rfc8276
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Naik
Request for Comments: 8276 Nutanix
Category: Standards Track M. Eshel
ISSN: 2070-1721 IBM Almaden
December 2017
File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4
Abstract
This document describes an optional feature extending the NFSv4
protocol. This feature allows extended attributes (hereinafter also
referred to as xattrs) to be interrogated and manipulated using NFSv4
clients. Xattrs are provided by a file system to associate opaque
metadata, not interpreted by the file system, with files and
directories. Such support is present in many modern local file
systems. New file attributes are provided to allow clients to query
the server for xattr support, with that support consisting of new
operations to get and set xattrs on file system objects.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8276.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. Uses of Extended Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Functional Gaps Due to Lack of NFSv4 Extended Attribute
Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. File System Support for Extended Attributes . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Relationship with Named Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. XDR Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7.1. Code Components Licensing Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.2. XDR for Xattr Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. Protocol Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.1. New Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.2. New Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.2.1. xattr_support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.3. New Error Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8.3.1. NFS4ERR_NOXATTR (Error Code 10095) . . . . . . . . . 12
8.3.2. NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG (Error Code 10096) . . . . . . . . 13
8.4. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8.4.1. GETXATTR - Get an Extended Attribute of a File . . . 14
8.4.2. SETXATTR - Set an Extended Attribute of a File . . . 15
8.4.3. LISTXATTRS - List Extended Attributes of a File . . . 17
8.4.4. REMOVEXATTR - Remove an Extended Attribute of a File 18
8.4.5. Valid Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8.5. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.6. Numeric Values Assigned to Protocol Extensions . . . . . 22
8.7. Caching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
8.8. Xattrs and File Locking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.9. pNFS Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
1. Introduction
Extended attributes, also called xattrs, are a means to associate
opaque metadata with file system objects, organized as key/value
pairs. They are especially useful when they add information that is
not, or cannot be, present in the associated object itself. User-
space applications can arbitrarily create, interrogate, and modify
the key/value pairs.
Extended attributes are file system agnostic; applications use an
interface not specific to any file system to manipulate them.
Applications are not concerned about how the key/value pairs are
stored internally within the underlying file system. All major
operating systems provide facilities to access and modify extended
attributes. Many user-space tools allow xattrs to be included
together with regular attributes that need to be preserved when
objects are updated, moved, or copied.
Extended attributes have not previously been included within the
NFSv4 specification. Some issues that need to be addressed in order
to be included are that, as with named attributes, some aspects of
the handling of xattrs are not precisely defined and xattrs are not
formally documented by any standard such as POSIX [POSIX].
Nevertheless, it appears that xattrs are widely deployed, and their
support in modern disk-based file systems is nearly universal.
There is no current specification of how xattrs could be mapped to
any existing file attributes defined in the NFSv4 protocol [RFC5661]
[RFC7530] [RFC7862]. As a result, most NFSv4 client implementations
ignore application-specified xattrs. This state of affairs results
in data loss if one copies, over the NFSv4 protocol, a file with
xattrs from one file system to another that also supports xattrs.
There is thus a need to provide a means by which such data loss can
be avoided. This will involve exposing xattrs within the NFSv4
protocol, despite the lack of completely compatible file system
implementations.
This document discusses (in Section 5) the reasons that NFSv4-named
attributes, as currently standardized in [RFC5661], are unsuitable
for representing xattrs. Instead, it describes a separate protocol
mechanism to support xattrs. As a consequence, xattrs and named
attributes will both be OPTIONAL features with servers free to
support either, both, or neither.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Uses of Extended Attributes
Applications can store tracking information in extended attributes.
Examples include storing metadata identifying the application that
created the file, a tag to indicate when the file was last verified
by a data integrity scrubber, or a tag to hold a checksum/crypto hash
of the file contents along with the date of that signature. Xattrs
can also be used for decorations or annotations. For example, a file
downloaded from a web server can be tagged with the URL, which can be
convenient if its source has to be determined in the future.
Likewise, an email attachment, when saved, can be tagged with the
message-id of the email, making it possible to trace the original
message.
Applications may need to behave differently when handling files of
varying types. For example, file managers, such as GNOMEs, offer
unique icons, different click behavior, and special lists of
operations to perform depending on the file format. This can be
achieved by looking at the file extension (Windows), or the type can
be interpreted by inspecting it (Unix MIME type). Some file managers
generate this information on the fly; others generate the information
once and then cache it. Those that cache the information tend to put
it in a custom database. The file manager must work to keep this
database in sync with the files, which can change without the file
manager's knowledge. A better approach is to dispense with the
custom database and store such metadata in extended attributes. This
is easier to maintain, provides faster access, and is readily
accessible by applications [Love].
3. Functional Gaps Due to Lack of NFSv4 Extended Attribute Support
In addition to the prospect of data loss (discussed in Section 1)
that arises from use of xattrs on local file systems, application use
of xattrs poses further difficulties given the current lack of xattr
support within NFSv4. As a result, certain applications may not be
supported by NFSv4 or may be supported in an unsatisfactory way.
