<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc .>
<?rfc strict='yes'?>
<?rfc iprnotified='no'?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-templin-6man-aero3-54" ipr="trust200902"
     updates="" obsoletes="">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="AERO">Automatic Extended Route Optimization (AERO)</title>

    <author fullname="Fred L. Templin" initials="F. L." role="editor"
            surname="Templin">
      <organization>Boeing Technology Innovation</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 3707</street>

          <city>Seattle</city>

          <region>WA</region>

          <code>98124</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>fltemplin@acm.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="15" month="February" year="2026"/>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies an Automatic Extended Route Optimization
      (AERO) and mobility service for IP internetworking over Overlay
      Multilink Network (OMNI) Interfaces. AERO/OMNI use IPv6 Neighbor
      Discovery (IPv6 ND) control plane messaging over the OMNI virtual
      link to support secured network admission and OMNI link forwarding.
      Flow-based secure multilink path selection, multinet traversal,
      mobility management, multicast forwarding, multihop operation and
      route optimization are naturally supported through dynamic neighbor
      cache updates. AERO is a widely-applicable service well-suited for
      air/land/sea/space secure global mobile Internetworking applications
      including aviation, intelligent transportation systems, mobile
      end user devices, space exploration and many others.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>Automatic Extended Route Optimization (AERO) fulfills the
      requirements of route optimization <xref target="RFC5522"/>
      and Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) <xref target="RFC7333"/>
      for air/land/sea/space secure global mobile Internetworking
      applications including aeronautical networking, intelligent
      transportation systems, home network users, enterprise mobile
      device users, space exploration and many others. AERO employs
      the Overlay Multilink Network Interface (OMNI) <xref target=
      "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> with its Non-Broadcast, Multiple
      Access (NBMA) virtual link model.</t>

      <t>The OMNI link is an adaptation layer virtual overlay manifested
      by IPv6 encapsulation over a network-of-networks concatenation of
      underlay Internetworks. Nodes on the link can exchange original IP
      packets as single-hop neighbors; both IP protocol versions (IPv4
      and IPv6) are supported. The OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL) supports
      multilink operation for increased reliability and path optimization
      while providing fragmentation and reassembly services to support
      performance optimization and Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)
      diversity. This specification provides a route optimization
      and mobility service architecture companion to the OMNI
      specification.</t>

      <t>The AERO service connects Clients as OMNI link end systems via
      Proxy/Servers and Relays as intermediate systems; AERO further
      employs Gateways that interconnect diverse Internetworks as
      OMNI link segments through OAL forwarding at a layer below IP. Each
      node's OMNI interface supports the operation of IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
      (IPv6 ND) <xref target="RFC4861"/> as the mobility service control
      message protocol. A Client's OMNI interface can be configured over
      multiple underlay interfaces, and therefore appears as a single
      interface with multiple underlay addresses. These underlay
      addresses are subject to change due to mobility and/or multilink
      fluctuations, with changes propagated by ND messaging the same
      as for any IPv6 link.</t>

      <t>Clients engage the AERO service according to either
      the "on-link" or "off-link" models for IPv6 Neighbor
      Discovery over OMNI links as discussed in <xref target=
      "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. For destinations that match
      an on-link prefix, the Client performs address resolution
      and neighbor unreachability detection as a network layer
      function that requires IPv6 ND messaging and neighbor
      cache state coordination between the network and adaptation
      layers. For destinations that match an off-link prefix, the
      Client forwards packets to a virtual router function within
      the OMNI interface. The OMNI interface then performs IPv6 ND
      messaging and neighbor state management as an adaptation
      layer service without disturbing the network layer.</t>
       
      <t>AERO provides a secure virtual link management service where
      mobile node Clients use Proxy/Servers acting as proxys and/or
      designated routers while correspondent nodes on foreign networks
      use any Relay on the link for efficient communications. Foreign
      network correspondent nodes forward original IP packets destined
      to other AERO nodes via the nearest Relay, which forwards them
      through the cloud. Mobile node Clients discover shortest paths
      to OMNI link neighbors through AERO route optimization. Both
      unicast and multicast communications are supported.</t>

      <t>Correspondent nodes on foreign networks configure IP
      addresses from Foreign Network Prefixes (FNPs) advertised by
      Relays. Mobile node Clients register Mobile Network Prefixes
      (MNPs) with Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) Proxy/Servers to support
      global mobile Internetworking.</t>

      <t>AERO Gateways peer with Proxy/Servers in a secured private BGP
      overlay routing instance to establish a Segment Routing Topology (SRT)
      virtual spanning tree over the underlay Internetworks of one or more
      disjoint administrative domains concatenated as a single unified OMNI
      link. Each OMNI link instance is characterized by a set of Mobility Service
      Prefixes (MSPs) common to all mobile nodes and from which MNP sub-prefixes
      are derived. Relays provide an optimal route from correspondent nodes
      on foreign links/networks to mobile or fixed nodes on the local OMNI
      link. From the perspective of underlay Internetworks, each Relay
      appears as the source of a route to the MSP; uplink traffic to
      mobile nodes is therefore naturally routed to the nearest Relay.</t>

      <t>AERO operates over OMNI links that span private-use Internetworks
      and/or the global public IPv4 and IPv6 Internets. In both cases, Clients
      may be located behind Network Address Translators (NATs) on the path to
      their associated Proxy/Servers and/or peers. A means for supporting
      robust NAT traversal while avoiding "triangle routing" and critical
      infrastructure traffic concentration is therefore provided through
      a service known as route optimization.</t>

      <t>AERO assumes the use of PIM Sparse Mode in support of multicast
      communication. In support of Source Specific Multicast (SSM) when a
      Mobile Node is the source, AERO route optimization ensures that a
      shortest-path multicast tree is established with provisions for mobility
      and multilink operation. In all other multicast scenarios there are no
      AERO dependencies.</t>

      <t>AERO provides a secure aeronautical Internetworking service for both
      manned and unmanned aircraft, where the aircraft is treated as a mobile
      node (MN) that can connect airborne Internet of Things (IoT) sub-networks.
      AERO is also applicable to a wide variety of other use cases. For example,
      it can be used to coordinate the links of mobile nodes (e.g., cellphones,
      tablets, laptop computers, etc.) that connect into a home enterprise
      network via public access networks with Virtual Private Network (VPN)
      or open Internetwork services enabled according to the appropriate
      security model. AERO also supports terrestrial vehicular, urban air
      mobility and mobile pedestrian communication services for intelligent
      transportation systems <xref target="RFC9365"/>. Other applicable use
      cases including home and small office networks, enterprise networks
      and many others represent additional large classes of potential
      AERO/OMNI users.</t>

      <t>Together with OMNI, AERO supports secured optimal routing for
      the "6 M's of Modern Internetworking", including:<list style="numbers">
          <t>Multilink - a mobile node's ability to coordinate
          multiple diverse underlay data links as a single logical unit (i.e.,
          the OMNI interface) to achieve the required communications
          performance and reliability objectives.</t>

          <t>Multinet - the ability to span the OMNI link over an end
          to end topology connecting multiple diverse administrative domain
          network segments while maintaining seamless communications
          between mobile Clients and correspondents such as air traffic
          controllers, fleet administrators, other mobile Clients, etc.</t>

          <t>Mobility - a mobile node's ability to change network
          points of attachment (e.g., moving between wireless base stations)
          which may result in an underlay interface address change, but
          without disruptions to ongoing communication sessions with peers
          over the OMNI link.</t>

          <t>Multicast - the ability to send a single network
          transmission that reaches multiple nodes belonging to the same
          interest group, but without disturbing other nodes not subscribed to
          the interest group.</t>

          <t>Multihop - a mobile Client peer-to-peer relaying capability
          useful when multiple forwarding hops between peers may
          be necessary to reach a target peer or an infrastructure
          access point connection to the OMNI link.</t>

          <t>(Performance) Maximization - the ability to exchange
          packets of all sizes between peers without loss due to a
          link size restriction, and to adaptively adjust packet sizes
          to maintain the best performance profile for each independent
          traffic flow.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>The following numbered sections present the AERO specification. The
      appendices at the end of the document are non-normative.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The terminology in the normative references applies; especially, the
      OMNI specification terminology <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>
      and the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (IPv6 ND) <xref target="RFC4861"/> node
      variables, protocol constants and message types (including Router
      Solicitation (RS), Router Advertisement (RS), Neighbor Solicitation (NS),
      Neighbor Advertisement (NA), unsolicited NA (uNA) and Redirect) are
      cited extensively throughout. AERO further introduces new "pseudo"
      IPv6 ND message types Multilink Initiate (MI), Multilink Respond (MR)
      and Multilink Control (MC) with formats identical to the standard NS
      message but with different Code values. These messages are used to
      control adaptation layer functions only and are never exposed to
      the network layer.</t>

      <t>Throughout the document, the simple terms "(Proxy/)Client",
      "Proxy/Server", "Gateway" and "Relay" refer to "AERO/OMNI (Proxy/)Client",
      "AERO/OMNI Proxy/Server", "AERO/OMNI Gateway" and "AERO/OMNI Relay",
      respectively. Capitalization is used to distinguish these terms from
      other common Internetworking uses in which they appear in lower case,
      and implies that the node in question both configures an OMNI interface
      and engages the OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL).</t>

      <t>The terms "All-Routers multicast", "All-Nodes multicast",
      "Solicited-Node multicast" and "Subnet-Router anycast" are defined
      in <xref target="RFC4291"/>.</t>

      <t>The term "IP" refers generically to either Internet
      Protocol version (IPv4 <xref target="RFC0791"/> or IPv6
      <xref target="RFC8200"/>) for specification elements that
      apply equally to both.</t>

      <t>The terms "application layer (L5 and higher)", "transport layer
      (L4)", "network layer (L3)", "(data) link layer (L2)" and "physical
      layer (L1)" are used consistently with common Internetworking
      terminology, with the understanding that reliable delivery protocol
      users of UDP are considered as transport layer elements. The OMNI
      specification further introduces an "adaptation layer" positioned
      below the network layer but above the link layer, which may include
      physical links and Internet- or higher-layer tunnels. A (network)
      interface is a node's attachment to a link (via L2), and an OMNI
      interface is therefore a node's attachment to an OMNI link (via
      the adaptation layer).</t>

      <t>The following terms are defined within the scope of this document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (IPv6 ND)"><vspace/>a control
          message service for coordinating neighbor relationships between
          nodes connected to a common link. AERO uses the IPv6 ND messaging
          service specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/> in conjunction with
          the OMNI extensions specified in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="IPv6 Prefix Delegation (IPv6 PD)"><vspace/>a networking
          service for delegating IPv6 prefixes to nodes on the link. AERO nodes
          apply the IPv6 PD service provided by DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC8415"/>
          <xref target="RFC9762"/> in conjunction with OMNI interface IPv6 ND.</t>

          <t hangText="GUA, ULA, LLA, MLA"><vspace/>A Globally-Unique
          (GUA), Unique-Local (ULA) or Link-Local (LLA) Address per
          the IPv6 addressing architecture <xref target="RFC4193"/>
          <xref target="RFC4291"/>, or a Multilink-Local Address (MLA)
          per <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-mla"/>. IPv4 prefixes
          other than those reserved for special purposes <xref target=
          "RFC6890"/> are also considered as GUA prefixes.</t>

          <t hangText="L3"><vspace/>The Network layer in the OSI reference
          model, also known as "layer 3" or the "IP layer". The Network
          layer engages the Adaptation layer via OMNI interfaces.</t>

          <t hangText="Adaptation layer"><vspace/>An IPv6 encapsulation and
          fragmentation mid-layer that adapts L3 to a diverse collection
          of underlay interfaces. The adaptation layer then engages an
          underlay network that performs UDP/IP, IP, or NULL encapsulation
          for transmission over underlay interface attachments to L2 media.</t>

          <t hangText="L2"><vspace/>The Data Link layer in the OSI reference
          model, also known as "layer 2" or "link layer".</t>

          <t hangText="Access Network (ANET)"><vspace/>a connected network
          region (e.g., an aviation radio access network, corporate enterprise
          network, satellite service provider network, cellular operator
          network, residential WiFi network, etc.) that connects Clients to
          the Mobility Service over the OMNI link. Physical and/or data
          link level security is assumed and sometimes referred to as
          "protected spectrum" for wireless domains. Private enterprise
          networks and ground domain aviation service networks may provide
          multiple secured IP hops between the Client's point of connection
          and the nearest Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Ad-hoc NETwork (MANET)"><vspace/>a connected
          ANET region for which links often have undetermined connectivity
          properties, lower layer security services cannot always be assumed
          and multihop forwarding between Clients acting as MANET routers
          may be necessary. AERO and the OMNI link model naturally support
          MANET Internetworking <xref target= "I-D.templin-manet-inet"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="Internetwork (INET)"><vspace/>a connected network
          region with a coherent IP addressing plan that provides transit
          forwarding services between (M)ANETs and AERO/OMNI nodes that
          coordinate with the Mobility Service over unprotected media. No
          physical and/or data link level security is assumed, therefore
          security must be applied by the network and/or higher layers.
          The global public Internet itself is an example.</t>

          <t hangText="End-user Network (EUN)"><vspace/>a simple or complex
          "downstream" network tethered to a Client as a single logical unit
          that travels together. The EUN could be as simple as a single link
          connecting a single end system, or as complex as a large network with
          many links, routers, bridges and end user devices. The EUN provides
          an "upstream" link for arbitrarily many low-, medium- or high-end
          devices dependent on the Client for their upstream connectivity,
          i.e., as Internet of Things (IoT) entities. EUNs can also support
          a recursively-descending chain of additional Clients such that the
          EUN of an upstream Client appears as the (M)ANET of a downstream
          Client.</t>

          <t hangText="*NET"><vspace/>a "wildcard" term used when a given
          specification applies equally to all MANET/ANET/INET cases. From the
          Client's perspective, *NET interfaces are "upstream" interfaces that
          connect the Client to the Mobility Service, while EUN interfaces
          are "downstream" interfaces that the Client uses to connect
          downstream *NETs which may connect other Clients. Local communications
          between correspondents within the same *NET can often be conducted
          based on IPv6 ULAs <xref target="RFC4193"/> or MLAs <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-mla"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="underlay network/interface"><vspace/>a *NET
          interface over which an OMNI interface is configured. The
          network layer engages the OMNI interface as an ordinary
          network interface, and the adaptation layer engages each
          underlay interface as a link layer conduit. The underlay
          includes UDP/IP, IP or NULL encapsulations for data units
          transferred between the adaptation and link layers.</t>

          <t hangText="MANET Interface"><vspace/>a node's underlay interface
          to a local network with indeterminant neighborhood properties over
          which multihop relaying may be necessary. All MANET interfaces used
          by AERO/OMNI are IPv6 interfaces and therefore must configure a
          Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) no smaller than the IPv6 minimum
          MTU (1280 octets) even if lower-layer fragmentation is needed.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI link"><vspace/>the same as defined in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. The OMNI link employs IPv6
          encapsulation to traverse intermediate systems in a spanning tree
          over underlay network segments the same as a bridged campus LAN.
          AERO nodes on the OMNI link appear as single-hop neighbors at
          the network layer even though they may be separated by many
          underlay network hops; AERO nodes can employ Segment Routing
          <xref target="RFC8402"/><xref target="RFC8754"/> to cause
          packets to visit selected waypoints within the same OMNI
          link limited domain.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI link segment"><vspace/>a Proxy/Server and
          all of its constituent Clients within any attached *NETs is
          considered as a leaf OMNI link segment, with each leaf
          interconnected via links and "bridge" nodes in intermediate
          OMNI link segments. When the *NETs of multiple leaf segments
          overlap (e.g., due to network mobility), they can combine to
          form larger *NETs with no changes to Client-to-Proxy/Server
          relationships. The OMNI link consists of the concatenation
          of all OMNI link leaf and intermediate segments as a
          loop-free spanning tree.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI interface"><vspace/>a node's virtual
          interface to an OMNI link, and configured over one or more
          underlay interfaces. If there are multiple OMNI links in an OMNI
          domain, a separate OMNI interface is configured for each link.
          The OMNI interface configures a Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)
          and an Effective MTU to Receive (EMTU_R) the same as any interface.
          The OMNI interface assigns an "external" LLA and
          Ethernet link-layer address the same as for any IPv6 interface,
          assigns a different "internal" LLA and link-layer address
          to support a virtual internal router entity, and assigns an MLA
          for adaptation layer addressing over underlay interfaces. Since
          OMNI interface MLAs are managed for uniqueness and LLAs are
          used for node-local operations only, OMNI interfaces assume
          Optimistic Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) per <xref
          target="RFC4429"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL)"><vspace/>an OMNI interface
          sublayer service that encapsulates original IP packets
          admitted into the interface in an IPv6 header and/or subjects them
          to fragmentation and reassembly. The OAL is also responsible for
          generating MTU-related control messages as necessary, and for
          providing addressing context for spanning multiple segments of
          an extended OMNI link.</t>

          <t hangText="OMNI Option"><vspace/>a pseudo IPv6 ND option
          providing multilink parameters for the OMNI interface. The OMNI
          option is appended to the end of a control message during OAL
          encapsulation such that it appears immediately following the
          final message option or composite packet extension.</t>

          <t hangText="(network) partition"><vspace/>frequently, underlay
          networks such as large corporate enterprise networks are sub-divided
          internally into separate isolated partitions (a technique also known
          as "network segmentation"). Each partition is fully connected
          internally but disconnected from other partitions, and there is no
          requirement that separate partitions maintain consistent Internet
          Protocol and/or addressing plans. (Each partition appears as a
          separate OMNI link segment as discussed throughout this document.)</t>

          <t hangText="underlay network encapsulation"><vspace/>OMNI protocol
          encapsulation of OAL packets/fragments in an outer header or headers
          to form carrier packets that can be routed within the scope of the
          local *NET underlay network partition. Common underlay network
          encapsulation combinations include UDP, IP, Ethernet, etc. using
          a port/protocol/type number for OMNI.</t>

          <t hangText="underlay-extended (UNX) address"><vspace/>an address
          that appears in encapsulations for an underlay interface and also in
          control message OMNI options. UNX can be either an IP address for
          IP encapsulations or an IEEE EUI address <xref target="EUI"/> for
          direct data link encapsulation. (When UDP/IP encapsulation is used,
          the UDP port number is regarded as an extension of the IP UNX.)</t>

          <t hangText="original IP packet"><vspace/>a whole IP
          packet or fragment admitted into the OMNI interface by the
          network layer prior to OAL encapsulation/fragmentation, or an IP
          packet delivered to the network layer by the OMNI interface
          following OAL reassembly/decapsulation.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL packet"><vspace/>an original IP packet
          encapsulated in an OAL IPv6 header with an IPv6 Extended Fragment
          Header extension that includes an 8-octet (64-bit) OAL Identification
          value. Each OAL packet is then subject to fragmentation by the
          source and reassembly by the destination.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL fragment"><vspace/>a portion of an OAL packet
          following fragmentation but prior to underlay encapsulation,
          or following underlay decapsulation but prior to OAL reassembly.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL atomic fragment"><vspace/>an OAL packet that can
          be forwarded without fragmentation, but still includes an IPv6 Extended
          Fragment Header with an 8-octet (64-bit) OAL Identification value
          and with Index and More Fragments both set to 0. (Note that control
          message atomic fragments also omit the Extended Fragment Header
          over secured spanning tree links.)</t>

          <t hangText="carrier packet"><vspace/>an OAL packet or fragment
          submitted for underlay interface encapsulation. OAL nodes exchange
          carrier packets over underlay interfaces in a hop-by-hop fashion
          beginning with the OAL source, then continuing over any OAL
          intermediate nodes and ending with the OAL destination. Each
          intermediate hop removes the underlay encapsulations of the
          previous hop and inserts underlay encapsulations appropriate
          for the next hop. Carrier packets may themselves be subject to
          fragmentation and reassembly in some IPv4 underlay networks at
          a layer below the OAL. Carrier packets sent over unsecured paths
          use OMNI protocol underlay encapsulations, while those sent over
          secured paths use security encapsulations such as IPsec <xref
          target="RFC4301"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL source"><vspace/>a node that configures an
          OMNI interface acts as an OAL source when it encapsulates original
          IP packets to form OAL packets, then performs OAL fragmentation and
          underlay encapsulation to create carrier packets. Every OAL source
          is also an OAL end system.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL destination"><vspace/>a node that configures an
          OMNI interface acts as an OAL destination when it decapsulates
          carrier packets, then performs OAL reassembly/decapsulation to
          restore the original IP packet. Every OAL destination is also
          an OAL end system.</t>

          <t hangText="OAL intermediate system"><vspace/>a node that
          configures an OMNI interface acts as an OAL intermediate
          system when it decapsulates carrier packets received from a
          first segment to obtain the OAL packet/fragment, then
          re-encapsulates in new underlay headers and sends these new carrier
          packets into the next segment. OAL intermediate systems decrement
          the Hop Limit in OAL packets/fragments during forwarding, and
          discard the OAL packet/fragment if the Hop Limit reaches 0.
          OAL intermediate systems do not decrement the TTL/Hop Limit
          of the original IP packet, which can only be updated
          by the network and higher layers. OAL intermediate systems along
          the path explicitly addressed by the OAL IPv6 Destination (e.g.,
          Proxys, etc.) are regarded as "endpoint" intermediate systems
          while those not explicitly addressed (e.g., MANET routers, AERO
          Gateways, etc.) are regarded as "transit" intermediate systems.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service Prefix (MSP)"><vspace/>an aggregated
          IP GUA prefix (e.g., 2001:db8::/32, 2002:192.0.2.0::/40, etc.)
          assigned to the OMNI link and from which more-specific Mobile
          Network Prefixes (MNPs) are delegated, where IPv4 MSPs are
          represented as "6to4 prefixes" per <xref target="RFC3056"/>.
          OMNI link administrators typically obtain MSPs from an Internet
          address registry, however private-use prefixes can alternatively
          be used subject to certain limitations (see: <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>). OMNI links that connect to the
          global Internet advertise their MSPs to interdomain routing
          peers.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)"><vspace/>a longer IP
          GUA prefix derived from an MSP (e.g., 2001:db8:1000:2000::/56,
          2002:192.0.2.8::/48, etc.) and delegated to an AERO Client.</t>

          <t hangText="Foreign Network Prefix (FNP)"><vspace/>a global IP
          prefix not covered by a MSP and assigned to a link or network
          outside of the AERO/OMNI domain. Relays advertise any of their
          associated FNPs into the AERO/OMNI routing system and forward
          packets between MNP mobile or fixed nodes on the OMNI link
          and FNP correspondent nodes on other links.</t>

          <t hangText="Subnet Router Anycast (SRA) Address"><vspace/>An
          IPv6 address taken from an FNP/MNP in which the remainder
          of the address beyond the final bit of the prefix is set to
          the value "all-zeros". For example, the SRA for 2001:db8:1::/64
          is simply 2001:db8:1:: (i.e., with the 64 least significant bits
          set to 0). For IPv4, the IPv6 SRA corresponding to the IPv4
          prefix 192.0.2.0/24 is 2002:192.0.2.0::/40 per <xref target=
          "RFC3056"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="Interface Identifier (IID)"><vspace/>the least
          significant 64 bits of an IPv6 address, as specified in the
          IPv6 addressing architecture <xref target="RFC4291"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO node"><vspace/>a node that is connected to an
          OMNI link and participates in the AERO internetworking and
          mobility service.</t>

          <t hangText="(AERO) (Proxy/)Client"><vspace/>an AERO node
          that configures an OMNI interface over one or more underlay
          interfaces and requests MNP prefix delegations from AERO
          Proxy/Servers. The Client assigns LLAs and an MLA to the
          OMNI interface for use in IPv6 ND exchanges with other
          AERO nodes and forwards original IP packets to correspondents
          according to OMNI interface neighbor cache state. The Client
          coordinates with Proxy/Servers and/or other Clients over
          upstream (M)ANET/INET interfaces and may also provide Proxy
          services for other Clients over downstream interfaces.</t>

          <t hangText="(AERO) Proxy/Server"><vspace/>an AERO
          node that provides a proxying service between AERO Clients and
          external peers on its Client-facing (M)ANET interfaces (i.e., in
          the same fashion as for an enterprise network proxy) as well as
          designated router services for coordination with correspondents on
          its INET-facing interfaces. (Proxy/Servers in the open INET instead
          configure only a single INET interface and no (M)ANET interfaces.) The
          Proxy/Server configures an OMNI interface and maintains BGP peerings
          with Gateways to provide a local anchor point for its stable and/or
          mobile Clients.</t>

          <t hangText="(AERO) Relay"><vspace/>an AERO Proxy/Server
          that provides forwarding services between nodes reached via the
          OMNI link and correspondents on foreign links/networks. AERO
          Relays maintain BGP peerings with Gateways the same as Proxy/Servers.
          Relays also run a dynamic routing protocol to discover any
          Foreign Network Prefix (FNP) routes in service on other
          links/networks, advertise OMNI link MSP(s) to other
          links/networks, and redistribute FNPs discovered on other
          links/networks into the OMNI link BGP routing system. (Relays
          that connect to major Internetworks such as the global IPv6
          or IPv4 Internets can also be configured to advertise
          "default" routes into the OMNI link BGP routing system.)</t>

          <t hangText="(AERO) Gateway"><vspace/>a BGP hub
          autonomous system node that also provides OAL forwarding services
          for nodes on an OMNI link. Gateways forward OAL packets/fragments
          between OMNI link segments as OAL intermediate systems while
          decrementing the OAL IPv6 header Hop Limit but without decrementing
          the network layer IP TTL/Hop Limit. Gateways peer with Proxy/Servers
          and other Gateways to form an IPv6-based OAL spanning tree over all
          OMNI link segments and to discover the set of all FNP/MNP prefixes
          in service. Gateways process OAL packets/fragments received over
          the secured spanning tree that are addressed to themselves,
          while forwarding all other OAL packets/fragments to the next hop
          also via the secured spanning tree. Gateways forward OAL
          packets/fragments received over the unsecured spanning tree to the
          next hop either via the unsecured spanning tree or via direct
          encapsulation if the next hop is on the same OMNI link segment.
          It is important to note that all Gateways are also Proxy/Servers,
          but only those Proxy/Servers configured as intermediate nodes
          in the spanning tree are considered Gateways.</t>

          <t hangText="First-Hop Segment (FHS) Client"><vspace/>a Client
          that initiates communications with a target peer by sending control
          messages to establish reverse-path multilink forwarding state in
          OMNI link intermediate systems on the path to the target. Note
          that in some  arrangements the Client's (FHS) Proxy/Server (and
          not the Client itself) initiates the exchange.</t>

