rfc3661
Network Working Group B. Foster
Request for Comments: 3661 C. Sivachelvan
Updates: 3435 Cisco Systems
Category: Informational December 2003
Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Return Code Usage
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document provides implementation guidelines for the use of
return codes in RFC 3435, Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP)
Version 1.0. Return codes in RFC 3435 do not cover all possible
specific situations that may ever occur in a gateway. That is not
possible and not necessary. What is important is to ensure that the
Call Agent that receives a return code behaves appropriately and
consistently for the given situation. The purpose of this document
is to provide implementation guidelines to ensure that consistency.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Document Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Return Code Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1. Return Code Categories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2. Return Code Situations and Categories . . . . . . . . . 3
2.3. Summary of Return Code Categories . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3. Additional Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1. Gateway Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2. Call Agent Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5. Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6. Normative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7. Authors' Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
8. Full Copyright Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 1]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
1. Introduction
This document provides implementation guidelines for the use of
return codes in the Media Gateway Control Protocol MGCP 1.0 [1].
Return codes in [1] do not cover all possible specific situations
that may ever occur in the gateway. That is not possible and not
necessary. What is important is to ensure that the Call Agent that
receives that return code behaves appropriately and consistently for
the situation that occurred. The solution described in this document
is to categorize return codes that gateways return based on the
expected behavior for the Call Agents that receive them.
Categorizing errors helps both Call Agent and gateway developers: it
helps gateway developers choose an appropriate return code when a
specific one for the situation is not available; it also helps Call
Agent developers ensure that there is consistent behavior for the
return code that is received.
1.2. Document Organization
In addition to categorizing return codes (section 2.1), section 2.2
provides a consolidated list of return codes in terms of "situations"
that may have triggered and the "categories" that they fall under.
This provides some additional implementation guidelines for the use
of these return codes. Section 2.3 includes a summary of the return
codes and their categories. Section 3 provides some additional
implementation guidelines for Call Agent and gateway developers.
2. Return Code Usage
2.1. Return Code Categories
The following categorizes return codes from gateways based on
expected Call Agent behavior.
Category normal: These return codes are used in normal operation and
do not represent error conditions.
Category none (specific errors requiring specific action): A return
code associated with a specific situation in the gateway that will
invoke a corresponding specific Call Agent behavior. As such,
these return codes are not categorized into a common behavioral
category.
Category "Service Failure": A category in which the endpoint is
either out-of-service or the treatment by the Call Agent is
expected to be the same as for an out-of-service endpoint.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 2]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Category "Provisioning Mismatch": A situation where the gateway has
indicated that it does not support what the Call Agent has asked
it to do. This may be caused by a lack of synchronization between
the provisioning of the Call Agent and the gateway. Note that
attempts should be made to weed out these types of error
situations during integration testing.
Category "Temporary Failure": The transient nature of this error is
such that this particular call is likely to be permanently
affected but later calls on the same endpoint may proceed
successfully. Typically the situation that caused this error is
not going to disappear unless there is some change in state in the
gateway or network (e.g., more bandwidth becomes available, more
CPU resources become available etc.). This situation is not
likely to change in a few 10's of milliseconds but could change
within some number of seconds or minutes later (as resources
become free), i.e., within the time period that you might expect a
different call to be tried on that endpoint.
Category "State Mismatch": A case where there is a state mismatch
between the Call Agent and the gateway that can be resolved by the
Call Agent making a request that is more appropriate to the
gateway state. Although categorized with a common category
indicator the behavior of the Call Agent will depend on the
situation (the type of state mismatch that has occurred as well as
other state information, e.g., call state).
Category "Remote Connection Descriptor Error": This indicates some
mismatch between the two gateways involved in the call. Note that
per RFC 2327, all gateways should ignore SDP attributes that they
do not recognize (i.e., lack of recognition of an SDP attribute
should not be the cause of an error indication).
The exact behavior of the Call Agent for the above categories may
depend on the type of endpoint (analog, ISUP trunk, CAS trunk, etc.),
whether this is the originating or terminating endpoint in the call
and possibly other information related to call state. This document
does not attempt to outline the Call Agent behavior based on call
state. Instead, it just recommends that the Call Agent behavior be
consistent based on a combination of call state and the specific
category of error received.