Some examples are discussed below.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
Swift, the OpenStack distributed object store, uses xattrs to store
an object's metadata along with all the data together in one file.
Swift-on-File [Swift] transfers the responsibility of maintaining
object durability and availability to the underlying file system. At
the time of writing, this requires a native file system client to
mount the volumes. Xattr support in NFSv4 would open up the
possibility of storing and consuming data from other storage systems
and facilitate the migration of data between different backend
storage systems.
Baloo, the file indexing and search framework for Key Distribution
Exchange (KDE), has moved to storing metadata such as tags, ratings,
and comments in file system xattrs instead of a custom database for
simplicity. Starting with KDE Plasma 5.1, NFS is no longer supported
due to its lack of xattr support [KDE].
4. File System Support for Extended Attributes
Extended attributes are supported by most modern file systems.
Some of the file systems that support extended attributes in Linux
are as follows: ext3, ext4, JFS, XFS, and Btrfs. The getfattr and
setfattr utilities can be used to retrieve and set xattrs. The names
of the extended attributes must be prefixed by the name of the
category and a dot; hence, these categories are generally qualified
as namespaces. Currently, four namespaces exist: user, trusted,
security, and system [Linux]. Recommendations on how they should be
used have been published [freedesktop].
FreeBSD supports extended attributes in two universal namespaces --
user and system -- although individual file systems are allowed to
implement additional namespaces [FreeBSD].
Some file systems have facilities that are capable of storing both
extended attributes and named attributes. For discussion regarding
the relationship between these features, see Section 5. Solaris 9
and later provide file "forks", logically represented as files within
a hidden directory that is associated with the target file [fsattr].
In the New Technology File System (NTFS), extended attributes may be
stored within "file streams" [NTFS].
Xattrs can be retrieved and set through system calls or shell
commands and are generally supported by user-space tools that
preserve other file attributes. For example, the "rsync" remote copy
program will correctly preserve user-extended attributes between
Linux/ext4 and OSX/hfs by stripping off the Linux-specific "user."
prefix.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
5. Namespaces
Operating systems may define multiple "namespaces" in which xattrs
can be set. Namespaces are more than organizational classes; the
operating system may enforce different access policies and allow
different capabilities depending on the namespace. Linux, for
example, defines "security", "system", "trusted", and "user"
namespaces, the first three being specific to Linux [freedesktop].
Implementations generally agree on the semantics of a "user"
namespace, which allows applications to store arbitrary user
attribute data with file system objects. Access to this namespace is
controlled via the normal file system attributes. As such, getting
and setting xattrs from the user namespace can be considered
interoperable across platforms and vendor implementations.
Attributes from other namespaces are typically platform specific.
This document provides support for namespaces related to user-managed
metadata only, thus avoiding the need to specify the semantics
applicable to particular system-interpreted xattrs. The values of
xattrs are considered application data just as the contents of named
attributes, files, and symbolic links are. Servers have a
responsibility to store whatever value the client specifies and to
return it on demand. Xattr keys and values MUST NOT be interpreted
by the NFS clients and servers, as such behavior would lead to
non-interoperable implementations. If there were a need to specify
one or more attributes that servers need to act upon, the appropriate
semantics would be specified by adding a new attribute for the
purpose as provided for by [RFC5661] and [RFC8178].
6. Relationship with Named Attributes
[RFC7530] defines named attributes as opaque byte streams that are
associated with a directory or file and referred to by a string name.
Named attributes are intended to be used by client applications as a
method to associate application-specific data with a regular file or
directory. Although this makes xattrs similar in concept and use to
named attributes, there are important semantic differences.
File systems typically define operations to get and set individual
xattrs as being atomic, although collectively they may be
independent. Xattrs generally have size limits ranging from a few
bytes to several kilobytes; the maximum supported size is not
universally defined and is usually restricted by the file system.
Similar to Access Control Lists (ACLs), the amount of xattr data
exchanged between the client and server for get/set operations can be
considered to fit in a single COMPOUND request, bounded by the
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
channel's negotiated maximum size for requests. Named attributes, on
the other hand, are unbounded data streams and do not impose
atomicity requirements.
Individual named attributes are analogous to files and are opened and
closed just as files are. Caching of the data for these needs to be
handled just as data caching is for ordinary files following
close-to-open semantics. Xattrs, on the other hand, have caching
requirements similar to other file attributes.
Named attributes and xattrs have different semantics and are treated
by applications as belonging to disjoint namespaces. As a result,
mapping from one to the other would be, at best, a compromise.
Despite these differences, the underlying file system structure used
to store named attributes is generally capable of storing xattrs.
However, the converse is typically not the case because of the size
limits applicable to xattrs.