          <t hangText="Last-Hop Segment (LHS) Client"><vspace/>a Client that
          responds to a communications request from a source peer's initiation
          by returning a response message to establish forward-path multilink
          forwarding state in OMNI link intermediate systems on the path to
          the source. Note that in some arrangements the Client's (LHS)
          Proxy/Server (and not the Client itself) returns the response.</t>

          <t hangText="First-Hop Segment (FHS) Proxy/Server"><vspace/>a
          Proxy/Server for an FHS Client's underlay interface that forwards
          the Client's OAL packets into the segment management topology.
          FHS Proxy/Servers also act as intermediate forwarding systems
          to facilitate RS/RA exchanges between a Client and its MAP
          Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t hangText="Last-Hop Segment (LHS) Proxy/Server"><vspace/>a
          Proxy/Server for an underlay interface of an LHS Client that
          forwards OAL packets received from the segment management
          topology to the Client over that interface.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) Proxy/Server"><vspace/>a
          Proxy/Server selected by a Client that injects the Client's MNP
          into the BGP routing system and provides both forwarding and mobility
          services for any *NET underlay interfaces that register the MNP.
          Clients often select the first FHS Proxy/Server they coordinate with
          to serve in the MAP role as all FHS Proxy/Servers are equally capable
          candidates to serve as a MAP. The Client can instead select any
          available Proxy/Server for the OMNI link as there is no requirement
          that the MAP must also be one of the Client's FHS Proxy/Servers. This
          flexible arrangement supports a fully distributed mobility management
          service.</t>

          <t hangText="Segment Routing Topology (SRT)"><vspace/>a Multinet
          OMNI link forwarding region between FHS and LHS Proxy/Servers.
          FHS/LHS Proxy/Servers and SRT Gateways span the OMNI link on behalf
          of communicating peer nodes. The SRT maintains a spanning tree
          established through BGP peerings between Gateways and Proxy/Servers.
          Each SRT leaf segment includes Gateways in a "hub" and Proxy/Servers
          in "spokes", while adjacent segments are interconnected by
          Gateway-Gateway peerings. The BGP peerings are configured over both
          secured and unsecured underlay network paths such that a secured
          spanning tree is available for critical control messages while other
          messages can use the unsecured spanning tree.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Node (MN)"><vspace/>an AERO Client and all of
          its downstream-attached networks that move together as a single
          unit, i.e., an end system and its connected IoT sub-networks.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Router (MR)"><vspace/>a MN's on-board
          router that forwards original IP packets between any
          downstream-attached networks and the OMNI link. The MR
          is the MN entity that hosts the AERO Client.</t>

          <t hangText="Address Resolution Source (ARS)"><vspace/>the node
          nearest the original source that initiates OMNI link address
          resolution. The ARS may be a Proxy/Server or Relay for the source,
          or may be the source Client itself. The ARS is often (but not
          always) also the same node that becomes the FHS source during
          route optimization.</t>

          <t hangText="Address Resolution Target (ART)"><vspace/>the node
          toward which address resolution is directed. The ART may be a Relay
          or the target Client itself. The ART is often (but not always) also
          the same node that becomes the LHS target during route optimization.</t>

          <t hangText="Address Resolution Responder (ARR)"><vspace/>the node
          that responds to address resolution requests on behalf of the ART.
          The ARR may be a Relay, the ART itself, or the ART's current MAP
          Proxy/Server. Note that a MAP Proxy/Server can assume the ARR role
          even if it is located on a different SRT segment than the ART. The
          MAP Proxy/Server assumes the ARR role only when it receives an RS
          message from the ART with the 'ARR' flag set (see: <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>).</t>

          <t hangText="Potential Router List (PRL)"><vspace/>a geographically
          and/or topologically referenced list of addresses of all Proxy/Servers
          within the same OMNI link segment. Each OMNI link segment has its
          own PRL.</t>

          <t hangText="Distributed Mobility Management (DMM)"><vspace/>a
          BGP-based overlay routing service coordinated by Proxy/Servers and
          Gateways that tracks all Proxy/Server-to-Client associations.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service (MS)"><vspace/>the collective set of
          all Proxy/Servers, Gateways and Relays that provide the AERO Service
          to Clients.</t>

          <t hangText="flow"><vspace/>a sequence of packets sent from a
          particular source to a particular unicast, anycast, or multicast
          destination that a node desires to label as a flow. The 3-tuple
          of (Source Address, Destination Address, Flow Label) enables
          efficient IPv6 flow classification. The IPv6 Flow Label
          Specification is observed per <xref target="RFC6437"/>
          <xref target="RFC6438"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Flow Information Base (AFIB)"><vspace/>A
          multilink forwarding table on each OAL source, destination and
          intermediate system that includes AERO Flow Vectors (AFV) with
          both next hop forwarding instructions and context for reconstructing
          compressed headers for specific underlay interface pairs used to
          transport flows from a source to a destination.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Flow Vector (AFV)"><vspace/>An AFIB entry
          that includes soft state for each underlay interface pairwise
          communication flow from source to destination. AFVs are identified
          by an AFV Index (AFVI) paired with the previous hop underlay address,
          with the pair established based on adaptation layer control
          messaging. The AFV also caches underlay interface pairwise
          Identification sequence number parameters to support carrier
          packet filtering.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Flow Vector Index (AFVI)"><vspace/>A
          2-octet or 4-octet integer value supplied by a previous hop OAL
          node when it requests a next hop OAL node to create an AFV.
          (The AFVI is always processed as a 4-octet value, but compressed
          headers may omit the 2 most significant octets when they encode
          the value 0.) The next hop OAL node caches the AFVI and underlay address
          supplied by the previous hop as header compression/decompression
          state for future OAL packets with compressed headers. The previous
          hop OAL node must ensure that the AFVI values it assigns to the
          next hop via a specific underlay interface are distinct and
          reused only after their useful lifetimes expire. The special
          value 0 means that no AFVI is asserted.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="reqs" title="Requirements">
      <t>OMNI interfaces should limit the size of their control
      plane messages (plus any original IP packet attachments)
      to the adaptation layer path MTU which may be as small as the
      minimum IPv6 link MTU minus encapsulation overhead. If there
      are sufficient OMNI parameters and/or IP packet attachments
      that would exceed this size, the OMNI interface forwards the
      information as multiple smaller control messages and the recipient
      accepts the union of all information received. This allows the
      messages to travel without loss due to a size restriction over
      secured control plane paths that include IPsec tunnels <xref
      target="RFC4301"/>, secured direct point-to-point links and/or
      unsecured paths that require an authentication signature.</t>

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref target="RFC2119"/><xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
      they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="aerospec"
             title="Automatic Extended Route Optimization (AERO)">
      <t>The following sections specify the operation of IP over OMNI links
      using the AERO service:</t>

      <section anchor="node-types" title="AERO Node Types">
        <t>AERO (Proxy/)Clients can be deployed as fixed infrastructure nodes
        close to end systems, or as Mobile Nodes (MNs) that can change their
        network attachment points dynamically. AERO Clients configure OMNI
        interfaces over underlay interfaces with addresses that may change
        due to mobility. AERO Clients that obtain MNPs register them with
        the AERO service, and distribute the MNPs to EUNs (which may
        connect other Clients). AERO Clients can also provide Proxy
        services for other Clients on downstream-attached networks.</t>

        <t>AERO Gateways, Proxy/Servers and Relays are infrastructure
        elements in *NET boundary (or standalone INET) deployments and
        hence have INET addresses that rarely (if ever) change. Together,
        they provide access to the AERO service OMNI link virtual overlay
        for connecting AERO Clients. AERO Gateways (together with
        Proxy/Servers and Relays) provide the secured backbone supporting
        infrastructure for an OMNI link Segment Routing Topology (SRT)
        spanning tree.</t>

        <t>AERO Gateways are Proxy/Servers deployed as OMNI link intermediate
        systems that forward packets both within the same SRT segment and
        between disjoint SRT segments based on an IPv6 encapsulation mid-layer
        known as the OMNI Adaptation Layer (OAL). The OMNI interface and OAL
        provide an adaptation layer forwarding service that the network layer
        perceives as L2 bridging, since the inner IP TTL/Hop Limit is not
        decremented. Each Gateway peers with Proxy/Servers, Relays and other
        Gateways in a dynamic routing protocol instance as a Distributed
        Mobility Management (DMM) service for the list of active MNPs (see:
        <xref target="scaling"/>). Gateways assign one or more Mobility
        Service Prefixes (MSPs) to the OMNI link and configure IPsec tunnels
        with Proxy/Servers, Relays and other Gateways; they further maintain
        forwarding table entries for each FNP/MNP prefix in service on
        the OMNI link.</t>

        <t>AERO Proxy/Servers distributed across one or more SRT segments
        provide default forwarding and mobility/multilink services for AERO
        Client mobile nodes. Each Proxy/Server acts as either an OMNI link
        intermediate system or end system according to the service model
        selected by the Client. Each Proxy/Server also peers with Gateways
        in an adaptation layer dynamic routing protocol instance to advertise
        its list of associated MNPs (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). MAP
        Proxy/Servers provide prefix delegation services and track the
        mobility/multilink profiles of each of their associated Clients,
        where each delegated prefix becomes an MNP taken from an MSP.
        Proxy/Servers at *NET boundaries provide a primary forwarding
        service for (M)ANET Client communications with peers in external
        INETs. Proxy/Servers in open INETs provide an authentication
        service for control messages but should be considered as a less
        preferred data plane forwarding service when a Client cannot
        forward directly to an INET peer. Source Clients securely
        coordinate with target Clients by sending control messages
        via a First-Hop Segment (FHS) Proxy/Server which forwards
        them over the SRT spanning tree to a Last-Hop Segment (LHS)
        Proxy/Server which finally forwards them to the target.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays are Proxy/Servers that provide forwarding services
        to exchange original IP packets between the OMNI link and fixed or
        mobile nodes on other links/networks. Relays run a dynamic routing
        protocol to discover any FNP prefixes in service on foreign
        links/networks, and Relays that connect to larger Internetworks
        (such as the Internet) may originate default routes. The Relay
        redistributes OMNI link MSP(s) into other links/networks, and
        redistributes FNPs via OMNI link Gateway BGP peerings.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="span" title="The AERO Service over OMNI Links">
        <section anchor="aero-reference" title="AERO/OMNI Reference Model">
          <t><xref target="chaining-fig"/> presents the basic OMNI link
          reference model:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="chaining-fig" title="AERO/OMNI Reference Model">
              <artwork><![CDATA[
                      +-----------------+
                      | AERO Gateway G1 |
                      | Nbr: S1, S2, P1 |
                      |(X1->S1; X2->S2) |
                      |      MSP M1     |
                      +--------+--------+
    +--------------+           |            +--------------+
    |  AERO P/S S1 |           |            |  AERO P/S S2 |
    |  Nbr: C1, G1 |           |            |  Nbr: C2, G1 |
    |  default->G1 |           |            |  default->G1 |
    |    X1->C1    |           |            |    X2->C2    |
    +-------+------+           |            +------+-------+
            |       OMNI link  |                   |
    X===+===+==================+===================+===+===X
        |                                              |
  +-----+--------+                            +--------+-----+
  |AERO Client C1|                            |AERO Client C2|
  |    Nbr: S1   |                            |   Nbr: S2    |
  | default->S1  |                            | default->S2  |
  |    MNP X1    |                            |    MNP X2    |
  +------+-------+                            +-----+--------+
         |                                          |
        .-.                                        .-.
     ,-(  _)-.     +-------+     +-------+      ,-(  _)-.
  .-(_  IP   )-.   |IP end |     |IP end |    .-(_  IP   )-.
(__     EUN     )--|system |     |system |--(__     EUN     )
   `-(______)-'    +-------+     +-------+     `-(______)-'
]]></artwork>
            </figure> In this model:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the OMNI link is an overlay network service configured over
              one or more underlay SRT segments which may be managed by
              diverse administrative domains using incompatible protocols
              and/or addressing plans.</t>

              <t>AERO Gateway G1 aggregates Mobility Service Prefix (MSP) M1,
              discovers Mobile Network Prefixes (MNPs) X* and advertises the
              MSP via BGP peerings over secured tunnels to other Gateways in
              the SRT (not shown). Together, the set of all Gateways provide
              the backbone for an SRT spanning tree for the OMNI link.</t>

              <t>AERO Proxy/Servers S1 and S2 configure secured tunnels with
              Gateway G1 and also provide mobility, multilink, multicast and
              default router services for the MNPs of their associated Clients
              C1 and C2. (Proxy/Servers that act as Relays can also advertise
              FNP routes for non-mobile correspondent nodes the same as for
              MNP Clients.)</t>

              <t>AERO Clients C1 and C2 associate with Proxy/Servers S1 and
              S2, respectively. They receive MNP delegations X1 and X2, and
              also act as default routers for their associated physical or
              internal virtual EUNs. (While not shown, AERO Clients can
              also be recursively nested in an arbitrarily-deep chain of
              (Proxy/)Clients between a Proxy/Server and the ultimate IP
              end systems.)</t>

              <t>IP end systems attach to the EUNs served by Clients C1
              and C2, respectively. (Although not depicted here, there
              may be multiple Proxy/Client intermediate systems between
              Clients C1 and C2 and the ultimate IP end systems.)</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>An OMNI link configured over a single underlay network appears as
          a single unified link with a consistent addressing plan; all nodes
          on the link can exchange carrier packets via simple underlay encapsulation
          (i.e., following any necessary NAT traversal) since the underlay is
          connected. In common practice, however, OMNI links are often
          configured over an SRT spanning tree that bridges multiple distinct
          underlay network segments managed under different administrative
          authorities (e.g., as for worldwide aviation service providers such
          as ARINC, SITA, Inmarsat, etc.). Individual underlay networks may
          also be partitioned internally, in which case each internal
          partition appears as a separate segment.</t>

          <t>The addressing plan of each SRT segment is consistent internally
          but will often bear no relation to the addressing plans of other
          segments. Each segment is also likely to be separated from others by
          network security devices (e.g., firewalls, proxys, packet filtering
          gateways, etc.), and disjoint segments often have no common physical
          link connections. Therefore, nodes can only be assured of exchanging
          carrier packets directly with correspondents in the same segment,
          and not with those in other segments. The only means for joining the
          segments therefore is through inter-domain peerings between AERO
          Gateways.</t>

          <t>The OMNI link spans multiple SRT segments using the OAL
          to provide the network layer with a virtual abstraction similar
          to a bridged campus LAN. The OAL is an OMNI interface sublayer
          that inserts a mid-layer IPv6 encapsulation header for
          inter-segment forwarding (i.e., bridging) without decrementing
          the network layer TTL/Hop Limit of the original IP packet.
          An example OMNI link SRT is shown in <xref target="the-span"/>:</t>

          <figure anchor="the-span"
                  title="OMNI Link Segment Routing Topology (SRT)">
            <artwork><![CDATA[    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  .                                                                           .
 .                                                                             .
 .     .-(::::::::)                .-(::::::::)               .-(::::::::)     .
 .  .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+    .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+   .-(::::::::::::)-.  .
 . (::::    FHS    :::)--|G|--(::: Intermediate ::)--|G|--(::::    LHS    :::) .
 .  `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+    `-(::Segments::)-'   +-+   `-(::::::::::::)-'  .
 .     `-(::::::)-'                `-(::::::)-'               `-(::::::)-'     .
 .           |                                                      |          .
 .         +---+                                                  +---+        .
 .         |P/S|                                                  |P/S|        .
 .         +---+                                                  +---+        .
 .           |                                                      |          .
 .     .-(::::::::)                                          .-(::::::::)      .
 .  .-(: First Hop :)-.  +-------+             +-------+   .-(: Last Hop :)-.  .
 . (::::  Access  ::::)--| Source|             | Target|--(::::  Access  ::::) .
 .  `-(:: Network ::)-'  | Client|             | Client|     (:: Network ::)-' .
 .     `-(::::::)-'      +-------+             +-------+      `-(::::::)-'     .
 .                                                                             .
 .                                                                             .
 .         <--  Segment Routing Topology (SRT) Spanned by OMNI Link -->        .
   .                                                                          .
     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>In the Segment Routing Topology, a source Client connects via a first
          hop access network served by a First Hop Segment (FHS) Proxy/Server. The
          FHS Proxy/Server then forwards to an FHS Gateway which connects to an
          arbitrarily complex set of Intermediate Segments. Adjacent intermediate
          Segments are joined by intermediate Gateways (not shown) that serve as
          adaptation layer IPv6 routers, with the final segment connected by a
          Last Hop Segment (LHS) Gateway. The LHS Gateway then forwards to an LHS
          Proxy/Server which in turn connects to the last hop access network where
          the target Client resides.</t>

          <t>Gateway, Proxy/Server and Relay OMNI interfaces are configured
          over both secured tunnels and open INET underlay interfaces within
          their respective SRT segments. Within each segment, Gateways
          configure "hub-and-spokes" BGP peerings with Proxy/Servers and
          Relays as "spokes". Adjacent SRT segments are joined by
          Gateway-to-Gateway peerings to collectively form a spanning tree
          over the entire SRT. The "secured spanning tree" supports
          authentication and integrity for critical control plane messages
          (and any trailing data plane message extensions). The "unsecured
          spanning tree" conveys ordinary carrier packets without security
          codes and that must be examined by destinations according to data
          origin authentication procedures. AERO nodes can employ route
          optimization to cause carrier packets to take more direct paths
          between OMNI link neighbors without having to follow strict
          spanning tree paths.</t>

          <t>The network of networks concept emerged from the earliest
          days of Internetworking <xref target="CERF1"/><xref target=
          "KAHN"/><xref target="POUZIN"/>. The concept has carried
          forward to the present day where the Internet has become
          successful beyond measure. The AERO Multinet service
          concatenates SRT segments through Gateway-to-Gateway peerings
          as first suggested in "Interconnection of Packet switching Networks"
          <xref target="POUZIN"/> and later formalized in the "Catenet
          Model for Internetworking (IEN48)" <xref target="CERF2"/>. The
          catenet model in particular suggests an interconnection of
          independent and diverse packet switching network "segments"
          to form a much larger Internetwork supporting end-to-end
          services.</t>

          <t>The catenet vision faded into obscurity as the Internet
          evolved in the decades that followed, and the adaptation layer
          was omitted from the architecture. As a result, the Internet
          has flourished as a monolithic public routing and addressing
          service interconnecting private domains leading to the rise
          of the middle (including NATs) and a diminished role for
          end-to-end <xref target="RFC3724"/>. The adaptation layer
          manifested by AERO and OMNI now promises to restore the
          best aspects of end-to-end through incremental deployment
          of catenet constructs in the modern Internet.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aero-lla" title="AERO Addressing">
          <t>AERO nodes on OMNI links assign an external Link-Local
          Address (LLA) and link-layer address on the OMNI interface
          as required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>. AERO nodes also
          assign different internal LLA and link-layer addresses to
          support the operation of an adaptation layer internal
          virtual router entity.</t>

          <t>AERO nodes assign a Multilink Local Address (MLA) to the
          OMNI interface per <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-mla"/>. The
          node assigns an MLA to an OMNI interface the same as suggested
          for "sites" in the IPv6 scoped addressing architecture <xref
          target="RFC4007"/>, i.e., as a single adaptation layer address
          assigned to a virtual interface configured over potentially
          multiple underlying interfaces.</t>

          <t>MLAs are considered as adaptation layer addresses in the
          architecture and can appear as OAL encapsulation addresses,
          but nodes may also use them as the Source and Destination
          Addresses of original IP packets exchanged between peers
          within the same OMNI link segment. Each original IP packet
          with MLA addresses is subject to OAL encapsulation with an
          IPv6 header that also uses MLA addresses.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients receive Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)
          delegations during Proxy/Server RS/RA exchanges and
          assign the MNPs to EUN interfaces.</t>

          <t>AERO MSPs, MNPs and Foreign Network Prefixes (FNPs) are
          typically based on GUAs, but in some cases may be based on
          IPv4 private addresses <xref target="RFC1918"/> or IPv6
          ULA-C's <xref target="RFC4193"/>.</t>

          <t>AERO address selection rules are conducted per <xref target=
          "RFC6724"/> as updated by <xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-rfc6724-update"/>.</t>

          <t>See <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> for a full discussion
          of the various unicast, anycast and multicast addresses used by AERO
          nodes on OMNI links.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="scaling" title="AERO Overlay Routing System">
          <t>The AERO routing system comprises a private Border Gateway
          Protocol (BGP) <xref target="RFC4271"/> service coordinated between
          Gateways as interior nodes and Proxy/Servers and Relays as leaf
          nodes of a spanning tree. The service supports OAL packet/fragment
          forwarding at a layer below IP and does not interact with the
          public Internet BGP routing system, but supports redistribution
          of information for other networks connected by Relays.</t>

          <t>In a reference deployment, each Proxy/Server is configured as an
          Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) for a stub Autonomous System
          (AS) using a 32-bit AS Number (ASN) <xref target="RFC4271"/> that is
          unique within the BGP instance, and each Proxy/Server further uses
          eBGP to peer with one or more Gateways but does not peer with other
          Proxy/Servers. Each SRT segment in the OMNI link must include one
          or more Gateways in a "hub" AS, which peer with the Proxy/Servers
          within that segment as "spoke" ASes. All Gateways within the same
          segment are members of the same hub AS, and use iBGP to maintain a
          consistent view of all active routes currently in service. The
          Gateways of different segments peer with one another using eBGP.</t>

          <t>Gateways maintain forwarding table entries for the set of all
          MLAs and FNP/MNP routes that are currently active for the OMNI
          link; Gateways also maintain black-hole routes for the OMNI link
          MSPs so that OAL packets/fragments destined to non-existent
          more-specific routes are flushed from the routing system. In
          this way, Proxy/Servers and Relays have only partial topology
          knowledge (i.e., they only maintain routing information for
          their directly associated Clients and foreign links) and they
          forward all other OAL packets/fragments to Gateways which have
          full topology knowledge.</t>

          <t>MLAs and FNP/MNP routes are dynamically advertised in the AERO
          routing system by Proxy/Servers and Relays that provide anchor
          points for their corresponding prefixes. For example, if three
          Proxy/Servers ('D', 'E' and 'F') service the MNPs
          2001:db8:1000:1::64/, 2001:db8:1000:2::/64 and
          2001:db8:1000:2::/48 then the routing system would include:<list
              style="hanging">
              <t hangText="D:">2001:db8:1000:1::/64</t>

              <t hangText="E:">2001:db8:1000:2::/64</t>

              <t hangText="F:">2001:db8:1000:3::/64</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>A full discussion of the BGP-based routing system used
          by AERO is found in <xref target="I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="srt" title="Segment Routing Topologies (SRTs)">
          <t>The distinct GUA prefixes in an OMNI link domain identify
          distinct Segment Routing Topologies (SRTs). Each SRT is a
          mutually-exclusive OMNI link overlay instance using a distinct set
          of GUAs, and emulates a bridged campus LAN service for the OMNI
          link. In some cases (e.g., when redundant topologies are needed for
          fault tolerance and reliability) it may be beneficial to deploy
          multiple SRTs that act as independent overlay instances. A
          communication failure in one instance therefore will not affect
          communications in other instances.</t>

          <t>Each SRT is identified by a distinct MSP prefix and assigns
          an IPv6 SRA address used for OMNI interface determination in
          Safety-Based Multilink (SBM) as discussed in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. Each OMNI interface further
          applies Performance-Based Multilink (PBM) internally.</t>

          <t>The Gateways and Proxy/Servers of each independent SRT engage in
          BGP peerings to form a spanning tree with the Gateways in non-leaf
          nodes and the Proxy/Servers in leaf nodes. The spanning tree is
          configured over both secured and unsecured underlay network paths.
          The secured spanning tree is used to convey secured control messages
          (and sometimes data message extensions) between Proxy/Servers and
          Gateways, while the unsecured spanning tree forwards bulk data
          messages and/or unsecured control messages.</t>

          <t>Each SRT segment is identified by a unique MSP prefix used by
          all Proxy/Servers and Gateways in the segment. Each AERO node must
          therefore discover an SRT prefix that correspondents can use to
          determine the correct segment, and must publish the SRT prefix in
          control messages.</t>

          <t>Note: The distinct MSP prefixes in an OMNI link domain can be
          carried either in a common BGP routing protocol instance for all
          OMNI links or in distinct BGP routing protocol instances for
          different OMNI links. In some SBM environments, such separation may
          be necessary to ensure that distinct OMNI links do not include any
          common infrastructure elements as single points of failure. In other
          environments, carrying the MSPs of multiple OMNI links within a
          common routing system may be acceptable.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="interface" title="OMNI Interface Characteristics">
        <t>OMNI interfaces are virtual interfaces configured over one or more
        underlay interfaces classified as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>(M)ANET interfaces connect to a protected and secured ANET or
            an open MANET that connects to an INET via Proxy/Servers. The
            (M)ANET interface may be either on the same L2 link segment as a
            Proxy/Server, or separated from a Proxy/Server by multiple IP hops.
            (Note that NATs may appear internally within a (M)ANET and may
            require NAT traversal on the path to the Proxy/Server the same
            as for the INET case.) MANETs are special cases of ANETs in
            which adaptation layer multihop forwarding may be necessary,
            and protected secured underlay links cannot always be assumed.</t>

            <t>INET interfaces connect to an INET either natively or through
            one or several IPv4 Network Address Translators (NATs). Native
            INET interfaces have global IP addresses that are reachable from
            correspondent on the same INET. NATed INET interfaces typically
            have private IP addresses and connect to a private network behind
            one or more NATs with the outermost NAT providing INET access.</t>

            <t>EUN interfaces connect a Client's downstream-attached
            networks, where the Client provides forwarding services for EUN
            end system communications to remote peers. An EUN can be as
            simple as a small IoT sub-network that travels with a mobile Client
            to as complex as a large private enterprise network that the
            Client connects to a larger ANET or INET.</t>

            <t>VPN interfaces use security encapsulations (e.g. IPsec tunnels)
            over underlay networks to connect Clients, Proxy/Servers and/or
            Gateways. VPN interfaces provide security services at lower layers
            of the architecture the same as for Direct point-to-point
            interfaces.</t>