2.2. Return Code Situations and Categories
This section describes return codes in MGCP 1.0 [1] in terms of
"situations" that may have triggered that return code and
"categories" to which the return code belongs. The purpose is to
provide developers additional guidelines for return code use.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 3]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Note that any indication that a response is valid for a
NotificationRequest (RQNT) is also an indication that it is valid for
a connection handling request, i.e., CreateConnection (CRCX),
ModifyConnection (MDCX), or DeleteConnection (DLCX) with an
encapsulated RQNT. The same holds for the EndpointConfiguration
(EPCF) command.
000 - Response acknowledgement
Response valid for: Confirmation of a final response after a
provisional response (3-way handshake).
Situation: If the final response that follows a provisional
response contains an empty response acknowledgement parameter, a
Response Acknowledgement is used to acknowledge the final
response (section 3.5.6 of [1]).
Category: normal.
100 - Transaction in progress
Response valid for: Any command that may result in a long
transaction execution time, e.g., more than 200 ms.
Situation: When a transaction is expected to take a processing
time that is beyond the normal retry timer, the gateway will
return a provisional response. A final response will be
provided later, after the transaction has completed. Refer to
section 3.5.6 of [1]. An example of this might be a
CreateConnection command using RSVP, where the time to create
the connection may be longer than usual because of the need to
perform the network resource reservation.
Category: normal.
101 - Transaction has been queued for execution
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: As described in [1], Section 4.4.8, we assume that
Call Agents and gateways conceptually maintain a queue of
incoming transactions to be executed. Associated with this
transaction queue is a high-water and a low-water mark. Once
the queue length reaches the high-water mark, the entity should
start issuing 101 provisional responses (transaction queued)
until the queue length drops to the low-water mark. This
applies to new transactions as well as to retransmissions. A
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 4]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
final response will be provided later, after the transaction has
completed. In this case, the Call Agent should throttle back
its request rate for this gateway.
Category: normal.
200 - Transaction executed normally
Response valid for: Any command (including DeleteConnection).
Situation: Normal response as a result of successful
execution. The 250 response code can be used to acknowledge a
successful completion of a DeleteConnection command. However, a
200 response code is also appropriate.
Category: normal
250 - The connection was deleted
Response valid for: DeleteConnection.
Situation: Response to a successful DeleteConnection command.
Category: normal
400 - Unspecified transient error
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: Unspecified transient error. A more specific error
code should be used if one is available since this error code
provides very little information. If used, some specific
commentary should be included to aid in debug.
Category: "Temporary Failure".
401 - The phone is already off-hook
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: This is returned in response to a request for an
off-hook transition requested event when the phone is already
off-hook. It is also returned when a request is made to
generate a signal that has an explicit on-hook precondition in
the signal definition, such as the ringing signal ("rg") in the
Line package [2]. It is also returned when requesting an
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 5]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
incoming off-hook/seizure indication for a Channel Associated
Signaling (CAS) trunk when the incoming hook-state for that
trunk is already off-hook.
Category: "State Mismatch". If the Call Agent makes the request
with a requested event indicating a different hook-state, the
request should not result in this return code again.
402 - The phone is already on-hook
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: This is returned in response to a request for an on-
hook or hook-flash requested event when the phone is already
on-hook. It is also returned when a request is made to generate
a signal that has an explicit off-hook precondition in the
signal definition, such as the dial tone ("dl") in the Line
package [2]. It is also returned when requesting an incoming
on-hook indication for a CAS trunk when the incoming hook-state
for that trunk is already on-hook.
Category: "State Mismatch". If the Call Agent makes the
request with a requested event indicating a different hook-
state, the request should not result in this error again.
403 - Insufficient resources available at this time
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned if the request cannot be processed
due to a temporary lack of gateway resources, such as CPU
utilization, DSP resources, memory etc; however, the command may
succeed at a later time when resources free up. Note that lack
of network resources should not result in this code (i.e.,
return code 404 would be more appropriate).
