Reservation Request it reserves all
the appropriate switch resources needed to establish a branch with
corresponding attributes. If sufficient resources are not available,
a failure response is returned indicating "18: Insufficient
resources". Other failure responses are as defined for the Add
Branch message.
5.2 Delete Reservation Message
The Delete Reservation message deletes a Reservation object in the
switch and frees the reserved switch resources associated with that
reservation object. The Reservation Request Message is:
Message Type = 71
The Delete Reservation message has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reservation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
If the Reservation ID matches that of an extant Reservation then the
reservation is deleted and corresponding switch resources are freed.
If the numerical value of the Reservation ID is greater than the
value of the Max Reservations (from the Switch Configuration
message), a failure response is returned indicating "20: Reservation
ID out of Range". If the value of Reservation ID does not match that
of any extant Reservation, a failure response is returned indicating
"23: Non-existent reservation ID".
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
5.3 Delete All Reservations Message
The Delete All Reservation message deletes all extant Reservation
objects in the switch and frees the reserved switch resources of
these reservations. The Reservation Request Message is:
Message Type = 72
The Delete All Reservation message has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
6. Management Messages
6.1 Port Management Message
The Port Management message allows a port to be brought into service,
to be taken out of service, to be set to loop back, reset, or to
change the transmit data rate. Only the Bring Up and the Reset Input
Port functions change the connection state (established connections)
on the input port. Only the Bring Up function changes the value of
the Port Session Number. The Port Management message MAY also be
used for enabling the replace connection mechanism. The Port
Management message is also used as part of the Event Message flow
control mechanism.
If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll", a success
response message MUST be sent upon successful completion of the
operation. The success response message MUST NOT be sent until the
operation has been completed. The Port Management Message is:
Message Type = 32
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Port Management message has the following format for the request
and success response messages:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|R|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Duration | Function |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Flags | Flow Control Flags |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Transmit Data Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Event Sequence Number
The success response message gives the current value of the
Event Sequence Number of the switch port indicated by the Port
field. The Event Sequence Number is set to zero when the port
is initialised. It is incremented by one each time the port
detects an asynchronous event that the switch would normally
report via an Event message. If the Event Sequence Number in
the success response differs from the Event Sequence Number of
the most recent Event message received for that port, events
have occurred that were not reported via an Event message.
This is most likely to be due to the flow control that
restricts the rate at which a switch can send Event messages
for each port. In the request message this field is not used.
R: Connection Replace
The R flag shall only be checked when the Function field = 1
(Bring Up). If the R flag is set in the Port Management
request message, it indicates that a switch controller requests
the switch port to support the Connection Replace mechanism.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Connection Replace behaviour is described in chapter 4.2. If a
switch does not support the Connection Replace mechanism, it
MUST reply with the failure response: "45: Connection Replace
mechanism not supported on switch" and reset the R-flag. Upon
successful response, the R flag SHOULD remain set in the
response message.
Duration
Is the length of time in seconds, that any of the loopback
states remain in operation. When the duration has expired, the
port will automatically be returned to service. If another
Port Management message is received for the same port before
the duration has expired, the loopback will continue to remain
in operation for the length of time specified by the Duration
field in the new message. The Duration field is only used in
request messages with the Function field set to Internal
Loopback, External Loopback, or Bothway Loopback.
Function
Specifies the action to be taken. The specified action will be
taken regardless of the current status of the port (Available,
Unavailable, or any Loopback state). If the specified function
requires a new Port Session Number to be generated, the new
Port Session Number MUST be returned in the success response
message. The defined values of the Function field are:
Bring Up:
Function = 1. Bring the port into service. All connections
that originate at the specified input port MUST be deleted
and a new Port Session Number MUST be selected, preferably
using some form of random number. On completion of the
operation all dynamically assigned Label values for the
specified input port MUST be unassigned, i.e., no
connections will be established in the Label space that GSMP
controls on this input port. Afterwards, the Port Status of
the port will be Available.
Take Down:
Function = 2. Take the port out of service. Any data
received at this port will be discarded. No data will be
transmitted from this port. Afterwards, the Port Status of
the port will be Unavailable.
The behaviour is undefined if the port is taken down over
which the GSMP session that controls the switch is running.
(In this case the most probable behaviour would be for the
switch either to ignore the message or to terminate the
current GSMP session and to initiate another session,
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
possibly with the backup controller, if any.) The correct
method to reset the link over which GSMP is running is to
issue an RSTACK message in the adjacency protocol.
Internal Loopback:
Function = 3. Data arriving at the output port from the
switch fabric are looped through to the input port to return
to the switch fabric. All of the functions of the input
port above the physical layer, e.g., header translation, are
performed upon the looped back data. Afterwards, the Port
Status of the port will be Internal Loopback.
External Loopback:
Function = 4. Data arriving at the input port from the
external communications link are immediately looped back to
the communications link at the physical layer without
entering the input port. None of the functions of the input
port, above the physical layer are performed upon the looped
back data. Afterwards, the Port Status of the port will be
External Loopback.
Bothway Loopback:
Function = 5. Both internal and external loopbacks are
performed. Afterwards, the Port Status of the port will be
Bothway Loopback.
Reset Input Port:
Function = 6. All connections that originate at the
specified input port MUST be deleted and the input and
output port hardware re-initialised. On completion of the
operation, all dynamically assigned Label values for the
specified input port MUST be unassigned, i.e., no
connections will be established in the Label space that GSMP
controls on this input port. The range of labels that may
be controlled by GSMP on this port will be set to the
default values specified in the Port Configuration message.
The transmit data rate of the output port MUST be set to its
default value. The Port Session Number is not changed by
the Reset Input Port function. Afterwards, the Port Status
of the port will be Unavailable.
Reset Flags:
Function = 7. This function is used to reset the Event
Flags and Flow Control Flags. For each bit that is set in
the Event Flags field, the corresponding Event Flag in the
switch port MUST be reset to 0. For each bit that is set in
the Flow Control Flags field, the corresponding Flow Control
Flag in the switch port MUST be toggled; i.e., flow control
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
for the corresponding event is turned off if is currently on
and it is turned on if it is currently off. The Port Status
of the port is not changed by this function.
Set Transmit Data Rate:
Function = 8. Sets the transmit data rate of the output
port as close as possible to the rate specified in the
Transmit Data Rate field. In the success response message,
the Transmit Data Rate MUST indicate the actual transmit
data rate of the output port. If the transmit data rate of
the requested output port cannot be changed a failure
response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating:
"43: The transmit data rate of this output port cannot be
changed". If the transmit data rate of the requested output
port can be changed, but the value of the Transmit Data Rate
field is beyond the range of acceptable values, a failure
response MUST be returned with the Code field indicating:
"44: Requested transmit data rate out of range for this
output port". In the failure response message, the Transmit
Data Rate MUST contain the same value as contained in the
request message that caused the failure. The transmit data
rate of the output port is not changed by the Bring Up, Take
Down, or any of the Loopback functions. It is returned to
the default value by the Reset Input Port function.
Transmit Data Rate
This field is only used in request and success response
messages with the Function field set to "Set Transmit Data
Rate". It is used to set the output data rate of the output
port. It is specified in cells/s and bytes/s. If the Transmit
Data Rate field contains the value 0xFFFFFFFF the transmit data
rate of the output port SHOULD be set to the highest valid
value.
Event Flags
Field in the request message that is used to reset the Event
Flags in the switch port indicated by the Port field. Each
Event Flag in a switch port corresponds to a type of Event
message. When a switch port sends an Event message, it sets
the corresponding Event Flag on that port. Depending on the
setting in the Flow Control Flag, a port is either subject to
flow control or not. If it is subject to flow control, then it
is not permitted to send another Event message of the same type
before the Event Flag has been reset. To reset an event flag,
the Function field in the request message is set to "Reset
Flags". For each bit that is set in the Event Flags field, the
corresponding Event Flag in the switch port is reset.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Event Flags field is only used in a request message with
the Function field set to "Reset Event Flags". For all other
values of the Function field, the Event Flags field is not
used. In the success response message the Event Flags field
MUST be set to the current value of the Event Flags for the
port, after the completion of the operation specified by the
request message, for all values of the Function field. Setting
the Event Flags field to all zeros in a "Reset Event Flags"
request message allows the controller to obtain the current
state of the Event Flags and the current Event Sequence Number
of the port without changing the state of the Event Flags.
The correspondence between the types of Event messages and the
bits of the Event Flags field is as follows:
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U|D|I|N|Z|A|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
U: Port Up Bit 0, (most significant bit)
D: Port Down Bit 1,
I: Invalid Label Bit 2,
N: New Port Bit 3,
Z: Dead Port Bit 4,
A: Adjacency Event Bit 5,
x: Unused Bits 6-15.
Flow Control Flags Field
The flags in this field are used to indicate whether the flow
control mechanism described in the Events Flag field is turned
on or not. If the Flow Control Flag is set, then the flow
control mechanism for that event on that port is activated. To
toggle the flow control mechanism, the Function field in the
request message is set to "Reset Flags". When doing a reset,
for each flag that is set in the Flow Control Flags field, the
corresponding flow control mechanism MUST be toggled.
The Flow Control Flags correspond to the same event definitions
as defined for the Event Flag.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
6.2 Label Range Message
The default label range, Min Label to Max Label, is specified for
each port by the Port Configuration or the All Ports Configuration
messages. When the protocol is initialised, before the transmission
of any Label Range messages, the label range of each port will be set
to the default label range. (The default label range is dependent
upon the switch design and configuration and is not specified by the
GSMP protocol.) The Label Range message allows the range of labels
supported by a specified port, to be changed. Each switch port MUST
declare whether it supports the Label Range message in the Port
Configuration or the All Ports Configuration messages. The Label
Range message is:
Message Type = 33
The Label Range message has the following format for the request and
success response messages:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Q|M|D|x| Range Count | Range Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Label Range Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Each element of the Label Range Block has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|C| |
+-+-+-+-+ Min Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Max Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Remaining Labels |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Flags
Q: Query
If the Query flag is set in a request message, the switch
MUST respond with the current range of valid labels. The
current label range is not changed by a request message with
the Query flag set. If the Query flag is zero, the message
is requesting a label change operation.
M: Multipoint Query
If the Multipoint Query flag is set the switch MUST respond
with the current range of valid specialized multipoint
labels. The current label range is not changed by a request
message with the Multipoint Query flag set.
D: Non-contiguous Label Range Indicator
This flag will be set in a Query response if the labels
available for assignment belong to a non-contiguous set.
V: Label
The Label flag use is port type specific.
C: Multipoint Capable
Indicates label range that can be used for multipoint
connections.
Range Count
Count of Label Range elements contained in the Label Range
Block.
Range Length
Byte count in the Label Range Block.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Min Label
The minimum label value in the range.
Max Label
The maximum label value in the range.
Remaining Labels
The maximum number of remaining labels that could be requested
for allocation on the specified port.
The success response to a Label Range message requesting a change of
label range is a copy of the request message with the Remaining
Labels field updated to the new values after the Label Range
operation.
If the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the Label
range, it MUST return a failure response message with the Code field
set to: "40: Cannot support one or more requested label ranges". In
this failure response message, the switch MUST use the Min Label and
Max Label fields to suggest a label range that it is able to satisfy.
A Label Range request message may be issued regardless of the Port
Status or the Line Status of the target switch port. If the Port
field of the request message contains an invalid port (a port that
does not exist or a port that has been removed from the switch) a
failure response message MUST be returned with the Code field set to,
"4: One or more of the specified ports does not exist".
If the Query flag is set in the request message, the switch MUST
reply with a success response message containing the current range of
valid labels that are supported by the port. The Min Label and Max
Label fields are not used in the request message.
If the Multipoint Query flag is set in the request message and the
switch does not support a range of valid multipoint labels, then the
switch MUST reply with a failure response message with the Code field
set to, "42: Specialised multipoint labels not supported". The Min
Label and Max Label fields are not used in the Multipoint request
message.
If a label range changes and there are extant connection states with
labels used by the previous label range, a success response message
MUST be returned with the Code field set to, "46: One or more labels
are still used in the previous Label Range". This action indicates
that the label range has successfully changed but with a warning that
there are extant connection states for the previous label range.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
6.2.1 Labels
6.2.1.1 ATM Labels
If the Label Type = ATM Label, the labels range message MUST be
interpreted as an ATM Label as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|C| ATM Label (0x100) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| min VPI | min VCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| ATM Label (0x100) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| max VPI | max VCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Remaining VPI's | Remaining VCI's |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
V: Label
If the Label flag is set, the message refers to a range of
VPI's only. The Min VCI and Max VCI fields are unused. If the
Label flag is zero the message refers to a range of VCI's on
either one VPI or on a range of VPI's.
Min VPI, Max VPI
Specify a range of VPI values, Min VPI to Max VPI inclusive. A
single VPI may be specified with a Min VPI and a Max VPI having
the same value. In a request message, if the value of the Max
VPI field is less than or equal to the value of the Min VPI
field, the requested range is a single VPI with a value equal
to the Min VPI field. Zero is a valid value. In a request
message, if the Query flag is set, and the Label flag is zero,
the Max VPI field specifies a single VPI and the Min VPI field
is not used. The maximum valid value of these fields for both
request and response messages is 0xFFF.
Min VCI, Max VCI
Specify a range of VCI values, Min VCI to Max VCI inclusive. A
single VCI may be specified with a Min VCI and a Max VCI having
the same value. In a request message, if the value of the Max
VCI field is less than or equal to the value of the Min VCI
field, the requested range is a single VCI with a value equal
to the Min VCI field. Zero is a valid value. (However, VPI=0,
VCI=0 is not available as a virtual channel connection as it is
used as a special value in ATM to indicate an unassigned cell.)