            <t>Direct point-to-point interfaces securely connect Clients,
            Proxy/Servers and/or Gateways over physical or virtual media that
            does not transit any open Internetwork paths. Examples include a
            line-of-sight link between a remote pilot and an unmanned aircraft,
            a fiberoptic link between Gateways, etc.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces use OAL encapsulation and fragmentation as
        discussed in <xref target="encaps-and-route"/>. OMNI interfaces use underlay
        encapsulation (see: <xref target="encaps-and-route"/>) to exchange
        carrier packets with OMNI link neighbors over INET interfaces and
        IPsec tunnels as well as over ANET interfaces for which the Client
        and neighbor may be multiple IP hops away. OMNI interfaces use link
        layer encapsulation only (i.e., and no other underlay encapsulations)
        over Direct underlay interfaces or (M)ANET interfaces when the Client
        and neighbor are known to be on the same underlay link.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces maintain an adaptation layer view of the neighbor
        cache for tracking per-neighbor state. IP nodes that configure OMNI
        interfaces use ND messages including Router Solicitation (RS), Router
        Advertisement (RA), Neighbor Solicitation (NS), Neighbor Advertisement
        (NA), unsolicited Neighbor Advertisement (uNA) and Redirect to manage
        both the network and adaptation layer views of the neighbor cache.
        The adaptation layer further uses a multilink forwarding message set
        termed Multilink Initiate (MI), Multilink Respond (MR) and Multilink
        Control (MC) which use the same ICMPv6 Type value as the standard NS
        message but with different Code values. OMNI neighbors invoke per-flow
        OAL Identification window synchronization in their ND message exchanges
        to enable Source Address verification, header compression and robust
        fragmentation/reassembly.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces include OMNI options formatted as specified in
        <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> in the control messages they
        forward. The OMNI option includes parameters for coordinating the
        OMNI interface's underlay interfaces.</t>

        <t>A Client's OMNI interface may be configured over multiple *NET
        underlay interfaces. For example, common mobile handheld devices have
        both wireless local area network ("WLAN") and cellular wireless links.
        These links are often used "one at a time" with low-cost WLAN
        preferred and highly-available cellular wireless as a standby, but a
        simultaneous-use capability could provide benefits. In a more complex
        example, aircraft frequently have many wireless data link types (e.g.
        satellite-based, cellular, terrestrial, air-to-air directional, etc.)
        with diverse performance and cost properties.</t>

        <t>If a Client's multiple *NET underlay interfaces are used
        "one at a time" (i.e., all other interfaces are in standby mode while
        one interface is active), then successive control messages all include
        OMNI option Interface Attributes, Traffic Selector and/or Neighbor
        Synchronization sub-options with the same underlay interface ifIndex.
        In that case, the Client would appear to have a single underlay
        interface but with a dynamically changing underlay address.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple active *NET underlay interfaces,
        then from the perspective of IPv6 ND it would appear to have multiple
        underlay addresses. In that case, control message OMNI options MAY
        include multiple Interface Attribute sub-options; each with a different
        underlay interface ifIndex.</t>

        <t>Proxy/Servers on the open Internet include only a single INET
        underlay interface. INET Clients therefore discover only the UNX
        information for the Proxy/Server's INET interface. Proxy/Servers on a
        (M)ANET/INET boundary include both (M)ANET and INET underlay interfaces.
        (M)ANET Clients therefore must discover both the (M)ANET and INET
        UNX information for their Proxy/Servers.</t>

        <t>Gateway and Proxy/Server OMNI interface connections to the SRT
        are configured over both secured IPsec tunnels for carrying IPv6
        ND and BGP protocol control plane messages and open INET paths
        for carrying unsecured data plane messages. The OMNI interface
        configures an MLA and acts as an OAL source to encapsulate original
        IP packets, then fragments the resulting OAL packets, performs
        underlay encapsulation and sends the resulting carrier packets
        over the secured or unsecured underlay paths. Note that Gateway and
        Proxy/Server end-to-end transport protocol sessions used by the BGP
        run directly over the OMNI interface and use MLA IPv6 Source and
        Destination Addresses.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroinit" title="OMNI Interface Initialization">
        <t>AERO Proxy/Servers and Clients configure OMNI interfaces as
        their point of attachment to the OMNI link. AERO nodes assign
        the MSPs for the link to their OMNI interfaces (i.e., as a
        "route-to-interface") to ensure that original IP packets with
        Destination Addresses covered by an MNP not explicitly associated
        with another interface are directed to an OMNI interface where
        address resolution is applied.</t>

        <t>OMNI interface initialization procedures for Gateways, Proxy/Servers
        and Clients are discussed in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="rinit" title="AERO Gateway Behavior">
          <t>AERO Gateways configure an OMNI interface and assign an
          MLA. Gateways configure underlay interface secured tunnels
          with Proxy/Servers in the same SRT segment and other Gateways
          in the same (or an adjacent) SRT segment. Gateways then engage
          in an adaptation layer BGP routing protocol session with
          neighbors over the secured spanning tree (see: <xref
          target="scaling"/>).</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sinit" title="AERO Proxy/Server and Relay Behavior">
          <t>When a Proxy/Server enables an OMNI interface, it assigns both
          an LLA and MLA. The Proxy/Server also configures secured
          underlay interface tunnels and engages in adaptation layer BGP
          routing protocol sessions over the OMNI interface with one or
          more neighboring Gateways.</t>

          <t>The OMNI interface provides a single interface abstraction to the
          network layer, but internally serves as an NBMA nexus for exchanging
          carrier packets with other OMNI nodes over underlay interfaces and/or
          secured tunnels. The Proxy/Server further configures a service to
          facilitate control message exchanges with AERO Clients and manages
          per-Client Neighbor Cache Entries (NCEs) and IP forwarding table
          entries based on control message exchanges.</t>

          <t>Relays are simply Proxy/Servers that run a dynamic routing
          protocol to redistribute routes between the OMNI interface and
          foreign networks/links (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). The Relay
          provisions MNPs and advertises the MSP(s) for the OMNI link over
          its foreign network interface attachments. The Relay further
          provides an OMNI link attachment point for FNP-based topologies.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cinit" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>When a Client enables an OMNI interface, it assigns
          different administratively assigned internal and external
          LLAs and link-layer addresses as well as a globally unique
          MLA to the OMNI interface. The adaptation layer within the
          interface then issues an internally-generated RA message to the
          network layer to establish itself as a (virtual) default router
          for the OMNI link. The network layer then issues a DHCPv6 Prefix
          Delegation (PD) request per <xref target="RFC9762"/>. When it receives
          the PD request (or after a brief timeout), the adaptation layer
          then sends OMNI-encapsulated RS messages to FHS Proxy/Servers
          which optionally coordinate with a MAP Proxy/Server that
          delegates one or more MNPs. The MAP/FHS Proxy/Servers then
          return an RA message to the Client which may pass through
          one or more NATs in the path.</t>

          <t>When the Client sends initial RS messages, it will discover
          MNPs in the corresponding RAs that it receives from FHS
          Proxy/Servers and can then associate them with the OMNI
          interface. If the Client is operating outside the context of
          AERO infrastructure, however, it may continue using MLAs over
          its underlay or OMNI interfaces for peer-to-peer communications
          within the local *NET.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroncache"
               title="OMNI Interface Neighbor Cache Maintenance">
        <t>Each Client and Proxy/Server OMNI interface maintains a
        network layer conceptual Neighbor and Destination Cache per
        <xref target="RFC1256"/><xref target="RFC4861"/> the same as
        for any IP interface. The OMNI interface network layer neighbor
        cache (NLNC) is maintained through static and/or dynamic
        neighbor cache entry (NLNCE) configurations. The IP layer
        initiates and terminates IP ND messaging exchanges to manage
        the network layer view of the neighbor cache.</t>

        <t>Each OMNI interface also maintains an internal adaptation
        layer view of the neighbor cache (ALNC) that includes an entry
        (ALNCE) for each of its active OAL neighbors. ALNCE state is
        managed according to neighbor cache entry states per Section
        7.3.2 of <xref target="RFC4861"/> the same as the NLNC. The
        adaptation layer indexes the ALNC by the neighbor's MLA and
        includes routing information for any of the neighbor's FNPs/MNPs. 
        Control messages that update the ALNC include an OMNI option
        with zero or more sub-options.</t>

        <t>Each OMNI interface ALNCE is indexed by the IPv6 MLA of
        a neighbor found in an ND message and determines the context
        for Identification verification. Clients and Proxy/Servers
        maintain NCEs through dynamic RS/RA message exchanges, and
        also maintain NCEs for any active correspondent peers through
        dynamic IPv6 NS/NA message exchanges.</t>

        <t>Clients establish NCEs and establish adaptation layer service
        profiles for their associated FHS and MAP Proxy/Servers through
        the exchange of RS/RA messages as specified in <xref target=
        "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. When a Client and Proxy/Server
        establish NCEs, they set a ReachableTime timer to
        REACHABLE_TIME seconds.</t>

        <t>Both the Client and its MAP Proxy/Server have full knowledge
        of the Client's current underlay Interface Attributes and Traffic
        Selectors, while FHS Proxy/Servers acting in "proxy" mode have
        knowledge of only the individual Client underlay interfaces
        they service.</t>

        <t>When an Address Resolution Source (ARS) sends an NS(AR) message
        toward an Address Resolution Target (ART) Client/Relay, the OMNI link
        routing system directs the NS(AR) to a MAP Proxy/Server for the ART.
        The MAP then either acts as an Address Resolution Responder (ARR) on
        behalf of the ART or forwards the NS(AR) to the ART which acts as an
        ARR on its own behalf. The ARR returns an NA(AR) response to the ARS,
        which creates or updates NCE state for the ART while caching network
        layer and underlay addressing information. The ARS then (re)sets
        ReachableTime for the NCE to REACHABLE_TIME seconds and performs
        multilink forwarding ND message exchanges over specific underlay
        interface pairs to determine paths for sending carrier packets
        directly to the ART. The ARS otherwise decrements ReachableTime
        while no further solicited ND messages arrive.</t>

        <t>Proxy/Servers add an additional state DEPARTED to the list of NCE
        states found in Section 7.3.2 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>. When a
        Client terminates its association, the Proxy/Server OMNI interface
        sets a DepartTime variable for the NCE to DEPART_TIME seconds.
        DepartTime is decremented unless a new control message causes the
        state to return to REACHABLE. While a NCE is in the DEPARTED state,
        the Proxy/Server forwards OAL packets/fragments destined to the
        target Client to the Client's new FHS/MAP Proxy/Server instead.</t>

        <t> It is RECOMMENDED that REACHABLE_TIME be set to the default constant
        value 30 seconds as specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>. It is
        RECOMMENDED that DEPART_TIME be set to the default constant value 10
        seconds to accept any carrier packets that may be in flight. When
        ReachableTime or DepartTime decrement to 0, the NCE is deleted.</t>

        <t>AERO nodes also use the value MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT to limit the
        number of NS(NUD) messages sent when a correspondent may have gone
        unreachable, the value MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS to limit the number
        of RS messages sent without receiving an RA and the value
        MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT to limit the number of solicited
        IPv6 ND advertisements that can be sent based on a single event.
        It is RECOMMENDED that MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT, MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS
        and MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT be set to 3 the same as specified
        in <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>Different values for the above constants MAY be administratively
        set; however, if different values are chosen, all nodes on the link
        MUST consistently configure the same values.</t>

        <section anchor="STLLAO" title="AERO/OMNI Control Plane Messages">
          <t>OMNI interfaces use IPv6 ND messages as the secured control plane
          messaging service for all adaptation layer neighbor coordination
          exchanges. IPv6 ND messages sent over OMNI interfaces include
          or omit the Source/Target Link Layer Address Option (S/TLLAO)
          as discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. OMNI
          interfaces forward IPv6 ND messages to and from the IP layer
          the same as for standard IPv6 ND, but also append/remove a
          trailing OMNI pseudo-option during encapsulation/decapsulation
          <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

          <t>For each IPv6 ND message, the OMNI interface includes a trailing
          OMNI option following any other ND message options then completely
          populates all sub-option information. If the OMNI interface includes
          an authentication sub-option, it calculates and includes a digital
          signature per the OMNI specification. OMNI interfaces verify integrity
          and authenticity of each message received, and process the message
          further only following successful verification.</t>

          <t>OMNI options include per-neighbor information that provides
          multilink forwarding, address resolution and traffic selector
          information for the neighbor's underlay interfaces. This information
          is stored in both the neighbor cache and AERO Flow Information
          Base (AFIB) as basis for the forwarding algorithm specified in <xref
          target="aeroalg"/>. The information is cumulative and reflects the
          union of the OMNI information from the most recent IPv6 ND messages
          received from the neighbor.</t>

          <t>AERO/OMNI Clients send RS messages to cause Proxy/Servers to
          respond with RA messages that include autoconfiguration and
          addressing parameters as specified in <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

          <t>AERO nodes use NS/NA messages as follows:<list style="symbols">
              <t>NS/NA(AR) messages are used for address resolution. When
              an ARS prepares an NS(AR) it sets the Source Address to the
              IPv6 MLA assigned to the OMNI interface. The ARS also sets the
              Target Address to the IP Destination Address of the invoking packet
              and sets the Destination Address to the solicited-node multicast
              address corresponding to the (unicast) Target Address. After
              the ARS sends the NS(AR), an ARR with addressing information
              for the ART returns a unicast NA(AR) that contains current,
              consistent and authentic Target Address resolution
              information. The ARR sets the NA(AR) Source Address to an
              IPv6 MLA assigned to the ART's OMNI interface, sets the
              Destination Address to the Source Address of the NS(AR)
              and sets the Target Address to the Target Address of
              the NS(AR). NS/NA(AR) messages must be secured.</t>

              <t>Other NS/NA message exchanges are used to determine
              target reachability (NS/NA(NUD)). These messages include
              the same addresses as for NS/NA(AR) with the exception
              that the source sets the NS(NUD) Destination and Target
              Address to the same unicast address. The target then
              returns a responsive NA(NUD). NS/NA(NUD) messages used
              to establish or update NCE state must be secured.</t>

              <t>Unsolicited NA messages (uNAs) are used to update a neighbor's
              cache when an underlay interface address changes due to a
              mobility event. Nodes also use uNAs during Route Optimization.</t>

              <t>NS/NA(DAD) messages are not used in AERO, since Duplicate
              Address Detection is not required on OMNI links. When the
              network layer issues an NS(DAD) message over an OMNI interface,
              the interface simply discards the message.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>AERO also introduces three IPv6 ND "pseudo-messages" for
          Multilink Forwarding. These messages use the same Type value
          and message formatting specifications as the standard NS messages
          but include different Code values. The messages are:<list style=
          "symbols">
              <t>Multilink Initiate (MI) (Type 135; Code TBD1) - sent
              as an adaptation layer control message used to initiate state
              needed to support multilink forwarding. Recipients of MI
              messages respond by returning a Multilink
              Respond (MR).</t>

              <t>Multilink Respond (MR) (Type 135; Code TBD2) - an
              adaptation layer control message multilink forwarding response
              to an MI message. Recipients of MR messages optionally return
              a Multilink Control (MC).</t>

              <t>Multilink Control (MC) (Type 135; Code TBD3) - a muti-purpose
              secured standalone adaptation layer control message used to
              confirm a previous MI/MR exchange, establish multilink
              forwarding state, forward error/informational messages or
              transport passenger packets.</t>
            </list></t>
          <t>Unlike standard IPv6 ND messages, the pseudo message set (MI/MR/MC)
          is used internally within the adaptation layer only and the messages
          are never exposed to the network layer. (Any MI/MR/MC messages
          accidentally exposed to the network layer would be silently
          discarded due to NA message validation rules per <xref target=
          "RFC4861"/> since they include non-zero Code values.)</t>

          <t>IPv6 ND pseudo messages MI and MC set the Source Address
          to the FNP/MNP/MLA Source Address of the invoking packet, set the
          Destination Address to the MLA of the LHS Proxy/Server and set
          the Target Address to the FNP/MNP/MLA Destination Address of the
          invoking packet.</t>

          <t>IPv6 ND pseudo message MR sets the Source Address to
          the Destination Address of the invoking packet, sets the
          Destination Address to the MLA of the FHS Proxy/Server and
          sets the Target Address to the Source Address of the
          invoking packet.</t>

          <t>IPv6 ND (pseudo) messages sent on OMNI links that must be
          examined by transit OAL intermediate systems on the path require
          a special codepoint for control message recognition. The OAL
          source therefore sets the DSCP field in the IPv6 OAL encapsulation
          header of such messages to the special value '111111' (see: <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>). The control planes of transit
          OAL intermediate systems can then intercept and process these
          messages before forwarding them to the next OAL hop.</t>

          <t>IPv6 ND (pseudo) messages also include an SRH
          extension to the OAL IPv6 header as discussed in <xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. The pseudo messages
          MI/MR/MC are distinguished from ordinary NS messages by
          the message Code field value alone, and must not elicit
          an NA response.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rs-ra-win"
                 title="OMNI Neighbor Window Synchronization">
          <t>In secured environments (e.g., between secured spanning tree
          neighbors, between neighbors on the same secured ANET, etc.), OMNI
          interface neighbors can exchange AERO control messages without
          including Identification values. In environments where spoofing
          is considered a threat, OMNI interface neighbors instead invoke
          Identification window synchronization by including OMNI Neighbor
          Synchronization sub-options in control message exchanges to maintain
          send/receive window state in their respective neighbor caches
          as well as in AFIB entries of all OAL intermediate nodes in
          the forward and reverse paths.</t>

          <t>In common arrangements, OAL Identification window synchronization
          is necessary for Client to Client, Client to Proxy/Server or
          Proxy/Server to Proxy/Server message exchanges conducted over unsecured
          Internetwork paths. Conversely, Proxy/Server to Proxy/Server, Proxy/Server
          to Gateway and Gateway to Gateway message exchanges carried over the
          secured spanning tree do not require window synchronization.</t>

          <t>OAL end system and intermediate nodes verify Identification
          values of OAL packets that traverse the unsecured spanning tree
          according to their populated AFIB state. This allows each OAL
          node to exclude spurious packets injected into the OMNI link
          from an off-path adversary.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="encaps-and-route"
               title="OMNI Interface Encapsulation and Fragmentation">
        <t>When the network layer forwards an original IP packet into
        an OMNI interface, the interface locates a NLNCE corresponding
        to the destination (which may only match "default"). The OMNI
        interface then invokes the OAL as discussed in <xref target=
        "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> which removes the virtual Ethernet
        header and encapsulates the packet in an IPv6 header to form
        an OAL packet according to ALNCE information.</t>

        <t>Following encapsulation, the OAL source then fragments the OAL
        packet while including an identical Identification value for each
        fragment that must be within the window for the flow over the
        interface pair selected for the neighbor. The OAL source includes
        any necessary OAL IPv6 extension headers including an identical
        SRH with each fragment. The OAL source can instead invoke OAL
        header compression by replacing the full OAL IPv6 header, SRH
        and Extended Fragment Header with an OAL Compressed Header (OCH)
        that includes an AERO Flow Vector Index (AFVI) (see: <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>).</t>

        <t>For messages that will traverse unsecured paths, the OAL
        source finally performs underlay encapsulation on each resulting OAL
        fragment to form a carrier packet, with Source Address set to
        its own address (e.g., 192.0.2.100) and Destination Address set
        to the address of the next hop OAL intermediate system or
        destination (e.g., 192.0.2.1). The carrier packet encapsulation
        format in the above example is shown in <xref target="span-encaps"/>:
        <figure anchor="span-encaps" title="Carrier Packet Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Underlay Headers       |
     ~       src = 192.0.2.100       ~
     |        dst = 192.0.2.1        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~Underlay IPv6 Extension Headers~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        OAL IPv6 Header        |
     ~       Source Address (1)      ~
     |    Destination Address (2)    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~   OAL IPv6 Extension Headers  ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |       Original IP Header      |
     ~     (first-fragment only)     ~
     ~       Source Address (3)      ~
     |    Destination Address (4)    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+       
     |                               |
     ~                               ~
     ~ Original Packet Body/Fragment ~
     ~                               ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In this format, the OAL source encapsulates the original IP header
        and packet body/fragment in an OAL IPv6 header. The OAL source
        then adds an SRH plus Extended Fragment Header as OAL IPv6 header
        extensions for each fragment and prepends underlay headers
        prepared as discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.
        The OAL source sends each such carrier packet into the SRT unsecured
        spanning tree, where they may be forwarded over multiple OAL
        intermediate systems until they arrive at the OAL destination.
        These carrier packets may themselves be subject to fragmentation
        and reassembly along the concatenated underlay network path
        segments.</t>

        <t>The OMNI link control plane service distributes Client MNP
        prefix information that may change occasionally due to regional
        node mobility, as well as more static information for Relay FNPs
        that rarely change. OMNI link Gateways and Proxy/Servers use
        the information to establish and maintain a forwarding plane
        spanning tree that connects all nodes on the link. The spanning
        tree supports a virtual bridging service according to link
        layer (instead of network layer) information, but may often
        include longer paths than necessary.</t>

        <t>Each OMNI interface therefore also includes an AERO Flow
        Information Base (AFIB) that caches AERO Flow Vectors (AFVs)
        which can provide both carrier packet Identification context and more
        direct forwarding "shortcuts" that avoid strict spanning tree paths.
        As a result, the spanning tree is always available but OMNI interfaces
        can often use the AFIB entries established through route optimization
        to greatly improve performance and reduce load on critical
        infrastructure elements.</t>

        <t>For OAL packets/fragments undergoing underlay re-encapsulation at an
        OAL intermediate system, the OMNI interface performs underlay decapsulation
        followed by Identification verification and OAL reassembly only if the
        OAL packet/fragment is addressed to itself. The OMNI interface then
        decrements the OAL IPv6 header Hop Limit and discards the packet/fragment
        if the Hop Limit reaches 0. Otherwise, the OMNI interface updates the
        OAL addresses if necessary, includes an appropriate Identification,
        performs OAL fragmentation then for each OAL fragment performs underlay
        encapsulation to produce a carrier packet appropriate for next
        segment forwarding.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerodecaps" title="OMNI Interface Decapsulation">
        <t>When an OAL node receives OAL packets/fragments addressed to
        another node, it discards the previous hop underlay headers and
        includes new underlay headers appropriate for the next hop in
        the forwarding path to the OAL destination. The node then sends
        these new carrier packets into the next hop underlay interface.</t>

        <t>When an OAL node receives OAL packets/fragments addressed
        to itself, it performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the
        Identification, then performs OAL reassembly/decapsulation to
        obtain the original OAL packet or composite packet (see: <xref
        target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>). Next, if the enclosed
        original IP packet(s) are addressed either to itself or to
        a destination reached via an interface other than the OMNI
        interface, the OAL node replaces the OAL encapsulation IPv6
        header with a virtual Ethernet header and forwards the
        original IP packet(s) to the network layer.</t>

        <t>If the original IP packet(s) are destined to another node
        reached by the OMNI interface, the OAL node instead decrements
        the Hop Limit, then performs underlay encapsulation and forwards
        these new carrier packets into an underlay interface for
        the next segment.</t>

        <t>Further OMNI link decapsulation details are specified in
        <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. Further OMNI link
        forwarding procedures are specified in <xref target="aeroalg"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroauth"
               title="OMNI Interface Data Origin Authentication">
        <t>AERO nodes employ simple data origin authentication procedures. In
        particular:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Gateways and Proxy/Servers accept carrier packets received
            from the secured spanning tree.</t>

            <t>AERO Proxy/Servers and Clients accept carrier packets and
            original IP packets that originate from within the same
            secured ANET.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients and Relays accept original IP packets from
            downstream network correspondents based on ingress filtering.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients, Relays, Proxy/Servers and Gateways verify
            carrier packet underlay encapsulation addresses according to
            <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

            <t>OAL end systems and intermediate systems forward/accept OAL
            packets/fragments with Identification values within the current
            window for the OAL source neighbor for a specific underlay
            interface pair and drop any packets with out-of-window
            Identification values.</t>
          </list>AERO nodes silently drop any packets that do not
        satisfy the above data origin authentication procedures. Further
        security considerations are discussed in <xref target="secure"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromtu" title="OMNI Interface MTU">
        <t>The OMNI interface observes the link nature of tunnels, including
        the Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU), Effective MTU to Receive (EMTU_R)
        and the role of fragmentation and reassembly <xref
        target="I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"/>. The OMNI interface employs the
        OAL to accommodate multiple underlay links with diverse MTUs. OMNI
        interface packet sizing considerations are specified in <xref target=
        "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>, where the OMNI interface MTU can
        essentially be considered "unlimited".</t>

        <t>When the network layer presents an original IP packet to
        the OMNI interface, the OAL source encapsulates and fragments the
        packet if necessary. When the network layer presents the OMNI
        interface with multiple original IP packets  addressed to the
        same IPv6 flow, the OAL source can concatenate them as a single OAL
        composite packet as discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>
        before applying fragmentation. The OAL source then submits each OAL
        fragment for underlay encapsulation and transmission as a carrier
        packet via an underlay interface connected to either a physical
        link (e.g., Ethernet, WiFi, Cellular, etc.) or a virtual link
        such as an Internet or higher-layer tunnel.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroalg" title="OMNI Interface Forwarding Algorithm">
        <t>Original IP packets enter a node's OMNI interface either
        from the network layer (i.e., from a local application or the IP
        forwarding system) while carrier packets enter from the underlay
        (i.e., from an OMNI interface neighbor). All original IP
        packets and carrier packets entering a node's OMNI interface
        first undergo data origin authentication as discussed in <xref
        target="aeroauth"/>. Those that satisfy data origin authentication
        are processed further, while all others are dropped silently.</t>

        <t>Original IP packets that enter the OMNI interface from the
        network layer are forwarded to an OMNI interface neighbor using OAL
        encapsulation and fragmentation to produce carrier packets for
        transmission over underlay interfaces. (If forwarding state indicates
        that the original IP packet should instead be forwarded back
        to the network layer, the packet is dropped to avoid looping).
        Carrier packets that enter the OMNI interface from the underlay
        are either re-encapsulated and re-admitted into the underlay, or
        reassembled and forwarded to the network layer where they are subject
        to either local delivery or IP forwarding.</t>

        <t>When the network layer of a router forwards an original IP
        packet into the OMNI interface, it decrements the TTL/Hop
        Limit following standard IP router conventions. Once inside the
        OMNI interface, however, the OAL does not decrement the original
        IP packet TTL/Hop Limit further since its adaptation layer
        forwarding actions occur below the network layer. The original
        IP packet's TTL/Hop Limit will therefore be the same when
        it exits the destination OMNI interface as when it first
        entered the source OMNI interface.</t>