Category: "Temporary Failure".
404 - Insufficient bandwidth at this time.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is an indication that there is not enough
bandwidth available to sustain the call. It is as a result of
some failed bandwidth check (could be RSVP or some other
mechanism). It is possible that the Call Agent could request a
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 6]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
codec requiring lower bandwidth codec and have a successful
result. Alternatively, it could treat this as a "Temporary
Failure" for this codec.
Category: "Temporary Failure". Although categorized under
this general category, note that the Call Agent could apply some
specific behavior (try a lower bandwidth codec) depending on
policy.
405 - Endpoint is restarting
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: It may be returned to requests made when the
endpoint is in-service and has initiated the restart procedures
(see [1], Section 4.4.6) but the procedure has not yet
completed. If the request is made at a later time, it may be
"successful" but may not be appropriate (because of possible
state mismatch). The Call Agent should proceed after it
believes the restart procedure has completed.
Category: "Temporary Failure"
406 - Transaction Timeout
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: The transaction took longer than expected and has
been aborted. An example might be a transaction where a
provisional response (100 response code) was returned.
Following that, the gateway determined that the actual
transaction was taking longer than should reasonably be expected
and as a result it aborted the transaction and returned 406 as
the final response.
Category: "Temporary Failure". If this error code is
returned repeatedly, it could indicate a more serious problem.
407 - Transaction aborted by some external action.
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned to indicate cancellation of a
pending request (see [1] Section 4.4.4). For example,
DeleteConnection is received while processing a CreateConnection
or ModifyConnection. Also, if either a ModifyConnection,
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 7]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
NotificationRequest, or EndpointConfiguration command is in
progress, and the same command is received with a different
transaction Id, 407 will be returned.
Category: none (specific situation and behavior).
409 - Internal overload
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: Gateway is overloaded (e.g., too many requests per
second from the Call Agent) and is unable to process any more
transactions at this time. In this case, the Call Agent SHOULD
throttle back its request rate for this gateway as described in
[1], Section 4.4.8.
Category: "Temporary Failure". Note that although the Call
Agent behavior with respect to the call being set up corresponds
to this general category, there is some specific Call Agent
behavior implied as well (i.e., the Call Agent throttling back).
410 - No endpoint available
Response valid for: CreateConnection using an "any of" wildcard.
Situation: A CreateConnection request was made with an "any
of" ("$") wildcard and no endpoint was available to execute the
request. As described in [1], Section 2.3.5, when the "any of"
wildcard is used with the CreateConnection command, the endpoint
assigned MUST be in-service and MUST NOT already have any
connections on it.
Category: none (specific situation and behavior).
500 - Endpoint unknown
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: There is no endpoint matching the EndpointId
provided with the command. This could be the result of a
provisioning mismatch between the Call Agent and the gateway or
it could be because a card was removed from the gateway so that
the endpoint is no longer available (in which case a
RestartInProgress should be received, although the Call Agent
cannot depend on this). Note that the endpoint is not just out-
of-service (in which case 501 would be used); it is completely
unknown/unavailable to the MGCP.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 8]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
501 - Endpoint is not ready or is out of service
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned if the endpoint is in a permanent
"not ready" state. This includes maintenance states such as
out-of-service. Note that an endpoint that has initiated the
restart procedure is in-service, and hence should not use this
return code, even if the restart procedure has not yet completed
(see [1], Section 4.4.5).
Category: "Service Failure".
502 - Insufficient resources (permanent).
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned when the endpoint does not have
sufficient resources and future requests on this endpoint are
expected to fail, meaning some resources dedicated to the
endpoint are broken (e.g., return code 529 - "hardware failure"
might be a more specific indication). For situations where
resources may become available in the future (i.e., resources
are pooled and not available at the present time), return code
403 should be used instead.
Category: "Service Failure".
503 - "All of" wildcard too complicated.
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned when the wildcard convention used
in the request is understood, but the requested command cannot
be processed with the specified wildcarding. An example of this
would be a NotificationRequest with a request such that a
failure would make it too difficult to roll back the state of
all the endpoints to what they were prior to the request.