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Remaining VPI's, Remaining VCI's
These fields are unused in the request message. In the success
response message and in the failure response message these
fields give the maximum number of remaining VPI's and VCI's
that could be requested for allocation on the specified port
(after completion of the requested operation in the case of the
success response). It gives the switch controller an idea of
how many VPI's and VCI's it could request. The number given is
the maximum possible given the constraints of the switch
hardware. There is no implication that this number of VPI's
and VCI's is available to every switch port.
If the Query flag and the Label flag are set in the request message,
the switch MUST reply with a success response message containing the
current range of valid VPI's that are supported by the port. The Min
VPI and Max VPI fields are not used in the request message.
If the Query flag is set and the Label flag is zero in the request
message, the switch MUST reply with a success response message
containing the current range of valid VCI's that are supported by the
VPI specified by the Max VPI field. If the requested VPI is invalid,
a failure response MUST be returned indicating: "13: One or more of
the specified Input Labels is invalid". The Min VPI field is not
used in either the request or success response messages.
If the Query flag is zero and the Label flag is set in the request
message, the Min VPI and Max VPI fields specify the new range of
VPI's to be allocated to the input port specified by the Port field.
The range of VPI's previously allocated to this port SHOULD be
increased or decreased to the specified value.
If the Query flag and the Label flag are zero in the request message,
the Min VCI and Max VCI fields specify the range of VCI's to be
allocated to each of the VPI's specified by the VPI range. The range
of VCI's previously allocated to each of the VPI's within the
specified VPI range on this port, it SHOULD be increased or decreased
to the specified value. The allocated VCI range MUST be the same on
each of the VPI's within the specified VPI range.
If the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the label
range, it MUST return a failure response message with the Code field
set to: "40: Cannot support one or more requested label ranges". If
the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the VPI, the
switch MUST use the Min VPI and Max VPI fields to suggest a VPI range
that it would be able to satisfy and set the VCI fields to zero, or
if the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the VCI range
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
on all VPI's within the requested VPI range, the switch MUST use the
Min VPI, Max VPI, Min VCI, and Max VCI fields to suggest a VPI and
VCI range that it would be able to satisfy.
In all other failure response messages for the label range operation,
the switch MUST return the values of Min VPI, Max VPI, Min VCI, and
Max VCI from the request message.
While switches can typically support all 256 or 4096 VPI's, the VCI
range that can be supported is often more constrained. Often the Min
VCI MUST be 0 or 32. Typically all VCI's within a particular VPI
MUST be contiguous. The hint in the failure response message allows
the switch to suggest a label range that it could satisfy in view of
its particular architecture.
While the Label Range message is defined to specify both a range of
VPI's and a range of VCI's within each VPI, the most likely use is to
change either the VPI range or the range of VCI's within a single
VPI. It is possible for a VPI to be valid but to be allocated no
valid VCI's. Such a VPI could be used for a virtual path connection,
but to support virtual channel connections it would need to be
allocated a range of VCI's.
6.2.1.2 Frame Relay Labels
If the Label Type = FR Label, the labels range message MUST be
interpreted as Frame Relay Labels as shown:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|C| FR Label (0x101) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| Res |Len| Min DLCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| FR Label (0x101) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| Res |Len| Max DLCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Remaining DLCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
V: Label
The Label flag is not used.
Res
The Res field is reserved in [21], i.e., it is not explicitly
reserved by GSMP.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Len
The Len field specifies the number of bits of the DLCI. The
following values are supported:
Len DLCI bits
0 10
2 23
Min DLCI, Max DLCI
Specify a range of DLCI values, Min DLCI to Max DLCI inclusive.
The values SHOULD be right justified in the 23-bit fields and
the preceding bits SHOULD be set to zero. A single DLCI may be
specified with a Min DLCI and a Max DLCI having the same value.
In a request message, if the value of the Max DLCI field is
less than or equal to the value of the Min DLCI field, the
requested range is a single DLCI with a value equal to the Min
DLCI field. Zero is a valid value.
Remaining DLCI's
This field is unused in the request message. In the success
response message and in the failure response message, this
field gives the maximum number of remaining DLCI's that could
be requested for allocation on the specified port (after
completion of the requested operation in the case of the
success response). It gives the switch controller an idea of
how many DLCI's it could request. The number given is the
maximum possible given the constraints of the switch hardware.
There is no implication that this number of DLCI's is available
to every switch port.
6.2.1.3 MPLS Generic Labels
The Label Range Block for PortTypes using MPLS labels. These types
of labels are for use on links for which label values are independent
of the underlying link technology. Examples of such links are PPP
and Ethernet. On such links the labels are carried in MPLS label
stacks [14]. If Label Type = MPLS Gen Label, the labels range
message MUST be interpreted as MPLS Generic Label as shown:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|C| MPLS Gen Label (0x102)| Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Min MPLS Label |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| MPLS Gen Label (0x102)| Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Max MPLS Label |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Remaining Labels |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
V: Label
The Label flag is not used.
Min MPLS Label, Max MPLS Label
Specify a range of MPLS label values, Min MPLS Label to Max
MPLS Label inclusive. The Max and Min MPLS label fields are 20
bits each.
Remaining MPLS Labels
This field is unused in the request message. In the success
response message and in the failure response message this field
gives the maximum number of remaining MPLS Labels that could be
requested for allocation on the specified port (after
completion of the requested operation in the case of the
success response). It gives the switch controller an idea of
how many MPLS Labels it could request. The number given is the
maximum possible given the constraints of the switch hardware.
There is no implication that this number of Labels is available
to every switch port.
6.2.1.4 FEC Labels
The Label Range message is not used for FEC Labels and is for further
study.
7. State and Statistics Messages
The state and statistics messages permit the controller to request
the values of various hardware counters associated with the switch
input and output ports and connections. They also permit the
controller to request the connection state of a switch input port.
The Connection Activity message is used to determine whether one or
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
more specific connections have recently been carrying traffic. The
Statistics message is used to query the various port and connection
traffic and error counters.
The Report Connection State message is used to request an input port
to report the connection state for a single connection, a single ATM
virtual path connection, or for the entire input port.
7.1 Connection Activity Message
The Connection Activity message is used to determine whether one or
more specific connections have recently been carrying traffic. The
Connection Activity message contains one or more Activity Records.
Each Activity Record is used to request and return activity
information concerning a single connection. Each connection is
specified by its input port and Input Label which are specified in
the Input Port and Input Label fields of each Activity Record.
Two forms of activity detection are supported. If the switch
supports per connection traffic accounting, the current value of the
traffic counter for each specified connection MUST be returned. The
units of traffic counted are not specified but will typically be
either cells or frames. The controller MUST compare the traffic
counts returned in the message with previous values for each of the
specified connections to determine whether each connection has been
active in the intervening period. If the switch does not support per
connection traffic accounting, but is capable of detecting per
connection activity by some other unspecified means, the result may
be indicated for each connection using the Flags field. The
Connection Activity message is:
Message Type = 48
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Connection Activity request and success response messages have
the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Number of Records |x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Activity Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Number of Records
Field specifies the number of Activity Records to follow. The
number of Activity records in a single Connection Activity
message MUST NOT cause the packet length to exceed the maximum
transmission unit defined by the encapsulation.
Each Activity Record has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V|C|A|x| TC Count | TC Block Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Traffic Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Flags
V: Valid Record
In the success response message the Valid Record flag is
used to indicate an invalid Activity Record. The flag MUST
be zero if any of the fields in this Activity Record are
invalid, if the input port specified by the Input Port field
does not exist, or if the specified connection does not
exist. If the Valid Record flag is zero in a success
response message, the Counter flag, the Activity flag, and
the Traffic Count field are undefined. If the Valid Record
flag is set, the Activity Record is valid, and the Counter
and Activity flags are valid. The Valid Record flag is not
used in the request message.
C: Counter
In a success response message, if the Valid Record flag is
set, the Counter flag, if zero, indicates that the value in
the Traffic Count field is valid. If set, it indicates that
the value in the Activity flag is valid. The Counter flag
is not used in the request message.
A: Activity
In a success response message, if the Valid Record and
Counter flags are set, the Activity flag, if set, indicates
that there has been some activity on this connection since
the last Connection Activity message for this connection.
If zero, it indicates that there has been no activity on
this connection since the last Connection Activity message
for this connection. The Activity flag is not used in the
request message.
TC Count
In cases where per connection traffic counting is supported,
this field contains the count of Traffic Count entries.
TC Block Length
In cases where per connection traffic counting is supported,
this field contains the Traffic Count block size in bytes.
Input Port
Identifies the port number of the input port on which the
connection of interest originates in order to identify the
connection (regardless of whether the traffic count for the
connection is maintained on the input port or the output port).
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Input Label
Fields identify the specific connection for which statistics
are being requested.
Traffic Count
Field is not used in the request message. In the success
response message, if the switch supports per connection traffic
counting, the Traffic Count field MUST be set to the value of a
free running, connection specific, 64-bit traffic counter
counting traffic flowing across the specified connection. The
value of the traffic counter is not modified by reading it. If
per connection traffic counting is supported, the switch MUST
report the Connection Activity result using the traffic count
rather than using the Activity flag.
The format of the failure response is the same as the request message
with the Number of Records field set to zero and no Connection
Activity records returned in the message. If the switch is incapable
of detecting per connection activity, a failure response MUST be
returned indicating, "3: The specified request is not implemented on
this switch".
7.2 Statistics Messages
The Statistics messages are used to query the various port,
connection and error counters.
The Statistics request messages have the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Label
The Label Fields identifies the specific connection for which
statistics are being requested.
The success response for the Statistics message has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Input Cell Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Input Frame Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Input Cell Discard Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Input Frame Discard Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Header Checksum Error Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Input Invalid Label Count +
| |
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Output Cell Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Output Frame Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Output Cell Discard Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ Output Frame Discard Count +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Field and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Input Cell Count, Output Cell Count
Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting cells
arriving at the input or departing from the output
respectively. These fields are relevant for label type = ATM,
for all other label types these fields SHOULD be set to zero by
the sender and ignored by the receiver.
Input Frame Count, Output Frame Count
Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting frames
(packets) arriving at the input or departing from the output
respectively. These fields are relevant for label types = FR
and MPLS, for all other label types these fields SHOULD be set
to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.
Input Cell Discard Count, Output Cell Discard Count
Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting cells
discarded due to queue overflow on an input port or on an
output port respectively. These fields are relevant for label
type = ATM, for all other label types these fields SHOULD be
set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.
Input Frame Discard Count, Output Frame Discard Count
Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting frames
discarded due to congestion on an input port or on an output
port respectively. These fields are relevant for label
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 66]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
types = FR and MPLS, for all other label types these fields
SHOULD be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the
receiver.
Header Checksum Error Count
Gives the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting cells
or frames discarded due to header checksum errors on arrival at
an input port. For an ATM switch this would be the HEC count.
Invalid Label Count
Gives the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting cells
or frames discarded because their Label is invalid on arrival
at an input port.
7.2.1 Port Statistics Message
The Port Statistics message requests the statistics for the switch
port specified in the Port field. The contents of the Label field in
the Port Statistics request message is ignored. All of the count
fields in the success response message refer to per-port counts
regardless of the connection to which the cells or frames belong.
Any of the count fields in the success response message not supported
by the port MUST be set to zero. The Port Statistics message is:
Message Type = 49
7.2.2 Connection Statistics Message
The Connection Statistics message requests the statistics for the
connection specified in the Label field that originates on the switch
input port specified in the Port field. All of the count fields in
the success response message refer only to the specified connection.
The Header Checksum Error Count and Invalid Label Count fields are
not connection specific and MUST be set to zero. Any of the other
count fields not supported on a per connection basis MUST be set to
zero in the success response message. The Connection Statistics
message is:
Message Type = 50
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 67]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
7.2.3 QoS Class Statistics Message
The QoS Class Statistics message is not supported in this version of
GSMP.
Message Type = 51 is reserved.
7.3 Report Connection State Message
The Report Connection State message is used to request an input port
to report the connection state for a single connection or for the
entire input port. The Report Connection State message is:
Message Type = 52
The Report Connection State request message has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|A|V| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Field and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Input Port
Identifies the port number of the input port for which the
connection state is being requested.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 68]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Flags
A: All Connections
If the All Connections flag is set, the message requests the
connection state for all connections that originate at the
input port specified by the Input Port field. In this case
the Input Label field and the Label flag are unused.
V: ATM VPI
The ATM VPI flag may only be set for ports with
PortType=ATM. If the switch receives a Report Connection
State message in which the ATM VPI flag set and in which the
input port specified by the Input Port field does not have
PortType=ATM, the switch MUST return a Failure response "28:
ATM Virtual Path switching is not supported on non-ATM
ports".
If the All Connections flag is zero and the ATM VPI flag is
also zero, the message requests the connection state for the
connection that originates at the input port specified by
the Port and Input Label fields.
ATM specific procedures:
If the All Connections flag is zero and the ATM VPI flag is
set and the input port specified by the Input Port field has
LabelType=ATM, the message requests the connection state for
the virtual path connection that originates at the input
port specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields. If
the specified Input VPI identifies an ATM virtual path
connection (i.e., a single switched virtual path) the state
for that connection is requested. If the specified Input
VPI identifies a virtual path containing virtual channel
connections, the message requests the connection state for
all virtual channel connections that belong to the specified
virtual path.