        <t>When an OAL intermediate system receives a carrier packet,
        it performs underlay decapsulation to obtain the enclosed OAL
        packet/fragment. When the intermediate system forwards an OAL
        packet/fragment not addressed to itself (or one addressed to
        itself but that also includes an SRH with Segments Left greater
        than 0), it decrements the OAL Hop Limit without decrementing
        the network layer IP TTL/Hop Limit. If decrementing would cause
        the OAL Hop Limit to become 0, the OAL intermediate system drops
        the OAL packet/fragment. This ensures that original IP
        packet(s) cannot enter an endless loop.</t>

        <t>OMNI interfaces may have multiple underlay interfaces and/or
        NCEs for neighbors with multiple underlay interfaces (see: <xref
        target="interface"/>). The OAL uses Interface Attributes and/or
        Traffic Selectors to select an outbound underlay interface for
        each OAL packet and also to select underlay network
        Destination Addresses based on the neighbor's target underlay
        interfaces. AERO implementations SHOULD permit network management
        to dynamically adjust Traffic Selector values at runtime.</t>

        <t>If an OAL packet/fragment matches the Interface Attributes and/or
        Traffic Selectors of multiple outgoing interfaces and/or neighbor
        interfaces, the OMNI interface replicates the packet and sends a
        separate copy via each of the (outgoing / neighbor) interface pairs;
        otherwise, it sends a single copy via an interface with the best
        matching attributes/selectors. (While not strictly required, the
        likelihood of successful reassembly is often greatest when the
        OMNI interface sends all fragments of the same fragmented OAL
        packet/fragment consecutively over the same underlay interface
        pair to avoid complicating factors such as delay variance and
        reordering.) AERO nodes keep track of which underlay interfaces
        are currently "reachable" or "unreachable", and use only
        "reachable" interfaces for forwarding purposes.</t>

        <t>In addition to standard forwarding based on Interface Attributes
        and/or Traffic Selectors, nodes may employ a policy engine that would
        provide further guidance to the forwarding algorithm. For example the
        policy engine may suggest a load balancing profile over multiple underlay
        interface pairs, with portions of a traffic flow spread between multiple
        paths according to Equal Cost MultiPath or Link Aggregation Groups (LAGs)
        <xref target="RFC6438"/> (note that Interface Attributes include an
        underlay interface group identifier). Other policies may suggest the
        use of paths with the least cost, best performance, etc. This document
        therefore specifies mechanisms without mandating any particular policies.</t>

        <t>All Clients, Proxy/Servers and Gateways serve as OAL intermediate
        nodes for the purpose of forwarding OAL packets/fragments that include
        an SRH or OCH with non-zero AFVI over the unsecured spanning tree based
        on AFIB entries. When an OAL intermediate node forwards an OAL
        packet/fragment with an underlay Source Address and AFVI that matches
        an AFV, the node first verifies that the Identification is in sequence.
        The OAL intermediate node then rewrites the packet's AFVI with a value
        that will be recognized by the next OAL hop and forwards the packet.
        (For OAL packets/fragments with uncompressed headers and with AFVI
        set to 0, the OAL intermediate node instead forwards based on matching
        the OAL IPv6 Destination Address with a standard IPv6 forwarding table
        entry after applying SRH processing.) The chain of OAL source,
        intermediate and destination nodes may therefore traverse many
        (Proxy/)Clients, Proxy/Servers and Gateways on the path.</t>

        <t>The following sections discuss the OMNI interface-specific
        forwarding algorithms for Clients, Proxy/Servers and Gateways.
        In the following discussion, an original IP packet's
        Destination Address is said to "match" if it is the same as a
        cached address, or if it is covered by a cached FNP/MNP.</t>

        <section anchor="cforw" title="Client Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>When the network layer presents an original IP packet to a
          Client's OMNI interface (i.e., following next-hop determination),
          the Client forwards the packet to the OMNI interface virtual
          router function if the Destination is off-link. The virtual
          router then either forwards the packet to a Proxy/Server or
          initiates adaptation layer address resolution and forwards
          the packet according to ALNCE information. If the
          Destination is on-link, the Client instead invokes network
          layer address resolution if there is no NLNCE. The Client
          holds the packet in a queue until address resolution completes,
          then admits the packet into the OMNI interface. The OMNI
          interface then searches for an ALNCE that matches the
          Destination. If there is a matching ALNCE for a neighbor
          reached via a *NET interface (i.e., an upstream interface),
          the Client selects one or more "reachable" neighbor interfaces
          in the entry for forwarding purposes.</t>

          <t>When a carrier packet enters a Client's OMNI interface
          from the underlay, the Client performs underlay decapsulation if
          necessary to obtain the OAL packet/fragment then examines the OAL
          Destination Address (i.e., after locating the correct AFV if the
          OAL packet header is OCH). If the OAL Destination Address matches
          one of the Client's addresses and the packet includes an SRH with
          Segments Left greater than 0, the Client rewrites the OAL Destination
          Address and forwards the packet to the peer Client or Proxy/Server
          indicated by the next hop SRH address. Otherwise, the Client (acting
          as an OAL destination) verifies that the Identification is in-window
          for the matching AFV, then reassembles/decapsulates as necessary and
          delivers the original IP packet to the network layer. If the OAL
          Destination Address does not match, the Client drops the original
          IP packet and MAY return a network layer ICMP Destination
          Unreachable message subject to rate limiting (see: <xref
          target="aeroerr"/>).</t>

          <t>Note: The forwarding table entries established in peer Clients
          are based on MLAs which also appear as OAL Source or Destination
          Addresses within (M)ANETs. The original IP packet Source and
          Destination Addresses instead use MNP or MLA addresses.</t>

          <t>Note: Clients within MANETs support Client-to-Client multihop
          forwarding when necessary to reach destinations or FHS Proxy/Servers
          that may be multiple OAL hops away. In this way, forwarding Clients
          act as OAL intermediate nodes and forward using OCH compression
          based on AFV state that is indexed by the AFVIs included in each
          OAL packet/fragment.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pforw"
                 title="Proxy/Server and Relay Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>When the network layer admits an original IP packet into
          a Proxy/Server's OMNI interface, the OAL drops the packet
          to avoid looping if forwarding state indicates that it should be
          forwarded back to the network layer. Otherwise, the OAL examines the
          IP Destination Address to determine if it matches the MLA of a
          neighboring Gateway found in the OMNI interface's network layer
          neighbor cache. If so, the Proxy/Server performs OAL encapsulation
          and fragmentation then performs underlay encapsulation and
          forwards the resulting carrier packet to the Gateway over a secured
          link (e.g., an IPsec tunnel, Direct link, etc.) to support control
          plane functions such as the operation of the BGP routing protocol.
          If the IP Destination Address matches an FNP/MNP associated with
          a (foreign) Proxy/Server or Client, the (local) Proxy/Server instead
          assumes the Relay role and forwards the original IP packet in the
          same manner as for Client forwarding while including an SRH.
          Specifically, if there is a matching NCE the Proxy/Server selects
          one or more "reachable" neighbor interfaces in the entry for
          forwarding purposes; otherwise, the Proxy/Server performs OAL
          encapsulation/fragmentation followed by underlay encapsulation
          and forwards the resulting carrier packets while invoking address
          resolution and multilink forwarding procedures per <xref
          target="predirect"/>.</t>

          <t>When the Proxy/Server receives carrier packets on
          underlay interfaces that contain OAL packets/fragments with both
          a Source and Destination OAL Address that correspond to the same
          Client's MLA, the Proxy/Server drops the carrier packets regardless
          of their OMNI link point of origin. The Proxy/Server also drops
          original IP packets received on underlay interfaces either
          directly from a *NET Client if the original IP Destination
          Address corresponds to the same Client's delegated MNP.
          Proxy/Servers also drop carrier packets that contain OAL
           packets/fragments with foreign OAL Destination Addresses
          (MLAs) that do not match one of their local *NET Clients.
          These checks are essential to prevent forwarding inconsistencies
          from accidentally or intentionally establishing endless loops
          that could congest nodes and/or *NET links.</t>

          <t>Proxy/Servers process carrier packets that contain OAL
          packets/fragments with OCH headers or with Destination
          Addresses that match their MLA and also include
          an SRH. In the first case, the Proxy/Server examines the
          underlay Source Address and AFVI to locate the corresponding
          AFV entry in the AFIB. In the second case, the Proxy/Server
          applies standard SRH processing procedures. The Proxy/Server
          then forwards them according to the AFV or IPv6 routing
          state while decrementing the OAL packet/fragment Hop Limit.</t>

          <t>For OAL packets/fragments with Destination Addresses that
          match their MLA and also include an SRH,
          the Proxy/Server performs any necessary local processing then
          rewrites the OAL Destination Address according to the next
          hop SRH address. For those that do not include an OCH or
          SRH with additional next hop addresses, the Proxy/Server
          instead performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the
          Identification and performs OAL reassembly to obtain the
          original IP packet. For data packets addressed to its own
          MLA that arrived via the secured spanning tree,
          the Proxy/Server delivers the original IP packet to the
          network layer to support secured BGP routing protocol control
          messaging. For data packets originating from one of its
          dependent Clients, the Proxy/Server instead performs OAL
          encapsulation/fragmentation followed by underlay encapsulation
          and sends the resulting carrier packets while invoking address
          resolution and multilink forwarding procedures per <xref target=
          "predirect"/>. For control messages, the Proxy/Server instead
          authenticates the message and processes it as specified in
          later sections of this document while updating neighbor
          cache and/or AFIB state accordingly.</t>

          <t>When the Proxy/Server receives carrier packets that contain
          OAL packets with OAL Destination Address set to the MLA of
          one of its Client neighbors established through RS/RA exchanges,
          it accepts the carrier packets only if data origin authentication
          succeeds. If the NCE state is DEPARTED, the Proxy/Server changes
          the OAL Destination Address to the MLA of the Client's new
          Proxy/Server, decrements the OAL Hop Limit, then performs
          underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting carrier packets
          into the spanning tree which will eventually deliver them to the
          new Proxy/Server. If the neighbor cache state for the Client is
          REACHABLE and the Proxy/Server is a MAP responsible for serving
          as the Client's address resolution responder and/or default router,
          it verifies the Identification then submits the OAL packet/fragment
          for reassembly. The Proxy/Server then decapsulates and processes
          the resulting control message or original IP packet accordingly.
          Otherwise, the Proxy/Server changes the OAL Destination Address
          to the local Client's MLA, includes an SRH with intermediate
          hop MLAs, decrements the OAL Hop Limit, performs underlay
          encapsulation and forwards the carrier packet to the Client
          which then performs data origin verification and reassembly.
          (In the mobility case, the Client may receive fragments of
          the same original IP packet from different Proxy/Servers but
          this will not interfere with correct reassembly.)</t>

          <t>When the Proxy/Server receives carrier packets that contain
          OAL packets with OAL Source Address set to the MLA of one of its
          Client neighbors established through RS/RA exchanges, it accepts
          the carrier packets only if data origin authentication succeeds.
          The local Proxy/Server then forwards the packet according to
          the IP destination or AFVI state previously established through
          multilink control messaging.</t>

          <t>When the Proxy/Server receives carrier packets that contain
          OAL packets with OAL Destination Address set to a FNP address that
          does not match the MSP, it accepts the carrier packets only if data
          origin authentication succeeds and if there is a network layer
          forwarding table entry for the FNP. The Proxy/Server then performs
          underlay decapsulation, verifies the Identification, performs OAL
          reassembly/decapsulation to obtain the original IP packet, then
          presents it to the network layer (as a Relay) where it will
          be delivered according to standard IP forwarding.</t>
          
          <t>When a Proxy/Server receives a carrier packet from the secured
          spanning tree, it considers the message as authentic without having
          to verify network or higher layer authentication signatures.</t>

          <t>If the Proxy/Server has multiple original IP packets to
          send to the same neighbor, it can concatenate them as a single OAL
          composite packet <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rforw" title="Gateway Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>When the network layer admits an original IP packet into
          the Gateway's OMNI interface, the OAL drops the packet if routing
          indicates that it should be forwarded back to the network layer to
          avoid looping. Otherwise, the Gateway examines the IP Destination
          Address to determine if it matches the MLA of a
          neighboring Gateway or Proxy/Server by examining the OMNI interface's
          network layer neighbor cache. If so, the Gateway performs OAL
          encapsulation/fragmentation followed by underlay encapsulation and
          forwards the resulting carrier packets to the neighboring Gateway
          or Proxy/Server over a secured link (e.g., an IPsec tunnel, etc.)
          to support the operation of control plane functions (including
          the BGP routing protocol) between OAL neighbors.</t>

          <t>Gateways forward OAL packets/fragments reassembled from spanning
          tree carrier packets while decrementing the OAL Hop Limit but not the
          original IP header TTL/Hop Limit. Gateways send carrier packets that
          contain OAL packets/fragments with critical BGP routing protocol or
          other control messages via the SRT secured spanning tree, and may
          send other carrier packets via the secured/unsecured spanning tree
          or via more direct paths according to AFIB information. When the
          Gateway receives a carrier packet, it decapsulates to obtain the
          OAL packet/fragment then searches for an AFIB entry that matches
          the OAL AFVI or an IPv6 forwarding table entry that matches the
          OAL Destination Address.</t>

          <t>Gateways process carrier packets containing OAL packets/fragments
          with OAL Destination Addresses that do not match their MLAs
          in the same manner as for traditional IP forwarding within
          the OAL, i.e., they forward packets not explicitly addressed
          to themselves. Gateways locally process OAL packets/fragments
          with OCH headers or full OAL headers with their MLA as
          the OAL Destination Address. If the OAL packet/fragment contains
          an OCH or a full OAL header with an SRH extension, the Gateway
          forwards the OAL packet/fragment to the next hop while decrementing
          the OAL Hop Limit but without reassembling. When the Gateway forwards
          the OAL packet/fragment, it either rewrites the OCH AFVI with the
          value it will represent to the next OAL hop or follows standard
          SRH processing procedures.</t>

          <t>If the OAL packet/fragment includes a full OAL header but
          does not include an AFVI, the Gateway instead examines the OAL
          packet. The Gateway first determines whether the OAL packet includes an
          MI/MR/MC message then processes the message according to the multilink
          forwarding procedures discussed in <xref target="predirect"/>. If
          the carrier packets arrived over the secured spanning tree and the
          enclosed OAL packets/fragments are addressed to its MLA, the
          Gateway instead reassembles then discards the OAL header and
          forwards the original IP packet to the network layer to support
          secured BGP routing protocol control messaging. The Gateway
          instead drops all other OAL packets.</t>

          <t>Gateways forward OAL packets/fragments received in carrier
          packets that arrived from a first segment via the secured spanning
          tree to the next segment also via the secured spanning tree.
          Gateways forward OAL packets/fragments received in carrier packets
          that arrived from a first segment via the unsecured spanning tree
          to the next segment also via the unsecured spanning tree. Gateways
          configure an IPv6 routing table that determines the next hop for
          a given OAL Destination Address, where the secured/unsecured
          spanning tree is determined through the selection of the underlay
          interface to be used for transmission (e.g., an IPsec tunnel
          or an open INET interface).</t>

          <t>As for Proxy/Servers, Gateways must verify that the underlay Source
          Addresses of carrier packets not received from the secured spanning
          tree are "trusted" before forwarding according to an AFV (otherwise,
          the carrier packet must be dropped).</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroerr" title="OMNI Interface Error Handling">
        <t>When an AERO node admits an original IP packet into the OMNI
        interface, it may receive link and/or network layer error indications.
        The AERO node may also receive OMNI link error indications in
        OAL-encapsulated MC messages that include authentication signatures.</t>

        <t>A link layer error indication is an ICMP error message generated
        by a router in an underlay network on the path to the next OAL hop or
        by the next OAL hop itself. The message includes an IP header with
        the address of the node that generated the error as the Source Address
        and with the underlay address of the AERO node as the Destination
        Address.</t>

        <t>The IP header is followed by an ICMP header that includes an error
        Type, Code and Checksum. Valid type values include "Destination
        Unreachable", "Packet Too Big", "Time Exceeded", "Parameter Problem"
         etc. <xref target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

        <t>The ICMP header is followed by the leading portion of the carrier
        packet that generated the error, also known as the "packet-in-error".
        For ICMPv6, <xref target="RFC4443"/> specifies that the
        packet-in-error includes: "As much of invoking packet as possible
        without the ICMPv6 packet exceeding the minimum IPv6 MTU" (i.e., no
        more than 1280 bytes). For ICMPv4, <xref target="RFC0792"/> specifies
        that the packet-in-error includes: "Internet Header + 64 bits of
        Original Data Datagram", however <xref target="RFC1812"/> Section
        4.3.2.3 updates this specification by stating: "the ICMP datagram
        SHOULD contain as much of the original datagram as possible without
        the length of the ICMP datagram exceeding 576 bytes".</t>

        <t>The link layer error message format is shown in <xref
        target="icmp2err"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp2err"
            title="OMNI Interface Link-Layer Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                               |
     ~    IP Header of link layer    ~
     ~         error message         ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~          ICMP Header          ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
     |                               |   P
     ~  carrier packet underlay and  ~   a
     ~   OAL encapsulation headers   ~   c
     |                               |   k
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   e
     |                               |   t
     ~    original IP packet hdrs    ~   
     ~    (first-fragment only)      ~   i
     |                               |   n
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   
     |                               |   e
     ~    Portion of the body of     ~   r
     ~    the original IP packet     ~   r
     ~       (all fragments)         ~   o
     |                               |   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>The AERO node rules for processing these link layer error
        messages are as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When an AERO node receives a link layer Parameter Problem
            message, it processes the message the same as described as for
            ordinary ICMP errors in the normative references <xref
            target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link layer Packet Too
            Big messages, there may be a restricting link on the path or the
            next OAL hop may be experiencing reassembly cache congestion. In
            both cases, the node should adaptively decrease the size of the
            OAL fragments it sends to this OAL next hop (note that the PTB
            messages could indicate either "hard" or "soft" errors).</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link layer Time Exceeded
            messages, the IP ID field may be wrapping before earlier fragments
            awaiting reassembly have been processed. In that case, the node
            should adaptively decrease the size of the OAL fragments it sends
            to this OAL next hop.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to carrier packets that it sends
            to one of its neighbor correspondents, the node should process
            the message as an indication that a path may be failing, and
            optionally initiate NUD over that path. If it receives Destination
            Unreachable messages over multiple paths, the node should allow
            future carrier packets destined to the correspondent to flow
            through a default route and re-initiate route optimization.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent link layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to carrier packets that it sends
            to one of its neighbor Proxy/Servers, the Client should mark the
            path as unusable and use another path. If it receives Destination
            Unreachable messages on many or all paths, the Client should
            associate with a new Proxy/Server and release its association with
            the old Proxy/Server as specified in <xref target="newsrv"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Proxy/Server receives persistent link layer
            Destination Unreachable messages in response to carrier packets
            that it sends to one of its neighbor Clients, the Proxy/Server
            should mark the underlay path as unusable and use another underlay
            path.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Proxy/Server receives link layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to a carrier packet that it sends
            to one of its permanent neighbors, it treats the messages as an
            indication that the path to the neighbor may be failing. However,
            the dynamic routing protocol should soon re-converge and correct
            the temporary outage.</t>
          </list>When an AERO Gateway receives a carrier packet for which the
        network layer Destination Address is covered by an MSP assigned to a
        black-hole route, the Gateway drops the carrier packet if there is no
        more-specific routing information for the destination and returns an
        OMNI interface Destination Unreachable message subject to rate
        limiting.</t>

        <t>AERO nodes include ICMPv6 error messages intended for an OAL source
        as sub-options in the OMNI option of secured MC messages. When the
        OAL source receives the MC message, it can extract the ICMPv6 error
        message enclosed in the OMNI option and either process it locally or
        translate it into a network layer error to return to the original
        source.</t>

        <t>An AERO/OMNI intermediate system may discover that a transit packet
        has no matching AFIB state to support forwarding to the next adaptation
        layer hop. In that case, the intermediate system should return a
        Destination Unreachable error sub-option in a secured MC message.
        The OAL source should process the message as an indication that AFIB
        multilink forwarding state for a particular flow must be refreshed.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd" title="AERO Mobility Service Coordination">
        <t>AERO nodes observes the Router Discovery and Prefix Registration
        specifications and coordinate their autoconfiguration actions with
        the mobility service through RS/RA message exchanges as specified
        in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

        <section anchor="aeropd-dhcp" title="AERO Service Model">
          <t>Each AERO Proxy/Server on the OMNI link is configured to
          respond to Client MNP prefix delegation/registration requests
          based on the DHCPv6 service. Each Proxy/Server is provisioned
          with a database of MNP-to-Client ID mappings for all Clients
          enrolled in the AERO service. The Client database is maintained
          by a central administrative authority for the OMNI link and securely
          distributed to all Proxy/Servers, e.g., via the Lightweight
          Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) <xref target="RFC4511"/>,
          via static configuration, etc. Clients receive the same
          MNP service regardless of the Proxy/Servers they select
          and provision their MNPs for downstream-attached node
          addressing on EUN interfaces. (Note: an OMNI link can
          instead delegate non-correlated MNPs to Clients instead of
          maintaining a common synchronized database. In that case,
          each Client may receive a different MNP delegation each
          time it registers with the OMNI domain and may need to
          renumber its downstream-attached EUNs.)</t>

          <t>Clients associate each of their *NET underlay interfaces
          with FHS Proxy/Servers. Each FHS Proxy/Server locally services
          one or more of the Client's underlay interfaces, and the Client
          typically selects one among them to serve as the MAP Proxy/Server
          (the Client may instead select a "third-party" MAP Proxy/Server that
          does not directly service any of its underlay interfaces). All of
          the Client's other FHS Proxy/Servers forward proxyed copies of RS/RA
          messages between the MAP Proxy/Server and Client without assuming
          the MAP role functions themselves.</t>

          <t>Each Client typically associates with a single MAP Proxy/Server,
          while all other Proxy/Servers are candidates for providing the MAP
          role for other Clients. A Client can select both an FHS and MAP
          Proxy/Server in a single message by including an SRH in the RS
          message OAL header when it already knows the MAP's address.
          An FHS Proxy/Server assumes the MAP role when it receives an
          RS message with a Destination Address that matches its own MLA
          or link-scoped All-Routers multicast. An FHS Proxy/Server assumes
          the proxy role when it receives an RS message with an SRH or
          with a Destination Address that matches another Proxy/Server.
          (An FHS Proxy/Server can also assume the proxy role when it
          receives an RS message addressed to link-scoped All-Routers
          multicast if it can determine the MLA of another Proxy/Server
          to serve as a MAP.)</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Proxy/Servers use control messages to
          maintain NLNCEs and ALNCEs. AERO Proxy/Servers configure
          their OMNI interfaces as advertising NBMA interfaces, and
          therefore send unicast RA messages with a short Router Lifetime
          value (e.g., 2 * ReachableTime seconds) in response to a Client's
          RS message. Thereafter, Clients send additional RS messages
          to keep Proxy/Server state alive.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and FHS/MAP Proxy/Servers include MNP prefix
          delegation parameters in RS/RA messages. The control messages are
          exchanged between the Client and any FHS Proxy/Servers acting
          as proxys for the MAP Proxy/Server as specified in <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> according to the address/prefix
          management schedule required by the service. If the Client knows
          its MNP in advance, it can include the MNP in its prefix
          delegation request. If the MAP Proxy/Server accepts the Client's
          MNP assertion (or if it delegates a new MNP for the Client), it
          injects the MNP into the routing system and establishes the
          necessary neighbor cache state.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and their FHS Proxy/Servers on MANETs and open
          INETs must establish and maintain Identification synchronization
          windows in their RS/RA exchanges. The window synchronization
          provides a well-managed Identification value that the Client
          and Proxy/Server can use for validating control messages with
          authentication signatures.</t>

          <t>All Client and Proxy/Server behaviors for the exchange of
          RS/RA messages are conducted according to the Router Discovery
          and Prefix Delegation specifications found in <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="predirect"
               title="AERO Address Resolution, Multilink Forwarding and Route Optimization">
        <t>AERO nodes invoke address resolution, multilink forwarding and
        route optimization when they need to forward the initial original
        IP packets of flows to new neighbors over (M)ANET/INET interfaces
        as well as to maintain continuous multilink forwarding coordination
        with existing neighbors. As specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>,
        "when a node has a unicast packet to send to a neighbor, but
        does not know the neighbor's link-layer address, it performs
        address resolution".</t>

        <t>Possible Source and Destination Addresses for original IP packets
        that traverse a local (M)ANET/INET and/or the rest of the OMNI link
        include addresses taken from an FNP, MNP or MLA assigned to a Client.
        The flow is then identified by the 3-tuple consisting of the IPv6
        Source Address, Destination Address and Flow Label.</t>

        <t>The Address Resolution Source (ARS) considers candidate
        original IP packet destinations as either on-link or off-link on
        the OMNI interface. For destinations that match an on-link prefix,
        the ARS invokes address resolution as a network layer function if
        there is no NLNCE matching the destination. For destinations that
        match an off-link prefix, the ARS forwards the packet to a virtual
        router function within the OMNI interface that invokes address
        resolution as an adaptation layer function if there is no ALNCE
        matching the destination. The first such address resolution may
        return prefix information sufficient to satisfy future resolutions
        for addresses covered by the same prefix locally and without the
        need for additional control messaging over the network.</t>

        <t>Address resolution is based on an IPv6 ND NS/NA(AR) messaging
        exchange between the ARS and the target neighbor as the Address
        Resolution Target (ART). The ARS engages address resolution by 
        sending NS(AR) messages over a selected underlay interface to
        determine adaptation and underlay address mappings for the
        ART network layer address. (The ARS may select any available
        underlay interface to carry the NS(AR) with a likely emphasis
        on the best performing, least congested, etc.)</t>

        <t>The ARS then discovers address resolution information from
        any OMNI Interface Attributes sub-options included in NA(AR)
        messages returned by the ART. Both the ARS and ART can update
        their neighbor caches based on the address resolution information
        and cache any information received in Route Information Options
        (RIOs) <xref target="RFC4191"/> included in the NS/NA(AR) exchange.
        Note that the NS/NA(AR) RIOs are included as adaptation layer
        information in the OMNI option per <xref target=
        "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> and are not delivered to the
        network layer.</t>

        <t>The original source or its current FHS/MAP Proxy/Server
        serves as the ARS. Either the ART itself or the current LHS/MAP
        Proxy/Server (or Relay) for the ART serves as the Address
        Resolution Responder (ARR), i.e., the NA(AR) source.</t>

        <t>Address resolution is initiated by the first eligible ARS closest
        to the original source as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>For Clients on VPN/IPsec and Direct interfaces, the Client's
            FHS Proxy/Server is the ARS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on (M)ANET interfaces, either the FHS Proxy/Server
            or the Client itself may be the ARS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on INET interfaces, the Client itself is the
            ARS.</t>