While it might be possible to write guidance about how a client can
use the named attribute mechanism to act like xattrs, such as by
carving out some namespace and specifying locking primitives to
enforce atomicity constraints on individual get/set operations, such
an approach is sufficiently problematic; thus, it will not be
attempted here. A client application trying to use xattrs through
named attributes with a server that supported xattrs directly would
get a lower level of service and could fail to cooperate on a local
application running on the server unless the server file system
defined its own interoperability constraints. File systems that
already implement xattrs and named attributes natively would need
additional guidance such as reserving a named attribute namespace
specifically for implementation purposes.
7. XDR Description
This document contains the External Data Representation (XDR)
[RFC4506] description of the extended attributes. The XDR
description is embedded in this document in a way that makes it
simple for the reader to extract into a ready-to-compile form. The
reader can feed this document into the following shell script to
produce the machine-readable XDR description of extended attributes:
<CODE BEGINS>
#! /bin/sh
grep '^ *///' $* | sed 's?^ */// ??' | sed 's?^ *///$??'
<CODE ENDS>
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
That is, if the above script is stored in a file called "extract.sh",
and this document is in a file called "spec.txt", then the reader can
do:
sh extract.sh < spec.txt > xattr_prot.x
The effect of the script is to remove leading white space from each
line, plus a sentinel sequence of "///".
The initial section of the embedded XDR file header follows.
Subsequent XDR descriptions, with the sentinel sequence, are embedded
throughout the document.
Note that the XDR code contained in this document depends on types
from the NFSv4.2 nfs4_prot.x file [RFC7863]. This includes both nfs
types that end with a 4, such as nfs_cookie4, count4, etc., as well
as more-generic types, such as opaque and bool.
To produce a compilable XDR file, the following procedure is
suggested:
o Extract the file nfs4_prot.x as described in [RFC7863].
o Extract xattr_prot.x from this document as described above.
o Apply any changes required for other extensions to be included
together with the xattr extension.
o Perform modifications to nfs4_prot.x as described by comments
within xattr_prot.x.
o Extend the unions nfs_argop4 and nfs_resop4 to include cases for
the new operations defined in this document.
o Combine the XDR files for the base NFSv4.2 protocol and all needed
extensions by either concatenating the relevant XDR files or using
file inclusion.
7.1. Code Components Licensing Notice
Both the XDR description and the scripts used for extracting the XDR
description are Code Components as described in "Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents", Section 4 of [LEGAL]. These Code
Components are licensed according to the terms of that document.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
<CODE BEGINS>
/// /*
/// * Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified
/// * as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
/// *
/// * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
/// * or without modification, are permitted provided that the
/// * following conditions are met:
/// *
/// * o Redistributions of source code must retain the above
/// * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
/// * following disclaimer.
/// *
/// * o Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
/// * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
/// * following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
/// * materials provided with the distribution.
/// *
/// * o Neither the name of Internet Society, IETF or IETF
/// * Trust, nor the names of specific contributors, may be
/// * used to endorse or promote products derived from this
/// * software without specific prior written permission.
/// *
/// * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
/// * AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
/// * WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
/// * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
/// * FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO
/// * EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
/// * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
/// * EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
/// * NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
/// * SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
/// * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
/// * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
/// * OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
/// * IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF
/// * ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
/// *
/// * This code was derived from RFC 8276.
/// * Please reproduce this note if possible.
/// */
<CODE ENDS>
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
7.2. XDR for Xattr Extension
<CODE BEGINS>
/// /*
/// * xattr_prot.x
/// */
/// /*
/// * The following includes statements that are for example only.
/// * The actual XDR definition files are generated separately
/// * and independently and are likely to have a different name.
/// * %#include <rpc_prot.x>
/// * %#include <nfsv42.x>
/// */
<CODE ENDS>
8. Protocol Extensions
This section documents extensions to the NFSv4 protocol operations to
allow xattrs to be queried and modified by clients. A new attribute
is added to allow clients to determine if the file system being
accessed provides support for xattrs. New operations are defined to
allow xattr keys and values to be queried and set. In addition, the
ACCESS operation is extended by adding new mask bits to provide
access information relating to xattrs.
These changes follow applicable guidelines for valid NFSv4 XDR
protocol extension, as specified in [RFC8178], and obey the rules for
extensions capable of being made without a change in minor version
number.
8.1. New Definitions
<CODE BEGINS>
/// typedef component4 xattrkey4;
/// typedef opaque xattrvalue4<>;
<CODE ENDS>
Each xattr is a key/value pair. xattrkey4 is a string denoting the
xattr key name and an attrvalue4, which is a variable-length string
that identifies the value of the xattr. The handling of xattrkey4
with regard to internationalization-related issues is the same as
that for NFSv4 file names and named attribute names, as described in
[RFC7530]. Any regular file or directory may have a set of extended
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
attributes, each consisting of a key and associated value. The NFS
client or server MUST NOT interpret the contents of xattrkey4 or
xattrvalue4.