Input Label
Field identifies the specific connection for which the
connection state is being requested. For requests that do not
require a connection to be specified, the Input Label field is
not used.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 69]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Report Connection State success response message has the
following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Input Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Connection Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Input Port
Is the same as the Input Port field in the request message. It
identifies the port number of the input port for which the
connection state is being reported.
Sequence Number
In the case that the requested connection state cannot be
reported in a single success response message, each successive
success response message, in reply to the same request message,
MUST increment the Sequence Number. The Sequence Number of the
first success response message, in response to a new request
message, MUST be zero.
Connection Records
Each success response message MUST contain one or more
Connection Records. Each Connection Record specifies a single
point-to-point or point-to-multipoint connection. The number
of Connection Records in a single Report Connection State
success response MUST NOT cause the packet length to exceed the
maximum transmission unit defined by the encapsulation. If the
requested connection state cannot be reported in a single
success response message, multiple success response messages
MUST be sent. All success response messages that are sent in
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 70]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
response to the same request message MUST have the same Input
Port and Transaction Identifier fields as the request message.
A single Connection Record MUST NOT be split across multiple
success response messages. "More" in the Result field of a
response message indicates that one or more further success
response messages should be expected in response to the same
request message. "Success" in the Result field indicates that
the response to the request has been completed. The Result
values are defined in chapter 3.1.1.
Each Connection Record has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|A|V|P| Record Count | Record Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Input Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Output Branch Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Flags
A: All Connections
V: ATM VPI
For the first Connection Record in each success response
message, the All Connections and the ATM VPI flags MUST be
the same as those of the request message. For successive
Connection Records in the same success response message,
these flags are not used.
P: ATM VPC
The ATM VPC flag may only be set for ports with
PortType=ATM. The ATM VPC flag, if set and only if set,
indicates that the Connection Record refers to an ATM
virtual path connection.
Input Label
The input label of the connection specified in this Connection
Record.
Record Count
Count of Output Branch Records included in a response message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 71]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Record Length
Length in bytes of Output Branch Records field
Output Branch Records
Each Connection Record MUST contain one or more Output Branch
Records. Each Output Branch Record specifies a single output
branch belonging to the connection identified by the Input
Label field of the Connection Record and the Input Port field
of the Report Connection State message. A point-to-point
connection will require only a single Output Branch Record. A
point-to-multipoint connection will require multiple Output
Branch Records. If a point-to-multipoint connection has more
output branches than can fit in a single Connection Record
contained within a single success response message, that
connection may be reported using multiple Connection Records in
multiple success response messages.
Each Output Branch Record has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Output Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Output Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Output Port
The output port of the switch to which this output branch is
routed.
Output Label
The output label of the output branch specified in this Output
Branch Record.
ATM specific procedures:
If this Output Branch Record is part of a Connection Record
that specifies a virtual path connection (the ATM VPC flag
is set) the Output VCI field is unused.
A Report Connection State request message may be issued regardless of
the Port Status or the Line Status of the target switch port.
If the Input Port of the request message is valid, and the All
Connections flag is set, but there are no connections established on
that port, a failure response message MUST be returned with the Code
field set to, "10: General Message Failure". For the Report
Connection State message, this failure code indicates that no
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 72]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
connections matching the request message were found. This failure
message SHOULD also be returned if the Input Port of the request
message is valid, the All Connections flag is zero, and no
connections are found on that port matching the specified connection.
8. Configuration Messages
The configuration messages permit the controller to discover the
capabilities of the switch. Three configuration request messages
have been defined: Switch, Port, and All Ports.
8.1 Switch Configuration Message
The Switch Configuration message requests the global (non port-
specific) configuration for the switch. The Switch Configuration
message is:
Message Type = 64
The Port field is not used in the switch configuration message.
The Switch Configuration message has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MType | MType | MType | MType |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Firmware Version Number | Window Size |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Switch Type | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| Switch Name |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Max Reservations |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 73]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
MType
Represents an alternative QoS Configuration type. In the
request message the requested MType is in the most significant
(leftmost) MType byte; the other three MType bytes are unused.
The reply message will either accept the MType request by
including the requested MType in the leftmost MType field of
the response message or it will reject the MType request by
responding with MType=0, the default MType, in the first MType
field. Optionally, in the case of a rejection, the switch
reply can include up to 3 additional MType values, each of
which indicates an available alternative QoS Configuration. A
switch that supports only the default QoS Configuration always
returns MType=0 in all four MType fields. MType negotiation is
discussed in section 8.1.1.
0 - Indicates use of the default GSMP model
1-200 - Reserved
201-255 - Experimental
Firmware Version Number
The version number of the switch control firmware installed.
Window Size
The maximum number of unacknowledged request messages that may
be transmitted by the controller without the possibility of
loss. This field is used to prevent request messages being
lost in the switch because of overflow in the receive buffer.
The field is a hint to the controller. If desired, the
controller may experiment with higher and lower window sizes to
determine heuristically the best window size.
Switch Type
A 16-bit field allocated by the manufacturer of the switch.
(For these purposes, the manufacturer of the switch is assumed
to be the organisation identified by the OUI in the Switch Name
field.) The Switch Type identifies the product. When the
Switch Type is combined with the OUI from the Switch Name the
product is uniquely identified. Network Management may use
this identification to obtain product related information from
a database.
Switch Name
A 48-bit quantity that is unique within the operational context
of the device. A 48-bit IEEE 802 MAC address, if available,
may be used as the Switch Name. The most significant 24 bits
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 74]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
of the Switch Name MUST be an Organisationally Unique
Identifier (OUI) that identifies the manufacturer of the
switch.
Max Reservations
The maximum number of Reservations that the switch can support
(see Chapter 5). A value of 0 indicates that the switch does
not support Reservations.
8.1.1 Configuration Message Processing
After adjacency between a controller and after a switch is first
established the controller that opts to use a QoS Configuration model
other then the default would send the Switch Configuration request
including the requested QoS Configuration's MType value in the
request message. This request MUST be sent before any connection
messages are exchanged. If the switch can support the requested QoS
configuration, then the switch includes the requested MType value in
the response message as an indication that it accepts the request.
If the switch cannot support the requested QoS Configuration, it
replaces the MType value in the request message with that of the
default QoS Configuration, i.e., MType=0.
The switch configuration response messages may additionally include
the MType values of up to three alternative QoS Configurations that
the switch supports and that the controller may choose between.
The exchange continues until the controller sends a requested MType
that the switch accepts or until it sends a connection request
message. If the exchange ends without confirmation of an alternate
switch model, then the default Mtype=0 is be used.
Once an MType has been established for the switch, it cannot be
changed without full restart, that is the re-establishment of
adjacency with the resetting of all connections.
8.2 Port Configuration Message
The Port Configuration message requests the switch for the
configuration information of a single switch port. The Port field in
the request message specifies the port for which the configuration is
requested. The Port Configuration message is:
Message Type = 65.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 75]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Port Configuration success response message has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Flags | Port Attribute Flags |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PortType |S|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Data Fields Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ PortType Specific Data ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Number of Service Specs |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-|
| |
~ Service Specs List ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Port
The switch port to which the configuration information refers.
Configuration information relating to both the input and the
output sides of the switch port is given. Port numbers are 32
bits wide and allocated by the switch. The switch may choose
to structure the 32 bits into subfields that have meaning to
the physical structure of the switch hardware (e.g., physical
slot and port). This structure may be indicated in the
Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number fields.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 76]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Event Sequence Number
The Event Sequence Number is set to zero when the port is
initialised. It is incremented by one each time the port
detects an asynchronous event that the switch would normally
report via an Event message. The Event Sequence Number is
explained in section 9.
Event Flags
Event Flags in a switch port corresponds to a type of Event
message.
Port Attribute Flags
Port Attribute Flags indicate specific behaviour of a switch
port. The format of the Port Attribute Flags field is given
below:
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|R|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
R: Connection Replace flag
If set, indicates that connections being established by an
Add Branch message with a corresponding R-bit set will
replace any previously established connection if a clash
between the established output branch and the requested
output branch occurs [see chapter 4.2].
x: Unused.
PortType
1: PortType is ATM
2: PortType is FR
3: PortType is MPLS
S: Service Model
If set, indicates that Service Model data follows the
PortSpecific port configuration data.
Data Fields Length
The total length in bytes of the combined PortType Specific
Data and Service Model Data fields. The length of each of
these fields may be derived from the other data so the value of
Data Fields Length serves primarily as a check and to assist
parsing of the All Ports Configuration message success
response.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 77]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
PortType Specific Data
This field contains the configuration data specific to the
particular port type as specified by the PortType field. The
field format and length also depends on the value of the
PortType. PortType Specific Data is defined below.
Number of Service Specs
Field contains the total number of Service Specs following in
the remainder of the Port Configuration message response or
Port Configuration Record.
Service Specs List
The Service Specs correspond to the Input and Output Service
selectors used in Connection Management and Reservation
messages. Specifically they define the possible values used
when the Service Selector (IQS or OQS) is set to 0b10
indicating the use of the default service specification model
defined in Chapter 10.
Service Spec
The format of each service spec is given below:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Service ID | Capability Set ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Each Service Spec identifies a Service supported by the switch
together with the Capability Set ID that identifies the
parameters of that instance of the Service. The Service Spec
List may contain more than one Service Spec sharing the same
Service ID. However, each Service Spec in the Service Specs
List MUST be unique.
Service ID
Field contains the Service ID of a Service supported on the
port. Service ID values are defined as part of the Service
definition in Chapter 9.6.
Capability Set ID
Field identifies a Capability Set ID of the Service
specified by the Service ID that is supported on the port.
Capability Set ID values are defined by the Switch in the
Service Configuration response message (see Section 8.4).
The switch MUST NOT return a {Service ID, Capability Set ID}
pair that is not reported in a Service Configuration
response message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 78]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
8.2.1 PortType Specific Data
The length, format and semantics of the PortType Specific Data field
in the Port Configuration message success response and in the Port
Records of the All Port Configuration message success response all
depend on the PortType value of the same message or record
respectively. The specification of the PortType Specific Data field
is given below. For each defined PortType value the Min and Max
Label fields are given in the subsequent subsections.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|P|M|L|R|Q| Label Range Count | Label Range Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Default Label Range Block ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Receive Data Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Transmit Data Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Status | Line Type | Line Status | Priorities |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Physical Slot Number | Physical Port Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Where each of the ranges in the Default Label Range Blocks will have
the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|C| |
+-+-+-+-+ Min Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Max Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 79]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Flags
P: VP Switching
The ATM VPC flag may only be set for ports with
PortType=ATM. The VP Switching flag, if set, indicates that
this input port is capable of supporting virtual path
switching. Else, if zero, it indicates that this input port
is only capable of virtual channel switching.
M: Multicast Labels
The Multicast Labels flag, if set, indicates that this
output port is capable of labelling each output branch of a
point-to-multipoint tree with a different label. If zero,
it indicates that this output port is not able to label each
output branch of a point-to-multipoint tree with a different
label.
L: Logical Multicast
The Logical Multicast flag, if set, indicates that this
output port is capable of supporting more than a single
branch from any point-to-multipoint connection. This
capability is often referred to as logical multicast. If
zero, it indicates that this output port can only support a
single output branch from each point-to-multipoint
connection.
R: Label Range
The Label Range flag, if set, indicates that this switch
port is capable of reallocating its label range and
therefore accepts the Label Range message. Else, if zero,
it indicates that this port does not accept Label Range
messages.
Q: QoS
The QoS flag, if set, indicates that this switch port is
capable of handling the Quality of Service messages defined
in section 9 of this specification. Else, if zero, it
indicates that this port does not accept the Quality of
Service messages.
V: Label
The Label flag is port type specific.
C: Multipoint Capable
This flag indicates that the label range may be used for
multipoint connections.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 80]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Label Range Count
The total number of Default Label Range elements contained in
the Default Label Range Block.
Label Range Length
Byte count in the Default Label Range Block.
Min Label
The specification of the Min Label field for each defined
PortType value is given in the subsequent subsections. The
default minimum value of a dynamically assigned incoming label
that the connection table on the input port supports and that
may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not changed as a
result of the Label Range message.
Max Label
The specification of the Max Label field for each defined
PortType value is given in the subsequent subsections. The
default maximum value of a dynamically assigned incoming label
that the connection table on the input port supports and that
may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not changed as a
result of the Label Range message.
Receive Data Rate
The maximum rate of data that may arrive at the input port in;
cells/s for PortType = ATM
bytes/s for PortType = FR
bytes/s for PortType = MPLS
Transmit Data Rate
The maximum rate of data that may depart from the output port
in;
cells/s for PortType = ATM
bytes/s for PortType = FR
bytes/s for PortType = MPLS
(The transmit data rate of the output port may be changed by
the Set Transmit Data Rate function of the Port Management
message.)
Port Status
Gives the administrative state of the port. The defined values
of the Port Status field are:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 81]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Available:
Port Status = 1. The port is available to both send and
receive cells or frames. When a port changes to the
Available state from any other administrative state, all
dynamically assigned connections MUST be cleared and a new
Port Session Number MUST be generated.
Unavailable:
Port Status = 2. The port has intentionally been taken out
of service. No cells or frames will be transmitted from
this port. No cells or frames will be received by this
port.
Internal Loopback:
Port Status = 3. The port has intentionally been taken out
of service and is in internal loopback: cells or frames
arriving at the output port from the switch fabric are
looped through to the input port to return to the switch
fabric. All of the functions of the input port above the
physical layer, e.g., header translation, are performed upon
the looped back cells or frames.