            <t>For FNP correspondent nodes on foreign links/networks
            serviced by a Relay, the Relay is the ARS.</t>

            <t>For Clients that engage the MAP Proxy/Server in "mobility
            anchor" mode, the MAP Proxy/Server is the ARS.</t>

            <t>For peer Clients within the same (M)ANET/EUN, address
            resolution and route optimization is through receipt of
            Redirect messages.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The AERO routing system directs an address resolution request sent
        by the ARS to the ARR. The ARR then returns an address resolution
        reply which must include information that is complete, current,
        consistent and authentic. Both the ARS and ARR are then jointly
        responsible for periodically refreshing the address resolution, and
        for quickly informing each other of any changes. Following address
        resolution, the ARS and ART perform subsequent multilink forwarding
        and route optimization exchanges to maintain optimal forwarding
        profiles for each distinct flow.</t>

        <t>During address resolution, multilink forwarding and/or route
        optimization a control message source may attach a small number
        of original IP packets associated with the message exchange as
        composite packet extensions per <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.
        The authentication signatures and/or lower-layer security features
        employed at the OAL source and each OAL intermediate system will
        provide authorization and integrity services for both the IPv6
        ND messages and their IP packet attachments. The final OAL
        intermediate system in the path will then securely forward the
        control message IP packet attachments to the target.</t>

        <t>The source can attach original IP packets to the
        subject control message, but this may cause the message size
        to exceed the IPv6 minimum MTU and/or result in sub-optimal
        forwarding for the IP packet attachments. In that case, the
        source can instead create small MC "pilot" messages used
        to transport the original IP packets as attachments over
        shortest paths determined by routing. The OAL source can
        attach as many IP packets as will fit without causing the
        OAL packet to exceed the adaptation layer path MTU using
        the composite packet construct discussed in <xref target=
        "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

        <t>When the target Proxy/Server or Client receives a pilot
        MC, it removes all passenger attachment original IP packets
        then delivers them to the destination. This service supports
        assured (but sub-optimal) short-term delivery of protocol
        data while neighbor coordination is in progress without
        creating network state.</t>

        <t>The address resolution, multilink forwarding and route optimization
        procedures are specified in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="sendns" title="Multilink Address Resolution">
          <t>Address resolution over OMNI interfaces is conceptually
          the same as specified in Section 7 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>
          including the sending and receiving of NS/NA(AR) messages as
          well as their implications for neighbor cache entry creation
          and state management. The NS/NA(AR) messages include addresses
          and S/TLLAOs in the same manner as for any interface and as
          discussed in <xref target="STLLAO"/>. The OMNI interface
          therefore exhibits an IP layer behavior that is
          indistinguishable from an ordinary interface while
          managing adaptation layer state at a layer below IP.</t>

          <t>For destinations that match an off-link prefix, Address
          Resolution over OMNI interfaces is driven by NS/NA(AR)
          messaging as an adaptation layer function without disturbing
          the NLNCE. The network layer forwards packets that match
          an off-link prefix to a virtual router function within the
          OMNI interface. The virtual router function then either
          forwards the packets to an FHS Proxy/Server to act as the
          ARS or initiates an NS/NA(AR) exchange at the adaptation
          layer (without including S/TLLAOs) while acting as an ARS
          on its own behalf. In that case, the OMNI interface caches
          any updated adaptation layer addressing information received
          in NS/NA(AR) messages in the ALNC.</t>

          <t>For destinations that match an on-link prefix, Address
          Resolution over OMNI interfaces is driven by network layer
          NS/NA(AR) messaging the same as for any IP interface. The
          OMNI interface then removes the S/TLLAO upon transmission
          of all NS/NA(AR) messages and includes an S/TLLAO with the
          OMNI interface internal link-layer address when delivering
          an NS/NA(AR) message to the network layer.</t>

          <t>When one or more original IP packets matching an on-link
          prefix are forwarded over an OMNI interface, the ARS checks
          the Destination Cache to determine whether there is a NCE that
          matches the Destination Address. If there is a NCE in the
          REACHABLE state, the ARS invokes the OAL and forwards the
          resulting carrier packets according to the cached state then
          returns from processing. If there is no NLNCE but the ARS
          is able to determine that adaptation layer mapping state
          for the IP destination is available, e.g., by snooping the
          ALNC, it can also create a NLNCE in the REACHABLE state and
          admit the original IP packets into the interface without
          requiring an NS/NA(AR) exchange.</t>

          <t>Otherwise, if there is no NLNCE the ARS creates one in the
          INCOMPLETE state. The ARS then prepares an Address Resolution
          NS(AR) message to send toward an ART. The resulting NS(AR)
          message must be sent securely and includes Source, Destination
          and Target Addresses as discussed in <xref target="STLLAO"/>.</t>

          <t>When the ARS admits the NS(AR) message into the OMNI
          interface, the adaptation layer returns an immediate NA(AR)
          if the ALNC already contains fresh address resolution
          information for the FNP/MNP prefix or MLA that covers the
          IP Destination Address. Otherwise, the adaptation layer
          prepares to forward the NS(AR) while removing the SLLAO
          (if present) since the locally-unique link-layer address
          has no useful information for prospective neighbors.</t>

          <t>For both the on-link and off-link cases of forwarding
          an NS(AR) at the adaptation layer, the ARS then includes
          an OMNI option with an authentication sub-option (if
          necessary). If the ARS can commit to managing its own
          dynamic mobility updates, it then includes Interface
          Attributes and/or Traffic Selectors for all of the source
          Client's underlay interfaces plus RIOs for any of the Client's
          MNPs. The ARS then then submits the NS(AR) message for OAL
          encapsulation and transmission.</t>

          <section anchor="sendns2" title="Sending the NS(AR)">
            <t>When the ARS is a FHS Proxy/Server, it sets the OAL Source
            Address to its own MLA and sets the OAL Destination
            Address to the NS(AR) Target Address. The ARS then
            performs underlay encapsulation and sends the resulting
            carrier packet into the SRT secured spanning tree without
            decrementing the network layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>

            <t>When the ARS is a Client, it instead uses its own MLA as
            the OAL Source Address and the MLA of the next OAL hop as
            the OAL Destination Address while including an SRH with the
            MLAs of OAL intermediate systems ending with the MLA of
            the interface-specific FHS Proxy/Server. If the Client is
            in a MANET or an open INET, it next calculates and includes
            an authentication signature. In all *NET cases, the Client
            then includes an OAL IPv6 Extended Fragment Header with
            Identification set to an in-window value for this FHS
            Proxy/Server. The ARS Client then performs underlay encapsulation
            and forwards the carrier packet to the FHS Proxy/Server.</t>

            <t>The FHS Proxy/Server then performs underlay decapsulation,
            verifies the Identification, verifies the NS(AR) OAL
            checksum/authentication signature and confirms that
            the Client's claimed FNP/MNP RIO(s) and Source Address
            are correct. The FHS Proxy/Server then changes the OAL
            Source Address to its own MLA and changes the
            OAL Destination Address to the NS(AR) Target Address.
            The FHS Proxy/Server next removes the IPv6 Extended
            Fragment Header, performs underlay encapsulation and sends
            the resulting carrier packet into the secured spanning
            tree on behalf of the Client.</t>

            <t>Note: both the source and target Client/Relay and their MAP
            Proxy/Servers include current and accurate information for their
            multilink Interface Attributes profile. The MAP Proxy/Servers can be
            trusted to provide an authoritative ARR response and/or mobility
            update message on behalf of the source/target if necessary.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="relayns" title="Relaying the NS(AR)">
            <t>When a Gateway receives carrier packets containing the
            NS(AR), it performs underlay decapsulation and determines the next
            hop by consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the
            OAL header Destination Address. The Gateway next decrements
            the OAL header Hop Limit, performs underlay encapsulation and
            sends the carrier packet(s) via the secured spanning tree the
            same as for any IPv6 router where they may traverse multiple
            intermediate OMNI link segments interconnected by Gateways.
            The final Gateway will deliver the carrier packets via the
            secured spanning tree to the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server (or Relay)
            that services the ART.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="nsna" title="NS(AR) Processing at the ARR/ART">
            <t>When the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server (or Relay) of the ART receives
            the NS(AR) secured carrier packets with the target address of
            the ART as the OAL Destination Address, it performs underlay
            decapsulation then either forwards the NS(AR) to the ART or
            processes it locally if it is acting as the ART's designated
            ARR. The LHS/MAP Proxy/Server (or Relay) processes the message
            as follows:</t>

            <t><list style="symbols">
                <t>if the NS(AR) target matches a Client NCE in the DEPARTED
                state, the (old) MAP Proxy/Server resets the OAL Destination
                Address to the MLA of its new MAP Proxy/Server. The old MAP
                Proxy/Server then decrements the OAL header Hop Limit, performs
                underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting carrier
                packet over the secured spanning tree.</t>

                <t>If the NS(AR) target matches a Client NCE in the REACHABLE
                state, the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server (or Relay) notes whether the
                NS(AR) arrived from the secured spanning tree. If the message
                arrived via the secured spanning tree the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server
                (or Relay) verifies the NS(AR) OAL checksum only; otherwise,
                it must also verify the authentication signature.</t>

                <t>If the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server maintains a Report List for
                the ART (see: <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>), it
                next records the NS(AR) Source Address in the Report List
                for this ART. If the MAP Proxy/Server is the ART's designated
                ARR, it forwards any original IP packet(s) attached to the
                NS(AR) composite packet to the ART and prepares to return
                an NA(AR) as discussed below; otherwise, the LHS/MAP
                Proxy/Server determines the underlay interface for the
                ART and proceeds as follows:<list
                    style="symbols">
                    <t>If the LHS/MAP Proxy/Server is also the LHS
                    Proxy/Server on the underlay interface used to convey
                    the NS(AR) to the ART, it includes an OAL IPv6 Extended
                    Fragment Header with an in-window Identification for
                    the ART Client plus an SRH and authentication signature
                    if necessary then recalculates the OAL checksum. The
                    Proxy/Server then changes the OAL Source Address to its
                    own MLA, changes the OAL Destination Address to the next
                    hop MLA on the path to the ART, decrements the OAL Hop Limit,
                    performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting
                    carrier packet over the underlay interface to the ART.</t>

                    <t>If the MAP Proxy/Server is not the LHS Proxy/Server
                    on the underlay interface used to convey the NS(AR) to the
                    ART, it instead changes the OAL Destination Address to the
                    MLA of the LHS Proxy/Server for the selected ART interface.
                    The MAP Proxy/Server next decrements the OAL Hop Limit,
                    performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting
                    carrier packet over the secured spanning tree.</t>

                    <t>When the LHS Proxy/Server receives the carrier packets,
                    it performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the NS(AR)
                    OAL checksum, then forwards to the ART while changing the
                    OAL addresses as above. The LHS Proxy/Server also includes
                    an IPv6 Extended Fragment Header plus an SRH and authentication
                    signature if necessary while recalculating the checksum the
                    same as described above.</t>
                  </list></t>

                <t>If the NS(AR) target matches one of its FNP routes, the
                MAP/LHS Proxy/Server serves as both a Relay and an ARR, since
                the Relay forwards original IP packets toward FNP
                target nodes at the network layer.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>If the ARR is a Relay or the ART itself, it first creates or
            updates an ALNCE for the NS(AR) Source MLA while caching all
            Interface Attributes and Traffic Selector information in the
            ALNCE and caching any IPv6 addresses for the original source
            found in the Interface Attributes in the Destination Cache. The
            ARR then installs any RIO MNP prefixes in the ALNCE. (If the
            NS(AR) does not include address resolution information, the
            ART will simply need to initiate another unidirectional
            address resolution request if it has return traffic to
            send back to the ARS.)</t>

            <t>Next, if the NS(AR) target is on-link on the ARR/ART's
            OMNI interface the ART delivers the NS(AR) to the network
            layer while including an SLLAO with the OMNI interface internal
            link-layer address. The network layer will return an NA(AR)
            with a TLLAO which the ARR removes before forwarding the
            NA(AR) back to the ARS. For off-link targets, the ARR instead
            prepares a solicited NA(AR) message to return to the ARS as an
            adaptation layer function without exposing the NS(AR) to the
            network layer.</t>

            <t>In both the on- and off-link cases, the ARR includes RIOs for
            all of the ART's FNPs/MNPs, where the RIO for a destination
            that matches only "default" includes a /64 FNP that covers
            the address. The ARR then includes Interface Attributes and
            Traffic Selector sub-options for all of the ART's underlay
            interfaces with current information for each interface.
            The ARR next sets the NA(AR) message R flag to 1 (as a
            router) and S flag to 1 (as a response to a solicitation)
            and sets the O flag to 1 (as an authoritative responder).</t>

            <t>The ARR finally includes an authentication signature, an
            IPv6 Extended Fragment Header and an OAL SRH with MLA addressing
            information for the LHS hops on the path to the LHS Proxy/Server
            and ending with the MNP of the ARS MAP/FHS Proxy/Server that
            appeared in the NS(AR) SRH. The ARR next calculates the
            NA(AR) OAL checksum then submits the NA(AR) for encapsulation
            with OAL Source Address set to its own MLA and Destination
            Address set to either the MLA that appeared in the NS(AR)
            OAL source for (M)ANET traversal or the NS(AR) source itself
            for INET traversal. The ARR then performs underlay encapsulation
            and forwards the resulting carrier packet.</t>

            <t>When the ART's LHS Proxy/Server receives carrier
            packets sent by an ART acting as an ARR on its own behalf,
            it performs underlay decapsulation then verifies the NA(AR)
            message OAL Identification and checksum/authentication
            signature. The Proxy/Server then verifies that any RIO information
            is acceptable, changes the OAL Source Address to its own MLA
            and changes the OAL Destination Address to the MLA of the
            ARS MAP/FHS Proxy/Server. The Proxy/Server next decrements
            the OAL Hop Limit, removes the OAL Extended Fragment Header,
            performs underlay encapsulation and finally forwards the
            resulting carrier packet into the secured spanning tree.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="relayna" title="Relaying the NA(AR)">
            <t>When a Gateway receives NA(AR) carrier packets, it
            performs underlay decapsulation and determines the next hop by
            consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the OAL
            header Destination Address. The Gateway then decrements
            the OAL header Hop Limit, performs underlay encapsulation and
            forwards the resulting carrier packet via the SRT secured
            spanning tree where it may traverse multiple intermediate
            OMNI link segments interconnected by other Gateways. The
            final-hop Gateway will deliver the carrier packets via
            the secured spanning tree to a FHS Proxy/Server for the
            ARS.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="procna" title="Processing the NA(AR) at the ARS">
            <t>When the ARS receives NA(AR) carrier packets, it performs
            underlay decapsulation then searches for an ALNCE that matches the MLA
            corresponding to the NA(AR) Source. The ARS then processes the
            message the same as for standard IPv6 Address Resolution <xref
            target="RFC4861"/>. In the process, it caches all OMNI option
            Interface Attributes and Traffic Selectors in the ALNCE for
            the NA(AR) MLA Source Address and caches any IPv6 addresses
            for the ART found in the Interface Attributes in the
            Destination Cache. The ARS then caches any RIO FNP/MNP
            prefixes in the ALNCE indexed by the neighbor's MLA. All
            included Interface Attributes sub-options plus RIOs together
            provide the address mapping information necessary to satisfy
            address resolution.</t>

            <t>For targets that match an on-link prefix, the adaptation
            layer of the ARS then includes a TLLAO with the OMNI interface
            internal link-layer address then delivers the NA(AR)
            to the network layer. The network layer will then set the
            NLNCE for this neighbor to REACHABLE while caching the
            link-layer address. Future original IP packet transmissions
            over the OMNI interface will use this IP to link-layer
            address mapping the same as for any IPv6 interface.</t>

            <t>When the ARS is a Client, the SRT secured spanning tree will
            first deliver the solicited NA(AR) message to the Client's FHS
            Proxy/Server, which includes an OAL Extended Fragment Header
            with an in-window Identification for this Client, and forwards
            the message to the Client. If the Client is on a well-managed
            ANET, physical security and protected spectrum ensures security
            for the NA(AR) without needing an additional authentication
            signature or Identification; if the Client is in a MANET or
            in the open INET the Proxy/Server must instead include an
            Identification and authentication signature. The Proxy/Server
            then includes an SRH, changes the OAL Source Address to its
            own MLA and changes the OAL Destination Address to the MLA
            of the next hop on the path to the Client when it forwards
            the NA(AR). The Proxy/Server then decrements the OAL Hop
            Limit, performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the
            resulting carrier packet over the underlay interface to the
            Client. When the Client receives the NA(AR), it caches the
            adaptation layer information as above then removes the OMNI
            option and forwards the NS(AR) to the network layer if the
            target is on-link. The Client is then responsible for
            informing the ART if any of its adaptation layer addressing
            changes (e.g., due to mobility) before the ALCNE expires.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="relyar" title="Reliability">
            <t>After the ARS transmits the first NS(AR), it should wait up to
            RETRANS_TIMER seconds to receive a responsive NA(AR). The ARS can
            then retransmit the NS(AR) up to MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT times before
            giving up.</t>
          </section>
        </section>

        <section anchor="segspan" title="Multilink Forwarding">
          <t>Following address resolution, the ARS and ART (i.e., the
          end system Clients or their respective Proxy/Servers) can
          assert per-flow multilink forwarding paths through underlay
          interface pairs serviced by the same Source/Destination Addresses
          and Flow Label by sending MI/MR/MC messages with OMNI Neighbor
          Synchronization sub-options and with an OAL SRH with an AVFI
          option with (I)nitialize set to 1. The MI/MR/MC messages
          establish per-flow multilink forwarding and header compression
          state in OAL intermediate systems in the path between the ARS
          and ART. Note that either the ARS or ART can independently
          initiate multilink forwarding by sending MI messages on
          behalf of specific flows over underlay interface pairs.</t>

          <t>The source Client or FHS Proxy/Server sets the MI address
          fields as discussed in <xref target="STLLAO"/> then includes
          the Flow Label of the original IP packet set according to
          <xref target="RFC6437"/><xref target="RFC6438"/>. The source
          finally performs OAL encapsulation with Source and Destination
          addresses set the same as for address resolution while including
          an SRH extension. The flow 3-tuple is then identified by the
          MI Source Address, Destination Address and Flow Label.</t>

          <t>When the target Client or LHS Proxy/Server returns an MR, it
          sets the address fields as discussed in <xref target="STLLAO"/>.
          The target Client or LHS Proxy/Server then sets the Flow Label
          to value that appeared in the MI Flow Label and finally performs
          OAL encapsulation while including an SRH extension with the
          MLA of the FHS Proxy/Server that appeared in the MI SRH as
          the ultimate hop.</t>

          <t>The multilink forwarding profile provides support for redundant
          paths that each OAL node can harness to its best advantage. For
          example, OAL nodes can use traffic selectors to distribute different
          traffic types over available multilink paths, while other factors
          such as metrics, cost, provider, etc. can also provide useful
          decision points. OAL nodes can also employ multilink forwarding
          for fault tolerance by sending redundant data over multiple paths
          simultaneously, or for load balancing where the individual packets
          of a single traffic flow are spread across multiple independent
          paths. OAL nodes that engage in multilink forwarding therefore must
          incorporate a policy engine that selects both inbound and outbound
          multilink paths for a given traffic profile at a given point in
          time. This specification therefore provides multilink forwarding
          mechanisms without mandating any specific multilink policy.</t>

          <t>All Client, Proxy/Server and Gateway nodes that configure
          OMNI interfaces and engage in multilink coordination include
          an additional forwarding table termed the AERO Flow
          Information Base (AFIB) that supports OAL packet/fragment
          forwarding based on original IP packet flows over specific
          OMNI neighbor interface pairs. The AFIB contains per-flow
          AERO Flow Vectors (AFVs) identified by the underlay address
          of the previous OAL hop plus a value known as the AFV Index
          (AFVI). The AFVs cache uncompressed OAL header information
          to support forwarding of packets with compressed headers as
          well as previous/next-hop addressing and AFVI information.
          The AFVs also cache window synchronization state (i.e., the
          starting sequence number and window size) for each specific
          flow. Using the window synchronization state, simple
          Identification-based data origin authentication is enabled
          at each OAL source, intermediate system and target node.</t>

          <t>Client and Proxy/Server OMNI interfaces manage end system
          AFIB entries in conjunction with their internal ALNC, where
          the ALNCEs link to (possibly) multiple AFVs with one per
          flow over a specific FHS/LHS interface ifIndex pair. When OMNI
          interface peers need to coordinate, they locate a NLNCE for the
          peer (established through address resolution) then use the ALNCE
          as a nexus that aggregates potentially many AVFs which cache
          AFVIs to support multilink forwarding on a per-flow basis.
          Gateway OMNI interfaces and the OMNI interfaces of Clients or
          Proxy/Servers acting as OAL intermediate nodes manage transit
          AFIB entries independently of their internal neighbor caches.
          These transit AFVs are indexed by the underlay address and AFVI
          supplied by the previous hop.</t>

          <t>OAL source, intermediate system and target nodes create
          or update AFVs/AFVIs when they process an MI/MR/MC initiation
          or response message with an OMNI Neighbor Synchronization
          sub-option with the SYN flag set (see: <xref target=
          "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>). The source of the initiating
          MI is considered to reside in the "First Hop Segment (FHS)",
          while the destination is considered to reside in the "Last
          Hop Segment (LHS)".</t>

          <t>The FHS and LHS roles are determined on a per-flow and
          per-interface-pair basis. After address resolution, either peer
          is equally capable of initiating multilink forwarding on behalf
          of a specific flow. The peer that sends the initiating MI
          message with Neighbor Synchronization for a specific pair becomes
          the FHS peer while the one that returns the responsive MR becomes
          the LHS peer for that (flow, interface pair) only. It is therefore
          commonplace that peers may assume the FHS role for some flows
          while assuming the LHS role for others, i.e., even though each
          peer maintains only a single NCE.</t>

          <t>When an OAL node sends/forwards an initiating MI or responsive
          MR with a Neighbor Synchronization sub-option with the SYN flag
          set, it creates or updates an AFV, caches the Identification
          window information, caches the MI/MR OAL IPv6 header and caches
          the flow 3-tuple for compression/decompression of the original
          IP packet header. The OAL node also records the previous hop
          underlay address and AFVI, then generates a new next hop AFVI or
          updates the lifetime of an already-established AFVI.
          The next hop AFVI should be selected within the range
          [1 - (2**16-1)] unless all values within that range are already
          in active use. Otherwise, the AFVI must be selected within the
          range [2**16 - (2**32-1)] while the value 0 indicates "AFVI
          unspecified". When the OAL node forwards future OAL
          packets/fragments that include the previous hop underlay address
          and AFVI, it can unambiguously locate the correct AFV and use
          the cached information to forward to the next OAL hop.</t>

          <t>OAL nodes cache AFVs for up to ReachableTime seconds following
          their initial creation. If the node processes another MI/MR
          message specific to an AFV, it updates ReachableTime to
          REACHABLE_TIME seconds, i.e., the same as for NCEs. If
          ReachableTime expires, the node deletes the AFV.</t>

          <t>The following sections provide the detailed specifications of
          these MI/MR/MC exchanges for all nodes along the forward and
          reverse paths.</t>

          <section anchor="fhsns"
                   title="FHS Client-Proxy/Server MI Forwarding">
            <t>When an FHS OAL source has an original IP packet
            to send toward an LHS OAL target, it first performs address
            resolution resulting in the creation of an ALNCE for the MLA
            of the target then selects a source and target underlay
            interface pair. The FHS source then uses its cached
            information for the target interface as LHS information
            then prepares an MI message with a Neighbor Synchronization
            sub-option while setting the MI Source, Target and
            Destination Addresses as specified above.</t>

            <t>The FHS source next creates an AFV then generates and assigns
            an AFVI for the flow over this interface pair; the AFVI (coupled
            with its UNX address) must be unique for its communications to
            this next OAL hop. The FHS source then includes an SRH with segment
            addressing information. The FHS source finally includes an OMNI
            Neighbor Synchronization sub-option with window synchronization
            parameters and prepares the MI message for transmission while
            also caching the window synchronization parameters in the
            local AFV.</t>

            <t>If the FHS source is the FHS Proxy/Server, it performs OAL
            encapsulation while setting the OAL Source Address to its own
            MLA and setting the OAL Destination Address to the MLA found
            in the target Interface Attributes. The FHS Proxy/Server then
            performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting
            carrier packet into the secured spanning tree which will
            deliver it to an FHS Gateway.</t>

            <t>If the FHS source is the FHS Client, it instead includes an
            authentication signature and OAL Extended Fragment Header with
            an in-window Identification for its FHS Proxy/Server if necessary.
            If FMT-Forward and FMT-Mode are both set, the Client sets the
            Neighbor Synchronization LHS ifIndex to the ifIndex of the target;
            otherwise, it sets the ifIndex to 0 to allow the FHS Proxy/Server
            to select the target ifIndex. The FHS Client then performs OAL
            encapsulation while including an SRH per <xref target=
            "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>, sets the OAL Source Address to
            its own MLA and sets the OAL Destination Address to the MLA
            of the first hop toward the FHS Proxy/Server. The FHS Client
            finally performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the
            resulting carrier packet to the FHS Proxy/Server.</t>

            <t>If there are multiple OAL hops between the Client and
            FHS Proxy/Server, the first OAL intermediate node receives
            the carrier packets containing the MI then also verifies the OAL
            checksum and authentication signature. The OAL intermediate node then
            caches the FHS/LHS Client addressing, AFVI and window synchronization
            information as previous hop information in a new or existing AFV.
            The OAL intermediate hop then creates a new unique AFVI to forward
            to the next OAL hop, then both caches the AFVI and writes it into
            the control message AVI field, i.e., while over-writing the value
            supplied by the previous hop. The OAL intermediate node then
            forwards to the next OAL hop toward the FHS Proxy/Server which
            then performs the same functions as the previous OAL hop.</t>