Category: Normally treated as a "Provisioning Mismatch". Note
however, that the Call Agent could treat it differently by
recovering with some specific behavior (e.g., generate a number
of individual requests without wildcards instead of a single one
with the wildcard).
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 9]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
504 - Unknown or unsupported command.
Response valid for: Any unknown command.
Situation: A command was requested other than those specified
in the MGCP specification [1], and the command is not supported.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
505 - Unsupported remote connection descriptor.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: One or more mandatory parameters or values in the
RemoteConnectionDescriptor are not supported by the gateway.
Note that, per [3], unsupported attribute lines must be ignored
and hence should not result in any errors.
Category: "Remote Connection Descriptor Error".
506 - Inability to satisfy both local connection options and remote
connection descriptor simultaneously.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: The LocalConnectionOptions and
RemoteConnectionDescriptor contain one or more mandatory
parameters or values that conflict with each other and/or cannot
be supported at the same time (except for codec negotiation
failure - see error code 534).
Category: "Remote Connection Descriptor Error".
507 - Unsupported Functionality. Note that this error code SHOULD
only be used if there is no other more specific error code for
the unsupported functionality.
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: Any situation where a request from the Call Agent
is not supported by the gateway - beyond the situations already
covered by other more specific return codes.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
508 - Unknown or unsupported quarantine handling.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 10]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Situation: The endpoint does not support or does not recognize
the requested quarantine handling.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
509 - Error in RemoteConnectionDescriptor
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: There is a syntax or semantic error in the Remote
Connection Descriptor. For example, there is no IP address for
an RTP media stream.
Category: "Remote Connection Descriptor Error".
510 - Protocol error
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: Some unspecified protocol error was detected.
Gateways should use this error as a last resort since it
provides very little information. If used, some specific
commentary should be included to aid in debug.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
511 - Unrecognized parameter extension.
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: It is returned if the requested command contains an
unrecognized mandatory parameter extension ("X+"). In MGCP 1.0,
this specifically refers to unrecognized parameters, since other
error codes are available for unrecognized connection modes
(517), unrecognized packages (518), unrecognized local
connection options (541), etc.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
512 - Gateway not equipped to detect one of the requested events.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: A valid event was requested however the gateway is
not equipped to detect this event (i.e., the package is only
implemented partially). Of course, such an implementation would
not conform to [1]. Note that if an invalid event was
requested, i.e., an event not defined in the relevant package,
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 11]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
then error code 522 should be used. Also note, that if the
package is unknown or unsupported, then error code 518 should be
used.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
513 - gateway is not equipped to generate one of the requested
signals.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: A valid signal was requested, however the gateway is
not equipped to generate this signal (i.e., the package is only
implemented partially). Of course, such an implementation would
not conform to [1]. Note that if an invalid signal was
requested, i.e., a signal not defined in the relevant package,
then error code 522 should be used. Also note, that if the
package is unknown or unsupported, then error code 518 should be
used.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
514 - The gateway cannot send the specified announcement.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest with a request for an
announcement to be played.
Situation: This is a specific situation with respect to
playing announcements on an endpoint or connection associated
with the endpoint. Error code 538 could be used instead.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
515 - Incorrect connection-id.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection,
DeleteConnection, NotificationRequest, AuditConnection.
Situation: An unknown connection-id has been specified. It is
possible that the connection has already been deleted. It
should be noted that a connection-id can also supplied with
events and signals (e.g., "S: L/rt@connId"). Note that a
mismatch between connection-id and call-id should use error code
516.
Category: "State Mismatch".
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 12]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
516 - Unknown or incorrect call-id.
Response valid for: ModifyConnection, DeleteConnection.
Situation: Unknown call-id, or the call-id supplied is
incorrect (e.g., connection-id not associated with this call-
id).
Category: "State Mismatch".
517 - Invalid or unsupported mode.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is returned if the command specifies a
connection mode that the endpoint does not support (note that
not all endpoints will support all modes). Note that if the
unsupported mode is an extension connection mode, error code 518
(unsupported package) should be used instead.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
518 - Unsupported or unknown package.