External Loopback:
Port Status = 4. The port has intentionally been taken out
of service and is in external loopback: cells or frames
arriving at the input port from the external communications
link are immediately looped back to the communications link
at the physical layer without entering the input port. None
of the functions of the input port above the physical layer
are performed upon the looped back cells or frames.
Bothway Loopback:
Port Status = 5. The port has intentionally been taken out
of service and is in both internal and external loopback.
The Port Status of the port over which the GSMP session
controlling the switch is running MUST be declared Available.
The controller will ignore any other Port status for this port.
The Port Status of switch ports after power-on initialisation
is not defined by GSMP.
Line Type
The type of physical transmission interface for this port. The
values for this field are defined by the IANAifType's specified
in [17].
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 82]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The following values are identified for use in this version
of the protocol.
PortType = Unknown: other(1)
PortType = MPLS: ethernetCsmacd(6),
ppp(23)
PortType = ATM: atm(37)
PortType = FR: frameRelayService(44)
Line Status
The status of the physical transmission medium connected to the
port. The defined values of the Line Status field are:
Up:
Line Status = 1. The line is able to both send and
receive. When the Line Status changes to Up from
either the Down or Test states, a new Port Session
Number MUST be generated.
Down:
Line Status = 2. The line is unable either to send
or receive or both.
Test:
Line Status = 3. The port or line is in a test
mode, for example, power-on test.
Priorities
The number of different priority levels that this output port
can assign to connections. Zero is invalid in this field. If
an output port is able to support "Q" priorities, the highest
priority is numbered zero and the lowest priority is numbered
"Q-1". The ability to offer different qualities of service to
different connections based upon their priority is assumed to
be a property of the output port of the switch. It may be
assumed that for connections that share the same output port, a
cell or frame on a connection with a higher priority is much
more likely to exit the switch before a cell or frame on a
connection with a lower priority if they are both in the switch
at the same time.
Physical Slot Number
The physical location of the slot in which the port is located.
It is an unsigned 16-bit integer that can take any value except
0xFFFF. The value 0xFFFF is used to indicate "unknown". The
Physical Slot Number is not used by the GSMP protocol. It is
provided to assist network management in functions such as
logging, port naming, and graphical representation.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 83]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Physical Port Number
The physical location of the port within the slot in which the
port is located. It is an unsigned 16-bit integer that can
take any value except 0xFFFF. The value 0xFFFF is used to
indicate "unknown". The Physical Port Number is not used by
the GSMP protocol. It is provided to assist network management
in functions such as logging, port naming, and graphical
representation.
There MUST be a one to one mapping between the Port Number and
the Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number combination.
Two different Port Numbers MUST NOT yield the same Physical
Slot Number and Physical Port Number combination. The same
Port Number MUST yield the same Physical Slot Number and
Physical Port Number within a single GSMP session. If both
Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number indicate
"unknown" the physical location of switch ports may be
discovered by looking up the product identity in a database to
reveal the physical interpretation of the 32-bit Port Number.
8.2.1.1 PortType Specific data for PortType=ATM
If PortType=ATM, the Default Label Range Block has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|V|x| ATM Label (0x100) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x| VPI | VCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
V: Label
If the Label flag is set, the message refers to a range of
VPI's only. The Min VCI and Max VCI fields are unused. If the
Label flag is zero the message refers to a range of VCI's on
either one VPI or on a range of VPI's.
Min VPI
The default minimum value of dynamically assigned incoming VPI
that the connection table on the input port supports and that
may be controlled by GSMP.
Max VPI
The default maximum value of dynamically assigned incoming VPI
that the connection table on the input port supports and that
may be controlled by GSMP.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 84]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
At power-on, after a hardware reset, and after the Reset Input
Port function of the Port Management message, the input port
MUST handle all values of VPI within the range Min VPI to Max
VPI inclusive and GSMP MUST be able to control all values
within this range. It should be noted that the range Min VPI
to Max VPI refers only to the incoming VPI range that can be
supported by the associated port. No restriction is placed on
the values of outgoing VPI's that may be written into the cell
header. If the switch does not support virtual paths it is
acceptable for both Min VPI and Max VPI to specify the same
value, most likely zero.
Use of the Label Range message allows the range of VPI's
supported by the port to be changed. However, the Min VPI and
Max VPI fields in the Port Configuration and All Ports
Configuration messages always report the same default values
regardless of the operation of the Label Range message.
Min VCI
The default minimum value of a dynamically assigned incoming
VCI that the connection table on the input port can support and
may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not changed as a
result of the Label Range message.
Max VCI
The default maximum value of a dynamically assigned incoming
VCI that the connection table on the input port can support and
may be controlled by GSMP.
At power-on, after a hardware reset, and after the Reset Input
Port function of the Port Management message, the input port
MUST handle all values of VCI within the range Min VCI to Max
VCI inclusive, for each of the virtual paths in the range Min
VPI to Max VPI inclusive, and GSMP MUST be able to control all
values within this range. It should be noted that the range
Min VCI to Max VCI refers only to the incoming VCI range that
can be supported by the associated port on each of the virtual
paths in the range Min VPI to Max VPI. No restriction is
placed on the values of outgoing VCI's that may be written into
the cell header. Use of the Label Range message allows the
range of VCI's to be changed on each VPI supported by the port.
However, the Min VCI and Max VCI fields in the Port
Configuration and All Ports Configuration messages always
report the same default values regardless of the operation of
the Label Range message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 85]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
For a port over which the GSMP protocol is operating, the VCI of the
GSMP control channel may or may not be reported as lying within the
range Min VCI to Max VCI. A switch should honour a connection
request message that specifies the VCI value of the GSMP control
channel even if it lies outside the range Min VCI to Max VCI
8.2.1.2 PortType Specific data for PortType=FR
If PortType=FR, the Default Label Range Block has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| FR Label (0x101) | Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x|Res|Len| DLCI |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Res
The Res field is reserved in [21], i.e., it is not explicitly
reserved by GSMP.
Len
This field specifies the number of bits of the DLCI. The
following values are supported:
Len DLCI bits
0 10
2 23
Min DLCI, Max DLCI
Specify a range of DLCI values, Min DLCI to Max DLCI inclusive.
The values SHOULD be right justified in the 23-bit fields and
the preceding bits SHOULD be set to zero. A single DLCI may be
specified with a Min DLCI and a Max DLCI having the same value.
In a request message, if the value of the Max DLCI field is
less than or equal to the value of the Min DLCI field, the
requested range is a single DLCI with a value equal to the Min
DLCI field. Zero is a valid value.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 86]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
8.2.1.3 PortType Specific data for PortType=MPLS
The Default Label Range Block for PortTypes using MPLS labels. These
types of labels are for use on links for which label values are
independent of the underlying link technology. Examples of such
links are PPP and Ethernet. On such links the labels are carried in
MPLS label stacks [14]. Ports of the Type MPLS have the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x| MPLS Gen Label (0x102)| Label Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| MPLS Label |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Min MPLS Label, Max MPLS Label
Specify a range of MPLS label values, Min MPLS Label to Max
MPLS Label inclusive. The Max and Min MPLS label fields are 20
bits each.
8.2.1.4 PortType Specific data for PortType=FEC
The Default Label Range Block for PortTypes using FEC labels is not
used. The Label Range Count and Label Range Length fields defined in
[8.2.1] should be set to 0.
8.3 All Ports Configuration Message
The All Ports Configuration message requests the switch for the
configuration information of all of its ports. The All Ports
Configuration message is:
Message Type = 66
The Port field is not used in the request message.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 87]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The All Ports Configuration success response message has the
following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Number of Records |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Port Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Number of Records
Field gives the total number of Port Records to be returned in
response to the All Ports Configuration request message. The
number of port records in a single All Ports Configuration
success response MUST NOT cause the packet length to exceed the
maximum transmission unit defined by the encapsulation. If a
switch has more ports than can be sent in a single success
response message it MUST send multiple success response
messages. All success response messages that are sent in
response to the same request message MUST have the same
Transaction Identifier as the request message and the same
value in the Number of Records field. All success response
messages that are sent in response to the same request message,
except for the last message, MUST have the result field set to
"More". The last message, or a single success response
message, MUST have the result field set to "Success". All Port
records within a success response message MUST be complete,
i.e., a single Port record MUST NOT be split across multiple
success response messages.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 88]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Port Records
Follow in the remainder of the message. Each port record has
the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Flags | Port Attribute Flags |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PortType |S|x|x|x|x|x|x|x| Data Fields Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ PortType Specific Data ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Number of Service Specs |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Service Specs List ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The definition of the fields in the Port Record is exactly the same
as that of the Port Configuration message [section 8.2].
8.4 Service Configuration Message
The Service Configuration message requests the switch for the
configuration information of the Services that are supported. The
Service Configuration message is:
Message Type = 67
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 89]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Service Configuration success response message has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Number of Service Records |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Service Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Number of Service Records
Field gives the total number of Service Records to be returned
in the Service Records field.
Service Records
A sequence of zero or more Service Records. The switch returns
one Service Record for each Service that it supports on any of
its ports. A Service record contains the configuration data of
the specified Service. Each Service Record has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Service ID | Number of Cap. Set. Records |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
~ Capability Set Records ~
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Service ID
The Service ID Field identifies the Service supported by the
port. The Services are defined with their Service ID values as
described in section 10.2.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 90]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Number of Cap. Set. Records
Field gives the total number of Capability Set Records to be
returned in the Service Record field.
Capability Set Records
The switch returns one or more Capability Set Records in each
Service Record. A Capability Set contains a set of parameters
that describe the QoS parameter values and traffic controls
that apply to an instance of the Service. Each Capability Set
record has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cap. Set ID | Traffic Controls |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CLR | CTD |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Frequency | CDV |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Capability Set ID
The value in this Field defines a Capability Set ID supported
by the switch. The values of a Capability Set ID are assigned
by the switch and used in Port Configuration messages to
identify Capability Sets supported by individual ports. Each
Capability Set Record within a Service Record MUST have a
unique Capability Set ID.
Traffic Controls
Field identifies the availability of Traffic Controls within
the Capability Set. Traffic Controls are defined as part of
the respective Service definition, see Chapter 10. Some or all
of the Traffic Controls may be undefined for a given Service,
in which case the corresponding Flag is ignored by the
controller. The Traffic Controls field is formatted into
Traffic Control Sub-fields as follows:
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| U | D | I | E | S | V |x x x x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Traffic Control Sub-fields have the following encoding:
0b00 Indicates that the Traffic Control is not available in
the Capability Set.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 91]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
0b01 Indicates that the Traffic Control is applied to all
connections that use the Capability Set.
0b10 Indicates that the Traffic Control is available for
application to connections that use the Capability Set
on a per connection basis.
0b11 Reserved
Traffic Control Sub-fields:
U: Usage Parameter Control
The Usage Parameter Control sub-field indicates the
availability of Usage Parameter Control for the
specified Service and Capability Set.
D: Packet Discard
The Packet Discard sub-field indicates the availability
of Packet Discard for the specified Service and
Capability Set.
I: Ingress Shaping
The Ingress Shaping sub-field indicates the
availability of Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak
Cell Rate and Cell Delay Variation Tolerance for the
specified Service and Capability Set.
E: Egress Shaping, Peak Rate
The Egress Shaping, Peak Rate sub-field indicates the
availability of Egress Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
and Cell Delay Variation Tolerance for the specified
Service and Capability Set.
S: Egress Traffic Shaping, Sustainable Rate
The Egress Shaping, Sustainable Rate sub-field, if set,
indicates that Egress Traffic Shaping to the
Sustainable Cell Rate and Maximum Burst Size is
available for the specified Service and Capability Set.
V: VC Merge
The VC Merge sub-field indicates the availability of
ATM Virtual Channel Merge (i.e., multipoint to point
ATM switching with a traffic control to avoid AAL5 PDU
interleaving) capability for the specified Service and
Capability Set.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 92]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
QoS Parameters
The remaining four fields in the Capability Set Record contain
the values of QoS Parameters. QoS Parameters are defined as
part of the respective Service definition, see Chapter 9.6.
Some or all of the QoS Parameters may be undefined for a given
Service, in which case the corresponding field is ignored by
the controller.
CLR: Cell Loss Ratio
The Cell Loss Ratio parameter indicates the CLR
guaranteed by the switch for the specified Service. A
cell loss ratio is expressed as an order of magnitude
n, where the CLR takes the value of ten raised to the
power of -n, i.e., log(CLR)=-n. The value n is coded
as a binary integer, having a range of 1 <= n <= 15.
In addition, the value 0b1111 1111 indicates that no
CLR guarantees are given.
Frequency
The frequency field is coded as an 8 bit unsigned
integer. Frequency applies to the MPLS CR-LDP Service
(see Section 10.4.3). Valid values of Frequency are:
0 - Very frequent
1 - Frequent
2 - Unspecified
CTD: Cell Transfer Delay
The CTD value is expressed in units of microseconds.
It is coded as a 24-bit integer.
CDV: Peak-to-peak Cell Delay Variation
The CDV value is expressed in units of microseconds.
It is coded as a 24-bit integer.
9. Event Messages
Event messages allow the switch to inform the controller of certain
asynchronous events. By default the controller does not acknowledge
event messages unless ReturnReceipt is set in the Result field. The
Code field is only used in case of Adjacency Update message,
otherwise it is not used and SHOULD be set to zero. Event messages
are not sent during initialisation. Event messages have the
following format:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 93]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Transaction Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|I| SubMessage Number | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Port Session Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Event Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x|S|x|x| |
+-+-+-+-+ Label |
~ ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note: Fields and Parameters that have been explained in the
description of the general messages will not be explained in
this section. Please refer to section 3.1 for details.