            <t>When the FHS Proxy/Server receives the carrier packets, it
            performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the Identification,
            and verifies the MI OAL checksum and authentication signature.
            The FHS Proxy/Server then creates an AFV (i.e., the same as the
            FHS Client had done) while caching the FHS/LHS Client addressing,
            AFVI and window synchronization information as previous hop
            information for this AFV. The FHS Proxy/Server next generates
            a new unique AFVI to forward to the next OAL hop, then both
            caches the AFVI in the AFV and writes it into the MI AFVI field.
            The FHS Proxy/Server next calculates the MI OAL checksum then
            decrements the OAL Hop Limit, removes the OAL Extended Fragment
            Header, performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the
            resulting carrier packet into the secured spanning tree.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="gwns" title="FHS/intermediate/LHS Gateway MI Forwarding">
            <t>Gateways in the spanning tree forward OAL packets/fragments not
            explicitly addressed to themselves, while forwarding those that
            arrived via the secured spanning tree to the next hop also via the
            secured spanning tree and forwarding all others via the unsecured
            spanning tree. When an FHS Gateway receives an MI packet over
            the secured spanning tree, it performs underlay decapsulation
            then verifies the MI OAL checksum. The FHS Gateway next creates an
            AFV based on the previous hop Neighbor Synchronization information,
            i.e., the same as the FHS Proxy/Server had done. The FHS Gateway then
            generates a locally-unique AFVI for the next hop and both caches
            the value in the AFV and copies it into the MI AFVI.</t>

            <t>The FHS Gateway then examines the SRT prefixes corresponding
            to both the FHS and LHS. If the FHS Gateway has a local interface
            connection to both the FHS and LHS (whether they are the same or
            different segments), the FHS/LHS Gateway caches the MI Neighbor
            Synchronization information in the AFV, and writes a new locally-unique
            AFVI for the next hop into the AFV and MI AFVI. The FHS Gateway then
            decrements the OAL Hop Limit, performs underlay encapsulation
            and forwards the resulting carrier packet into the secured
            spanning tree.</t>

            <t>When the FHS and LHS Gateways are different, the LHS Gateway
            will receive carrier packets over the secured spanning tree from
            the FHS Gateway, noting there may be many intermediate Gateways in
            the path between FHS and LHS which will update their transit AFVs
            in the same fashion while selecting new locally-unique AFVIs for
            the next hop based on Neighbor Synchronization and SRH information.
            The LHS Gateway then performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the
            Identification, verifies the MI OAL checksum then creates an AFV
            (i.e., the same as all previous hop Gateways had done) while caching
            the Neighbor Synchronization information from the previous hop and
            creating a new AFVI for the next hop. The LHS Gateway then decrements
            the OAL Hop Limit, performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the
            resulting carrier packet into the secured spanning tree.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="lhsnsna"
                   title="LHS Proxy/Server-Client MI/MR Processing">
            <t>When the LHS Proxy/Server receives the carrier packets from
            the secured spanning tree, it performs underlay decapsulation,
            verifies the MI OAL checksum then creates an AFV and caches the
            previous hop Neighbor Synchronization and addressing information.</t>

            <t>If the MI Destination Address matches the target and the
            LHS Proxy/Server is configured to respond on the target's
            behalf, (i.e., if FMT-Forward is set) it next prepares to return
            a responsive MR. The LHS Proxy/Server next creates or updates
            an NCE for the MI Source Address (if necessary) with state set
            to STALE.</t>

            <t>The LHS Proxy/Server then creates an MR while copying
            the Neighbor Synchronization sub-option from the MI and
            including responsive window synchronization information.
            The LHS Proxy/Server sets the MR addresses as discussed
            in <xref target="STLLAO"/> then encapsulates the MR with
            an SRH, with OAL Source Address set to the MI OAL Destination
            Address and with OAL Destination Address set to the MI OAL
            Source Address. If the LHS Proxy/Server will set the MR
            message SYN flag, it also writes a non-zero value in the
            MR AFVI field; otherwise, it writes the value 0. The LHS
            Proxy/Server then calculates the MR OAL checksum, performs
            underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting carrier
            packet into the secured spanning tree.</t>

            <t>The LHS Proxy/Server then creates a locally-unique AFVI
            for the Client and both caches it in the newly-created AFV
            and writes it into the MR AFVI field. If FMT-Forward is clear
            and FMT-Mode is set, the LHS Proxy/Server next resets the
            Neighbor Synchronization FHS ifIndex to 0. The LHS Proxy/Server
            next includes an authentication signature in the MI if necessary,
            changes the OAL Source Address to its own MLA, changes the
            Destination Address to the MLA of the next hop toward the LHS
            Client and includes an SRH with the MLAs of intermediate systems.
            The LHS Proxy/Server then decrements the OAL Hop Limit, includes
            an OAL Extended Fragment Header with an appropriate Identification
            value if necessary, performs underlay encapsulation and forwards
            the resulting carrier packet to the LHS Client.</t>

            <t>If there are multiple OAL hops between the LHS Proxy/Server
            and LHS Client, the first OAL intermediate node receives the
            carrier packet containing the MI then also verifies the OAL checksum
            and authentication signature. The OAL intermediate node then
            caches the FHS/LHS Client addressing, AFVI and window synchronization
            information as previous hop information in a new or existing AFV.
            The OAL intermediate hop then creates a new unique AFVI to forward
            to the next OAL hop, then both caches the AFVI and writes it into
            the MI, i.e., while over-writing the value supplied by the previous
            hop. The OAL intermediate node then forwards to the next OAL hop
            toward the LHS Client which then performs the same functions as
            the previous OAL hop.</t>

            <t>When the LHS Client receives the carrier packet, it performs
            underlay decapsulation, verifies the Identification, then
            verifies the MI OAL checksum/authentication signature. The LHS
            Client then creates an ALNCE for the MI Source Address (if
            necessary) in the STALE state and caches the MI Neighbor
            Synchronization information in a new AFV associated with the
            NCE corresponding to the MI Source Address. If the LHS Client
            will request reverse path state establishment, it finally generates
            and assigns a locally-unique AFVI for a flow to be forwarded
            to the previous hop, which it caches in the new AFV. Otherwise,
            the LHS Client sets the reverse path AFVI to 0.</t>

            <t>The LHS Client then prepares an MR using the same
            procedures as for the LHS Proxy/Server above while including
            responsive window synchronization information, the new AFVI
            in the MR and with SRH addressing information for OAL
            forwarding in the reverse path. The LHS Client includes an
            authentication signature if necessary, calculates the MR
            OAL checksum, then encapsulates the MR with OAL Source
            Address set to its own MLA and OAL Destination Address set
            to the MLA of the next hop toward the LHS Proxy/Server. The
            LHS Client finally includes an OAL SRH and Extended Fragment
            Header with an appropriate Identification if necessary,
            performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the resulting
            carrier packet to the LHS Proxy/Server.</t>

            <t>If there are multiple OAL hops between the LHS Client and
            LHS Proxy/Server, the first OAL intermediate node receives
            the carrier packet containing the MR then also verifies the
            OAL checksum and authentication signature. If the MR Neighbor
            Synchronization sub-option SYN flag is set, the OAL intermediate
            node then caches the LHS/FHS Client addressing, AFVI and window
            synchronization information as previous hop information in a new
            or existing AFV. The OAL intermediate hop then creates a new
            unique AFVI to forward to the next OAL hop, then both caches
            the AFVI and writes it into the MR, i.e., while over-writing
            the value supplied by the previous hop. The OAL intermediate
            node then forwards to the next OAL hop toward the LHS Proxy/Server
            which then performs the same functions as the previous OAL hop.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="gwna" title="Reverse Path Forwarding of the MR">
            <t>When the LHS Proxy/Server receives the carrier packet, it
            performs underlay decapsulation, verifies the Identification
            and verifies the MR OAL checksum/authentication signature. The
            LHS Proxy/Server removes the OAL Extended Fragment Header and
            forwards the MR over the reverse path toward the initiating
            FHS node, where it may traverse many intermediate Gateways.</t>

            <t>Each Gateway along the reverse path processes the Neighbor
            Synchronization information in the MR message in the same way
            that the Gateways in the forward path had processed the MI.
            If the FHS Proxy/Server forwards the message, it changes the
            OAL Source Address to its own MLA, changes the Destination
            Address to the next hop MLA toward the FHS Client and
            includes an SRH. The MR will eventually arrive at the
            initiating FHS node as confirmation that AFV state is
            established in all end and intermediate systems in
            the forward path.</t>

            <t>Flow state is normally unidirectional from the source to the
            destination, however the LHS node can elect bidirectional state
            by setting the SYN flag in the MR Neighbor Synchronization
            sub-option. In that case, the forward and reverse paths between
            the FHS (initiator) Proxy/Server and LHS (responder) Proxy/Server
            may traverse different sets of intermediate nodes but the source
            and destination are still able to coordinate the value used in
            the Flow Label. The initiator should then complete the three-way
            handshake by returning an MC or a data packet with an in-window
            Identification value to confirm that the SYN was received.</t>

            <t>Under nominal conditions when the source and destination do
            not coordinate their flow 3-tuples, if AFV state is needed
            in the reverse path a separate MI/MR exchange between the LHS
            initiator and FHS responder based on asynchronous packet
            arrivals may be needed. In that case, the forward and reverse
            path flows bear no relation to one another and will often
            include different flow 3-tuple information.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="oalendsync"
                   title="OAL End System Exchanges Following Synchronization">
            <t>Following the initial MI/MR/MC exchange OAL end systems can
            begin exchanging ordinary carrier packets
            for synchronized flows that include AFVIs and with Identification
            values within their respective send windows without requiring
            security signatures and/or secured spanning tree traversal. OAL
            end and intermediate systems can also consult their AFIBs when
            they receive carrier packets that contain OAL packets/fragments
            with AFVIs to unambiguously locate the correct AFV and can use
            the AFV state to forward OAL packets/fragments to the next hop.
            OAL end systems must then perform continuous MI/MR/MC exchanges
            to update window state, register new flows for optimized
            multilink forwarding, confirm reachability and/or refresh
            AFIB cache state in the path before ReachableTime expires.</t>

            <t>While the OAL end systems continue to actively exchange OAL
            packets, they are jointly responsible for updating cache state
            and per-interface reachability before expiration. Window
            synchronization state is performed on a per-flow basis and
            tracked in the AFVs which are also linked to the appropriate
            NCE. However, the window synchronization exchange only confirms
            target Client reachability over the specific underlay interface
            pair. Reachability for other underlay interfaces that share the
            same NCE must be determined individually using additional MI/MR/MC
            messages that include Neighbor Synchronization information.</t>

            <t>OAL sources can then begin including OCHs in OAL
            packets/fragments with an AFVI that OAL intermediate
            systems can use for shortest-path forwarding based on AFVIs
            instead of spanning tree OAL IPv6 addresses. Forwarding based
            on the limited OCH information is supported since all OAL nodes
            in the path up to (and sometimes including) the OAL destination
            have already established AFVs.</t>

            <t>When a Proxy/Server receives OAL packets/fragments destined
            to a local SRT segment Client or forwards OAL packets/fragments
            received from a local segment Client, it first locates the correct
            AFV. If the OAL packet/fragment includes a secured control
            message, the Proxy/Server uses the Client's ALNCE established
            through RS/RA exchanges to re-encapsulate while
            sending outbound secured carrier packets via the secured spanning
            tree and sending inbound secured carrier packets while including
            an OAL authentication signature/checksum. For ordinary OAL
            packets/fragments, the Proxy/Server uses the same AFV if directed
            by AFVI and/or OAL addressing. Otherwise it locates an AFV
            established through an MI/MR/MC exchange between the Client
            and the remote SRT segment peer, and forwards the OAL
            packet/fragments without first reassembling/decapsulating.</t>

            <t>When a source Client forwards OAL packets/fragments it can
            employ header compression according to the AFVs established
            through an MI/MR/MC exchange with a remote or local peer. When
            a target Client receives carrier packets that contain OAL
            packets/fragments that match a local AFV, the Client first
            verifies the Identification then decompresses the headers if
            necessary, reassembles to obtain the OAL packet then decapsulates
            and delivers the original IP packet to the network layer.</t>

            <t>When synchronized peer Clients in the same SRT segment with
            FMT-Forward and FMT-Mode set discover each other's NATed UNX
            addresses, they can exchange carrier packets that contain OAL
            packets/fragments directly with header compression using AFVIs
            discovered as above (see: <xref target="cliro"/>).</t>

            <t>When the FHS Client or FHS Proxy/Server sends an MI for the
            purpose of establishing multilink forwarding state, it should wait
            up to RETRANS_TIMER seconds to receive a responsive MR. The FHS
            node can then retransmit the MI up to MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT times
            before giving up.</t>
          </section>

          <section anchor="async" title="Dynamic Multilink Flow State Management">
            <t>Following address resolution, either the ARS or ART acting
            as an OAL source may immediately begin forwarding original IP
            packets for a flow as composite packet attachments to "pilot"
            MC messages without waiting for an initial MI/MR round-trip
            exchange. The messages will include an authentication signature
            if necessary that covers the entire composite packet including
            the MC pilot and all original IP packet attachments.</t>

            <t>Each MC message OMNI option contains a Neighbor Synchronization
            sub-option with the SYN flag set to cause OAL intermediate systems
            in the forward path to create or update AFIB state. The MC sets its
            Source/Destination/Target Addresses and Neighbor Synchronization
            flags the same as described for MI messages above. All OAL intermediate
            systems in the forward path will process the MC message the same as
            specified for MI messages above.</t>

            <t>The OAL source should continue to forward additional original
            IP packets for the flow that arrive during a brief convergence
            interval as secured MC composite packets, e.g., up to N composite
            packets within a 1 second window. The OAL source can then begin
            forwarding new IP packet arrivals for the flow via the unsecured
            spanning tree while applying OAL encapsulation, fragmentation and
            header compression. The OAL source can continue forwarding under
            the optimistic expectation that AFIB state is securely established
            in the forward path and/or infer forward progress through receipt
            of return traffic. As AFIB state becomes stale, the OAL source
            can resume forwarding secured MC composite packets during a new
            convergence interval to refresh/renew state as above before
            resuming via the unsecured spanning tree.</t>

            <t>The OAL source can also forward OAL-fragmented packets in
            this manner by including the fragment body preceded by an OMNI
            Fragment Header (OMNI-FH) immediately following the OAL-encapsulated
            MC message. Each fragment MUST be no larger than the minimum OAL
            Fragment Size (OFS) of 1024 octets to ensure they will transit
            the secured spanning tree without encountering a size restriction.
            The fragment size is determined by the MC message payload length
            minus the initial payload length up to the beginning of the
            OMNI-FH, i.e., the fragment must appear as the final trailing
            component of the composite packet.</t>

            <t>Further information on OMNI fragmentation and reassembly can
            be found in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>
          </section>
        </section>

        <section anchor="manet" title="Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) Forwarding">
        <t>Clients with OMNI interfaces configured over underlay
        interfaces with indeterminant neighborhood properties may be
        connected to a Mobile Ad-hoc NETwork (MANET). Each MANET
        may be either completely outside of the range of any OMNI link
        Proxy/Servers or may require multihop traversal between Clients
        acting as MANET routers to reach Proxy/Servers that connect to
        the rest of the OMNI link. The former class of MANETs must
        operate in isolation solely based on the unique IPv6 MLAs
        they configure locally. The latter class allows MANET routers
        to extend infrastructure-based addressing information including
        MNPs over multiple OMNI link hops as discussed in the OMNI
        specification.</t>

        <t>MANET Clients configure their OMNI interfaces over one or
        more MANET interfaces where multihop forwarding may be necessary.
        Routing protocols suitable for use over MANET interfaces include
        OSPFv3 <xref target="RFC5340"/> with MANET Designated Router
        (OSPF-MDR) extensions <xref target="RFC5614"/>, OLSRv2 <xref
        target="RFC7181"/>, Babel <xref target="RFC8966"/>, AODVv2
        <xref target="I-D.perkins-manet-aodvv2"/> and others. Other
        services specific to MANET link-local and/or site-local
        operations (including SMF <xref target="RFC6621"/>, DLEP
        <xref target="RFC8175"/> and others) are also considered
        in-scope. These services strive for optimal use of available
        radio bandwidth and power consumption in their control message
        transmissions, but efficient data plane operation is also
        essential.</t>

        <t>Clients must therefore reduce overhead through minimal
        encapsulation and effective header compression whenever possible.
        For this reason, when the MANET routing protocol discovers a new
        MLA-based route the Client configures a lesser-preferred forwarding
        table entry over the corresponding MANET interface and a
        more-preferred forwarding table entry over the OMNI interface
        as specified in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. This
        will cause the network layer to direct outbound packets to the
        OMNI interface, which can apply header compression and underlay
        MANET interface selection.</t> 

        <t>Multilink Clients that connect a MANET to the rest of the
        OMNI link act as regular Clients for exchanges with external
        INETs, but act as Proxy/Servers over their MANET interfaces.
        Each such Client therefore has at least two underlay interfaces,
        including both INET and MANET interfaces. The Client therefore
        services the MANET as if it were a Proxy/Server but presents
        itself as a Client to external facing INETs. This class of
        Clients are also known as "Proxy/Clients".</t>

        <t>The process for a multihop Client to establish multilink forwarding
        and header compression AFV state in the MANET is conducted in the same
        fashion as described above and using the same MI/MR/MC or unidirectional
        MC message exchanges. Each MANET forwarding node in the path creates
        or updates AFV state in the same fashion as for intermediate
        Gateways in the secured spanning tree except that the MI/MR/MC
        messages require authentication signatures (unless neighboring
        MANET nodes configure IPsec tunnels) and an Identification that is
        within the window for its serving Proxy/Server if the destination
        is outside of the local MANET cluster. The MI/MR/MC messages extend
        from the initiating FHS MANET Client, then across any MANET hops
        over intermediate FHS Proxy/Clients, then to the FHS Proxy/Server,
        then across the secured SRT spanning tree to the LHS Proxy/Server,
        then finally across any intermediate LHS MANET hops to the responding
        LHS Client. (When the source and target Client are both within the
        same local MANET cluster, however, the process is conducted directly
        between the two Clients without engaging the FHS Proxy/Server.) In
        all other ways, the MI/MR/MC or unidirectional MC exchanges are
        the same as discussed in <xref target="segspan"/>.</t>

        <t>Following the MI/MR/MC exchanges, each MANET router in
        the forward (and optionally also reverse) path in both the FHS
        and LHS MANETs will have established AFVs containing multilink
        forwarding and header compression state for the flow. The AFVs
        determine AFVI-based forwarding based on the OCH header contents,
        and each MANET router only forwards packets with in-window
        Identification values for the flow. MANET routers maintain
        AFVs for up to ReachableTime seconds unless they are refreshed
        by a new MI/MR/MC message. New window synchronization
        exchanges must also be performed periodically to avoid
        window exhaustion and/or spoofing based on predictable
        Identifications.</t>

        <t>Note: while the MANET routing protocol runs directly over the node's
        MANET interfaces to discover routing information, the node configures
        lesser-preferred forwarding table entries over the MANET interface and
        corresponding more-preferred forwarding table entries over the OMNI
        interface. This causes the network layer to forward outbound packets via
        the OMNI interface which applies encapsulation, fragmentation and/or
        header compression as necessary before forwarding over the underlying
        MANET interface. The OMNI protocol designator in the UDP port, IP
        protocol or Ethernet EtherType field will then cause the packets
        to visit the OMNI interface of each successive next-hop MANET node.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="route-opt" title="AERO Route Optimization">
        <section anchor="psro" title="Proxy/Server-to-Proxy/Server Route Optimization">
          <t>When the FHS and LHS Proxy/Servers are both connected to an
          IPv6 underlay for the same SRT segment, they can forward MI/MR/MC
          exchanges directly over the underlay without engaging SRT spanning
          tree hops.</t>

          <t>If the underlay is not secured, the FHS and LHS Proxy/Servers
          must include an authentication signature with their MI/MR/MC
          messages, which could either be the original authentication signature
          included by their respective Clients or a new signature included by
          the Proxy/Server itself. If the Proxy/Server that processes the
          MI/MR/MC message determines that the message is authentic, it
          creates or updates an AFV entry according to the multilink
          forwarding parameters. This establishes both AFVI and
          Identification window state to be used for future data
          traffic forwarding.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="gwro" title="Gateway-to-Proxy/Server Route Optimization">
          <t>When the LHS gateway and FHS Proxy/Server are both connected to an
          IPv6 underlay for the same SRT segment, they can forward MI/MR/MC
          exchanges directly over the underlay without engaging additional
          SRT spanning tree hops. In this arrangement, the LHS Gateway acts
          the same as the FHS Proxy/Server as discussed in <xref target=
          "psro"/> and observes the requirement for including authentication
          signatures.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cliro" title="Client-to-Client Route Optimization">
          <t>When the FHS/LHS Clients are both located on the same SRT
          segment, Client-to-Client route optimization is possible following
          the establishment of any necessary state in NATs in the path. Both
          Clients will have already established state via their respective
          shared segment Proxy/Servers (and possibly also any shared segment
          Gateways) and can begin sending carrier packets directly via NAT
          traversal while avoiding any Proxy/Server and/or Gateway hops.</t>

          <t>When the FHS/LHS Clients on the same SRT segment perform initial
          MI/MR/MC exchanges to establish AFIB state, they first
          examine the FMT-Forward and FMT-Mode settings to determine whether
          direct-path forwarding is even possible for one or both Clients
          (direct-path forwarding is only possible when FMT-Forward and
          FMT-Mode are both set). The MI/MR/MC messages then include an
          Interface Attributes sub-option (i.e., in addition to a Neighbor
          Synchronization sub-option) with the mapped UNX information
          discovered during the RS/RA exchanges with their respective
          Proxy/Servers. After the AFV paths have been established,
          both Clients can begin sending carrier packets via strict AFV
          paths while establishing a direct path for Client-to-Client
          route optimization.</t>

          <t>To establish the direct path, either Client (acting as the
          source) transmits a bubble to the mapped UNX for the target
          Client which primes the local chain of NATs for reception of future
          carrier packets from that UNX (see: <xref target="RFC4380"/>
          and <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>). The source Client
          then prepares an MI message with the FNP/MNP address of a subject
          packet as the Source Address, with the FNP/MNP address of the
          target as the Target and Destination Address and with an OMNI
          option with an Interface Attributes sub-option. The source Client
          then encapsulates the MI in an OAL header and SRH extension with
          its own MLA as the Source Address, with the MLA of the next
          OAL hop toward the Proxy/Server as the Destination Address and
          with an in-window Identification for the target. The source Client
          then performs underlay encapsulation and sends the resulting
          carrier packets to the Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t>When the Proxy/Server receives the carrier packets, it
          re-encapsulates and sends them as unsecured carrier packets
          according to AFIB state where they will eventually arrive at
          the target Client. The target Client then prepares an MR
          message with the MI Destination Address as the Source Address,
          with the MI Source Address as the Target and Destination
          Address and with an OMNI option with an Interface Attributes
          sub-option. The target Client then encapsulates the MR in an
          OAL header and SRH extension with its own MLA as the Source
          Address, with the MLA of the source Client as the Destination
          Address and with an in-window Identification for the source
          Client. The target Client then performs underlay encapsulation
          then forwards the resulting carrier packet directly to the
          source Client.</t>

          <t>Following the initial MI/MR exchange, both Clients mark their
          respective (source, target) underlay interface pairs as "trusted"
          for no more than ReachableTime seconds. The Clients can then
          begin exchanging ordinary data packets as OCH encapsulated
          carrier packets. While the Clients continue to exchange packets
          via the direct path avoiding all Proxy/Servers and Gateways, they
          should perform additional MI/MR exchanges via their local
          Proxy/Servers to refresh NCE state as well as send additional
          bubbles to the peer's UNX if necessary to refresh NAT state.</t>

          <t>Note: these procedures apply for a widely-deployed
          but basic class of NATs. Procedures for advanced NAT classes are
          outlined in <xref target="RFC6081"/>, which provides mechanisms that
          can be employed equally for AERO using the corresponding sub-options
          specified by OMNI.</t>

          <t>Note: each communicating pair of Clients may need to maintain
          NAT state for peer to peer communications via multiple underlay
          interface pairs and/or multiple flows. It is therefore important
          that UNX information is maintained with the correct peer
          interface and that the NCE may cache information for multiple
          peer interfaces.</t>

          <t>Note: the source and target Client exchange UNX information
          during the secured MI/MR/MC multilink route optimization exchange.
          This allows for subsequent MI/MR/MC exchanges to proceed using only
          the Identification value as a data origin confirmation. However,
          Client-to-Client peerings that require stronger security may
          also include authentication signatures for mutual authentication.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="clihocli"
                 title="Intra-(M)ANET/EUN Route Optimization">
          <t>When a Client forwards an OAL packet (or an original IP
          packet) from another Client connected to one of its downstream
          EUNs to a peer within the same downstream EUN, the Client
          returns an IPv6 ND Redirect message to inform the source that
          the target can be reached directly. The contents of the Redirect
          message are the same as specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>
          except that the message includes MLAs instead of LLAs, and
          should also include any OMNI option RIOs with MNP information
          corresponding to the target.</t>

          <t>In the same fashion, when a Proxy/Server forwards an OAL packet
          (or original IP packet) from a Client connected to one of its
          downstream *NETs to a peer within the same downstream *NET,
          the Proxy/Server returns an IPv6 ND Redirect message.</t>

          <t>All other route optimization functions are conducted per the
          MI/MR/MC messaging discussed in the previous sections.</t>
        </section>
        </section>
        <section anchor="alt-ar" title="Alternate Address Resolution Services">
          <t>The address resolution procedures discussed in previous
          sections are based on the exchange of NS/NA(AR) messages the
          same as for any link and apply for bounded-scale MLA address
          and/or FNP/MNP prefix populations. When the number of deployed
          addresses/prefixes exceeds the scaling capacity of the AERO
          BGP routing system, an alternate address resolution service
          may be needed for some or all target addresses.</t>

          <t>The FHS Proxy/Server engages such alternate services based on
          the Target Address found in a Client's NS(AR). For targets that
          are covered by BGP routing system prefixes, the FHS Proxy/Server
          forwards the NS(AR) into the routing system as above and expects
          to receive a responsive NA(AR). For targets that match prefixes
          beyond the BGP routing system's scaling capacity, the FHS
          Proxy/Server instead contacts a TBD mapping system that can
          maintain real-time address resolution mapping information
          for extremely large address/prefix populations.</t>

          <t>The BGP routing system at a minimum must carry the MLAs
          of all Proxy/Servers and Gateways on the OMNI link, and should
          also carry selected (sub)sets of FNP/MNP prefixes while all
          other information is maintained in the TBD mapping system.
          When the FHS Proxy/Server process an NS(AR) received from
          one of its Clients and with Target Address not covered by
          a BGP routing system prefix, it makes a side-call to the
          TBD mapping system instead of forwarding the NS(AR) into
          the routing system.</t>