Response valid for: Any command
Situation: A package name included in a request is not
supported (or unknown). Note that the package name may be a
prefix to an event or other things (e.g., a parameter) as
defined in [1]. Note that it is recommended to include a
PackageList parameter with a list of supported packages in the
response.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
519 - Endpoint does not have a digit map.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: Request was made to detect digits based on a digit
map and the gateway does not have a digit map.
Category: "State Mismatch". The Call Agent needs to send
down a digit map in order to continue with the call.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 13]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
520 - Endpoint is restarting.
Situation: This is normally a transient error in which error
code 405 SHOULD be used. Gateways SHOULD not use this error
code unless there is some relevant situation that warrants the
category of "Service Failure". Note that this was included in
[1] only to maintain backwards compatibility with previous
releases of the MGCP specification.
Category: If it is returned, this return code will be treated
as category "Service Failure", i.e., as if this endpoint is
out-of-service.
521 - Endpoint re-directed to another Call Agent.
Response valid for: RestartInProgress.
Situation: A RestartInProgress command was sent to the Call
Agent and the Call Agent returns this return code along with a
NotifiedEntity parameter pointing to another Call Agent. The
gateway then sends a new RestartInProgress command to the Call
Agent specified in the Notified Entity.
Category: none (specific situation and behavior).
522 - No such event or signal.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: This is returned if the requested event/signal name
is not registered with this package. If on the other hand the
signal or event is part of the package but is not supported by
the gateway, then return code 512 or 513 SHOULD be provided
instead. If the package is not supported, return code 518
SHOULD be returned.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
523 - Unknown action or illegal combination of actions.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest with one or more
requested events.
Situation: Request was made with a requested event(s) that
included an action or actions defined in [1] that are either
unknown, unsupported or an illegal combination as indicated in
section 2.3.3 of [1]. Note that unsupported extension actions
should generate error code 518 (unsupported package).
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 14]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
524 - Internal inconsistency in Local Connection Options
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is returned if one or more of the
LocalConnectionOptions (LCO) parameters are coded with values
that are not consistent with each other (e.g., other LCO
parameters inconsistent with the network type).
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
525 - Unknown extension in Local Connection Options.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is returned if the request contains a Local
Connection Option with one or more unrecognized mandatory ("x+")
extensions. Note that unsupported package extensions should use
error code 518 (unsupported package) instead.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
526 - Insufficient bandwidth
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: In most cases where there is insufficient
bandwidth, a 404 return code should be used. 526 would be used
in cases where future requests are destined to fail. An example
might be a very restricted bandwidth case, where there is not
enough bandwidth available for the codec requested even for a
single endpoint. Making a request with the same codec in the
future will fail. However, making a request for some other
codec (with a higher degree of compression) may pass. For
cases, where the bandwidth is pooled over multiple endpoints and
could free up at some future time (because an endpoint becomes
inactive), then 404 is more appropriate.
Category: If it is returned, this return code will be treated
as category "Provisioning Mismatch", e.g., the codec was
incorrectly provisioned for the bandwidth available.
527 - Missing RemoteConnectionDescriptor.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection,
NotificationRequest.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 15]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
Situation: This is returned if the connection has not yet
received a RemoteConnectionDescriptor when one is required to
support the request. This can for example happen if a
connection is attempted to be placed in "send/receive mode", or
if a signal is applied on a connection.
Category: "Remote Connection Descriptor Error" in the case
where the other end did not provide a connection descriptor.
Alternatively, if this is an initial request made by a Call
Agent (such there is no remote connection descriptor), then this
is a "State Mismatch" problem.
528 -Incompatible protocol version
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: A command was received with a protocol version that
was not supported.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch". This could also be
treated as a "State Mismatch" problem if the there is a recovery
mechanism (e.g., Call Agent recognizes the protocol version
mismatch and switches to the correct protocol version)
529 - Internal Hardware Error.
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: A hardware fault occurred during the execution of a
command such that repeating this command will result in a
failure indication once again. This is a slightly more specific
error code than error 502, although more commentary should be
provided (for debug purposes) if possible.
Category: "Service Failure".