Event Sequence Number
The current value of the Event Sequence Number for the
specified port. The Event Sequence Number is set to zero when
the port is initialised. It is incremented by one each time
the port detects an asynchronous event that the switch would
normally report via an Event message. The Event Sequence
Number MUST be incremented each time an event occurs even if
the switch is prevented from sending an Event message due to
the action of the flow control.
Label
Field gives the Label to which the event message refers. If
this field is not required by the event message it is set to
zero.
Each switch port MUST maintain an Event Sequence Number and a set of
Event Flags, one Event Flag for each type of Event message. When a
switch sends an Event message it MUST set the Event Flag for that
port corresponding to the Event type. If Flow Control is activated
for this Event type for this Port then the switch MUST NOT send
another Event message of the same type for that port until the Event
Flag has been reset. Event Flags are reset by the "Reset Event
Flags" function of the Port Management message. This is a simple
flow control preventing the switch from flooding the controller with
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 94]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
event messages. The Event Sequence Number of the port MUST be
incremented every time an event is detected on that port even if the
port is prevented from reporting the event due to the action of the
flow control. This allows the controller to detect that it has not
been informed of some events that have occurred on the port due to
the action of the flow control.
9.1 Port Up Message
The Port Up message informs the controller that the Line Status of a
port has changed from, either the Down or Test state to the Up state.
When the Line Status of a switch port changes to the Up state from
either the Down or Test state a new Port Session Number MUST be
generated, preferably using some form of random number. The new Port
Session Number is given in the Port Session Number field. The Label
field is not used and is set to zero. The Port Up message is:
Message Type = 80
9.2 Port Down Message
The Port Down message informs the controller that the Line Status of
a port has changed from the Up state or Test state to the Down state.
This message will be sent to report link failure if the switch is
capable of detecting link failure. The port session number that was
valid before the port went down is reported in the Port Session
Number field. The Label field is not used and is set to zero. The
Port Down message is:
Message Type = 81
9.3 Invalid Label Message
The Invalid Label message is sent to inform the controller that one
or more cells or frames have arrived at an input port with a Label
that is currently not allocated to an assigned connection. The input
port is indicated in the Port field, and the Label in the Label
field. The Invalid Label message is:
Message Type = 82
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 95]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
9.4 New Port Message
The New Port message informs the controller that a new port has been
added to the switch. The port number of the new port is given in the
Port field. A new Port Session Number MUST be assigned, preferably
using some form of random number. The new Port Session Number is
given in the Port Session Number field. The state of the new port is
undefined so the Label field is not used and is set to zero. The New
Port message is:
Message Type = 83
9.5 Dead Port Message
The Dead Port message informs the controller that a port has been
removed from the switch. The port number of the port is given in the
Port field. The Port Session Number that was valid before the port
was removed is reported in the Port Session Number field. The Label
fields are not used and are set to zero. The Dead Port message is:
Message Type = 84
9.6 Adjacency Update Message
The Adjacency Update message informs the controller when adjacencies,
i.e., other controllers controlling a specific partition, are joining
or leaving. When a new adjacency has been established, the switch
sends an Adjacency Update message to every controller with an
established adjacency to that partition. The Adjacency Update
message is also sent when adjacency is lost between the partition and
a controller, provided that there are any remaining adjacencies with
that partition. The Code field is used to indicate the number of
adjacencies known by the switch partition. The Label field is not
used and SHOULD be set to zero. The Adjacency Update message is:
Message Type = 85
10. Service Model Definition
10.1 Overview
In the GSMP Service Model a controller may request the switch to
establish a connection with a given Service. The requested Service
is identified by including a Service ID in the Add Branch message or
the Reservation Message. The Service ID refers to a Service
Definition provided in this chapter of the GSMP specification.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 96]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
A switch that implements one or more of the Services, as defined
below, advertises the availability of these Services in the Service
Configuration message response (see Section 8.4). Details of the
switch's implementation of a given Service that are important to the
controller (e.g., the value of delay or loss bounds or the
availability of traffic controls such as policers or shapers) are
reported in the form of a Capability Set in the Service Configuration
message response.
Thus a switch's implementation of a Service is defined in two parts:
the Service Definition, which is part of the GSMP specification, and
the Capability Set, which describes attributes of the Service
specific to the switch. A switch may support more than one
Capability Set for a given Service. For example if a switch supports
one Service with two different values of a delay bound it could do
this by reporting two Capability Sets for that Service.
The Service Definition is identified in GSMP messages by the Service
ID, a sixteen-bit identifier. Assigned numbers for the Service ID
are given with the Service Definitions in Section 10.4. The
Capability Set is identified in GSMP messages by the Capability Set
ID, a sixteen-bit identifier. Numbers for the Capability Set ID are
assigned by the switch and are advertised in the Service
Configuration message response.
The switch reports all its supported Services and Capability Sets in
the Service Configuration message response. The subset of Services
and Capability Sets supported on an individual port is reported in
the Port Configuration message response or in the All Ports
Configuration message response. In these messages the Services and
Capability Sets supported on the specified port are indicated by a
list of {Service ID, Capability Set ID} number pairs.
10.2 Service Model Definitions
Terms and objects defined for the GSMP Service Model are given in
this section.
10.2.1 Original Specifications
Services in GSMP are defined largely with reference to Original
Specifications, i.e., the standards or implementation agreements
published by organisations such as ITU-T, IETF, and ATM Forum that
originally defined the Service. This version of GSMP refers to 4
original specifications: [8], [9], [10] and [11].
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 97]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
10.2.2 Service Definitions
Each Service Definition in GSMP includes definition of:
Traffic Parameters
Traffic Parameter definitions are associated with Services
while Traffic Parameter values are associated with connections.
Traffic Parameters quantitatively describe a connection's
requirements on the Service. For example, Peak Cell Rate is a
Traffic Parameter of the Service defined by the ATM Forum
Constant Bit Rate Service Category.
Some Traffic Parameters are mandatory and some are optional,
depending on the Service.
Semantics of Traffic Parameters are defined by reference to
Original Specifications.
QoS Parameters
QoS Parameters and their values are associated with Services.
QoS Parameters express quantitative characteristics of a
switch's support of a Service. They include, for example,
quantitative bounds on switch induced loss and delay.
Some QoS Parameters will be mandatory and some will be
optional.
Semantics of QoS Parameters are defined by reference to
Original Specifications.
Traffic Controls
The implementation of some Services may include the use of
Traffic Controls. Traffic Controls include, for example
functions such as policing, input shaping, output shaping,
tagging and marking, frame vs. cell merge, frame vs. cell
discard.
Switches are not required to support Traffic Controls. Any
function that is always required in the implementation of a
Service is considered part of the Service and is not considered
a Traffic Control.
If a switch supports a Traffic Control then the control may be
applied either to all connections that use a given Capability
Set (see below) or to individual connections.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 98]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The definition of a Traffic Control is associated with a
Service. Traffic Controls are defined, as far as possible, by
reference to Original Specifications.
10.2.3 Capability Sets
For each Service that a switch supports the switch MUST also support
at least one Capability Set. A Capability Set establishes
characteristics of a switch's implementation of a Service. It may be
appropriate for a switch to support more than one Capability Set for
a given Service.
A Capability Set may contain, depending on the Service definition,
QoS Parameter values and an indication of availability of Traffic
Controls.
If a switch reports QoS Parameter values in a Capability Set then
these apply to all the connections that use that Capability Set.
For each Traffic Control defined for a given Service the switch
reports availability of that control as one of the following:
Not available in the Capability Set,
Applied to all connections that use the Capability Set, or
Available for application to connections that use the Capability
Set on a per connection basis. In this case, a controller may
request application of the Traffic Control in connection
management messages.
10.3 Service Model Procedures
A switch's Services and Capability Sets are reported to a controller
in a Service Configuration message. A Service Configuration message
response includes the list of Services defined for GSMP that the
switch supports and, for each Service, a specification of the
Capability Sets supported for the Service. Services are referred to
by numbers standardised in the GSMP specification. Capability Sets
are referred to by a numbering system reported by the switch. Each
Capability Set within a given Service includes a unique identifying
number together with the switch's specification of QoS Parameters and
Traffic Controls.
A switch need not support all the defined Services and Capability
Sets on every port. The supported Services and Capability Sets are
reported to the controller on a per port basis in port configuration
messages. Port configuration response messages list the supported
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 99]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Services using the standardised identifying numbers and the
Capability Sets by using the identifying numbers established in the
switch Service configuration messages.
GSMP does not provide a negotiation mechanism by which a controller
may establish or modify Capability Sets.
When a controller establishes a connection, the connection management
message includes indication of the Service and the Capability Set.
Depending on these the connection management message may additionally
include Traffic Parameter values and Traffic Control flags.
A connection with a given Service can only be established if both the
requested Service and the requested Capability Set are available on
all of the connection's input and output ports.
Refresh of an extant connection is permitted but the add branch
message requesting the message MUST NOT include indication of
Service, Capability Sets or Traffic Parameters.
An extant connection's Traffic Parameters may be changed without
first deleting the connection. The Service and Capability Sets of an
extant connection cannot be changed.
Move branch messages may be refused on the grounds of resource
depletion.
10.4 Service Definitions
This section sets forth the definition of Services. The following
Service Identifiers are defined:
ID Service Type
1 CBR= 1
2 rt-VBR.1
3 rt-VBR.2
4 rt-VBR.3
5 nrt-VBR.1
6 nrt-VBR.2
7 nrt-VBR.3
8 UBR.1
9 UBR.2
10-11 Reserved
12 GFR.1
13 GFR.2
14-19 Reserved
20 Int-Serv Controlled Load
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 100]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
21-24 Reserved
25 MPLS CR-LDP QoS
26-29 Reserved
30 Frame Relay Service
31-49 Reserved
50-69 Reserved GMPLS
70-65535 Reserved
Each Service will be defined in its own subsection. Each Service
definition includes the following definitions:
Service Identifier
The reference number used to identify the Service in GSMP
messages.
Service Characteristics
A definition of the Service.
Traffic Parameters
A definition of the Traffic Parameters used in connection
management messages.
QoS Parameters
A definition of the QoS Parameters that are included in the
Capability Set for instances of the Service.
Traffic Controls
A definition of the Traffic Controls that may be supported by
an instance of the Service.
Descriptive text is avoided wherever possible in order to minimise
any possibility of semantic conflict with the Original
Specifications.
10.4.1 ATM Forum Service Categories
10.4.1.1 CBR
Service Identifier:
CBR.1 - Service ID = 1
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to ATM Forum CBR.1 Service, see [8].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 101]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
QoS Parameters:
- Cell Loss Ratio
- Maximum Cell Transfer Delay
- Peak-to-peak Cell Delay Variation
Traffic Controls:
- (U) Usage Parameter Control
- (I) Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
- (E) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate and Cell Delay
Variation Tolerance
- (D) Packet Discard
10.4.1.2 rt-VBR
Service Identifier:
rt-VBR.1 - Service ID = 2
rt-VBR.2 - Service ID = 3
rt-VBR.3 - Service ID = 4
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to ATM Forum rt-VBR Service, see [8].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
- Sustainable Cell Rate
- Maximum Burst Size
QoS Parameters:
- Cell Loss Ratio
- Maximum Cell Transfer Delay
- Peak-to-peak Cell Delay Variation
Traffic Controls:
- (U) Usage Parameter Control
- (I) Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
- (E) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate and Cell Delay
Variation Tolerance
- (S) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Sustainable Cell Rate and
Maximum Burst Size
- (P) Packet Discard
- (V) VC Merge
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 102]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
10.4.1.3 nrt-VBR
Service Identifier:
nrt-VBR.1 - Service ID = 5
nrt-VBR.2 - Service ID = 6
nrt-VBR.3 - Service ID = 7
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to ATM Forum nrt-VBR Service, see [8].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
- Sustainable Cell Rate
- Maximum Burst Size
QoS Parameter:
- Cell Loss Ratio
Traffic Controls:
- (U) Usage Parameter Control
- (I) Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
- (E) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate and Cell Delay
Variation Tolerance
- (S) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Sustainable Cell Rate and
Maximum Burst Size
- (P) Packet Discard
- (V) VC Merge
10.4.1.4 UBR
Service Identifier:
UBR.1 - Service ID = 8
UBR.2 - Service ID = 9
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to ATM Forum UBR Service, see [8].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
QoS Parameter:
None
Traffic Controls:
- (U) Usage Parameter Control
- (I) Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 103]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
- (E) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate and Cell Delay
Variation Tolerance
- (P) Packet Discard
- (V) VC Merge
10.4.1.5 ABR
ABR is not supported in this version of GSMP.
10.4.1.6 GFR
Service Identifier:
GFR.1 - Service ID = 12
GFR.2 - Service ID = 13
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to ATM Forum GFR Service, see [8].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
- Minimum Cell Rate
- Maximum Burst Size
- Maximum Frame Size
QoS Parameter:
- Cell Loss Ratio
Traffic Controls:
- (U) Usage Parameter Control
- (I) Ingress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate
- (E) Egress Traffic Shaping to the Peak Cell Rate and Cell Delay
Variation Tolerance
- (V) VC Merge
10.4.2 Integrated Services
10.4.2.1 Controlled Load
Service Identifier:
Int-Serv Controlled Load - Service ID = 20
Service Characteristics:
See [9].