          <t>The mapping system then returns an NA(AR) that includes
          the same OMNI information that would have resulted from a
          MAP/Client response to the NS(AR). The mapping system must
          remember each such transaction so that it can return future
          mobility update messages if mapping information changes the
          same as a MAP Proxy/Server would do. In all other ways,
          address resolution is satisfied for arbitrarily large
          population sizes.</t>

          <t>Since the numbers of Clients may far exceed the scaling
          capacity of the BGP routing system, Client MLAs are an
          example of information that may be better maintained in
          the TBD mapping system. This applies especially when the
          shortest possible Client MLA prefix length is /128.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nud" title="Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD)">
        <t>AERO nodes perform Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) per
        <xref target="RFC4861"/> either reactively in response to persistent
        link layer errors (see: <xref target="aeroerr"/>) or proactively to
        confirm reachability. The NUD algorithm is based on periodic control
        message exchanges and may further be seeded by IPv6 ND hints of
        forward progress, but care must be taken to avoid inferring
        reachability based on spoofed information.</t>

        <t>For on-link destinations, NUD messaging is driven by the network
        layer under the same conditions as for any interface; for off-link
        destinations, the process is driven by the adaptation layer. The
        NS/NA(NUD) messages follow the same forwarding and processing rules
        as for address resolution and confirm that the target neighbor is
        still reachable over a selected underlay interface path. The messages
        may also update NLNCE/ALNCE state if they include address resolution
        information and an authentication signature.</t>

        <t>In order to test additional underlay interface paths, the
        adaptation layer can independently send an MI message with an
        SRH with an AFVI with the (I)nitialize flag set to 0 in order
        to receive an MR response. The MI messages may be sent while
        ordinary data packets are flowing either as independent messages
        or as pilot messages of composite packets. The MI messages follow
        already-established paths without updating state and therefore
        need not include an authentication signature but should include
        an OMNI Nonce sub-option.</t>
        
        <t>When the source receives the MR, it marks the target underlay
        interface tested as "trusted". Note that underlay interface states are
        maintained independently of the overall NCE REACHABLE state, and that
        a single NCE may have multiple target underlay interfaces in various
        "trusted/untrusted" states while the NCE state as a whole remains
        REACHABLE.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromob"
               title="Mobility Management and Quality of Service (QoS)">
        <t>AERO is a fully Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) service in
        which each Proxy/Server is responsible for only a subset of the
        Clients on the OMNI link. This is in contrast to a Centralized
        Mobility Management (CMM) service where there are only one or a few
        network mobility collective entities for large Client populations.
        Clients coordinate with their associated FHS and MAP Proxy/Servers
        via RS/RA exchanges to maintain the DMM profile, and the AERO
        routing system tracks all current Client/Proxy/Server peering
        relationships.</t>

        <t>MAP Proxy/Servers provide an address resolution aggregation
        point for their dependent Clients, while FHS Proxy/Servers provide
        a proxy conduit between the Client and both the MAP and OMNI link
        in general. Clients are responsible for maintaining neighbor
        relationships with their Proxy/Servers through periodic RS/RA
        exchanges, which also serve to confirm neighbor reachability.
        When a Client's underlay interface attributes change, the Client
        is responsible for updating the MAP Proxy/Server through new RS/RA
        exchanges using the FHS Proxy/Server as a first-hop conduit. The
        FHS Proxy/Server can also act as a proxy to perform some IPv6 ND
        exchanges on the Client's behalf without consuming bandwidth on
        the Client underlay interface.</t>

        <t>Note: when a Client's underlay interface address changes, the
        Client and/or its (former) FHS Proxy/Server for this interface must
        invalidate any AFVs based on the (changed) interface. Future data
        packet forwarding will then trigger a new multilink forwarding
        MI/MR/MC exchange to re-populate new AFVs in the path.</t>

        <t>Mobility management considerations are specified in the following
        sections.</t>

        <section anchor="llchange"
                 title="Registering Link-Layer Information Changes">
          <t>When a Client needs to change its underlay Interface Attributes
          and/or Traffic Selectors for one or more underlay interfaces (e.g.,
          due to a mobility event), it sends RS messages to its MAP
          Proxy/Server via new FHS Proxy/Servers if necessary. Each RS
          includes an OMNI option with Interface Attributes and/or Traffic
          Selector sub-options for the ifIndex in question.</t>

          <t>Note that the FHS Proxy/Server may change due to an underlay
          interface connectivity change or an intentional switch to a new
          Proxy/Server. If the Client RS includes an OMNI Proxy/Server
          Departure sub-option for the former FHS Proxy/Server, the new
          FHS Proxy/Server can send a departure indication (see: <xref
          target="newsrv"/>); otherwise, any stale state in the former FHS
          Proxy/Server will simply expire after ReachableTime expires with
          no effect on the MAP Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t>Up to MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS RS messages MAY be sent in parallel
          with sending carrier packets containing user data in case one or
          more RAs are lost. If all RAs are lost, the Client SHOULD
          re-associate with a new Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t>When a Client needs to bring new underlay interfaces into service
          (e.g., when it activates a new data link), it sends an RS message to
          the MAP Proxy/Server via a FHS Proxy/Server for the underlay
          interface (if necessary) with an OMNI option that includes an
          Interface Attributes sub-option with interface parameters and
          with address resolution information for the new link.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmlink" title="Deactivating Existing Links">
          <t>When a Client needs to deactivate an existing underlay interface,
          it sends an RS message toward the MAP Proxy/Server via an FHS
          Proxy/Server with an OMNI option with appropriate Interface
          Attributes values for the deactivated link.</t>

          <t>If the Client needs to send RS messages over an underlay
          interface other than the one being deactivated, it MUST include
          current Interface Attributes for the link used as the first
          sub-option as well as additional Interface Attributes for any
          underlay interfaces being deactivated as additional sub-options
          with ifMetric set to 'ffffffff'. The Client (or its MAP
          Proxy/Server) then again sends uNA messages to all neighbors
          the same as described above.</t>

          <t>Note that when a Client deactivates an underlay interface,
          neighbors that receive the ensuing uNA messages need not purge
          all references for the underlay interface from their NCEs. The
          Client may reactivate or reuse the underlay interface and/or its
          ifIndex at a later point in time, when it will send new RS messages
          to an FHS Proxy/Server with fresh interface parameters to update
          any neighbors. The manner in which the Client dynamically manages
          its local ifIndex to interface mappings is a local decision, but
          should not be done in a manner that could cause state
          inconsistencies in the network.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newsrv" title="Moving Between Proxy/Servers">
          <t>When a Client associates with a new MAP Proxy/Server, it sends RS
          messages to register its underlay interfaces with the new MAP while
          including the departed MAP's MLA in a Proxy/Server Control OMNI
          sub-option. When the new MAP Proxy/Server returns an RA message
          via the FHS Proxy/Server (acting as a proxy), the FHS Proxy/Server
          sends a uNA to the departed MAP Proxy/Server if the departed MLA
          is other than ::/128. Note that the FHS Proxy/Server defers the
          uNA transmission until after the new MAP has responded for
          reliability purposes; if even greater reliability is needed, the
          FHS Proxy/Server can instead send an NS(NUD) message to receive
          an NA(NUD) response.</t>

          <t>The FHS Proxy/Server sets the uNA Source Address to the
          MLA of the new MAP, sets the Target Address to the Client's
          MLA and sets the Destination Address to the MLA of the departed
          MAP. The FHS Proxy/Server then includes a Proxy/Server Control
          OMNI sub-option with the M flag set to 1 and all other flags
          set to 0 and with no departed addresses included. The FHS
          Proxy/Server then encapsulates the uNA in an OAL header with
          its own MLA as the Source Address and the MLA of the departed
          MAP as the Destination Address, then performs underlay
          encapsulation and forwards the resulting carrier packet
          via the secured spanning tree.</t>

          <t>When the departed MAP Proxy/Server receives the carrier
          packet, it decapsulates to obtain the uNA and examines the
          Proxy/Server Control sub-option M flag. If the M flag is 1
          the departed MAP Proxy/Server then changes the Client's NCE
          state to DEPARTED, resets DepartTime and caches the new MAP
          Proxy/Server MLA. After a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds) the
          departed MAP Proxy/Server withdraws the Client's MNP(s) from
          the routing system. While in the DEPARTED state, the departed
          MAP Proxy/Server forwards any carrier packets received via the
          secured spanning tree destined to the Client's MNP addresses
          to the new MAP Proxy/Server's MLA. When DepartTime expires,
          the departed MAP Proxy/Server deletes the Client's NCE.</t>

          <t>Mobility events may also cause a Client to change to a new FHS
          Proxy/Server over a specific underlay interface at any time such
          that a Client RS/RA exchange over the underlay interface will engage
          the new FHS Proxy/Server instead of the old. The Client can arrange
          to inform the old FHS Proxy/Server of the departure by including a
          Proxy/Server Control sub-option with the MLA of the departed FHS
          Proxy/Server. The new FHS Proxy/Server will issue a uNA (or NS/NA)
          using the same procedures as outlined for the MAP above.</t>

          <t>The new FHS Proxy/Server sets the uNA Source Address its own
          MLA, sets the Target Address to the Client's MLA and sets the
          Destination Address to the MLA of the departed FHS Proxy/Server.
          The new FHS Proxy/Server then includes a Proxy/Server Control
          OMNI sub-option with the P flag set to 1 and all other flags
          set to 0 and with no departed addresses included. The new FHS
          Proxy/Server then encapsulates the uNA in an OAL header with
          its own MLA as the Source Address and the MLA of the old FHS
          Proxy/Server as the Destination Address, then performs underlay
          encapsulation and forwards the resulting carrier packet via the
          secured spanning tree.</t>

          <t>When the departed FHS Proxy/Server receives the uNA,
          it updates the Client's MLA to the address of the new FHS
          Proxy/Server and sets the NCE state to DEPARTED. The departed
          FHS Proxy/Server can then forward any packets it receives for
          the Client to its new FHS Proxy/Server. The departed FHS
          Proxy/Server's NCE for the Client will then naturally expire
          if no further RS message arrive. This can often result in
          successful delivery of carrier packets that would otherwise
          be lost temporarily due to the mobility event.</t>

          <t>Clients SHOULD NOT move rapidly between MAP Proxy/Servers in
          order to avoid causing excessive oscillations in the AERO routing
          system. Examples of when a Client might wish to change to a
          different MAP Proxy/Server include a MAP Proxy/Server that has
          become unresponsive, topological movements of significant distance,
          movement to a new geographic region, movement to a new OMNI link
          segment, etc.</t>

          <t>Note that a Client simultaneous change to both a new FHS
          and MAP Proxy/Server is signaled by the new FHS when it sends
          a uNA to both the departed FHS and MAP Proxy/Server. If both
          the departed FHS/MAP are one and the same, and the new FHS/MAP
          are one and the same, the new FHS sends a single uNA (or NS/NA)
          with both the M and P flags set to 1, i.e., it need not send
          multiple messages.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="mobman" title="Mobility Update Messaging">
          <t>Mobile Clients (and/or their MAP Proxy/Servers) accommodate
          mobility and/or multilink change events by sending secured uNA
          messages to each neighbor that previously received address
          resolution information. When a node sends a uNA message to
          each specific neighbor on behalf of a mobile Client, it sets
          the IPv6 Source and Target Address to the Client's MLA then
          sets the Destination Address to the neighbor's MLA.</t>

          <t>The node then encapsulates the uNA in an OAL header with
          Source set to its own MLA and Destination set to the MLA of
          the neighbor. The node also includes an OMNI option with
          Interface Attributes and Traffic Selector sub-options for
          any of the  mobile Client's underlay interfaces that may
          have changed values and includes an authentication
          signature if necessary.</t>

          <t>The node next sets the uNA R flag to 1, S flag to 0 and O flag
          to 1, then encapsulates the message in an OAL header. Following
          OAL and underlay encapsulation, the carrier packet containing the
          uNA message will then follow the secured spanning tree and arrive
          at the specific neighbor.</t>

          <t>As discussed in Section 7.2.6 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>,
          the transmission and reception of uNA messages is unreliable
          but provides a useful optimization. In well-connected Internetworks
          with robust data links uNA messages will be delivered with high
          reliability, but in any case the node can optionally send up to
          MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT uNAs to each neighbor to increase the
          likelihood that at least one will be received. Alternatively, the
          node can send an MI(MM) message to solicit an MR(MM) response
          as discussed in <xref target="STLLAO"/>.</t>

          <t>When the neighbor receives a uNA with address resolution
          changes, it marks any AFVs in its ALNCE for the uNA source that
          were established based on now-obsolete information as STALE.
          When the neighbor forwards the next packet for an affected flow,
          it initiates a new multilink forwarding exchange as specified
          in <xref target="segspan"/> to refresh AFVI state for the path.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pathchg" title="Accommodating Path Changes">
          <t>After AFV state has been established for a flow, all OAL
          intermediate systems in the forward path will have AFVs with 
          header compression state and (AFVI, UNX) information for
          the next hop. However, paths can fluctuate due to factors
          such as node mobility, routing changes, network membership,
          etc. If an OAL intermediate system forwarding OAL packets
          with OCH headers detects that the next hop in the path has
          changed, it immediately reverts to sending the packets with
          header compression disabled by including full OAL IPv6 and
          Extended Fragment Headers (plus full original IP headers)
          in future packets.</t>

          <t>When the OAL destination begins to receive OAL packets
          with full headers (i.e., when it had previously received
          OCH compressed headers), it assumes that the network path
          for this flow has changed and begins sending MC messages
          to the OAL source. The OAL destination sends the MC messages
          subject to rate limiting, and includes a Neighbor
          Synchronization OMNI sub-option with both the ACK and RST
          flags set and with the most recent OAL packet Identification
          recorded in the Acknowledgment field.</t>

          <t>When the OAL source receives the MC messages with ACK and
          RST set, it re-initiates multilink forwarding for this flow by
          issuing a new MI/MR/MC or unidirectional MC exchange the same
          as for a new flow as specified in <xref target="segspan"/>.
          The AFV state in the former path then simply expires and
          is soon purged by the former OAL intermediate nodes.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="mcast" title="Multicast">
        <t>Each Client provides an IGMP (IPv4) <xref target="RFC2236"/> or MLD
        (IPv6) <xref target="RFC3810"/> proxy service for its EUNs and/or
        hosted applications <xref target="RFC4605"/> and acts as a Protocol
        Independent Multicast - Sparse-Mode (PIM-SM, or simply "PIM")
        Designated Router (DR) <xref target="RFC7761"/> on the OMNI link.
        Proxy/Servers act as OMNI link PIM routers for Clients on ANET,
        VPN/IPsec or Direct interfaces, and Relays also act as OMNI link
        PIM routers on behalf of nodes on other links/networks.</t>

        <t>Clients on VPN/IPsec, Direct or (M)ANET underlay interfaces for which
        the *NET has deployed native multicast services forward IGMP/MLD messages
        into the *NET. The IGMP/MLD messages may be further forwarded by a
        first-hop *NET access router acting as an IGMP/MLD-snooping switch
        <xref target="RFC4541"/>, then ultimately delivered to a *NET (FHS)
        Proxy/Server. The FHS Proxy/Server then acts as an ARS to send NS(AR)
        messages to an ARR for the multicast source. Clients on *NET
        underlay interfaces without native multicast services instead send
        NS(AR) messages as an ARS to cause their FHS Proxy/Server to forward
        the message to an ARR. When the ARR prepares an NA(AR) response, it
        initiates PIM protocol messaging according to the Source-Specific
        Multicast (SSM) and Any-Source Multicast (ASM) operational modes as
        discussed in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="pim-ssm" title="Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)">
          <t>When an ARS "X" (i.e., either a Client or Proxy/Server) acting
          as PIM router receives a Join/Prune message from a node on its
          downstream interfaces containing one or more ((S)ource, (G)roup)
          pairs, it updates its Multicast Routing Information Base (MRIB)
          accordingly. For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's
          non-OMNI interfaces, X then forwards the (S, G) Join/Prune to any
          PIM routers on those interfaces per <xref target="RFC7761"/>. The
          same as for unicast destinations, the 3-tuple of Source Address,
          Destination Address and Flow Label identifies a flow for
          multicast group G.</t>

          <t>For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's OMNI
          interface, X sends an NS(AR) message (see: <xref target=
          "predirect"/>) into the secured spanning tree which
          delivers it to ARR "Y" that services S. Y will then return
          an NA(AR) that includes an OMNI option with Interface
          Attributes, Traffic Selectors and RIOs for S.</t>

          <t>When X processes the NA(AR) it selects one or more underlay
          interfaces for S and performs an MI/MR/MC multilink forwarding
          exchange over the secured spanning tree while including a PIM
          Join/Prune message OMNI sub-option for each multicast group of
          interest. If S is located behind any Proxys "Z"*, each Z*
          then updates its MRIB accordingly and maintains the FNP/MNP
          Source Address of X as the next hop in the reverse path. Since
          Gateways forward messages not addressed to themselves without
          examining them, this means that the (reverse) multicast tree
          path is simply from each Z* (and/or S) to X with no other
          multicast-aware routers in the path.</t>

          <t>Following the initial combined Join/Prune and MI/MR/MC
          messaging, X maintains a NCE for each S the same as if X was
          sending unicast data traffic to S. In particular, X performs
          additional MI/MR/MC exchanges to keep the NCE alive for
          up to t_periodic seconds <xref target="RFC7761"/>. If no new
          Joins are received within t_periodic seconds, X allows the
          NCE to expire. Finally, if X receives any additional Join/Prune
          messages for (S,G) it forwards the messages over the secured
          spanning tree.</t>

          <t>Client C that holds an MNP for source S may later depart from a
          first Proxy/Server Z1 and/or connect via a new Proxy/Server Z2. In
          that case, Y sends an MC message to X the same as specified for
          unicast mobility in <xref target="aeromob"/>. When X receives the
          MC message, it updates its NCE for the MLA for source S and
          sends new Join messages in MI/MR/MC exchanges addressed to the
          new target Client underlay interface connection for S. There is
          no requirement to send any Prune messages to old Proxy/Server Z1
          since source S will no longer source any multicast data traffic
          via Z1. Instead, the multicast state for (S,G) in Proxy/Server
          Z1 will soon expire since no new Joins will arrive.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pim-asm" title="Any-Source Multicast (ASM)">
          <t>When an ARS "X" acting as a PIM router receives Join/Prune
          messages from a node on its downstream interfaces containing one or
          more (*,G) pairs, it updates its Multicast Routing Information Base
          (MRIB) accordingly. X first performs an NS/NA(AR) exchange to
          receive address resolution information for Rendezvous Point (RP) "R"
          for each G. X then includes a copy of each Join/Prune message in the
          OMNI option of an MI/MR/MC message, then encapsulates the MI/MR/MC
          message in an OAL header and sends the message into the secured
          spanning tree.</t>

          <t>For each source "S" that sends multicast traffic to group G via
          R, Client S* that aggregates S (or its Proxy/Server) encapsulates
          the original IP packets in PIM Register messages, includes
          the PIM Register messages in the OMNI options of MC messages,
          performs OAL encapsulation and fragmentation with Identification
          values within the receive window for Client R* that aggregates R,
          then performs underlay encapsulation and forwards the
          resulting carrier packets.</t>

          <t>Client R* may then elect to send a PIM Join to S* in the
          OMNI option of a MC over the secured spanning tree. This will
          result in an (S,G) tree rooted at S* with R as the next hop
          so that R will begin to receive two copies of the original
          IP packet; one native copy from the (S, G) tree and a second
          copy from the pre-existing (*, G) tree that still uses MC PIM
          Register encapsulation. R can then issue an MC with a PIM
          Register-stop message over the secured spanning tree to suppress
          the Register-encapsulated stream. At some later time, if Client
          S* moves to a new Proxy/Server, it resumes sending original IP
          packets via MC PIM Register encapsulation via the
          new Proxy/Server.</t>

          <t>At the same time, as multicast listeners discover individual
          S's for a given G, they can initiate an (S,G) Join for each S
          under the same procedures discussed in <xref target="pim-ssm"/>.
          Once the (S,G) tree is established, the listeners can send (S, G)
          Prune messages to R so that multicast original IP packets
          for group G sourced by S will only be delivered via the (S, G)
          tree and not from the (*, G) tree rooted at R. All mobility
          considerations discussed for SSM apply.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="bidir-pim" title="Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM)">
          <t>Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM) <xref target="RFC5015"/> provides
          an alternate approach to ASM that treats the Rendezvous Point (RP)
          as a Designated Forwarder (DF). Further considerations for BIDIR-PIM
          are out of scope.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="multiaero" title="Operation over Multiple OMNI Links">
        <t>An AERO Client can connect to multiple OMNI links the same as for
        any data link service. In that case, the Client maintains a distinct
        OMNI interface for each link, e.g., 'omni0' for the first link,
        'omni1' for the second, 'omni2' for the third, etc. Each OMNI link
        would include its own distinct set of Gateways and Proxy/Servers,
        thereby providing redundancy in case of failures.</t>

        <t>Each OMNI link could utilize the same or different ANET/INET link
        layer connections. The links can be distinguished at the link layer
        via the SRT prefix in a similar fashion as for Virtual Local Area
        Network (VLAN) tagging (e.g., IEEE 802.1Q) and/or through assignment of
        distinct sets of MSPs on each link. This gives rise to the opportunity
        for supporting multiple redundant networked paths (see: <xref
        target="srt"/>).</t>

        <t>The Client's network layer can select the outbound OMNI interface
        appropriate for a given traffic profile while (in the reverse
        direction) correspondent nodes must have some way of steering their
        original IP packets destined to a target via the correct OMNI
        link.</t>

        <t>In a first alternative, if each OMNI link services different MSPs
        the Client can receive a distinct MNP from each of the links. IP
        routing will therefore assure that the correct OMNI link is used for
        both outbound and inbound traffic. This can be accomplished using
        existing technologies and approaches, and without requiring any
        special supporting code in correspondent nodes or Gateways.</t>

        <t>In a second alternative, if each OMNI link services the same MSP(s)
        then each link could assign a distinct "OMNI link Anycast" address
        that is configured by all Gateways on the link. Correspondent nodes
        can then perform Segment Routing to select the correct SRT, which will
        then direct the original IP packet over multiple hops to the
        target.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="dnsconsider" title="DNS Considerations">
        <t>AERO Client MNs and INET correspondent nodes consult the Domain
        Name System (DNS) the same as for any Internetworking node. When
        correspondent nodes and Client MNs use different IP protocol versions
        (e.g., IPv4 correspondents and IPv6 MNs), the INET DNS must maintain A
        records for IPv4 address mappings to MNs which must then be populated
        in Relay NAT64 mapping caches. In that way, an IPv4 correspondent node
        can send original IPv4 packets to the IPv4 address mapping of
        the target MN, and the Relay will translate the IPv4 header and
        Destination Address into an IPv6 header and IPv6 Destination Address
        of the MN.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Client registers with an AERO Proxy/Server, the
        Proxy/Server can return the address(es) of DNS servers in RDNSS
        options <xref target="RFC6106"/>. The DNS server provides the IP
        addresses of other MNs and correspondent nodes in AAAA records for
        IPv6 or A records for IPv4.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="trans" title="Transition/Coexistence Considerations">
        <t>OAL encapsulation ensures that dissimilar INET partitions can be
        joined into a single unified OMNI link, even though the partitions
        themselves may have differing protocol versions and/or incompatible
        addressing plans. However, a commonality can be achieved by
        incrementally distributing globally routable (i.e., native) IP
        prefixes to eventually reach all nodes (both mobile and fixed) in
        all OMNI link segments. This can be accomplished by incrementally
        deploying AERO Gateways on each INET partition, with each Gateway
        distributing its MNPs and/or discovering FNPs on its INET links.</t>

        <t>This gives rise to the opportunity to eventually distribute native
        IP addresses to all nodes, and to present a unified OMNI link view
        even if the INET partitions remain in their current protocol and
        addressing plans. In that way, the OMNI link can serve the dual
        purpose of providing a mobility/multilink service and a
        transition/coexistence service. Alternatively, if an INET partition
        is transitioned to a native IP protocol version and addressing
        scheme compatible with the OMNI link MNP-based addressing scheme,
        the partition and OMNI link can be joined by Gateways.</t>

        <t>Relays that connect INETs/EUNs with dissimilar IP protocol
        versions may need to employ a network address and protocol
        translation function such as NAT64 <xref target="RFC6146"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Proxy/Server-Gateway Bidirectional Forwarding Detection">
        <t>In environments where rapid failure recovery is essential,
        Proxy/Servers and Gateways SHOULD use Bidirectional Forwarding
        Detection (BFD) <xref target="RFC5880"/>. Nodes that use BFD can
        quickly detect and react to failures so that cached information is
        re-established through alternate nodes. BFD control messaging is
        carried only over well-connected ground domain networks (i.e., and not
        low-end radio links) and can therefore be tuned for rapid response.</t>

        <t>Proxy/Servers and Gateways can maintain BFD sessions in parallel
        with their BGP peerings. If a Proxy/Server or Gateway fails, BGP
        peers will quickly re-establish routes through alternate paths
        the same as for common BGP operational practice.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="reuse" title="Time-Varying MNPs">
        <t>In some use cases, it is desirable, beneficial and efficient for
        the Client to receive a constant MNP that travels with the Client
        wherever it moves. For example, this would allow air traffic
        controllers to easily track aircraft, etc. In other cases, however
        (e.g., intelligent transportation systems), the MN may be willing to
        sacrifice a modicum of efficiency in order to have time-varying MNPs
        that can be changed every so often to defeat adversarial tracking.</t>

        <t>The DHCPv6 service offers a way for Clients that desire
        time-varying MNPs to obtain short-lived prefixes (e.g., on the
        order of a small number of minutes). In that case, the identity
        of the Client would not be bound to the MNP but rather to a Node
        Identification value (see: <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>)
        that can serve as a Client ID seed for MNP prefix delegation. The
        Client would then be obligated to renumber its internal networks
        whenever its MNP changes. This should not present problems for
        Clients with automated network renumbering services, however it
        can limit the durations of ongoing sessions that would prefer
        to use a constant address.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="implement" title="Implementation Status">
      <t>AERO/OMNI Release-3.2 was tagged on March 30, 2021, and was
      subject to internal testing. The implementation is not planned
      for public release.</t>

