rfc5859
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Johnson
Request for Comments: 5859 Cisco Systems, Inc.
Category: Informational June 2010
ISSN: 2070-1721
TFTP Server Address Option for DHCPv4
Abstract
This memo documents existing usage for the "TFTP Server Address"
option. The option number currently in use is 150. This memo
documents the current usage of the option in agreement with RFC 3942,
which declares that any pre-existing usages of option numbers in the
range 128-223 should be documented, and the Dynamic Host
Configuration working group will try to officially assign those
numbers to those options. The option is defined for DHCPv4 and works
only with IPv4 addresses.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5859.
Johnson Informational [Page 1]
RFC 5859 TFTP Server Address June 2010
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. TFTP Server Address Option Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Johnson Informational [Page 2]
RFC 5859 TFTP Server Address June 2010
1. Introduction
Voice over IP (VoIP) devices, such as IP phones, have a need to
download their configuration from a configuration server on the
network. There are two commonly accepted methods to discover this
server via DHCP; the "sname" field in the DHCP header [RFC2131] and
the "TFTP Server Name" option (66) [RFC2132]. Both of these sources
of information, however, contain the TFTP server's hostname. That
hostname must then be translated to an IP address. The usual method
to accomplish this would be DNS [RFC1034]. This means the firmware
in a VoIP device (with possibly limited flash, memory, and/or
processing resources) would need to implement the DNS protocol in
order to perform this translation. This would also introduce an
additional unnecessary point of failure whereby the device is
dependent on the DNS server infrastructure in order to boot up and
communicate with its call agent.
In order to eliminate DNS as a point of failure and to keep the
firmware in such a VoIP device to a minimum, the "VoIP Configuration
Server Address" option (150) was introduced. This option allows the
DHCP server to pass one or more IP addresses of the VoIP
configuration server(s) instead of the hostname, thus making the
information directly usable by the VoIP device.
Other reasons for this option are (1) the "siaddr" field is not
configurable on some DHCP servers; (2) the "siaddr" field only allows
for one IPv4 address, and it is desirable to have the ability to
configure multiple IP addresses for redundancy; (3) some DHCP servers
have been found to fill in their own IPv4 address as siaddr; (4) some
customers were already using the "siaddr" field for other purposes;
and finally (5) the configuration server may use a protocol other
than TFTP to serve configuration files, making the use of the "TFTP
Server Name" option (66) inappropriate.
In cases where other download server address information also appears
in the response packet, such as "sname" and "TFTP Server Name", it is
left to the device to decide which piece of information to use.
2. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Johnson Informational [Page 3]
RFC 5859 TFTP Server Address June 2010
3. TFTP Server Address Option Definition
The TFTP Server Address option is a DHCP option [RFC2132]. The
option contains one or more IPv4 addresses that the client MAY use.
The current use of this option is for downloading configuration from
a VoIP server via TFTP; however, the option may be used for purposes
other than contacting a VoIP configuration server.
The format of the option is:
Code Len IPv4 Configuration Server Address(es)
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| 150 | n | IPv4 address | ...
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Figure 1
The option minimum length (n) is 4.
The "Len" field must specify a length that is an integral multiple of
4 octets (4, 8, 12, etc.). If an option is received where this is
not the case, the option information MUST be ignored, but further
option processing may continue. Dividing this "Len" value by 4 will
give the number of IPv4 VoIP configuration server addresses that are
specified in the option.
The option MUST NOT be specified by the DHCP client, as it is
intended only to be returned from the DHCP server. If the DHCP
client wants to receive this information from the server, it needs to
include the number 150 in the "DHCP Parameter List" option (55).
Server addresses SHOULD be listed in order of preference, and the
client SHOULD use the addresses sequentially but may be configured to
use addresses randomly. The client may use as many or as few of the
addresses provided as it likes. For example, if the client is only
capable of accepting two configuration server addresses, it may
ignore any other addresses provided after the second address.
Each TFTP server address that is being used by the client should be
tried a total of four times with a 4-second wait time before
proceeding to the next address.
When this option appears along with the TFTP Server Name option (66)
[RFC2132], this option SHOULD have priority over option 66.
There is currently no defined IPv6 DHCP equivalent for this option.
Johnson Informational [Page 4]
RFC 5859 TFTP Server Address June 2010
4. Security Considerations
A rogue DHCP server could use this option in order to coerce a client
into downloading configuration data from an alternate configuration
server, and thus gain control of the device's configuration. This,
however, is no more of a security threat than similar attacks using
other DHCP options that specify server names or addresses, of which
there are many. If this is a concern, then DHCP authentication may
be used, but even secure delivery of an address over DHCP does not
protect the subsequent insecure download over TFTP. TFTP itself
provides no authentication or access control mechanisms, so even if
DHCP messages were authenticated, downloading the configuration would
still be insecure, unless some object-level security mechanisms were
used.
Where security concerns are an issue, it is suggested that
configuration files should be signed by a trusted agent.
Configuration files may also be encrypted based on a configuration
parameter on the DHCP client device. In other words, there are
various methods to ensure the integrity of configuration data
independent from ensuring the integrity of this DHCP option or even
DHCP itself. The full extent of such options is far too broad to be
addressed in this document.
Message authentication in DHCP for intradomain use where the out-of-
band exchange of a shared secret is feasible is defined in [RFC3118].
Potential exposures to attack are discussed in Section 7 of the DHCP
protocol specification [RFC2131].
5. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned DHCP option number 150, in accordance with
[RFC3942].
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2131] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",
RFC 2131, March 1997.
[RFC2132] Alexander, S. and R. Droms, "DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor
Extensions", RFC 2132, March 1997.
Johnson Informational [Page 5]
RFC 5859 TFTP Server Address June 2010
[RFC3942] Volz, B., "Reclassifying Dynamic Host Configuration
Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4) Options", RFC 3942,
November 2004.
6.2. Informative References
[RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
[RFC3118] Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, "Authentication for DHCP
Messages", RFC 3118, June 2001.
Author's Address
Richard A. Johnson
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 W. Tasman Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
USA
Phone: +1 408 526 4000
EMail: raj@cisco.com
Johnson Informational [Page 6]
ERRATA