8.2. New Attribute
The per-fs read-only attribute described below may be used to
determine if xattrs are supported. Servers need not support this
attribute, and some NFSv4.2 servers may be unaware of its existence.
Before interrogating this attribute using GETATTR, a client should
determine whether it is a supported attribute by interrogating the
supported_attrs attribute.
8.2.1. xattr_support
xattr_support is set to True, if the object's file system supports
extended attributes.
Since xattr_support is not a REQUIRED attribute, the server need not
support it. However, a client may reasonably assume that a server
(or file system) that does not support the xattr_support attribute
does not provide xattr support, and it acts on that basis.
Note that the protocol does not enforce any limits on the number of
keys, the length of a key, the size of a value, or the total size of
xattrs that are allowed for a file. The server file system MAY
impose additional limits. In addition, a single xattr key or value
exchanged between the client and server for get/set operations is
limited by the channel's negotiated maximum size for requests and
responses.
8.3. New Error Definitions
<CODE BEGINS>
/// /* Following lines are to be added to enum nfsstat4 */
/// /*
/// NFS4ERR_NOXATTR = 10095, /* xattr does not exist */
/// NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG = 10096 /* xattr value is too big */
/// */
<CODE ENDS>
8.3.1. NFS4ERR_NOXATTR (Error Code 10095)
The specified xattr does not exist or the server is unable to
retrieve it.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.3.2. NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG (Error Code 10096)
The size of the xattr value specified as part of a SETXATTR
operation, or the collective size of all xattrs of the file resulting
from the SETXATTR operation, is bigger than that supported by the
underlying file system.
8.4. New Operations
Applications need to perform the following operations on a given
file's extended attributes [Love]:
o Given a file, return a list of all of the file's assigned extended
attribute keys.
o Given a file and a key, return the corresponding value.
o Given a file, a key, and a value, assign that value to the key.
o Given a file and a key, remove that extended attribute from the
file.
In order to meet these requirements, this section introduces four new
OPTIONAL operations: GETXATTR, SETXATTR, LISTXATTRS and REMOVEXATTR.
These operations are to query, set, list, and remove xattrs,
respectively. A server MUST support all four operations when they
are directed to a file system that supports the xattr_support
attribute and returns TRUE when it is interrogated. For file systems
that either do not support the xattr_support attribute or return
FALSE when the xattr_support attribute is interrogated, all of the
above operations MUST NOT be supported. GETXATTR allows obtaining
the value of an xattr key, SETXATTR allows creating or replacing an
xattr key with a value, LISTXATTRS enumerates all the xattrs names,
and REMOVEXATTR allows deleting a single xattr.
Note that some server implementations may not be aware of the
existence of these operations, thereby a client cannot always expect
that issuing one of them will either succeed or return
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP. In some cases, NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL may be returned
or the request may encounter an XDR decode error on the server. As a
result, clients should only issue these operations after determining
that support is present.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.4.1. GETXATTR - Get an Extended Attribute of a File
8.4.1.1. ARGUMENTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// struct GETXATTR4args {
/// /* CURRENT_FH: file */
/// xattrkey4 gxa_name;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.1.2. RESULTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// union GETXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 gxr_status) {
/// case NFS4_OK:
/// xattrvalue4 gxr_value;
/// default:
/// void;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.1.3. DESCRIPTION
The GETXATTR operation will obtain the value for the given extended
attribute key for the file system object specified by the current
filehandle.
The server will fetch the xattr value for the key that the client
requests if xattrs are supported by the server for the target file
system. If the server does not support xattrs on the target file
system, then it MUST NOT return a value and MUST return the
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP error or another error indicating the request was not
understood. The server also MUST return NFS4ERR_NOXATTR if it
supports xattrs on the target but cannot obtain the requested data.
If the xattr value contained in the server response is such as to
cause the channel's negotiated maximum response size to be exceeded,
then the server MUST return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG in gxr_status.
8.4.1.4. IMPLEMENTATION
Clients that have cached an xattr may avoid the need to do a GETXATTR
by determining if the change attribute is the same as it was when the
xattr was fetched. If the client does not hold a delegation for the
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
file in question, it can obtain the change attribute with a GETATTR
request and compare that change attribute's value to the change
attribute value fetched when the xattr value was obtained. This
handling is similar to how a client would revalidate other file
attributes such as ACLs.
When responding to such a GETATTR, the server will, if there is an
OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation held by another client for the file in
question, either obtain the actual current value of these attributes
from the client holding the delegation by using the CB_GETATTR
callback or revoke the delegation. See Section 18.7.4 of [RFC5661]
for details.