      <t>A write-from-scratch reference implementation is under
      active internal development, with release version v0.pre8
      tagged on January 16, 2026. Future versions will be made
      available for public release.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>The IANA is instructed to assign three new Codes in the
      "ICMPv6 "Code" Fields - Type 136 - Neighbor Advertisement" registry
      of the https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters
      registry group (registration procedure is Standards Action
      or IESG Approval). The registry entries should appear as
      follows:<figure anchor="ipv6nd-codes"
            title="IPv6 ND Neighbor Solicitation Codes:">
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   Code   Message Name                         Reference  
   ----   -------------                        ----------  
   TBD1   Multilink Initiate (MI)              [RFCXXXX]
   TBD2   Multilink Respond (MR)               [RFCXXXX]
   TBD3   Multilink Control (MC)               [RFCXXXX]
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      <t>[RFCXXXX] above refers to this document, while
      [TBD1/TBD2/TBD3] may be any available values. The values
      [250/251/252] are suggested to support maximum forward
      compatibility for future specifications that might define
      earlier values in this and/or other IPv6 ND message tables.</t>

      <t>The IANA assigned UDP port number "8060" for an experimental
      first edition of AERO <xref target="RFC6706"/>. The Overlay
      Multilink Network Interface (OMNI) specification <xref
      target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/> reclaims "8060" as the
      service port for AERO/OMNI UDP/IP encapsulation, therefore
      this document makes no IANA request. (Note: although <xref
      target="RFC6706"/> was not widely implemented or deployed,
      it need not be obsoleted since it uses ICMPv6 message type
      '0' (Reserved) which implementations of this specification
      ignore.)</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="secure" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>AERO Gateways establish security associations with AERO
      Proxy/Servers and Relays within their local OMNI link segments
      using secured tunnels over underlay interfaces. The AERO Gateways
      of all OMNI link segments in turn configure secured tunnels with
      neighboring AERO Gateways for other OMNI link segments in a secured
      spanning tree topology. Applicable security services include IPsec
      <xref target="RFC4301"/> with IKEv2 <xref target="RFC7296"/>, etc.
      (Note that secured direct point-to-point links can also be used instead
      of or in addition to network layer security.) Together, these services
      are responsible for assuring connectionless integrity and data origin
      authentication with optional protection against replays for control
      messages that traverse the secured spanning tree.</t>

      <t>To prevent unauthorized local applications from congesting the
      secured spanning tree, Proxy/Servers and Gateways configure local
      access controls to permit only the BGP protocol service daemon to
      source routing protocol control messages with the MLA assigned
      to the OMNI interface as the source over the secured spanning tree.
      An implementation can employ a port/address filtering configuration
      that permits only TCP port 179 (as defined in the IANA "Service
      Names and Port Numbers" registry) when using the MLA assigned to
      the OMNI interface. To prevent malicious Clients from congesting
      the secured spanning tree, Proxy/Servers should also rate-limit
      the secured IPv6 ND messages they process for the same (source,
      target) pair, e.g., by applying IPv6 ND MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT;
      MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT limits.</t>

      <t>To prevent spoofing, Proxy/Servers MUST silently discard without
      responding to any unsecured IPv6 ND messages with OMNI sub-options
      that would otherwise affect state. Also, Proxy/Servers MUST silently
      discard without forwarding any original IP packets received
      from one of their own Clients (whether directly or following OAL
      reassembly) with a Source Address that does not match the Client's
      MNP and/or a Destination Address that does match the Client's MNP.
      Finally, Proxy/Servers MUST silently discard without forwarding
      any carrier packets that include an OAL packet/fragment with
      Source and Destination Addresses that both match the same MNP.</t>

      <t>AERO Clients that connect to secured ANETs need not apply additional
      security to their IPv6 ND messages, since the messages will be accepted
      and forwarded by a perimeter Proxy/Server that applies security over its
      INET-facing interface to the secured spanning tree (see above). AERO
      Clients that connect to MANETs or open INETs can use network and/or
      transport layer security services such as VPNs (e.g., IPsec tunnels)
      or can by some other means establish a secured direct link to a
      Proxy/Server. When a VPN or direct link may be impractical, however,
      INET Clients and Proxy/Servers SHOULD include and verify authentication
      signatures for IPv6 ND messages as specified in <xref target=
      "I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>.</t>

      <t>End systems SHOULD apply transport or higher layer security services
      such as QUIC-TLS <xref target="RFC9000"/>, TLS/SSL <xref target=
      "RFC8446"/>, DTLS <xref target="RFC6347"/>, etc. to provide a level of
      protection comparable to critical secured Internet services. End systems
      that require host-based VPN services SHOULD use network and/or transport
      layer security services such as IPsec, TLS/SSL, DTLS, etc. AERO
      Proxy/Servers and Clients can also provide a network-based VPN service
      on behalf of end systems, e.g., if the end system is located within a
      secured enclave and cannot establish a VPN on its own behalf.</t>

      <t>AERO Proxy/Servers and Gateways present targets for traffic
      amplification Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. This concern is no
      different than for widely-deployed VPN security gateways in the
      Internet, where attackers could send spoofed packets to the gateways at
      high data rates. This can be mitigated through the AERO/OMNI data origin
      authentication procedures, as well as connecting Proxy/Servers and
      Gateways over dedicated links with no connections to the Internet and/or
      when connections to the Internet are only permitted through well-managed
      firewalls. Traffic amplification DoS attacks can also target an AERO
      Client's low data rate links. This is a concern not only for Clients
      located on the open Internet but also for Clients in secured enclaves.
      AERO Proxy/Servers and Proxys can institute rate limits that protect
      Clients from receiving carrier packet floods that could DoS low data
      rate links.</t>

      <t>AERO Relays must implement ingress filtering to avoid a spoofing
      attack in which spurious messages with ULA addresses are injected into
      an OMNI link from an outside attacker. AERO Clients MUST ensure that
      their connectivity is not used by unauthorized nodes on their EUNs to
      gain access to a protected network, i.e., AERO Clients that act as
      routers MUST NOT provide routing services for unauthorized nodes. (This
      concern is no different than for ordinary hosts that receive an IP
      address delegation but then "share" the address with other nodes via
      some form of Internet connection sharing such as tethering.)</t>

      <t>The AERO service for MANET and open INET Clients depends on a
      public key distribution service in which Client public keys and
      identities are maintained in a shared database accessible to
      Proxy/Servers and potential correspondent peer nodes. Similarly,
      each Client must be able to determine the public key of each
      Proxy/Server, e.g. by consulting an online database.</t>

      <t>The PRL contains only public information, but MUST be well-managed
      and secured from unauthorized tampering. The PRL can be conveyed to
      the Client in a similar fashion as in <xref target="RFC5214"/> (e.g.,
      through data link layer login messaging, secure upload of a static
      file, DNS lookups, etc.).</t>

      <t>Security considerations for IPv6 fragmentation and reassembly are
      discussed in <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-omni3"/>. In environments
      where spoofing is considered a threat, all OAL nodes SHOULD employ
      Identification window synchronization and OAL end systems SHOULD
      configure an (end-system-based) firewall.</t>

      <t>Security considerations for accepting link layer ICMP messages
      and reflected carrier packets are discussed throughout the document.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>Discussions in the IETF, aviation standards communities and private
      exchanges helped shape some of the concepts in this work. Individuals
      who contributed insights include Mikael Abrahamsson, Felipe Magno de
      Almeida, Mark Andrews, Fred Baker, Amanda Baber,
      Bob Braden, Stewart Bryant, Scott Burleigh, Brian Carpenter,
      Wojciech Dec, Pavel Drasil, Ralph Droms, Adrian Farrel, Nick Green, Sri
      Gundavelli, Brian Haberman, Bernhard Haindl, Joel Halpern, Tom Herbert,
      Bob Hinden, Sascha Hlusiak, Lee Howard, Christian Huitema, Zdenek Jaron,
      Andre Kostur, Hubert Kuenig, Eliot Lear, Ted Lemon, Andy Malis, Satoru
      Matsushima, Tomek Mrugalski, Thomas Narten, Madhu Niraula, Alexandru
      Petrescu, Behcet Saikaya, Michal Skorepa, Dave Thaler, Joe Touch, Bernie
      Volz, Ryuji Wakikawa, Tony Whyman, Lloyd Wood and James Woodyatt.
      Members of the IESG also provided valuable input during their review
      process that greatly improved the document. Special thanks go to Stewart
      Bryant, Joel Halpern and Brian Haberman for their shepherding guidance
      during the publication of the AERO first edition.</t>

      <t>This work has further been encouraged and supported by Boeing
      colleagues including Akash Agarwal, Kyle Bae, M. Wayne Benson, Dave
      Bernhardt, Cam Brodie, John Bush, Balaguruna Chidambaram, Irene Chin,
      Bruce Cornish, Claudiu Danilov, Sean Dickson, Don Dillenburg, Joe
      Dudkowski, Wen Fang, Samad Farooqui, Anthony Gregory, Jeff Holland, Seth
      Jahne, Brian Jaury, Greg Kimberly, Ed King, Madhuri Madhava Badgandi,
      Laurel Matthew, Gene MacLean III, Kyle Mikos, Rob Muszkiewicz, Sean
      O'Sullivan, Satish Raghavendran, Vijay Rajagopalan, Kristina Ross, Greg
      Saccone, Ron Sackman, Bhargava Raman Sai Prakash, Rod Santiago, Madhanmohan
      Savadamuthu, Kent Shuey, Brian Skeen, Mike Slane, Carrie Spiker, Katie
      Tran, Brendan Williams, Amelia Wilson, Julie Wulff, Yueli Yang, Eric Yeh
      and other members of the Boeing mobility, networking and autonomy teams.
      Akash Agarwal, Kyle Bae, Wayne Benson, Madhuri Madhava Badgandi,
      Vijayasarathy Rajagopalan, Bhargava Raman Sai Prakash, Katie Tran and
      Eric Yeh are especially acknowledged for their work on the AERO
      implementation. Chuck Klabunde is honored for his support and guidance,
      and we mourn his untimely loss.</t>

      <t>This work was inspired by the support and encouragement of countless
      outstanding colleagues, managers and program directors over the span of
      many decades. Beginning in the late 1980s,' the Digital Equipment
      Corporation (DEC) Ultrix Engineering and DECnet Architects groups
      identified early issues with fragmentation and bridging links with
      diverse MTUs. In the early 1990s, engagements at DEC Project Sequoia at
      UC Berkeley and the DEC Western Research Lab in Palo Alto included
      investigations into large-scale networked filesystems, ATM vs Internet
      and network security proxys. In the mid-1990s to early 2000s employment
      at the NASA Ames Research Center (Sterling Software) and SRI
      International supported early investigations of IPv6, ONR UAV
      Communications and the IETF. An employment at Nokia where important IETF
      documents were published gave way to a present-day engagement with The
      Boeing Company. The work matured at Boeing through major programs
      including Future Combat Systems, Advanced Airplane Program, DTN for the
      International Space Station, Mobility Vision Lab, CAST, Caravan,
      Airplane Internet of Things, the NASA UAS/CNS program, the FAA/ICAO
      ATN/IPS program and many others. An attempt to name all who gave support
      and encouragement would double the current document size and result in
      many unintentional omissions - but to all a humble thanks.</t>

      <t>Earlier works on NBMA tunneling approaches are found in <xref
      target="RFC2529"/><xref target="RFC5214"/><xref target="RFC5569"/>.</t>

      <t>Many of the constructs presented in this second edition of AERO are
      based on the author's earlier works, including:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) <xref
          target="RFC5214"/></t>

          <t>The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) <xref
          target="RFC5320"/></t>

          <t>Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) <xref target="RFC5558"/></t>

          <t>Routing and Addressing in Networks with Global Enterprise
          Recursion (RANGER) <xref target="RFC5720"/><xref target="RFC6139"/></t>

          <t>The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) <xref
          target="RFC6179"/></t>

          <t>AERO, First Edition <xref target="RFC6706"/></t>
        </list>Note that these works cite numerous earlier efforts that are
      not included here due to space limitations. The authors of those
      earlier works are acknowledged for their insights.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the NASA Safe Autonomous Systems Operation
      (SASO) program under NASA contract number NNA16BD84C.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the FAA as per the SE2025 contract number
      DTFAWA-15-D-00030.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Commercial Airplanes (BCA)
      Airplane Internet of Things (AIoT) and autonomy programs.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Information Technology (BIT)
      MobileNet program.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing/Virginia Tech National
      Security Institute (VTNSI) 5G MANET research program.</t>

      <t>Honoring life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0791"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0792"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8200"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4861"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4862"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8028"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8415"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6890"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-6man-omni3"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4193"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6437"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6438"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4380"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6081"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2464"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6145"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6147"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4007"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6347"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7333"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2529"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5214"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4301"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5569"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3810"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4605"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4541"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3056"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7761"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2236"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5880"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6706"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8402"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8754"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5522"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8446"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1812"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6621"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8175"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6179"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5320"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5558"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6106"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9000"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7296"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4511"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5015"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6139"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1918"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4389"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5720"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1256"?>

      <reference anchor="BGP">
        <front>
          <title>BGP in 2015, http://potaroo.net</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="January" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="CERF1">
        <front>
          <title>A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication,
          https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1092259</title>

          <author fullname="Vint Cerf" initials="V." surname="Cerf">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <author fullname="Robert Kahn" initials="R." surname="Kahn">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="May" year="1974"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="CERF2">
        <front>
          <title>The Catenet Model For Internetworking, IETF IEN48,
          https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/scanned/ien48.pdf</title>

          <author fullname="Vint Cerf" initials="V." surname="Cerf">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="1978"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="KAHN">
        <front>
          <title>The Great Interconnector, IEEE Spectrum,
          https://spectrum.ieee.org/bob-kahn-2667754905</title>

          <author fullname="Tekla S. Perry" initials="T." surname="Perry">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="May" year="2024"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="POUZIN">
        <front>
          <title>Interconnection of Packet Switching Networks,
           http://xn--brwolff-5wa.de/public/Pouzin-1973-Interconnection-of-Packet-Switching-Networks--INWG-Note-42.pdf</title>

          <author fullname="Louis Pouzin" initials="L." surname="Pouzin">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="1973"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="EUI">
        <front>
          <title>IEEE Guidelines for Use of Extended Unique Identifier (EUI),
          Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI), and Company ID,
          https://standards.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/import/documents/tutorials/eui.pdf</title>

          <author></author>

          <date day="3" month="August" year="2017"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9365"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5340"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5614"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7181"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3724"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6724"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.perkins-manet-aodvv2"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-6man-mla"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-manet-inet"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6296"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4429"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8966"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9762"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-rfc6724-update"?>
    </references>

    <section anchor="misc" title="Non-Normative Considerations">
      <t>AERO can be applied to a multitude of Internetworking scenarios, with
      each having its own adaptations. The following considerations are
      provided as non-normative guidance:</t>

      <section anchor="rorefresh"
               title="Implementation Strategies for Route Optimization">
        <t>Address resolution and route optimization as discussed in <xref
        target="predirect"/> results in the creation of NCEs. The NCE state
        is set to REACHABLE for at most ReachableTime seconds. In order to
        refresh the NCE lifetime before the ReachableTime timer expires, the
        specification requires implementations to issue a new NS/NA(AR)
        exchange to reset ReachableTime while data messages are still flowing.
        However, the decision of when to initiate a new NS/NA(AR) exchange and
        to perpetuate the process is left as an implementation detail.</t>

        <t>One possible strategy may be to monitor the NCE watching for data
        messages for (ReachableTime - 5) seconds. If any data messages have
        been sent to the neighbor within this timeframe, then send an NS(AR)
        to receive a new NA(AR). If no data messages have been sent, wait for
        5 additional seconds and send an immediate NS(AR) if any data packets
        are sent within this "expiration pending" 5 second window. If no
        additional data messages are sent within the 5 second window, reset
        the NCE state to STALE.</t>

        <t>The monitoring of the neighbor data traffic therefore becomes an
        ongoing process during the NCE lifetime. If the NCE expires, future
        data messages will trigger a new NS/NA(AR) exchange while the messages
        themselves may be delivered over longer paths until route optimization
        state is re-established.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="imcplicit" title="Implicit Mobility Management">
        <t>OMNI interface neighbors MAY provide a configuration option that
        allows them to perform implicit mobility management in which no IPv6
        ND messaging is used. In that case, the Client only transmits carrier
        packets over a single interface at a time, and the neighbor always
        observes carrier packets arriving from the Client from the same
        underlay Source Address.</t>

        <t>If the Client's underlay interface address changes (either due
        to a readdressing of the original interface or switching to a new
        interface) the neighbor immediately updates the NCE for the Client and
        begins accepting and sending carrier packets according to the Client's
        new address. This implicit mobility method applies to use cases such
        as cellphones with both WiFi and Cellular interfaces where only one of
        the interfaces is active at a given time, and the Client automatically
        switches over to the backup interface if the primary interface
        fails.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="direct" title="Direct Underlying Interfaces">
        <t>When a Client's OMNI interface is configured over a Direct
        interface, the neighbor at the other end of the Direct link can
        receive original IP packets without any encapsulation. In that
        case, the Client sends packets over the Direct link according
        to traffic selectors. If the Direct interface is selected, then the
        Client's packets are transmitted directly to the peer without
        traversing an ANET/INET. If other interfaces are selected, then the
        Client's packets are transmitted via a different interface,
        which may result in the inclusion of Proxy/Servers and Gateways in the
        communications path. Direct interfaces must be tested periodically for
        reachability, e.g., via NUD.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroarch"
               title="AERO Critical Infrastructure Considerations">
        <t>AERO Gateways can be either Commercial off-the Shelf (COTS)
        standard IP routers or virtual machines in the cloud. Gateways must
        be provisioned, supported and managed by the INET administrative
        authority, and connected to the Gateways of other INETs via
        inter-domain peerings. Cost for purchasing, configuring and
        managing Gateways is nominal even for very large OMNI links.</t>

        <t>AERO INET Proxy/Servers can be standard dedicated server platforms,
        but most often will be deployed as virtual machines in the cloud. The
        only requirements for INET Proxy/Servers are that they can run the
        AERO/OMNI code and have at least one network interface connection to
        the INET. INET Proxy/Servers must be provisioned, supported and
        managed by the INET administrative authority. Cost for purchasing,
        configuring and managing cloud Proxy/Servers is nominal especially
        for virtual machines.</t>

        <t>AERO ANET Proxy/Servers are most often standard dedicated server
        platforms with one underlay interface connected to the ANET and a
        second interface connected to an INET. As with INET Proxy/Servers, the
        only requirements are that they can run the AERO/OMNI code and have at
        least one interface connection to the INET. ANET Proxy/Servers must be
        provisioned, supported and managed by the ANET administrative
        authority. Cost for purchasing, configuring and managing Proxys is
        nominal, and borne by the ANET administrative authority.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays are simply Proxy/Servers connected to INETs and/or
        EUNs that provide forwarding services for non-MNP destinations. The
        Relay connects to the OMNI link and engages in eBGP peering with one
        or more Gateways as a stub AS. The Relay then injects its MNPs and/or
        non-MNP prefixes into the BGP routing system, and provisions the
        prefixes to its downstream-attached networks. The Relay can perform
        ARS/ARR services the same as for any Proxy/Server, and can route
        between the MNP and non-MNP address spaces.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="servefail" title="AERO Server Failure Implications">
        <t>AERO Proxy/Servers do not present a single point of failure in the
        architecture since all Proxy/Servers on the link provide identical
        services and loss of a Proxy/Server does not imply immediate and/or
        comprehensive communication failures. Proxy/Server failure can be
        quickly detected and conveyed by Bidirectional Forward Detection
        (BFD) and/or proactive NUD allowing Clients to migrate to new
        Proxy/Servers.</t>

        <t>If a Proxy/Server fails, peer carrier packet forwarding to Clients
        will continue by virtue of the NCEs that have already been established
        through address resolution and route optimization. If a Client also
        experiences mobility events at roughly the same time the Proxy/Server
        fails, uNA messages may be lost but NCEs in the DEPARTED state
        will ensure that carrier packet forwarding to the Client's new
        locations will continue for up to DepartTime seconds.</t>

        <t>If a Client is left without a Proxy/Server for a considerable
        length of time (e.g., greater than ReachableTime seconds) then
        existing NCEs will eventually expire and both ongoing and new
        communications will fail. The original source will continue to
        retransmit until the Client has established a new Proxy/Server
        relationship, after which time communications can continue .</t>

        <t>Therefore, links that provide many Proxy/Servers with high
        availability profiles are responsive to loss of individual
        infrastructure elements, since Clients can quickly establish
        new Proxy/Server relationships in event of failures.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="clisrv" title="AERO Client / Server Architecture">
        <t>The AERO architectural model is client / server in the control
        plane, with route optimization in the data plane. The same as for
        common Internet services, the AERO Client discovers the addresses of
        AERO Proxy/Servers and connects to one or more of them. The AERO
        service is analogous to common Internet services such as google.com,
        yahoo.com, cnn.com, etc. However, there is only one AERO service for
        the link and all Proxy/Servers provide identical services.</t>

        <t>Common Internet services provide differing strategies for
        advertising server addresses to clients. The strategy is conveyed
        through the DNS resource records returned in response to name
        resolution queries. As of January 2020 Internet-based 'nslookup'
        services were used to determine the following:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "google.com", the DNS
            always returns one A record (i.e., an IPv4 address) and one AAAA
            record (i.e., an IPv6 address). The client receives the same
            addresses each time it resolves the domainname via the same DNS
            resolver, but may receive different addresses when it resolves the
            domainname via different DNS resolvers. But, in each case, exactly
            one A and one AAAA record are returned.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "ietf.org", the DNS
            always returns one A record and one AAAA record with the same
            addresses regardless of which DNS resolver is used.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "yahoo.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 4 A records and 4 AAAA records. Each time
            the client resolves the domainname via the same DNS resolver, the
            same list of addresses are returned but in randomized order (i.e.,
            consistent with a DNS round-robin strategy). But, interestingly,
            the same addresses are returned (albeit in randomized order) when
            the domainname is resolved via different DNS resolvers.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "amazon.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 3 A records and no AAAA records. As with
            "yahoo.com", the same three A records are returned from any
            worldwide Internet connection point in randomized order.</t>
          </list>The above example strategies show differing approaches to
        Internet resilience and service distribution offered by major Internet
        services. The Google approach exposes only a single IPv4 and a single
        IPv6 address to clients. Clients can then select whichever IP protocol
        version offers the best response, but will always use the same IP
        address according to the current Internet connection point. This means
        that the IP address offered by the network must lead to a
        highly-available server and/or service distribution point. In other
        words, resilience is predicated on high availability within the
        network and with no client-initiated failovers expected (i.e., it is
        all-or-nothing from the client's perspective). However, Google does
        provide for worldwide distributed service distribution by virtue of
        the fact that each Internet connection point responds with a different
        IPv6 and IPv4 address. The IETF approach is like google
        (all-or-nothing from the client's perspective), but provides only a
        single IPv4 or IPv6 address on a worldwide basis. This means that the
        addresses must be made highly-available at the network level with no
        client failover possibility, and if there is any worldwide service
        distribution it would need to be conducted by a network element that
        is reached via the IP address acting as a service distribution
        point.</t>

        <t>In contrast to the Google and IETF philosophies, Yahoo and Amazon
        both provide clients with a (short) list of IP addresses with Yahoo
        providing both IP protocol versions and Amazon as IPv4-only. The order
        of the list is randomized with each name service query response, with
        the effect of round-robin load balancing for service distribution.
        With a short list of addresses, there is still expectation that the
        network will implement high availability for each address but in case
        any single address fails the client can switch over to using a
        different address. The balance then becomes one of function in the
        network vs function in the end system.</t>

        <t>The same implications observed for common highly-available services
        in the Internet apply also to the AERO client/server architecture.
        When an AERO Client connects to one or more ANETs, it discovers one or
        more AERO Proxy/Server addresses through the mechanisms discussed in
        earlier sections. Each Proxy/Server address presumably leads to a
        fault-tolerant clustering arrangement such as supported by Linux-HA,
        Extended Virtual Synchrony or Paxos. Such an arrangement has
        precedence in common Internet service deployments in lightweight
        virtual machines without requiring expensive hardware deployment.
        Similarly, common Internet service deployments set service IP
        addresses on service distribution points that may relay requests to
        many different servers.</t>

        <t>For AERO, the expectation is that a combination of the Google/IETF
        and Yahoo/Amazon philosophies would be employed. The AERO Client
        connects to different ANET access points and can receive 1-2
        Proxy/Server ULAs at each point. It then selects one AERO Proxy/Server
        address, and engages in RS/RA exchanges with the same Proxy/Server
        from all ANET connections. The Client remains with this Proxy/Server
        unless or until the Proxy/Server fails, in which case it can switch
        over to an alternate Proxy/Server. The Client can likewise switch over
        to a different Proxy/Server at any time if there is some reason for it
        to do so. So, the AERO expectation is for a balance of function in the
        network and end system, with fault tolerance and resilience at both
        levels.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="changes" title="Change Log">
      <t>&lt;&lt; RFC Editor - remove prior to publication &gt;&gt;</t>

      <t>Differences from earlier versions:<list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="Draft -53 to -54"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Removed defunct specification on Segment Routing.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -52 to -53"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Support marking non IPv6 ND messages as control.</t>

            <t>OMNI interface LLA clarifications.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -50 to -52"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Fully embraced segment routing and Segment Routing Topology.</t>

            <t>Fully embraced MLA addressing and removed PNP addressing.</t>

            <t>Updated historical background.</t>

            <t>Clarified IPv6 ND message Source, Destination and Target addressing.</t>

            <t>Clarified that AFVI is now an SRH TLV option.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -49 to -50"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Clarified layering and restored the meaning of "L3/L2" to
            their widely-understood and accepted definitions.</t>

            <t>Clarifications for engaging the OMNI interface for MANET
            forwarding.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -48 to -49"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Updated mobility management section.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -47 to -48"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Introduced the "on-link" and "off-link" models for
            neighbor discovery.</t>

            <t>Updated mobility management section.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -46 to -47"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Clarified the role of S/TLLAOs.</t>
          </list></t>

          <t hangText="Draft -44 to -46"><vspace/><list style="symbols">
            <t>Address resolution clarifications and harmonization with
            RFC9762. Address resolution on the ARS now considers all
            addresses on the OMNI link as on-link, so that NS/NA(AR)
            always precede new communications. In many cases, however,
            the NS/NA(AR) exchange can be satisfied by the local
            adaptation layer without having to disturb the network.</t>

            <t>Removed major sections on RS/RA mobility service
            coordination that were redundant with the OMNI spec.</t>

            <t>Removed stale text from mobility sections.</t>

            <t>Simplified and clarified section on NUD.</t>

            <t>Updated SRH contents specification.</t>

            <t>Removed obsolete "OFH" references.</t>
          </list></t>
        </list></t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