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 104]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Traffic Parameters:
- Token bucket rate (r)
- Token bucket depth (b)
- Peak rate (p)
- Minimum policed unit (m)
- Maximum packet size (M)
QoS Parameter:
None.
Traffic Controls:
None.
10.4.3 MPLS CR-LDP
Service Identifier:
MPLS CR-LDP QoS - Service ID = 25
Service Characteristics:
See [10].
Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Data Rate
- Peak Burst Size
- Committed Data Rate
- Committed Burst Size
- Excess Burst Size
- Weight
QoS Parameter:
- Frequency
Traffic Controls:
None currently defined.
10.4.4 Frame Relay
Service Identifier:
Frame Relay Service - Service ID = 30
Service Characteristics:
Equivalent to Frame Relay Bearer Service, see [11].
Traffic Parameters:
- Committed Information Rate
- Committed Burst Rate
- Excess Burst Rate
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 105]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
QoS Parameters:
None.
Traffic Controls:
- Usage Parameter Control
- Egress Traffic Shaping to the Committed Information Rate and
Committed Burst Size
10.4.5 DiffServ
DiffServ is not supported in this version of GSMP.
10.5 Format and encoding of the Traffic Parameters
Connection management messages that use the GSMP Service Model (i.e.,
those that have IQS or OQS set to 0b10) include the Traffic
Parameters Block that specifies the Traffic Parameter values of a
connection. The required Traffic Parameters of a given Service are
given in Section 10.4. The format and encoding of these parameters
are given below.
10.5.1 Traffic Parameters for ATM Forum Services
The Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Cell Rate
- Cell Delay Variation Tolerance
- Sustainable Cell Rate
- Maximum Burst Size
- Minimum Cell Rate
- Maximum Frame Size
are defined in [8]. These Parameters are encoded as 24-bit unsigned
integers. Peak Cell Rate, Sustainable Cell Rate, and Minimum Cell
Rate are in units of cells per second. Cell Delay Variation
Tolerance is in units of microseconds. Maximum Burst Size and
Maximum Frame Size are in units of cells. In GSMP messages, the
individual Traffic Parameters are encoded as follows:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 106]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x| 24 bit unsigned integer |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format of the Traffic Parameters Block in connection management
messages depends on the Service. It is a sequence of the 32 bit
words (as shown above) corresponding to the Traffic Parameters as
specified in the Service Definitions given in Section 10.4.1 in the
order given there.
10.5.2 Traffic Parameters for Int-Serv Controlled Load Service
The Traffic Parameters:
- Token bucket rate (r)
- Token bucket size (b)
- Peak rate (p)
are defined in [9]. They are encoded as 32-bit IEEE single-precision
floating point numbers. The Traffic Parameters Token bucket rate (r)
and Peak rate (p) are in units of bytes per seconds. The Traffic
Parameter Token bucket size (b) is in units of bytes.
The Traffic Parameters:
- Minimum policed unit (m)
- Maximum packet size (M)
are defined in [9]. They are encoded as 32 integer in units of
bytes.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 107]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Traffic Parameters Block for the Int-Serv Controlled Load Service
is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Token bucket rate (r) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Token bucket size (b) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Peak rate (p) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum policed unit (m) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Maximum packet size (M) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
10.5.3 Traffic Parameters for CRLDP Service
The Traffic Parameters:
- Peak Data Rate
- Peak Burst Size
- Committed Data Rate
- Committed Burst Size
- Excess Burst Size
are defined in [10] to be encoded as a 32-bit IEEE single-precision
floating point number. A value of positive infinity is represented
as an IEEE single-precision floating-point number with an exponent of
all ones (255) and a sign and mantissa of all zeros. The values Peak
Data Rate and Committed Data Rate are in units of bytes per second.
The values Peak Burst Size, Committed Burst Size and Excess Burst
Size are in units of bytes.
The Traffic Parameter
- Weight
is defined in [10] to be an 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the
weight of the CRLSP. Valid weight values are from 1 to 255. The
value 0 means that weight is not applicable for the CRLSP.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 108]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
The Traffic Parameters Block for the CRLDP Service is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Peak Data Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Peak Burst Size |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Committed Data Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Committed Burst Size |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Excess Burst Size |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Weight |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
10.5.4 Traffic Parameters for Frame Relay Service
The Traffic Parameters:
- Committed Information Rate
- Committed Burst Size
- Excess Burst Size
are defined in [11]. Format and encoding of these parameters for
frame relay signalling messages are defined in [12]. (Note than in
[12] the Committed Information Rate is called "Throughput".) GSMP
uses the encoding defined in [12] but uses a different format.
The format of the Traffic Parameters Block for Frame Relay Service is
as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Mag |x x x x x| CIR Multiplier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Mag |x x| CBS Multiplier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|x x x x x x x x x x x x x| Mag |x x| EBS Multiplier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 109]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Mag
This field is an unsigned integer in the range from 0 to 6.
The value 7 is not allowed. Mag is the decimal exponent for
the adjacent multiplier field (which itself functions as a
mantissa).
CIR Multiplier
This field is an unsigned integer. It functions as the
mantissa of the Committed Information Rate Traffic Parameter.
CBS Multiplier
EBS Multiplier
These fields are unsigned integers. They function as the
mantissas of the Committed Burst Size and Excess Burst Size
Traffic Parameters respectively.
The Traffic Parameter Values are related to their encoding in GSMP
messages as follows:
Committed Information Rate = 10^(Mag) * (CIR Multiplier)
Committed Burst Size = 10^(Mag) * (CBS Multiplier)
Excess Burst Size = 10^(Mag) * (EBS Multiplier)
10.6 Traffic Controls (TC) Flags
The TC Flags field in Add Branch messages for connections using the
Service Model are set by the controller to indicate that specific
traffic controls are requested for the requested connection. The TC
Flags field is shown below:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U|D|I|E|S|V|P|x|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
U: Usage Parameter Control
When set, this flag indicates that Usage Parameter Control
is requested.
D: Packet Discard
When set, this flag indicates that Packet Discard is
requested.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 110]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
I: Ingress Shaping
When set, this flag indicates the availability of Ingress
Traffic Shaping to the Peak Rate and Delay Variation
Tolerance is requested.
E: Egress Shaping, Peak Rate
When set, this flag indicates that Egress Shaping to the
Peak Rate and Delay Variation Tolerance is requested.
S: Egress Traffic Shaping, Sustainable Rate
When set, this flag indicates that Egress Traffic Shaping to
the Sustainable Rate and Maximum Burst Size is requested.
V: VC Merge
When set, this flag indicates that ATM Virtual Channel Merge
(i.e., multipoint to point ATM switching with a traffic
control to avoid AAL5 PDU interleaving) is requested.
P: Port
When set indicates that traffic block pertains to Ingress
Port.
x: Reserved
The controller may set (to one) the flag corresponding to the
requested Traffic Control if the corresponding Traffic Control has
been indicated in the Service Configuration response message (Section
8.4) as available for application to connections that use the
requested Capability Set on a per connection basis. (The requested
Capability Set is indicated by the Capability Set ID the least
significant byte of the Service Selector field of the Add Branch
message.) If the Traffic Control has been indicated in the Service
Configuration response message as either not available in the
Capability Set or applied to all connections that use the Capability
Set then the controller sets the flag to zero and the switch ignores
the flag.
11. Adjacency Protocol
The adjacency protocol is used to synchronise state across the link,
to agree on which version of the protocol to use, to discover the
identity of the entity at the other end of a link, and to detect when
it changes. GSMP is a hard state protocol. It is therefore
important to detect loss of contact between switch and controller,
and to detect any change of identity of switch or controller. No
GSMP messages other than those of the adjacency protocol may be sent
across the link until the adjacency protocol has achieved
synchronisation.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 111]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
11.1 Packet Format
All GSMP messages belonging to the adjacency protocol have the
following structure:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Message Type | Timer |M| Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sender Name |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| Receiver Name |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sender Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Receiver Port |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PType | PFlag | Sender Instance |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Partition ID | Receiver Instance |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Version
In the adjacency protocol the Version field is used for version
negotiation. The version negotiation is performed before
synchronisation is achieved. In a SYN message the Version
field always contains the highest version understood by the
sender. A receiver receiving a SYN message with a version
higher than understood will ignore that message. A receiver
receiving a SYN message with a version lower than its own
highest version, but a version that it understands, will reply
with a SYNACK with the version from the received SYN in its
GSMP Version field. This defines the version of the GSMP
protocol to be used while the adjacency protocol remains
synchronised. All other messages will use the agreed version
in the Version field.
The version number for the version of the GSMP protocol defined
by this specification is Version = 3.
Message Type
The adjacency protocol is:
Message Type = 10
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 112]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Timer
The Timer field is used to inform the receiver of the timer
value used in the adjacency protocol of the sender. The timer
specifies the nominal time between periodic adjacency protocol
messages. It is a constant for the duration of a GSMP session.
The timer field is specified in units of 100ms.
M-Flag
The M-Flag is used in the SYN message to indicate whether the
sender is a master or a slave. If the M-Flag is set in the SYN
message, the sender is a master. If zero, the sender is a
slave. The GSMP protocol is asymmetric, the controller being
the master and the switch being the slave. The M-Flag prevents
a master from synchronising with another master, or a slave
with another slave. If a slave receives a SYN message with a
zero M-Flag, it MUST ignore that SYN message. If a master
receives a SYN message with the M-Flag set, it MUST ignore that
SYN message. In all other messages the M-Flag is not used.
Code
Field specifies the function of the message. Four Codes are
defined for the adjacency protocol:
SYN: Code = 1
SYNACK: Code = 2
ACK: Code = 3
RSTACK: Code = 4.
Sender Name
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the name of the
entity sending the message. The Sender Name is a 48-bit
quantity that is unique within the operational context of the
device. A 48-bit IEEE 802 MAC address, if available, may be
used for the Sender Name. If the Ethernet encapsulation is
used the Sender Name MUST be the Source Address from the MAC
header. For the RSTACK message, the Sender Name field is set
to the value of the Receiver Name field from the incoming
message that caused the RSTACK message to be generated.
Receiver Name
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the name of the
entity that the sender of the message believes is at the far
end of the link. If the sender of the message does not know
the name of the entity at the far end of the link, this field
SHOULD be set to zero. For the RSTACK message, the Receiver
Name field is set to the value of the Sender Name field from
the incoming message that caused the RSTACK message to be
generated.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 113]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Sender Port
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the local port number
of the link across which the message is being sent. For the
RSTACK message, the Sender Port field is set to the value of
the Receiver Port field from the incoming message that caused
the RSTACK message to be generated.
Receiver Port
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is what the sender
believes is the local port number for the link, allocated by
the entity at the far end of the link. If the sender of the
message does not know the port number at the far end of the
link, this field SHOULD be set to zero. For the RSTACK
message, the Receiver Port field is set to the value of the
Sender Port field from the incoming message that caused the
RSTACK message to be generated.
PType
PType is used to specify if partitions are used and how the
Partition ID is negotiated.
Type of partition being requested.
0 No Partition
1 Fixed Partition Request
2 Fixed Partition Assigned
PFlag
Used to indicate the type of partition request.
1 - New Adjacency.
In the case of a new adjacency, the state of the
switch will be reset.
2 - Recovered Adjacency.
In the case of a recovered adjacency, the state of
the switch will remain, and the Switch Controller
will be responsible for confirming that the state
of the switch matches the desired state.
Sender Instance
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the sender's instance
number for the link. It is used to detect when the link comes
back up after going down or when the identity of the entity at
the other end of the link changes. The instance number is a
24-bit number that is guaranteed to be unique within the recent
past and to change when the link or node comes back up after
going down. Zero is not a valid instance number. For the
RSTACK message, the Sender Instance field is set to the value
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 114]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
of the Receiver Instance field from the incoming message that
caused the RSTACK message to be generated.
Partition ID
Field used to associate the message with a specific switch
partition.
Receiver Instance
For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is what the sender
believes is the current instance number for the link, allocated
by the entity at the far end of the link. If the sender of the
message does not know the current instance number at the far
end of the link, this field SHOULD be set to zero. For the
RSTACK message, the Receiver Instance field is set to the value
of the Sender Instance field from the incoming message that
caused the RSTACK message to be generated.
11.2 Procedure
The adjacency protocol is described by the following rules and state
tables.
The rules and state tables use the following operations:
o The "Update Peer Verifier" operation is defined as storing the
values of the Sender Instance, Sender Port, Sender Name and
Partition ID fields from a SYN or SYNACK message received from the
entity at the far end of the link.
o The procedure "Reset the link" is defined as:
1. Generate a new instance number for the link
2. Delete the peer verifier (set to zero the values of Sender
Instance, Sender Port, and Sender Name previously stored by the
Update Peer Verifier operation)
3. Send a SYN message
4. Enter the SYNSENT state.
o The state tables use the following Boolean terms and operators:
A The Sender Instance in the incoming message matches the value
stored from a previous message by the "Update Peer Verifier"
operation.
B The Sender Instance, Sender Port, Sender Name and Partition
ID fields in the incoming message match the values stored
from a previous message by the "Update Peer Verifier"
operation.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 115]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
C The Receiver Instance, Receiver Port, Receiver Name and
Partition ID fields in the incoming message match the values
of the Sender Instance, Sender Port, Sender Name and
Partition ID currently sent in outgoing SYN, SYNACK, and ACK
messages.
"&&" Represents the logical AND operation
"||" Represents the logical OR operation
"!" Represents the logical negation (NOT) operation.
o A timer is required for the periodic generation of SYN, SYNACK,
and ACK messages. The value of the timer is announced in the
Timer field. The period of the timer is unspecified but a value
of one second is suggested.