530 - CAS Signaling Protocol Error.
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: This is specific to Channel Associated Signaling
(CAS) interfaces. A typical example might be an attempt to
outpulse digits failed for some reason.
Category: none (specific situation and behavior).
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 16]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
531 - Failure of a grouping of trunks (e.g., facility failure)
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection,
NotificationRequest.
Situation: Request made to an endpoint that has a failed trunk
connection (e.g., T1 or E1 failed). Note that an RSIP should
have been sent as a result of the facility failure. This is a
more specific response than return code 501.
Category: "Service Failure".
532 - Unsupported value(s) in Local Connection Options.
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is returned if one or more of the
LocalConnectionOptions parameters are coded with a value that
the gateway does not support.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
533 - Response too large
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This would only be likely to occur in the case of an
audit where the maximum response packet size would end up being
too large.
Category: none (specific situation and behavior).
534 - Codec negotiation failure
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: The intersection between the list of codecs that
the gateway supports, the codecs allowed by the local connection
options and the codecs supplied in the Remote Connection
Descriptor (if provided) is empty.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch" if the error resulted from
an empty approved list of codes as described in [1], Section
2.6). "Remote Connection Descriptor Error" if the error
resulted from an empty negotiated list of codecs, as described
in [1], Section 2.6.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 17]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
535 - Packetization period not supported
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: Normally this error should not be generated since
if the gateway is unable to support the packetization period
specified in the local connection options for the codec
indicated, it should follow the behavior specified in [1] (which
is to pick an appropriate value rather than failing the
request).
Category: "none".
536 - Unknown or unsupported Restart Method
Response valid for: RestartInProgress.
Situation: This error is generated by the Call Agent if it
receives a RestartInProgress command with an unsupported restart
method. Note that if the restart method is an extension restart
method, error code 518 (unsupported package) should be used
instead.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
537 - Unknown or unsupported digit map extension
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: Digit map letter in the digit map unknown or
unsupported. Note that this code does apply to extension digit
map letters as well.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
538 - Event/signal parameter error
Response valid for: NotificationRequest.
Situation: It is returned if the event/signal parameter is in
error or not supported. If the event/signal or a package is not
supported, then one of 512, 513, 518, or 522 should be used
instead.
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 18]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
539 - Invalid or unsupported command parameter
Response valid for: Any command.
Situation: This is returned if the command contains an invalid
or unsupported parameter, which is neither a package (which
would use return code 518) nor vendor specific extension (which
would use return code 511). For example, if an endpoint does
not support the BearerInformation parameter of the
EndpointConfiguration command, this return code could be used.
Of course, such an implementation would not conform to [1].
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
540 - Per endpoint connection limit exceeded
Response valid for: CreateConnection.
Situation: A CreateConnection command was made, but the
gateway cannot support any additional connections on that
endpoint.
Category: "State Mismatch".
541 - Invalid or unsupported Local Connection Options
Response valid for: CreateConnection, ModifyConnection.
Situation: This is returned if the command contains an invalid
or unsupported LocalConnectionOption, which is neither a package
(which would use return code 518) nor vendor specific extension
(which would use return code 511).
Category: "Provisioning Mismatch".
2.3. Summary of Return Code Categories
A summary of the categories of the various error codes is included in
the following table. This information is also repeated in the
detailed error descriptions in the next section.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 19]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Category | Return Codes |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| normal | 000, 100, 101, 200, 250 |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| none | 405, 407, 410, 510, 521, 530, 533, 535 |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| "Service | 501, 502, 520, 529, 531 |
| Failure" | |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|"Provisioning| 500, 503*, 504, 507, 508, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, |
| Mismatch" | 517, 518, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 528*, 532, 534*,|
| | 536, 537, 538, 539, 541 |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| "Temporary | 400, 403, 404*, 405, 406, 409 |
| Failure" | |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| "State | 401, 402, 515, 516, 519, 540 |
| Mismatch" | |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| "Remote | 505, 506, 509, 527* |
| Connection | |
| Descriptor | |
| Error" | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
* 404: may be treated as a "Temporary Failure", but specific
behavior is possible (e.g., trying an alternate codec with lower
bandwidth requirement rather than failing this call).