8.4.2. SETXATTR - Set an Extended Attribute of a File
8.4.2.1. ARGUMENTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// enum setxattr_option4 {
/// SETXATTR4_EITHER = 0,
/// SETXATTR4_CREATE = 1,
/// SETXATTR4_REPLACE = 2
/// };
/// struct SETXATTR4args {
/// /* CURRENT_FH: file */
/// setxattr_option4 sxa_option;
/// xattrkey4 sxa_key;
/// xattrvalue4 sxa_value;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.2.2. RESULTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// union SETXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 sxr_status) {
/// case NFS4_OK:
/// change_info4 sxr_info;
/// default:
/// void;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.4.2.3. DESCRIPTION
The SETXATTR operation changes one extended attribute of a file
system object. The change desired is specified by sxa_option.
SETXATTR4_CREATE is used to associate the given value with the given
extended attribute key for the file system object specified by the
current filehandle. The server MUST return NFS4ERR_EXIST if the
attribute key already exists. SETXATTR4_REPLACE is also used to set
an xattr, but the server MUST return NFS4ERR_NOXATTR if the attribute
key does not exist. By default (SETXATTR4_EITHER), the extended
attribute will be created if need be, or its value will be replaced
if the attribute exists.
If the xattr key and value contained in the client request are such
that the request would exceed the channel's negotiated maximum
request size, then the server MUST return NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG in
sxr_status. If the server file system imposes additional limits on
the size of the key name or value, it MAY return NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG.
A successful SETXATTR MUST change the file time_metadata and change
attributes if the xattr is created or the value assigned to xattr
changes. However, it is not necessary to change these attributes if
there has been no actual change in the xattr value. Avoiding
attribute change in such situations is desirable as it avoids
unnecessary cache invalidation.
On success, the server returns the change_info4 information in
sxr_info. With the atomic field of the change_info4 data type, the
server will indicate if the before and after change attributes were
obtained atomically with respect to the SETXATTR operation. This
allows the client to determine if its cached xattrs are still valid
after the operation. See Section 8.7 for a discussion on xattr
caching.
8.4.2.4. IMPLEMENTATION
If the object whose xattr is being changed has a file delegation that
is held by a client other than the one doing the SETXATTR, the
delegation(s) must be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed to
actually change the xattr until each such delegation is returned or
revoked. In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server
is likely to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the
delegation(s) remains outstanding, although it might not do that if
the delegations are returned quickly.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.4.3. LISTXATTRS - List Extended Attributes of a File
8.4.3.1. ARGUMENTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// struct LISTXATTRS4args {
/// /* CURRENT_FH: file */
/// nfs_cookie4 lxa_cookie;
/// count4 lxa_maxcount;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.3.2. RESULTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// struct LISTXATTRS4resok {
/// nfs_cookie4 lxr_cookie;
/// xattrkey4 lxr_names<>;
/// bool lxr_eof;
/// };
/// union LISTXATTRS4res switch (nfsstat4 lxr_status) {
/// case NFS4_OK:
/// LISTXATTRS4resok lxr_value;
/// default:
/// void;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.3.3. DESCRIPTION
The LISTXATTRS operation retrieves a variable number of extended
attribute keys from the file system object specified by the current
filehandle, along with information to allow the client to request
additional attribute keys in a subsequent LISTXATTRS.
The arguments contain a cookie value that represents where the
LISTXATTRS should start within the list of xattrs. A value of 0
(zero) for lxa_cookie is used to start reading at the beginning of
the list. For subsequent LISTXATTRS requests, the client specifies a
cookie value that is provided by the server on a previous LISTXATTRS
request.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
The lxa_maxcount value of the argument is the maximum number of bytes
for the result. This maximum size represents all of the data being
returned within the LISTXATTRS4resok structure and includes the XDR
overhead. The server may return less data. If the server is unable
to return a single xattr name within the maxcount limit, the error
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL will be returned to the client.
On successful return, the server's response will provide a list of
extended attribute keys. The "lxr_eof" flag has a value of TRUE if
there are no more keys for the object.
The cookie value is only meaningful to the server and is used as a
"bookmark" for the xattr key. As mentioned, this cookie is used by
the client for subsequent LISTXATTRS operations so that it may
continue listing keys. The cookie is similar in concept to a READDIR
cookie or the READ offset but should not be interpreted as such by
the client.
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
8.4.3.4. IMPLEMENTATION
The handling of a cookie is similar to that of the READDIR operation.
It should be a rare occurrence that a server is unable to continue
properly listing xattrs with the provided cookie. The server should
make every effort to avoid this condition since the application at
the client may not be able to properly handle this type of failure.
8.4.4. REMOVEXATTR - Remove an Extended Attribute of a File
8.4.4.1. ARGUMENTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// struct REMOVEXATTR4args {
/// /* CURRENT_FH: file */
/// xattrkey4 rxa_name;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.4.4.2. RESULTS
<CODE BEGINS>
/// union REMOVEXATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 rxr_status) {
/// case NFS4_OK:
/// change_info4 rxr_info;
/// default:
/// void;
/// };
<CODE ENDS>
8.4.4.3. DESCRIPTION
The REMOVEXATTR operation deletes one extended attribute of a file
system object specified by rxa_name. The server MUST return
NFS4ERR_NOXATTR if the attribute key does not exist.
