rfc4649
Network Working Group B. Volz
Request for Comments: 4649 Cisco Systems, Inc.
Category: Standards Track August 2006
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
Relay Agent Remote-ID Option
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This memo defines a new Relay Agent Remote-ID option for the Dynamic
Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6). This option is the
DHCPv6 equivalent for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv4 (DHCPv4) Relay Agent Option's Remote-ID suboption as specified
in RFC 3046.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Requirements Terminology ........................................2
3. The Relay Agent Remote-ID Option ................................2
4. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior .....................................3
5. DHCPv6 Server Behavior ..........................................3
6. Security Considerations .........................................3
7. IANA Considerations .............................................4
8. Acknowledgements ................................................4
9. References ......................................................4
9.1. Normative References .......................................4
9.2. Informative References .....................................4
Volz Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4649 Relay Agent Remote-ID August 2006
1. Introduction
DHCPv6 [1] provides IP addresses and configuration information for
IPv6 clients. It includes a relay agent capability, in which
processes within the network infrastructure receive multicast
messages from clients and relay them to DHCPv6 servers. In some
network environments, it will be useful for the relay agent to add
information to the DHCPv6 message before relaying it.
The information that relay agents supply can also be used in the
server's decision making about the addresses, delegated prefixes [4],
and configuration parameters that the client is to receive.
The memo specifies the DHCPv6 equivalent of the DHCPv4 Relay Agent
option's Remote-ID suboption as specified in [2]. The motivation and
usage scenarios are provided in [2].
2. Requirements Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [3].
3. The Relay Agent Remote-ID Option
This option may be added by DHCPv6 relay agents that terminate
switched or permanent circuits and have mechanisms to identify the
remote host end of the circuit.
The format of the DHCPv6 Relay Agent Remote-ID option is shown below:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_REMOTE_ID | option-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| enterprise-number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
. .
. remote-id .
. .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
option-code OPTION_REMOTE_ID (37)
option-len 4 + the length, in octets, of the remote-id
field. The minimum option-len is 5 octets.
Volz Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4649 Relay Agent Remote-ID August 2006
enterprise-number The vendor's registered Enterprise Number as
registered with IANA [5].
remote-id The opaque value for the remote-id.
The definition of the remote-id carried in this option is vendor
specific. The vendor is indicated in the enterprise-number field.
The remote-id field may be used to encode, for instance:
o a "caller ID" telephone number for dial-up connection
o a "user name" prompted for by a Remote Access Server
o a remote caller ATM address
o a "modem ID" of a cable data modem
o the remote IP address of a point-to-point link
o a remote X.25 address for X.25 connections
o an interface or port identifier
Each vendor must ensure that the remote-id is unique for its
enterprise-number, as the octet sequence of enterprise-number
followed by remote-id must be globally unique. One way to achieve
uniqueness might be to include the relay agent's DHCP Unique
Identifier (DUID) [1] in the remote-id.
4. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior
DHCPv6 relay agents may be configured to include a Remote-ID option
in relayed (RELAY-FORW) DHCPv6 messages.
5. DHCPv6 Server Behavior
This option provides additional information to the DHCPv6 server.
The DHCPv6 server, if it is configured to support this option, may
use this information to select parameters specific to particular
users, hosts, or subscriber modems. The combined enterprise-number
and remote-id SHOULD be considered an opaque value, with policies
based on exact string match only; that is, the remote-id field SHOULD
NOT be internally parsed by the server.
There is no requirement that a server return this option and its data
in a RELAY-REPLY message.
6. Security Considerations
See [1] section 21.1, on securing DHCPv6 messages sent between
servers and relay agents, and section 23, on general DHCPv6 security
considerations. [2] discusses how this information can be used to
enhance trust in some environments.
Volz Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4649 Relay Agent Remote-ID August 2006
Note that even if the DHCP server trusts the relay agent not to
modify information provided in this option, the confidence in that
information is no higher than the confidence that the relay agent has
in the information it puts in the option. For example, in some
protocols it may be possible for a DHCP client to spoof or otherwise
choose port identifiers, caller ID information, or other information
carried in this option. Sites should consider such possible spoofing
and how likely it is in their environment when deciding what uses of
this option are appropriate.
7. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned the DHCPv6 option code 37 for the Relay Agent
Remote-ID Option.
8. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Michael Patrick for [2], from which I've liberally borrowed
text.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[1] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M.
Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)",
RFC 3315, July 2003.
[2] Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 3046,
January 2001.
[3] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
9.2. Informative References
[4] Troan, O. and R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633, December
2003.
[5] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>.
Volz Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4649 Relay Agent Remote-ID August 2006
Author's Address
Bernard Volz
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1414 Massachusetts Ave.
Boxborough, MA 01719
USA
Phone: +1 978 936 0382
EMail: volz@cisco.com
Volz Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4649 Relay Agent Remote-ID August 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Volz Standards Track [Page 6]
ERRATA