There are two independent events: the timer expires, and a packet
arrives. The processing rules for these events are:
Timer Expires: Reset Timer
If state = SYNSENT Send SYN
If state = SYNRCVD Send SYNACK
If state = ESTAB Send ACK
Packet Arrives:
If incoming message is an RSTACK:
If (A && C && !SYNSENT) Reset the link
Else discard the message.
If incoming message is a SYN, SYNACK, or ACK:
Response defined by the following State Tables.
If incoming message is any other GSMP message and
state != ESTAB:
Discard incoming message.
If state = SYNSENT Send SYN (Note 1)
If state = SYNRCVD Send SYNACK (Note 1)
Note 1: No more than two SYN or SYNACK messages should be sent
within any time period of length defined by the timer.
o State synchronisation across a link is considered to be achieved
when the protocol reaches the ESTAB state. All GSMP messages,
other than adjacency protocol messages, that are received before
synchronisation is achieved, will be discarded.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 116]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
11.2.1 State Tables
State: SYNSENT
+====================================================================+
| Condition | Action | New State |
+==================+=====================================+===========+
| SYNACK && C | Update Peer Verifier; Send ACK | ESTAB |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| SYNACK && !C | Send RSTACK | SYNSENT |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| SYN | Update Peer Verifier; Send SYNACK | SYNRCVD |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| ACK | Send RSTACK | SYNSENT |
+====================================================================+
State: SYNRCVD
+====================================================================+
| Condition | Action | New State |
+==================+=====================================+===========+
| SYNACK && C | Update Peer Verifier; Send ACK | ESTAB |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| SYNACK && !C | Send RSTACK | SYNRCVD |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| SYN | Update Peer Verifier; Send SYNACK | SYNRCVD |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| ACK && B && C | Send ACK | ESTAB |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| ACK && !(B && C) | Send RSTACK | SYNRCVD |
+====================================================================+
State: ESTAB
+====================================================================+
| Condition | Action | New State |
+==================+=====================================+===========+
| SYN || SYNACK | Send ACK (note 2) | ESTAB |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| ACK && B && C | Send ACK (note 3) | ESTAB |
+------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
| ACK && !(B && C) | Send RSTACK | ESTAB |
+====================================================================+
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 117]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Note 2: No more than two ACKs should be sent within any time
period of length defined by the timer. Thus, one ACK MUST be
sent every time the timer expires. In addition, one further
ACK may be sent between timer expirations if the incoming
message is a SYN or SYNACK. This additional ACK allows the
adjacency protocol to reach synchronisation more quickly.
Note 3: No more than one ACK should be sent within any time
period of length defined by the timer.
11.3 Partition Information State
Each instance of a [switch controller-switch partition] pair will
need to establish adjacency synchronisation independently.
Part of the process of establishing synchronisation when using
partition will be to establish the assignment of partition
identifiers. The following scenarios are provided for:
- A controller can request a specific partition ID by setting the
PType to Fixed Partition Request.
- A controller can let the switch decide whether it wants to
assign a fixed partition ID or not, by setting the PType to No
Partition.
- A switch can assign the specific Partition ID to the session by
setting the PType to Fixed Partition Assigned. A switch can
specify that no partitions are handled in the session by
setting the PType to No Partition.
The assignment is determined by the following behaviour:
- An adjacency message from a controller with PType = 1 and
Code = SYN SHOULD be treated as a partition request.
- An adjacency message from a switch with PType = 2 and
Code = SYN SHOULD be treated as a partition assignment.
- An adjacency message from a controller or a switch with
PType = 2 and Code = (SYNACK || ACK) SHOULD be treated as a
success response, the partition is assigned.
- An adjacency message from a controller with PType = 0 and
Code = SYN indicates that the controller has not specified if
it requests partitions or not.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 118]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
- An adjacency message from a switch with PType = 0 and
Code = SYN indicates that the switch does not support
partitions.
- An adjacency message from a controller or a switch with
PType = 0 and Code = (SYNACK || ACK) indicates that the session
does not support partitions.
- An adjacency message from a controller or a switch with
PType = (1 || 2) and Code = RSTACK indicates that requested
Partition ID is unavailable.
- An adjacency message from a controller or a switch with
PType = 0 and Code = RSTACK indicates that an unidentified
error has occurred. The session SHOULD be reset.
All other combinations of PType and Code are undefined in this
version of GSMP.
11.4 Loss of Synchronisation
If after synchronisation is achieved, no valid GSMP messages are
received in any period of time in excess of three times the value of
the Timer field announced in the incoming adjacency protocol
messages, loss of synchronisation may be declared.
While re-establishing synchronisation with a controller, a switch
SHOULD maintain its connection state, deferring the decision about
resetting the state until after synchronisation is re-established.
Once synchronisation is re-established the decision about resetting
the connection state SHOULD be made on the following basis:
- If PFLAG = 1, then a new adjacency has been established and the
state SHOULD be reset
- If PFLAG = 2, then adjacency has been re-established and the
connection state SHOULD be retained. Verification that
controller and connection state are the same is the
responsibility of the controller.
11.5 Multiple Controllers per switch partition
Multiple switch controllers may jointly control a single switch
partition. The controllers may control a switch partition either in
a primary/standby fashion or as part of multiple controllers
providing load-sharing for the same partition. It is the
responsibility of the controllers to co-ordinate their interactions
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 119]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
with the switch partition. In order to assist the controllers in
tracking multiple controller adjacencies to a single switch
partition, the Adjacency Update message is used to inform a
controller that there are other controllers interacting with the same
partition. It should be noted that the GSMP does not include
features that allow the switch to co-ordinate cache synchronization
information among controllers. The switch partition will service
each command it receives in turn as if it were interacting with a
single controller. Controller implementations without controller
entity synchronisation SHOULD NOT use multiple controllers with a
single switch partition.
11.5.1 Multiple Controller Adjacency Process
The first adjacency for a specific partition is determined by the
procedures described in section 11.2 and an Adjacency Update message
will be sent. The next adjacencies to the partition are identified
by a new partition request with the same Partition ID as the first
one but with the different Sender Name. Upon establishing adjacency
the Adjacency count will be increased and an Adjacency Update message
will be sent.
When adjacency between one partition and a controller is lost, the
adjacency count will be decremented and an Adjacency Update message
will be sent.
Example:
A switch partition has never been used. When the first controller
(A) achieves adjacency, an adjacency count will be initiated and (A)
will get an Adjacency Update message about itself with Code field =
1. Since (A) receives an adjacency count of 1 this indicates that it
is the only controller for that partition.
When a second adjacency (B), using the same Partition ID, achieves
adjacency, the adjacency counter will be increased by 1. Both (A)
and (B) will receive an Adjacency Update message indicating an
adjacency count of 2 in the Code field. Since the count is greater
than 1, this will indicate to both (A) and (B) that there is another
controller interacting with the switch; identification of the other
controller will not be provided by GSMP, but will be the
responsibility of the controllers.
If (A) looses adjacency, the adjacency count will be decreased and an
Adjacency Update message will be sent to (B) indicating an adjacency
count of 1 in the Code field. If (B) leaves as well, the partition
is regarded as idle and the adjacency count may be reset.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 120]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
12. Failure Response Codes
12.1 Description of Failure and Warning Response Messages
A failure response message is formed by returning the request message
that caused the failure with the Result field in the header
indicating failure (Result = 4) and the Code field giving the failure
code. The failure code specifies the reason for the switch being
unable to satisfy the request message.
A warning response message is a success response (Result = 3) with
the Code field specifying the warning code. The warning code
specifies a warning that was generated during the successful
operation.
If the switch issues a failure response in reply to a request
message, no change should be made to the state of the switch as a
result of the message causing the failure. (For request messages
that contain multiple requests, such as the Delete Branches message,
the failure response message will specify which requests were
successful and which failed. The successful requests may result in a
changed state.)
If the switch issues a failure response it MUST choose the most
specific failure code according to the following precedence:
- Invalid Message
- General Message Failure
- Specific Message Failure A failure response specified in the
text defining the message type.
- Connection Failures
- Virtual Path Connection Failures
- Multicast Failures
- QoS Failures
- General Failures
- Warnings
If multiple failures match in any of the following categories, the
one that is listed first should be returned. The following failure
response messages and failure and warning codes are defined:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 121]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Invalid Message
3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
The Message Type field specifies a message that is not
implemented on the switch or contains a value that is not
defined in the version of the protocol running in this
session of GSMP.
4: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
At least one of the ports specified in the message is
invalid. A port is invalid if it does not exist or if it
has been removed from the switch.
5: Invalid Port Session Number.
The value given in the Port Session Number field does not
match the current Port Session Number for the specified
port.
7: Invalid Partition ID
The value given in the Partition ID field is not legal for
this partition.
General Message Failure
10: The meaning of this failure is dependent upon the
particular message type and is specified in the text
defining the message.
Specific Message Failure - A failure response that is only used by a
specific message type
- Failure response messages used by the Label Range message
40: Cannot support one or more requested label ranges.
41: Cannot support disjoint label ranges.
42: Specialised multipoint labels not supported.
- Failure response messages used by the Set Transmit Data Rate
function of the Port Management message
43: The transmit data rate of this output port cannot be changed.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 122]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
44: Requested transmit data rate out of range for this output
port.
The transmit data rate of the requested output port can be
changed, but the value of the Transmit Data Rate field is
beyond the range of acceptable values.
- Failure response message of the Port Management message
45: Connection Replace mechanism not supported on switch.
The R-flag SHOULD be reset in the Response Port Management
message.
- Failure response message range reserved for the ARM extension
128-159: These failure response codes will be interpreted
according to definitions provided by the model
description.
Connection Failures
11: The specified connection does not exist.
An operation that expects a connection to be specified
cannot locate the specified connection. A connection is
specified by the input port and input label on which it
originates. An ATM virtual path connection is specified
by the input port and input VPI on which it originates.
12: The specified branch does not exist.
An operation that expects a branch of an existing
connection to be specified cannot locate the specified
branch. A branch of a connection is specified by the
connection it belongs to and the output port and output
label on which it departs. A branch of an ATM virtual
path connection is specified by the virtual path
connection it belongs to and the output port and output
VPI on which it departs.
13: One or more of the specified Input Labels is invalid.
14: One or more of the specified Output Labels is invalid.
15: Point-to-point bi-directional connection already exists.
The connection specified by the Input Port and Input Label
fields already exists, and the bi-directional Flag in the
Flags field is set.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 123]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
16: Invalid Service Selector field in a Connection Management
message. The value of the Service Selector field is
invalid.
17: Insufficient resources for QoS Profile.
The resources requested by the QoS Profile in the Service
Selector field are not available.
18: Insufficient Resources.
Switch resources needed to establish a branch are not
available.
20: Reservation ID out of Range
The numerical value of Reservation ID is greater than the
value of Max Reservations (from the Switch Configuration
message).
21: Mismatched reservation ports
The value of Input Port differs from the input port
specified in the reservation or the value of Output Port
differs from the output port specified in the reservation.
22: Reservation ID in use
The value of Reservation ID matches that of an extant
Reservation.
23: Non-existent reservation ID
No reservation corresponding to Reservation ID exists.
36: Replace of connection is not activated on switch.
Only applicable for Add Branch messages. The Replace
Connection mechanism has not been activated on port by the
Port Management message.
37: Connection replacement mode cannot be combined with Bi-
directional or Multicast mode. The R flag MUST NOT be
used in conjunction with either the M flag or the B flag.
ATM Virtual Path Connections
24: ATM virtual path switching is not supported on this input
port.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 124]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
25: Point-to-multipoint ATM virtual path connections are not
supported on either the requested input port or the
requested output port.
One or both of the requested input and output ports is
unable to support point-to-multipoint ATM virtual path
connections.
26: Attempt to add an ATM virtual path connection branch to an
existing virtual channel connection.
It is invalid to mix branches switched as virtual channel
connections with branches switched as ATM virtual path
connections on the same point-to-multipoint connection.
27: Attempt to add an ATM virtual channel connection branch to an
existing ATM virtual path connection.
It is invalid to mix branches switched as virtual channel
connections with branches switched as ATM virtual path
connections on the same point-to-multipoint connection.
28: ATM Virtual path switching is not supported on non-ATM ports.
One or both of the requested input and output ports is not
an ATM port. ATM virtual path switching is only supported
on ATM ports.
Multicast Failures
29: A branch belonging to the specified point-to-multipoint
connection is already established on the specified output
port and the switch cannot support more than a single
branch of any point-to-multipoint connection on the same
output port.
30: The limit on the maximum number of multicast connections that
the switch can support has been reached.
31: The limit on the maximum number of branches that the specified
multicast connection can support has been reached.
32: Cannot label each output branch of a point-to-multipoint tree
with a different label.
Some switch designs, require all output branches of a
point-to-multipoint connection to use the same value of
Label.
33: Cannot add multi-point branch to bi-directional connection.
It is an error to attempt to add an additional branch to
an existing connection with the bi-directional flag set.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 125]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
34: Unable to assign the requested Label value to the requested
branch on the specified multicast connection.
Although the requested Labels are valid, the switch is
unable to support the request using the specified Label
values for some reason not covered by the above failure
responses. This message implies that a valid value of
Labels exists that the switch could support. For example,
some switch designs restrict the number of distinct Label
values available to a multicast connection. (Most switch
designs will not require this message.)
35: General problem related to the manner in which multicast is
supported by the switch.