A successful REMOVEXATTR MUST change the file time_metadata and
change attributes.
Similar to SETXATTR, the server communicates the value of the change
attribute immediately prior to, and immediately following, a
successful REMOVEXATTR operation in rxr_info. This allows the client
to determine if its cached xattrs are still valid after the
operation. See Section 8.7 for a discussion on xattr caching.
8.4.4.4. IMPLEMENTATION
If the object whose xattr is being removed has a file delegation that
is held by a client other than the one doing the REMOVEXATTR, the
delegation(s) must be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed to
delete the xattr until each such delegation is returned or revoked.
In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server is likely
to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the delegation(s)
remains outstanding, although it might not do that if the delegations
are returned quickly.
8.4.5. Valid Errors
This section contains a table that gives the valid error returns for
each new protocol operation. The error code NFS4_OK (indicating no
error) is not listed but should be understood to be returnable by all
new operations. The error values for all other operations are
defined in Section 13.2 of [RFC7530] and Section 11.2 of [RFC7862].
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| Operation | Errors |
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| GETXATTR | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADXDR, |
| | NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, |
| | NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED, NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, |
| | NFS4ERR_MOVED, NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOXATTR, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, |
| | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG, |
| | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE, NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG, |
| | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, |
| | NFS4ERR_STALE, NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, |
| | NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE |
| SETXATTR | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADCHAR, NFS4ERR_BADXDR, |
| | NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, NFS4ERR_DQUOT, |
| | NFS4ERR_EXIST, NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED, NFS4ERR_INVAL, |
| | NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED, NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, NFS4ERR_NOSPC, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOXATTR, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, |
| | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG, |
| | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE, NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG, |
| | NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, NFS4ERR_ROFS, |
| | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE, |
| | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE, |
| | NFS4ERR_XATTR2BIG |
| LISTXATTRS | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, |
| | NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, NFS4ERR_MOVED, |
| | NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP, NFS4ERR_NOXATTR, |
| | NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, NFS4ERR_PERM, |
| | NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE, |
| | NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG, NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, |
| | NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE, |
| | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE |
| REMOVEXATTR | NFS4ERR_ACCESS, NFS4ERR_BADCHAR, NFS4ERR_BADXDR, |
| | NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, NFS4ERR_DELAY, NFS4ERR_DQUOT, |
| | NFS4ERR_EXIST, NFS4ERR_INVAL, NFS4ERR_IO, |
| | NFS4ERR_LOCKED, NFS4ERR_MOVED, NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE, NFS4ERR_NOSPC, |
| | NFS4ERR_NOXATTR,, NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, |
| | NFS4ERR_OPENMODE, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION, |
| | NFS4ERR_PERM, NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, |
| | NFS4ERR_ROFS, NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT, NFS4ERR_STALE, |
| | NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS, NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE |
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+
Valid Error Returns for Each New Protocol Operation
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.5. Modifications to Existing Operations
In order to provide fine-grained access control to query or modify
extended attributes, new access rights are defined that can be
checked to determine if the client is permitted to perform the xattr
operation.
Note that in general, as explained in Section 18.1.4 of [RFC5661], a
client cannot reliably perform an access check with only current file
attributes and must verify access with the server.
This section extends the semantics of the ACCESS operation documented
in Section 18.1 of [RFC5661]. Three new access permissions can be
requested:
ACCESS4_XAREAD Query a file or directory for its xattr value
given a key.
ACCESS4_XAWRITE Modify xattr keys and/or values of a file or
directory.
ACCESS4_XALIST Query a file or directory to list its xattr keys.
As with the existing access permissions, the results of ACCESS are
advisory in nature, with no implication that such access will be
allowed or denied in the future.
The rules for the client and server follow:
o If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
can read an xattr of the file with GETXATTR, the client should set
ACCESS4_XAREAD in the request's access field.
o If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
can modify an xattr of the file with SETXATTR or REMOVEXATTR, the
client should set ACCESS4_XAWRITE in the request's access field.
o If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine if the user
can list the xattr keys of the file with LISTXATTRS, the client
should set ACCESS4_XALIST in the request's access field.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.6. Numeric Values Assigned to Protocol Extensions
This section lists the numeric values that are assigned new
attributes and operations to implement the xattr feature. To avoid
inconsistent assignments, these have been checked against the most
recent protocol version [RFC5661] and the current minor version
[RFC7862]. Development of interoperable prototypes is possible using
these values.