* 503: rather than treating this as a "Provisioning Mismatch", it is
possible for the Call Agent to recover from this error.
* 527: See the detailed description for this error code in section
2.2. This could be treated as a "State Mismatch" depending on the
circumstances.
* 528: See the detailed description for this error code in section
2.2. This could be treated as a "State Mismatch" depending on the
circumstances.
* 534: See the note on error code 534 in the detailed description
section (2.2) of this document (may be treated as a "Remote
Connection Descriptor Error" if no local connection options were
supplied).
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 20]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
3. Additional Guidelines
This section provides additional guidelines to Gateway and Call Agent
developers.
3.1. Gateway Recommendations
The following guidelines are recommended for gateway implementations:
* For uncategorized return codes (category "none") that involve
specific situations, gateways should make sure they do an accurate
mapping between the situation and the return code.
* Also for category "State Mismatch", it is equally important that
the situation (and state) is accurately mapped to the specific
error code.
* For situations similar to those involving return codes in "Service
Failure", Provisioning Mismatch", "Temporary Failure" and "Remote
Connection Descriptor Error" categories, the gateway should make
sure that it uses a return code in the correct category.
* MGCP allows additional commentary to be included with the return
code. It is important that the gateway includes more specific
information concerning the situation for debug purposes.
* It is recommended that return codes 502, 520 and 526 not be used
unless there is something that makes these permanent situations.
As indicated in the detailed description of these return codes,
403, 405 and 404 respectively are more appropriate in almost all
situations. If a gateway presently uses 502, 520 and 526 for
temporary situations and expects to upgrade to 403, 405 and 404,
the gateway should refrain from using 502, 520 and 526 for some
other use immediately after the upgrade. This is to avoid problems
where a Call Agent is expected to treat the same error code in two
different ways, e.g., 403 is a category "Temporary Failure" which
requires a different Call Agent behavior from 502 which is in
category "Service Failure".
3.2. Call Agent Recommendations
The following guidelines are recommended for gateway implementations:
* Call Agents should handle return codes they do not recognize (or
do not expect) based on the first digit in the return code as
outlined in [1].
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 21]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
* For categories "Service Failure", "Provisioning Mismatch",
"Temporary Failure", and "Remote Connection Descriptor Error",
Call Agents are expected to treat return codes that are within the
same category in the same way (i.e., make the same decision, based
on the return code and other state information available to them).
* Because there was little guidance given for return codes 502, 520
and 526 in RFC 2705 [4], Call Agents may have to treat these as
403, 405 and 404 respectively for gateways that have not been
updated according to [1] and these recommendations. The gateway
implementer should be consulted for information on the gateway
behavior for (now and in the future) for these return codes (i.e.,
it may be that return codes 502, 520 and 526 are presently used
incorrectly but will be replaced with 403, 405 and 404 in the
future).
4. Security Considerations
This document merely provides a convenient way to categorize MGCP
return codes in order to facilitate decisions related to failure
conditions; it does not impact MGCP security in any way.
5. Acknowledgements
Thanks also to Kevin Miller, Joe Stone, Flemming Andreasen, Bob
Biskner for input contributions used in this document.
6. Normative References
[1] Andreasen, F. and B. Foster, "Media Gateway Control Protocol
(MGCP) Version 1.0", RFC 3435, January 2003.
[2] Foster, B. and F. Andreasen, "Basic Media Gateway Control
Protocol (MGCP) Packages", RFC 3660, December 2003.
[3] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.
[4] Arango, M., Dugan, A., Elliott, I., Huitema, C. and S. Pickett,
"Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Version 1.0", RFC 2705,
October 1999.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 22]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
7. Authors' Addresses
C. Sivachelvan
Cisco Systems
2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
Richardson, TX, 75082
EMail: chelliah@cisco.com
B. Foster
Cisco Systems
EMail: bfoster@cisco.com
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 23]
RFC 3661 MGCP Return Code Usage December 2003
8. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Foster & Sivachelvan Informational [Page 24]
ERRATA