Use this message if none of the more specific multicast
failure messages apply. (Most switch designs will not
require this message.)
QoS Failures
60-79: These failure response codes will be interpreted according
to definitions provided by the model description.
80: Switch does not support different QoS parameters for different
branches within a multipoint connection.
General Failures
2: Invalid request message.
There is an error in one of the fields of the message not
covered by a more specific failure message.
6: One or more of the specified ports is down.
A port is down if its Port Status is Unavailable.
Connection Management, Connection State, Port Management,
and Configuration operations are permitted on a port that
is Unavailable. Connection Activity and Statistics
operations are not permitted on a port that is Unavailable
and will generate this failure response. A Port
Management message specifying a Take Down function on a
port already in the Unavailable state will also generate
this failure response.
19: Out of resources.
The switch has exhausted a resource not covered by a more
specific failure message, for example, running out of
memory.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 126]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
1: Unspecified reason not covered by other failure codes.
The failure message of last resort.
Warnings
46: One or more labels are still used in the previous Label Range.
12.2 Summary of Failure Response Codes and Warnings
The following list gives a summary of the failure codes defined for
failure response messages:
1: Unspecified reason not covered by other failure codes.
2: Invalid request message.
3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
4: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
5: Invalid Port Session Number.
6: One or more of the specified ports is down.
7: Invalid Partition ID.
10: General message failure. (The meaning of this failure code
depends upon the Message Type. It is defined within the
description of any message that uses it.)
11: The specified connection does not exist.
12: The specified branch does not exist.
13: One or more of the specified Input Labels is invalid.
14: One or more of the specified Output Labels is invalid.
15: Point-to-point bi-directional connection already exists.
16: Invalid service selector field in a connection management
message.
17: Insufficient resources for QoS profile.
18: Insufficient resources.
19: Out of resources (e.g., memory exhausted, etc.).
20: Reservation ID out of Range
21: Mismatched reservation ports
22: Reservation ID in use
23: Non-existent reservation ID
24: ATM virtual path switching is not supported on this input
port.
25: Point-to-multipoint ATM virtual path connections are not
supported on either the requested input port or the
requested output port.
26: Attempt to add an ATM virtual path connection branch to an
existing virtual channel connection.
27: Attempt to add an ATM virtual channel connection branch to
an existing virtual path connection.
28: ATM Virtual Path switching is not supported on non-ATM
ports.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 127]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
29: A branch belonging to the specified point-to-multipoint
connection is already established on the specified
output port and the switch cannot support more than a
single branch of any point-to-multipoint connection on
the same output port.
30: The limit on the maximum number of point-to-multipoint
connections that the switch can support has been
reached.
31: The limit on the maximum number of branches that the
specified point-to-multipoint connection can support has
been reached.
32: Cannot label each output branch of a point-to-multipoint
tree with a different label.
33: Cannot add multi-point branch to bi-directional
connection.
34: Unable to assign the requested Label value to the
requested branch on the specified point-to-multipoint
connection.
35: General problem related to the manner in which point-to-
multipoint is supported by the switch.
36: Replace of connection is not activated on switch.
37: Connection replacement mode cannot be combined with Bi-
directional or Multicast mode.
40: Cannot support one or more requested label ranges.
41: Cannot support disjoint label ranges.
42: Specialised multipoint labels not supported.
43: The transmit data rate of this output port cannot be
changed.
44: Requested transmit data rate out of range for this output
port.
45: Connection Replace mechanism not supported on switch.
46: Labels are still used in the existing Label Range.
60-79: Reserved for QoS failures.
80: Switch does not support different QoS parameters for
different branches within a multipoint connection.
128-159: Reserved for the ARM extensions.
13. Security Considerations
The security of GSMP's TCP/IP control channel has been addressed in
[15]. For all uses of GSMP over an IP network it is REQUIRED that
GSMP be run over TCP/IP using the security considerations discussed
in [15].
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 128]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Appendix A Summary of Messages
Message Name Message Number Status
Connection Management Messages
Add Branch .......................16
ATM Specific - VPC.............26
Delete Tree.......................18
Verify Tree.......................19 Obsoleted
Delete All Input..................20
Delete All Output.................21
Delete Branches...................17
Move Output Branch................22
ATM Specific - VPC............27
Move Input Branch.................23
ATM Specifc - VPC............28
Port Management Messages
Port Management...................32
Label Range.......................33
State and Statistics Messages
Connection Activity...............48
Port Statistics...................49
Connection Statistics.............50
QoS Class Statistics..............51 Reserved
Report Connection State...........52
Configuration Messages
Switch Configuration..............64
Port Configuration................65
All Ports Configuration...........66
Service Configuration.............67
Reservation Messages
Reservation Request...............70
Delete Reservation................71
Delete All Reservations...........72
Event Messages
Port Up...........................80
Port Down.........................81
Invalid Label.....................82
New Port..........................83
Dead Port.........................84
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 129]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Abstract and Resource Model Extension Messages
Reserved..........................200-249
Adjacency Protocol....................10 Required
Appendix B IANA Considerations
Following the policies outlined in "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs" (RFC 2434 [19]), the following name
spaces are defined in GSMPv3.
- Message Type Name Space [Appendix A]
- Label Type Name Space [3.1.3]
- Result Name Space [3.1.1]
- Failure Response Message Name Space [3.1.4],[11]
- Adaptation Type Name Space [4.1]
- Model Type Name Space [8.1]
- Port Type Name Space [8.2]
- Service ID Name Space [10.4]
- Traffic Control Name Space [8.4]
- Event Flag Name Space [6.1]
B.1. Message Type Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Message Types into four ranges.
The following are the guidelines for managing these ranges.
- Message Types 0-99.
Message Types in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Message types in this range are allocated
through an IETF consensus action [19].
- Message Types 100-199.
Message Types in this range are Specification Required
[19]. Message Types using this range must be documented
in an RFC or other permanent and readily available
references.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 130]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
- Message Types 200-249.
Message Types in this range are Specification Required
[19] and are intended for Abstract and Resource Model
Extension Messages. Message Types using this range must
be documented in an RFC or other permanent and readily
available references.
- Message Types 250-255.
Message Types in this range are reserved for vendor
private extensions and are the responsibility of
individual vendors. IANA management of this range of the
Message Type Name Space is unnecessary.
B.2. Label Type Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Label Types into three ranges. The
following are the guidelines for managing these ranges.
- Label Types 0x000-0xAFF.
Label Types in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Label Types in this range are allocated through
an IETF consensus action [19].
- Label Types 0xB00-0xEFF.
Label Types in this range are Specification Required [19].
Label Types using this range must be documented in an RFC
or other permanent and readily available reference.
- Label Types 0xF00-0xFFF.
Label Types in this range are reserved for vendor private
extensions and are the responsibility of individual
vendors. IANA management of this range of the Label Type
Name Space is unnecessary.
B.3. Result Name Space
The following is the guideline for managing the Result Name Space:
- Result values 0-255.
Result values in this range need an expert review, i.e.,
approval by a Designated Expert is required [19].
B.4. Failure Response Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Failure Responses into three
ranges. The following are the guidelines for managing these ranges:
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 131]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
- Failure Responses 0-59, 80-127, 160-255.
Failure responses in these ranges are part of the GSMPv3
base protocol. Failure Responses in these ranges are
allocated through an IETF consensus action [19].
- Failure Responses 60-79, 128-159.
Failure responses in these ranges are reserved for vendor
private extensions and are the responsibility of
individual vendors. IANA management of these ranges of
the Failure Response Name Space are unnecessary.
B.5. Adaptation Type Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Adaptation Types into two ranges.
The following are the guidelines for managing these ranges:
- Adaptation Type 0x000-0x2FF.
Adaptation Types in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Adaptation Types in this range are allocated
through an IETF consensus action [19].
- Adaptation Type 0x300-0xFFF.
Adaptation Types in this range are allocated by the first
come first served principle [19].
B.6. Model Type Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Model Types into three ranges. The
following are the guidelines for managing these ranges:
- Model Type 0.
Model Types in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Model Types in this range are allocated through
an IETF consensus action [19].
- Model Type 1-200.
Model Types in this range are Specification Required [19].
Message Types using this range must be documented in an
RFC or other permanent and readily available references.
- Model Type 201-255.
Model Types in this range are reserved for vendor private
extensions and are the responsibility of individual
vendors. IANA management of these ranges of the Model
Type Name Space are unnecessary.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 132]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
B.7. Port Type Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Port Types into two ranges. The
following are the guidelines for managing these ranges:
- Port Type 0-127.
Port Types in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Port Types in this range are allocated through
an IETF consensus action [19].
- Port Type 128-255.
Port Types in this range are Specification Required [19].
Port Types using this range must be documented in an RFC
or other permanent and readily available references.
B.8. Service ID Name Space
GSMPv3 divides the name space for Service IDs into two ranges. The
following are the guidelines for managing these ranges:
- Service ID 0-1023.
Service ID's in this range are part of the GSMPv3 base
protocol. Service ID's in this range are allocated
through an IETF consensus action [19].
- Service ID 1024-65535.
Service ID's in this range are Specification Required
[19]. Service ID's using this range must be documented in
an RFC or other permanent and readily available
references.
B.9. Traffic Control Name Space
The following are the guidelines for managing Traffic Control Flags
in GSMPv3:
- All Traffic Control Flags are allocated through an expert
review, i.e., approval by a Designated Expert [19].
B.10. Event Flag Name Space
The following are the guidelines for managing Event Flags in GSMPv3:
- All Event Flags are allocated through an expert review, i.e.,
approval by a Designated Expert [19].
The TCP port for establishing GSMP connections has been defined as
6068.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 133]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
References
[1] "B-ISDN ATM Layer Specification", International
Telecommunication Union, ITU-T Recommendation I.361, Feb. 1999.
[2] "B-ISDN ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) Specification", International
Telecommunication Union, ITU-T Recommendation I.363, Mar. 1993.
[3] "B-ISDN ATM Adaptation Layer specification: Type 5 AAL",
International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T, Recommendation
I.363.5, Aug. 1996.
[4] Sjostrand, H., Buerkle, J. and B. Srinivasan, "Definitions of
Managed Objects for the General Switch Management Protocol
(GSMP)", RFC 3295, June 2002.
[5] IANA Assigned Port Numbers, http://www.iana.org
[6] Newman, P, Edwards, W., Hinden, R., Hoffman, E. Ching Liaw, F.,
Lyon, T. and G. Minshall, "Ipsilon's General Switch Management
Protocol Specification Version 1.1", RFC 1987, August 1996.
[7] Newman, P., Edwards, W., Hinden, R., Hoffman, E., Ching Liaw,
F., Lyon, T. and G. Minshall, "Ipsilon's General Switch
Management Protocol Specification Version 2.0", RFC 2297, March
1998.
[8] ATM Forum Technical Committee, "Traffic Management Specification
Version 4.1", af-tm-0121.000, 1999.
[9] Wroclawski, J., "Specification of the Controlled-Load Network
Element Service", RFC 2211, September 1997.
[10] Jamoussi, B., Andersson, L., Callon, R., Dantu, R., Wu, L.,
Doolan, P., Worster, T., Feldman, N., Fredette, A., Girish, M.,
Gray, E., Heinanen, J., Kilty, T. and A. Malis, "Constraint-
Based LSP Setup using LDP", RFC 3212, January 2002.
[11] ITU-T Recommendation I.233 Frame Mode Bearer Services, ISDN
frame relaying bearer services and ISDN switching bearer
service, Nov. 1991.
[12] ITU-T Recommendation Q.933, Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) Digital Subscriber Signaling System No. 1 (DSS 1)
Signaling Specifications For Frame Mode Switched And Permanent
Virtual Connection Control And Status Monitoring, 1995.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 134]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
[13] ITU-T Recommendation Q.922, Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) Data Link Layer Specification For Frame Mode Bearer
Services, 1992
[14] Rosen, E., Tappan, D., Fedorkow, G., Rekhter, Y., Farinacci, D.,
Li, T. and A. Conta, "MPLS Label Stack Encoding", RFC 3032,
January 2001.
[15] Worster, T., Doria, A. and J. Buerkle, "General Switch
Management Protocol (GSMP) Packet Encapsulations for
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), Ethernet and Transmission
Control Protocol (TCP)", RFC 3293, June 2002.
[16] Doria, A. and K. Sundell, "General Switch Management Protocol
Applicability", RFC 3294, June 2002.
[17] IANAifType - MIB DEFINITIONS, http://www.iana.org, January 2001.
[18] Anderson, L., Doolan, P., Feldman, N., Fredette, A. and B.
Thomas, "LDP Specification", RFC 3036, January 2001.
[19] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998.
[20] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[21] Conta, A., Doolan, P. and A. Malis, "Use of Label Switching on
Frame Relay Networks Specification", RFC 3034, January 2001.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 135]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Authors' Addresses
Avri Doria
Div. of Computer Communications
Lulea University of Technology
S-971 87 Lulea
Sweden
Phone: +1 401 663 5024
EMail: avri@acm.org
Fiffi Hellstrand
Nortel Networks AB
S:t Eriksgatan 115 A
SE-113 85 Stockholm Sweden
EMail: fiffi@nortelnetworks.com
Kenneth Sundell
Nortel Networks AB
S:t Eriksgatan 115 A
SE-113 85 Stockholm Sweden
EMail: ksundell@nortelnetworks.com
Tom Worster
Phone: +1 617 247 2624
EMail: fsb@thefsb.org
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 136]
RFC 3292 General Switch Management Protocol V3 June 2002
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Doria, et. al. Standards Track [Page 137]
ERRATA