<CODE BEGINS>
/// /*
/// * ACCESS - Check Access Rights
/// */
/// const ACCESS4_XAREAD = 0x00000040;
/// const ACCESS4_XAWRITE = 0x00000080;
/// const ACCESS4_XALIST = 0x00000100;
/// /*
/// * New NFSv4 attribute
/// */
/// typedef bool fattr4_xattr_support;
/// /*
/// * New RECOMMENDED Attribute
/// */
/// const FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT = 82;
/// /*
/// * New NFSv4 operations
/// */
/// /* Following lines are to be added to enum nfs_opnum4 */
/// /*
/// OP_GETXATTR = 72,
/// OP_SETXATTR = 73,
/// OP_LISTXATTRS = 74,
/// OP_REMOVEXATTR = 75,
/// */
/// /*
/// * New cases for Operation arrays
/// */
/// /* Following lines are to be added to nfs_argop4 */
/// /*
/// case OP_GETXATTR: GETXATTR4args opgetxattr;
/// case OP_SETXATTR: SETXATTR4args opsetxattr;
/// case OP_LISTXATTRS: LISTXATTRS4args oplistxattrs;
/// case OP_REMOVEXATTR: REMOVEXATTR4args opremovexattr;
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
/// */
/// /* Following lines are to be added to nfs_resop4 */
/// /*
/// case OP_GETXATTR: GETXATTR4res opgetxattr;
/// case OP_SETXATTR: SETXATTR4res opsetxattr;
/// case OP_LISTXATTRS: LISTXATTRS4res oplistxattrs;
/// case OP_REMOVEXATTR: REMOVEXATTR4res opremovexattr;
/// */
<CODE ENDS>
8.7. Caching
The caching behavior for extended attributes is similar to other file
attributes such as ACLs and is affected by whether or not OPEN
delegation has been granted to a client.
Xattrs obtained from, or sent to, the server may be cached and
clients can use them to avoid subsequent GETXATTR requests, provided
that the client can ensure that the cached value has not been
subsequently modified by another client. Such assurance can be based
on the client holding a delegation for the file in question or the
client interrogating the change attribute to make sure that any
cached value is still valid. Such caching may be read-only or write-
through.
When a delegation is in effect, some operations by a second client to
a delegated file will cause the server to recall the delegation
through a callback. For individual operations, we describe, under
IMPLEMENTATION, when such operations are required to effect a recall.
The result of local caching is that the individual xattrs maintained
on clients may not be up to date. Changes made in one order on the
server may be seen in a different order on one client and in a third
order on another client. In order to limit problems that may arise
due to separate operations to obtain individual xattrs and other file
attributes, a client should treat xattrs just like other file
attributes with respect to caching as detailed in Section 10.6 of
[RFC7530]. A client may validate its cached version of an xattr for
a file by fetching the change attribute and assuming that if the
change attribute has the same value as it did when the attributes
were cached, then xattrs have not changed. If the client holds a
delegation that ensures that the change attribute cannot be modified
by another client, it can dispense with actual interrogation of the
change attribute.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
When a client is changing xattrs of a file, it needs to determine
whether there have been changes made to the file by other clients.
It does this by using the change attribute as reported before and
after the change operation (SETXATTR or REMOVEXATTR) in the
associated change_info4 value returned for the operation. The server
is able to communicate to the client whether the change_info4 data is
provided atomically with respect to the change operation. If the
change values are provided atomically, the client has a basis for
determining, given proper care, whether other clients are modifying
the file in question.
An effective way to enable the client to make this determination
simply is for it to serialize all xattr changes made to a specific
file. When this is done, and the server provides before and after
values of the change attribute atomically, the client can simply
compare the after value of the change attribute from one operation
with the before value on the subsequent change operation modifying
the file. When these are equal, the client is assured that no other
client is modifying the file in question.
If the comparison indicates that the file was updated by another
client, the xattr cache associated with the modified file is purged
from the client. If the comparison indicates no modification, the
xattr cache can be updated on the client to reflect the file
operation, and the associated timeout can be extended. The post-
operation change value needs to be saved as the basis for future
change_info4 comparisons.
Xattr caching requires that the client revalidate xattr cache data by
inspecting the change attribute of a file at the point when an xattr
was cached. This requires that the server update the change
attribute when xattrs are modified. For a client to use the
change_info4 information appropriately and correctly, the server must
report the pre- and post-operation change attribute values
atomically. When the server is unable to report the before and after
values atomically with respect to the xattr update operation, the
server must indicate that fact in the change_info4 return value.
When the information is not atomically reported, the client should
not assume that other clients have not changed the xattrs.
The protocol does not provide support for write-back caching of
xattrs. As such, all modifications to xattrs should be done by
requests to the server. The server should perform such updates
synchronously.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
8.8. Xattrs and File Locking
Xattr operations, for the most part, function independent of
operations related to file locking state. For example, xattrs can be
interrogated and modified without a corresponding OPEN operation.
The server does not need to check for locks that conflict with xattr
access or modify operations. For example, another OPEN specified
with OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH does not prevent
access to or modification of xattrs. Note that the server MUST still
verify that the client is allowed to perform the xattr operation on
the basis of access permissions.
However, the presence of delegations may dictate how xattr operations
interact with the state-related logic. Xattrs cannot be modified
when a delegation for the corresponding file is held by another
client. On the other hand, xattrs can be interrogated despite the
holding of a write delegation by another client since updates are
write-through to the server.
8.9. pNFS Considerations
All xattr operations are sent to the metadata server, which is
responsible for fetching data from and effecting necessary changes to
persistent storage.
9. Security Considerations
Since xattrs are application data, security issues are exactly the
same as those relating to the storing of file data and named
attributes. Clients MUST NOT accord any system-interpreted semantics
to xattrs, since their use is restricted to user-managed metadata
only as explained in Section 5. Extended attributes are various
sorts of application data, and the fact that the means of reference
is slightly different in each case should not be considered security
relevant. As such, the additions to the NFS protocol for supporting
extended attributes do not alter the security considerations of the
NFSv4 protocol [RFC7530].
10. IANA Considerations
The addition of xattr support to the NFSv4 protocol does not require
any actions by IANA. This document limits xattr names to the user
namespace, where application developers are allowed to define and use
attributes as needed. Unlike named attributes, there is no namespace
identifier associated with xattrs that may require registration.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[LEGAL] IETF Trust, "Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents",
Version 5.0, March 2015, <http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/
IETF-Trust-License-Policy.pdf>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4506] Eisler, M., Ed., "XDR: External Data Representation
Standard", STD 67, RFC 4506, DOI 10.17487/RFC4506, May
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4506>.
[RFC5661] Shepler, S., Ed., Eisler, M., Ed., and D. Noveck, Ed.,
"Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1
Protocol", RFC 5661, DOI 10.17487/RFC5661, January 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5661>.
[RFC7530] Haynes, T., Ed. and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System
(NFS) Version 4 Protocol", RFC 7530, DOI 10.17487/RFC7530,
March 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7530>.
[RFC7862] Haynes, T., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor
Version 2 Protocol", RFC 7862, DOI 10.17487/RFC7862,
November 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7862>.
[RFC7863] Haynes, T., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor
Version 2 External Data Representation Standard (XDR)
Description", RFC 7863, DOI 10.17487/RFC7863, November
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7863>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8178] Noveck, D., "Rules for NFSv4 Extensions and Minor
Versions", RFC 8178, DOI 10.17487/RFC8178, July 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8178>.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
11.2. Informative References
[FreeBSD] FreeBSD, "FreeBSD Manual Pages - extattr", FreeBSD System
Calls Manual, January 2008, <http://www.freebsd.org/
cgi/man.cgi?query=extattr&sektion=9>.
[freedesktop]
freedesktop, "Guidelines for extended attributes", May
2013, <http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/
CommonExtendedAttributes>.
[fsattr] Oracle, "fsattr - extended file attributes", Man Pages
Section 5: Standards, Environments, and Macros,
<http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5175/6mbba7f02>.
[KDE] Handa, V., "Extended Attributes Updates", August 2014,
<http://vhanda.in/blog/2014/08/
extended-attributes-updates/>.
[Linux] The Linux man-pages project, "Linux Programmer's Manual:
xattr(7)", Linux man pages: Section 7, September 2017,
<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/xattr.7.html>.
[Love] Love, R., "Linux System Programming: Talking Directly to
the Kernel and C Library", O'Reilly Media, Inc., February
2009.
[NTFS] Microsoft, "File Streams", <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
us/library/windows/desktop/aa364404(v=vs.85).aspx>.
[POSIX] The Open Group, "System Interfaces of The Open Group Base
Specifications Issue 7", IEEE Std 1003.1, 2016 Edition
(HTML Version), ISBN 1937218812, September 2016,
<http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/>.
[Swift] The OpenStack Foundation Wiki, "Swift-on-File", July 2015,
<https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swiftonfile>.
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 8276 Extended Attributes in NFSv4 December 2017
Acknowledgments
This document has attempted to capture the discussion on adding
xattrs to the NFSv4 protocol from many participants on the IETF NFSv4
mailing list. Those who provided valuable input and comments on
draft versions of this document include: Tom Haynes, Christoph
Hellwig, Nico Williams, Dave Noveck, Benny Halevy, and Andreas
Gruenbacher.
Authors' Addresses
Manoj Naik
Nutanix
1740 Technology Drive, Suite 150
San Jose, CA 95110
United States of America
Email: manoj.naik@nutanix.com
Marc Eshel
IBM Almaden
650 Harry Road
San Jose, CA 95120
United States of America
Phone: +1 408-927-1894
Email: eshel@us.ibm.com
Naik & Eshel Standards Track [Page 28]
ERRATA
